Autoimmune hepatitis

A nomogram for analyzing risk factors of poor treatment response in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify biochemical and clinical predictors of poor response (including incomplete response and non-response) to standard treatment in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients.

METHODS

This study retrospectively collected clinical data from 297 patients who were first diagnosed with AIH in Beijing Ditan Hospital from 2010 to 2019. Finally, 149 patients were screened out. Risk factors were screened by univariate and multifactorial logistic regression. Then they were used to establish the nomogram. The ROC curve, calibration curve, decision curves analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) were used to evaluate the nomogram.

RESULTS

149 patients were divided into two groups: the response group (n = 120, 80%) and the poor response group (n = 29, 20%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that IgG > 26.5 g/L (OR: 22.016; 95% CI: 4.677-103.640) in AIH patients increased the risk. In contrast, treatment response status was better in women (OR: 0.085; 95% CI: 0.015-0.497) aged >60 years (OR: 0.159; 95% CI: 0.045-0.564) with AST > 4.49 × ULN (OR: 0.066; 95% CI: 0.009-0.494). The C index (0.853) and the calibration curve show that the nomogram is well differentiated and calibrated; the DCA and CIC indicate that the model has good clinical benefits and implications.

CONCLUSION

The study found that male patients aged ≤ 60 years with IgG > 26.5 g/L and elevated AST ≤ 4.49 × ULN were more likely to have a non-response/incomplete response to standard treatment.

Chronic Liver Diseases in Children: Clinical Profile and Histology

AIM

The main aim of the study is to study the clinical profile of disorders of the liver and hepatobiliary system in paediatric patients and to correlate the histopathology findings of liver biopsy in chronic liver disease. Another aim being to assess the prognosis and to know the outcome and the effects of treatment in chronic liver diseases in paediatric age group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a prospective study, included the clinical profile of Chronic Liver Diseases (CLD) in children and the histopathological correlation. A total of 55 children were thoroughly investigated by doing relevant investigations and liver biopsy.

RESULTS

A male predominance (60%) was noted with maximum incidence in the age group of 6-12 years. The incidence of CLD was 1.1% of total admissions. The most common presenting complaint was jaundice and abdominal distension. Hepatic encephalopathy was noted in 29% patients. Hepatomegaly was seen in 63% patients and spleenomegaly was seen in 60% patients. The incidence of cirrhosis on liver biopsy was 42% (23cases) in CLD patients. The most common diagnosis on histopathology was Wilson's disease (22%), followed by hepatitis and autoimmune hepatitis. The predominant spectrum of CLD was metabolic liver disease and also the predominant cause of death.

CONCLUSION

As the incidence of CLD is quite low, a very high index of suspicion is required for its diagnosis. Some uncommon causes of CLD in children were seen in our study like neutral lipid storage disease, α1-Antitrypsin deficiency disease, lupus hepatitis, Alagille syndrome and Budd-Chiari syndrome. A patient of CLD with jaundice and hepatomegaly should be treated aggressively as those are the poor prognostic indicators of the disease. Hepatic encephalopathy and cirrhosis are also associated with poor outcome in patients with CLD. Liver biopsy histopathology by an expert and its correlation with laboratory investigations plays an important role in the diagnosis of CLD. The major cause of deaths in patients with CLD is due to end stage liver disease and fulminant hepatic failure and the only way to prevent and treat these patients is by liver transplantation.

A case of Autoimmune Hepatitis needed to be differentiated from EBV hepatitis, in that the histology of liver biopsy specimen was useful for diagnosis

A 10-year-old girl with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) was reported. She was admitted to our hospital because of cholestasis and elevation of liver enzymes for 2 months. Laboratory examination revealed that EBV-DNA copy number in the PBMNC (peripheral mononuclear cells) was 1.2 x 10(3) copies/microg of DNA, hypergammaglobulinemia, and positive antinuclear antibody, positive anti-smooth muscle antibody. The histology of her liver biopsy specimen revealed interface hepatitis, dense mononuclear cell infiltrates, mild fibrosis, and negative for EBV in situ hybridization assay indicating AIH and not EBV-associated hepatitis. She was treated firstly with methylprednisolone pulses, then will prednisolone p.o.+azathioprine p.o.. Intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy was introduced because of her abnormal immune pathology. All abnormal laboratory parameters improved to normal levels within 2 months, and EBV-DNA copy number in the PBMNC became negative after 4 months. The histology of liver biopsy specimen was useful for the diagnosis of AIH in such a difficult case needed to be differentiated from EBV hepatitis.

