A randomized, controlled trial of octreotide in the management of patients with acute pancreatitis

Carbachol protects the intestinal barrier in severe acute pancreatitis by regulating Cdc42/F-actin cytoskeleton

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of carbachol on the intestinal tight-junction barrier in a rat model of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) without aggravating pancreatic injury, and to determine whether cell division cycle 42 (Cdc42)/F-actin could have a regulatory role. Rats were separated into a sham-operation (SO) group (n=10), SO + carbachol group (n=10), SAP group (n=60) and SAP + carbachol group (n=60). Sodium taurocholate (5%) was retrogradely injected into the biliopancreatic duct of rats to induce SAP. Subsequently, 16S rRNA sequencing was used to detect bacterial translocation (BT) in the gut of surviving animals. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to detect morphological changes in the pancreas and intestine. The expression of F-actin and tight junction proteins was analyzed by western blotting and immunofluorescence, and Cdc42 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and western blotting. The results demonstrated that the intestinal injury in SO and SO + carbachol groups was lower than that in the SAP + carbachol group (P<0.05); however, the intestinal injury was similar in the SO and SO + carbachol groups (P>0.05), and was significantly more severe in the SAP group compared with the SAP + carbachol group (P<0.05). Similarly, pancreatic injury in the SAP and SAP + carbachol groups was significantly higher compared with the SO and SO + carbachol groups (P<0.05); however, pancreatic injury was similar in the SAP and SAP + carbachol groups (P>0.05), and in the SO and SO + carbachol groups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the mortality rate and BT in the SAP group were significantly higher compared with the SAP + carbachol group (mortality rate, 50% vs. 30%, P<0.05; BT, 60% vs. 33.3%, P<0.05). In addition, the expression of Cdc42, F-actin and claudin-2 was significantly higher in the SAP and SAP + carbachol groups compared with the SO and SO + carbachol groups (P<0.05), and the expression of occludin and zonula occludens-1 were significantly higher in the SO and SO + carbachol groups compared with the SAP and SAP + carbachol groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, these findings demonstrated that carbachol may protect the intestinal barrier in the SAP rat model without aggravating pancreatic injury via regulation of Cdc42/F-actin expression.

The effect of thymosin α1 for prevention of infection in patients with severe acute pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is an acute inflammatory disease with prolonged clinical course, which is complicated by the presence of persistent organ failure and severe infection. Infection mainly occurs in the late phase of SAP and it is found to be the main cause of death. Therefore, developing strategies for the prevention of SAP-related infection has been a crucial approach to improve patients' outcomes. Due to remarkable immune-cells-regulating properties, thymosin α1 has been recognized as a promising immune therapy, especially in several infectious diseases. Recently, thymosin α1 has been given high expectations to exert clinical benefits in the prevention of SAP-related infection.

AREAS COVERED

The review of currently available strategies for SAP-related infection prevention and the use of thymosin α1 in SAP patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The current available strategies achieve limited success for preventing SAP-related infection. A possible explanation is that the trigger of infection, immunosuppression has not been concurrently resolved. The application of thymosin α1 in a clinical study showed a prophylactic effect against SAP-related infection. However, the use of thymosin α1 in SAP patients is still at an early stage of clinical investigation and requires high-quality and large sample size evidences.

Association of Statins With Decreased Acute Pancreatitis Severity: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

Statins possess anti-inflammatory properties and have a protective effect in certain inflammatory conditions; however, their effect on the natural history of pancreatitis is unknown.

AIM

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of statin exposure on the severity of pancreatitis and incidence of organ failure using a propensity-matched approach.

METHODS

A historical cohort study was conducted of adult patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) admitted in the Cleveland Clinic Health System between 2007 and 2014. All medication, clinical, and outcomes data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Factors that influence statin use were included in a propensity model to minimize selection bias. Patients on and off statins were matched (1:1) based on the propensity score to simulate a randomized controlled trial. Measured outcomes included pancreatitis severity (Revised Atlanta Classification), incidence of multisystem organ failure (MSOF), new MSOF, acute necrosis, and death. Additional surrogate markers of severity included hospital length of stay, Bedside Index of Severity of Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), and presence of SIRS.

RESULTS

A total of 110 subjects taking a statin at admission were matched with 210 subjects not on a statin. Known baseline factors that may influence statin use and severity of pancreatitis were evenly matched between the 2 groups. Patients on a statin were less likely to develop MSOF, severe AP and necrosis. Although less in-hospital death occurred in the statin group when compared to nonusers, the difference was not statistically significant (2% vs. 4%; P=0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use is associated with decreased severity of AP observed as reduction in both overall MSOF incidence and new MSOF. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy of statin drugs in the treatment of AP.

