Deletion of twenty seven nucleotides within exon 11 of the band 3 gene identified in ovalocytosis in Lombok Island, Indonesia

High prevalence of Southeast Asian ovalocytosis in Malays with distal renal tubular acidosis

Southeast Asian ovalocytosis (SAO) is a red blood cell abnormality common in malaria-endemic regions and caused by a 27 nt deletion of the band 3 protein gene. Since band 3 protein, also known as anion exchanger 1, is expressed in renal distal tubules, the incidence of SAO was examined in distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) in Malays in Kelantan, Malaysia. Twenty-two patients with dRTA and 50 healthy volunteers were examined for complication of SAO by both morphological and genetic analyses. SAO was identified in 18 of the 22 dRTA patients (81.8%), but only two of the 50 controls (4%). The incidence of SAO was significantly high in those with dRTA (p<0.001), indicating a dysfunctional role for band 3 protein/anion exchanger 1 in the development of dRTA.

Measurement of ovalocyte frequency in peripheral blood smears in defining ovalocytosis in Papua New Guinea

Red cell oval morphology is still the only accepted basis for the clinical or epidemiological diagnosis of ovalocytosis. Therefore it is important to know the errors when detecting and counting morphological ovalocytes. In all previous studies of ovalocytosis there was no assessment of the variation which may have occurred in classification due to smearing and staining techniques or the criteria for the diagnosis of ovalocyte morphology; nor was inter or intraobserver variation assessed. We report how different peripheral blood smear methods influence the diagnosis of ovalocytosis in populations in the Madang and East Sepik Provinces in Papua New Guinea. We also examined within and between observer variation in the quantitative assessment of ovalocytosis at x 40 and x 100 microscopy powers. A modified method of making a thin malaria blood smear gave the best preservation of red cell morphology and was adopted for the quantitative ovalocytosis studies. A special haematology smear is unnecessary. Ovalocyte frequency estimations were similar when x 40 and x 100 lenses were used, but x 40 was preferable for assessing morphology. Two observers were consistent in their findings and produced very similar results for the high-quality smears from the planned Madang survey, and rather different results for the smears from the unplanned routine Sepik survey. We conclude that measurement error for ovalocytosis assessment can be quite small and unimportant, minimized by careful planning and quality control. Otherwise measurement error is substantial and threatens validity of classification and grading of ovalocytosis.