Treatment strategies in autoimmune hepatitis

Prednisone alone or a lower dose in combination with azathioprine is effective in improving symptoms, resolving laboratory and histologic features, and prolonging survival in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. The combination regimen of prednisone and azathioprine is preferred because of its lower frequency of corticosteroid-related side effects. Only patients with severe inflammatory activity have absolute indications for therapy. Treatment must be individualized in patients with mild-to-moderate disease. Medication should be continued at fixed daily maintenance levels until a remission, treatment failure, drug intolerance, or incomplete response has been established. Histologic examination before drug withdrawal ensures remission when symptoms and laboratory tests are normal or near normal. Treatment failure warrants high-dose therapy, whereas drug toxicity and incomplete response compel regimens that are modified individually according to response. Low-dose prednisone or indefinite azathioprine therapy are indicated in patients who have relapsed multiply. Empiric nonsteroidal treatments include ursodeoxycholic acid, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus, and they have been used in limited studies to treat recalcitrant disease or corticosteroid intolerance. Investigational therapies promise to target critical pathogenic mechanisms affecting immunocyte activation, autoantigen recognition, cytokine interactions, and regenerative activity.

Current concepts in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a global distribution and affects all ages. Genetic factors strongly influence susceptibility, clinical expression, and treatment response. The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis has been codified by an international panel. An acute or fulminant presentation is recognized but not a cholestatic form. Subclassifications by predominant autoantibody profile have been proposed, but they lack etiologic and prognostic differences. Autoantibodies continue to be characterized to improve diagnostic specificity, predict outcome, and identify pertinent antigenic targets. Cytosolic enzymes are prime candidates as autoantigens. DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are the susceptibility alleles in Caucasoid Northern Europeans and North Americans, and they also affect clinical expression and treatment outcome. Other autoimmune promoters affecting cytokine production and immunocyte activation may act in synergy with the susceptibility alleles to affect disease behavior. Cell-mediated and antibody-dependent forms of cytotoxicity are probably interactive pathogenic mechanisms, and novel site-specific therapies are feasible because these mechanisms are defined. Potent new immunosuppressive agents are emerging from the transplantation arena, but prednisone alone or in combination with azathioprine remains the mainstay of treatment. Corticosteroid therapy is effective but not ideal.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is one of the causes of chronic progressive liver disease in childhood. Here we report 14 cases with clinical findings, therapeutic management and prognosis, in order to define the course of the disease. Diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis was done with the presence of at least one of these autoantibodies; antinuclear antibody, smooth muscle antibody, liver-kidney microsomal type 1 antibody, and perinuclear antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody. Patients were seen every 3 to 6 months. After doing a complete physical examination, biochemical parameters and autoantibodies determined at each visit. Mean age at diagnosis was 10.9 +/- 2.6 years (range, 7-15.5 years) and female to male ratio was 1:3. Thirteen patients had jaundice and all had high levels of ALT, AST and gammaglobulin. Hepatomegaly was found in 71.4% and splenomegaly in 64.3% of the patients. All patients were classified as type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Liver biopsies revealed severe active hepatitis with mononuclear cell infiltration in portal areas, piecemeal necrosis. Drug therapy consisted of prednisone (2 mg/kg/day) per oral at the beginning, and addition of azathioprine (1.5 mg/kg/day) per oral at the 3rd-6th month with slow tapering of prednisone in 12 children. Both drugs were started together to two patients. Follow-up period was 30.7 +/- 15.6 months (range, 12-72 months). Sustained normalization of ALT could not be obtained with tapering doses of prednisone alone. Decrease in ALT levels did not correlate with disappearance of serum autoantibodies. None of the patients showed decompensation of liver disease. Azathioprine administration is necessary to decrease prednisone dose and to maintain a sustained normal transaminase values.