Pharmacological interventions for acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

In people with acute pancreatitis, it is unclear what the role should be for medical treatment as an addition to supportive care such as fluid and electrolyte balance and organ support in people with organ failure.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different pharmacological interventions in people with acute pancreatitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2016, Issue 9), MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and trial registers to October 2016 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also searched the references of included trials to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered only RCTs performed in people with acute pancreatitis, irrespective of aetiology, severity, presence of infection, language, blinding, or publication status for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified trials and extracted data. We did not perform a network meta-analysis as planned because of the lack of information on potential effect modifiers and differences of type of participants included in the different comparisons, when information was available. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the binary outcomes and rate ratios with 95% CIs for count outcomes using a fixed-effect model and random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 84 RCTs with 8234 participants in this review. Six trials (N = 658) did not report any of the outcomes of interest for this review. The remaining 78 trials excluded 210 participants after randomisation. Thus, a total of 7366 participants in 78 trials contributed to one or more outcomes for this review. The treatments assessed in these 78 trials included antibiotics, antioxidants, aprotinin, atropine, calcitonin, cimetidine, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), gabexate, glucagon, iniprol, lexipafant, NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), octreotide, oxyphenonium, probiotics, activated protein C, somatostatin, somatostatin plus omeprazole, somatostatin plus ulinastatin, thymosin, ulinastatin, and inactive control. Apart from the comparison of antibiotics versus control, which included a large proportion of participants with necrotising pancreatitis, the remaining comparisons had only a small proportion of patients with this condition. Most trials included either only participants with severe acute pancreatitis or included a mixture of participants with mild acute pancreatitis and severe acute pancreatitis (75 trials). Overall, the risk of bias in trials was unclear or high for all but one of the trials.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

seven trials were not funded or funded by agencies without vested interest in results. Pharmaceutical companies partially or fully funded 21 trials. The source of funding was not available from the remaining trials.Since we considered short-term mortality as the most important outcome, we presented only these results in detail in the abstract. Sixty-seven studies including 6638 participants reported short-term mortality. There was no evidence of any differences in short-term mortality in any of the comparisons (very low-quality evidence). With regards to other primary outcomes, serious adverse events (number) were lower than control in participants taking lexipafant (rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.96; N = 290; 1 study; very low-quality evidence), octreotide (rate ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89; N = 770; 5 studies; very low-quality evidence), somatostatin plus omeprazole (rate ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.70; N = 140; 1 study; low-quality evidence), and somatostatin plus ulinastatin (rate ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.60; N = 122; 1 study; low-quality evidence). The proportion of people with organ failure was lower in octreotide than control (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; N = 430; 3 studies; very low-quality evidence). The proportion of people with sepsis was lower in lexipafant than control (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.83; N = 290; 1 study; very low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of differences in any of the remaining comparisons in these outcomes or for any of the remaining primary outcomes (the proportion of participants experiencing at least one serious adverse event and the occurrence of infected pancreatic necrosis). None of the trials reported heath-related quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Very low-quality evidence suggests that none of the pharmacological treatments studied decrease short-term mortality in people with acute pancreatitis. However, the confidence intervals were wide and consistent with an increase or decrease in short-term mortality due to the interventions. We did not find consistent clinical benefits with any intervention. Because of the limitations in the prognostic scoring systems and because damage to organs may occur in acute pancreatitis before they are clinically manifest, future trials should consider including pancreatitis of all severity but power the study to measure the differences in the subgroup of people with severe acute pancreatitis. It may be difficult to power the studies based on mortality. Future trials in participants with acute pancreatitis should consider other outcomes such as complications or health-related quality of life as primary outcomes. Such trials should include health-related quality of life, costs, and return to work as outcomes and should follow patients for at least three months (preferably for at least one year).

[Estimation of the role of octreotide in treatment of severe pancreatic necrosis]

It was analyzed the results of treatment of 204 patients with severe course of destructive pancreatitis (severity of organs' dysfunction was 9 and more scores according to APACHE-II scale upon admission to the hospital). Logistic regression and Cox regression were used along with univariant statistical analysis, what permitted to estimate overall effect of octreotide and other potential predictors including severity of condition and medical factors on the mortality rate and extension of necrosis in patients with pancreatic necrosis. It was established that the use of octreotide in case of severe pancreatic necrosis significantly decreases mortality and extension of necrosis.

High-dose versus low-dose octreotide in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of high-dose octreotide in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) or SAP, two hundred and thirty-six patients with predicted SAP and 136 patients with SAP were randomized into control, high-dose octreotide (High-O) and low-dose octreotide (Low-O) groups. In addition to the conventional managements administrated in control group, High-O group received an intravenous infusion of octreotide at 50 μg/h × 3d + 25 μg/h × 4d, and Low-O group received octreotide at 25 μg/h × 7d. The major primary outcomes included the numbers of predicted SAP patients which developed SAP after intervention and the number of patients with SAP amelioration. Secondary outcomes included APACHE II, SIRS scores, plasma levels of somatostatin (SST), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). There were no significant differences between the control and Low-O groups in terms of prevention and treatment for SAP. The incidence of SAP in patients with predicted SAP who received High-O was significantly lower than the Low-O group: 37.5% vs. 59.8%, p=0.005. Compared with Low-O group, the number of SAP patients in the SAP arm in the High-O group was reduced by 29.8%. Plasma levels of SST in both predicted SAP and the SAP patients were efficiently recovered (from 132.71±31.40 pg/ml to 180.00±23.50 pg/ml, p<0.05) after high-dose octreotide supplementation, which concomitantly reduced TNF-α and IL-6 levels. High-dose octreotide administration within 48h after AP onset may efficiently reduce the risk of SAP developing and partly attenuate SAP through raising plasma SST to a normal level and decreasing IL-6 and TNF-α.

Treatment of acute pancreatitis: focus on medical care

Acute pancreatitis has an incidence of about 300 per 1 million individuals per year, of which 10-15% of patients develop the severe form of the disease. Novel management options, which have the potential to improve outcome, include initial proper fluid resuscitation, which maintains microcirculation and thereby potentially decreases ischaemia and reperfusion injury. The traditional treatment concept in acute pancreatitis, fasting and parenteral nutrition, has been challenged and early initiation of enteral feeding in severe pancreatitis and oral intake in mild acute pancreatitis is both feasible and provides some benefits. There are at present no data supporting immunonutritional supplements and probiotics should be avoided in patients with acute pancreatitis. There is also no evidence of any benefits provided by prophylactic antibacterials in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis. A variety of specific medical interventions have been investigated (e.g. intense blood glucose monitoring by insulin) but none has become clinically useful. Lessons can probably be learned from critical care in general, but studies are needed to verify these interventions in acute pancreatitis.

Injuries to the Pancreaticoduodenal Complex

Injuries to the pancreaticoduodenal complex present a significant challenge both in diagnosis and management. The retroperitoneal location of the pancreas means that it is not a common site of injury, but this also contributes to the difficulty in diagnosis, as the organ is concealed, and investigation often results in delay with its attendant increase in morbidity. The increase in violence in society, particularly of penetrating injuries and the increase in energy of wounding from gunshots, has made pancreatic injury more common. In many cases the surgical management is relatively simple, but occasionally complex and technical surgical solutions are necessary and the position of the pancreas makes its access and all procedures on it challenging. To compound this, pancreatic trauma is associated with a high incidence of injury to adjoining organs and major vascular structures, which adds to the high morbidity and mortality, and complications occur in 30-60% of patients [1, 2].

From acute pancreatitis to end-organ injury: mechanisms of acute lung injury

BACKGROUND

Multi-organ dysfunction, and in particular lung injury, is often responsible for the unfavorable outcome of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Understanding of the mechanisms by which local inflammation in the pancreas leads to end-organ injury is crucial for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed with the terms "acute pancreatitis," "lung injury," "inflammatory response," "SIRS," and "multi-organ dysfunction." Pertinent articles were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Modulation of the inflammatory response using a combination of immunomodulatory agents may decrease the incidence of severe pancreatitis-related acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Clinical trials are of utmost importance to establish the validity of such strategies.

Percutaneous management of necrotizing pancreatitis

The management algorithm surrounding necrotizing pancreatitis has altered radically in the last 15 years in response to evolving concepts, improved understanding and the development of minimally invasive techniques, including percutaneous necrosectomy, and laparoscopic or EUS-guided cystgastrostomy. This article discusses the emerging role of minimally invasive techniques, key to which is an understanding of the evolving pathology of post acute, necrosis-associated fluid collections in pancreatitis. A dynamic and multi-modal management approach is presented, the aim of intervention being the 'adequate and maintained control of sepsis': the choice of technique dependent on the anatomical position, the ratio of solid to fluid components within the collection, and in particular the degree of systemic organ dysfunction.

Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms

BACKGROUND

The management of acute pancreatitis (AP) is still based on speculative and unproven paradigms in many centers. Therefore, we performed an evidence-based analysis to assess the best available treatment.

METHODS

A comprehensive Medline and Cochrane Library search was performed evaluating the indication and timing of interventional and surgical approaches, and the value of aprotinin, lexipafant, gabexate mesylate, and octreotide treatment. Each study was ranked according to the evidence-based methodology of Sackett; whenever feasible, we performed new meta-analyses using the random-effects model. Recommendations were based on the available level of evidence (A=large randomized; B=small randomized; C=prospective trial).

RESULTS

None of the evaluated medical treatments is recommended (level A). Patients with AP should receive early enteral nutrition (level B). While mild biliary AP is best treated by primary cholecystectomy (level B), patients with severe biliary AP require emergency endoscopic papillotomy followed by interval cholecystectomy (level A). Patients with necrotizing AP should receive imipenem or meropenem prophylaxis to decrease the risk of infected necrosis and mortality (level A). Sterile necrosis per se is not an indication for surgery (level C), and not all patients with infected necrosis require immediate surgery (level B). In general, early necrosectomy should be avoided (level B), and single necrosectomy with postoperative lavage should be preferred over "open-packing" because of fewer complications with comparable mortality rates (level C).

CONCLUSIONS

While providing new insights into key aspects of AP management, this evidence-based analysis highlights the need for further clinical trials, particularly regarding the indications for antibiotic prophylaxis and surgery.

Early nonenhanced abdominal computed tomography can predict mortality in severe acute pancreatitis

We wondered whether nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) within 48 hours of admission could identify individuals at risk for higher mortality from acute pancreatitis. Data from the international phase III study of the platelet-activating factor-inhibitor Lexipafant was used to analyze noncontrast CT versus acute pancreatitis mortality. Nonenhanced CT examinations of the abdomen from the trial were classified by disease severity (Balthazar grades A-E) and then correlated with patient survival. Among the 477 individuals who underwent CT within 48 hours of admission and 220 individuals who did so over the subsequent 6 days, higher CT grades were associated with increased mortality. Each unit increase in Balthazar grade during the initial 48 hours was associated with an estimated increase in the risk of mortality of 33%, and this trend increased to 50% if pancreatic enlargement and peripancreatic stranding (grades B and C) were combined (P<0.05). CT grade correlated minimally with Ranson, Glasgow, or APACHE II score during the initial 48 hours; however, this correlation improved over 3-8 days. Early nonenhanced abdominal CT in patients with acute pancreatitis is a valuable prognostic indicator of mortality in acute pancreatitis, even among patients without clinical features of severe acute pancreatitis.

Gabexate mesilate and acute pancreatitis: an experience of evidence based drug information for improving rational drug use

INTRODUCTION

Gabexate mesylate is a drug marketed only in Italy and Japan and it is considered an essential drug in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. A periodic revision and evaluation of drug utilization in our hospital demonstrated that the dosages and indications of Gabexate mesilate (GM) did not follow those settled by the National Health System and by our Hospital Formulary. We therefore promoted and conducted a program of drug information and meetings with the physicians in order to improve the correct utilisation of GM and identify potential problems.

METHODS

GM prescriptions in 1999 were analysed for indications and dosages. Scheduled meetings with the medical staff were successively started in order to debate current therapies and treatments of acute pancreatitis using the criteria of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Follow-up was done in 2000, 2001 and 2002 to evaluate the efficacy of our intervention.

RESULTS

The hospital board and 20 physicians were involved in this program of evidence-based drug information. The follow-up and the monitoring of GM prescriptions showed a reduction in the utilisation of GM in the subsequent period.

CONCLUSIONS

GM is one of the most expensive drugs in our hospital, but its benefits are not very evident. Moreover, the international guidelines and literature ascribe to GM only a marginal role in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. Evidence-based medicine strengthens clinical experience with the evidence from the literature and underlines that essential drugs are used worldwide.

Inflammatory pancreatic diseases in older patients: recognition and management

The aging process influences and modifies the clinical picture and treatment modalities of inflammatory pancreatic diseases in elderly patients. The two major categories of inflammatory exocrine pancreatic diseases seen in the elderly are acute pancreatitis (AP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). In elderly patients with AP, the presence of concomitant diseases affecting renal, hepatic and cardiopulmonary function make the early clinical assessment of the severity of AP inaccurate at the time of admission to hospital. In addition, the classical multifactorial scoring system routinely utilised in clinical practice to determine the severity of AP may overscore elderly patients because increasing age is associated with more points. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is particularly useful in assessing the severity of AP and is required in all patients suspected with severe AP. It should be repeated after a certain time period to monitor the disease. The most important aspect of the management of elderly patients with severe AP is the prevention and treatment of systemic and local complications. Treatment of AP should address the removal of aetiological factor(s) and support of organ systems and hydroelectrolytic/caloric balance; specific treatments (antiproteases, antibacterials) should also be administered to patients with severe AP. Surgery is indicated mainly when infection occurs following pancreatic necrosis and/or fluid collection. However, in selected patients with a high anaesthetic risk, alternative, less invasive drainage options (percutaneous, endoscopic) should be considered. CP rarely occurs in older age, and it should be suspected based on clinical findings. The greatest challenge is the differentiation between CP and pancreatic cancer. Treatment of CP in the elderly should be directed at controlling the symptoms, by management of diabetes and exocrine insufficiency because pain and complications are rare in elderly patients with CP. Compliance with treatment should be periodically assessed if insulin and/or oral enzyme supplementation is required. Careful evaluation of nutritional status and its prompt correction is also important.

Acute Pancreatitis in Children

There are no drugs that cure or abate pancreatitis. The treatment of patients with mild and moderate episodes of pancreatitis (85%) is supportive and expectant. Central issues include the removal of the initiating process (if possible), relief of pain, and maintenance of fluid and electrolyte balance. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography may be required for stone extraction in patients with biliary pancreatitis. Surgery is rarely required. The aims of treatment for patients with severe disease includes treatment of local, systemic, and septic complications in addition to those for mild and moderate disease. Homeostasis is maintained by the correction of hypocalcemia, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, electrolyte imbalances, and hypoxemia. A large number of medications have been used unsuccessfully in an attempt to halt the progression of the autodigestive process within the pancreas and to reduce pancreatic secretions. Nutritional support with either enteral or parenteral feeding is given. Intravenous antibiotics or selective bowel decontamination decrease mortality in patients with severe episodes of pancreatitis. The treatment for these individuals is often prolonged. Surgical treatment of traumatic pancreatitis with ductal rupture includes repair or resection. At times, simple drainage is performed and definitive surgery is deferred until later. Surgical treatment of severe pancreatitis includes debridement of necrotic and infected tissue. The emerging consensus appears to be that necrosectomy and local lavage or open management with planned re-exploration offers better survival than the conventional therapy of resection plus drainage alone.

Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini consensus conference

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis, early assessment, and management of severe acute pancreatitis remain difficult clinical problems. This article presents the consensus obtained at a meeting convened to consider the evidence in these areas. The aim of the article is to provide outcome statements to guide clinical practice, with an assessment of the supporting evidence for each statement.

METHOD

Working groups considered the published evidence in the areas of diagnosis, assessment of severity, nonoperative treatment, and surgical treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Outcome statements were defined to summarize the conclusions on each point considered. The findings were discussed and agreed on by all participants. A careful assessment was made of the strength of the available evidence (proven, probable, possible, unproven, or inappropriate).

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

There is reliable evidence to support much current practice. Clear guidance can be given in most areas examined, and several areas were identified where further investigation would be helpful. Diagnosis using plasma concentrations of pancreatic enzymes is reliable. Rapid advances are taking place in the assessment of severity. Several new therapeutic strategies show real promise for the reduction of morbidity and mortality rates. Surgical debridement is required for infected pancreatic necrosis, but is less often necessary for sterile necrosis.

Beneficial effect of octreotide treatment in acute pancreatitis in rats

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide treatment contributes to the regulation of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production in sodium taurocholate-induced acute necrotizing pancreatitis in rats. Owing to its complex effect, octreotide can partially ameliorate the deleterious consequences of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Elevated TNF and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in the peritoneal fluid may be considered a consequence of the activation of peritoneal macrophages.

BACKGROUND

The effects of octreotide on exocrine pancreatic function have been investigated in numerous studies, but little attention has been paid to its influence on cytokine production in acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

Acute pancreatitis was induced by the retrograde injection of taurocholic acid into the pancreatic duct in male Wistar rats. Serum amylase activity, wet pancreatic weight/body weight (pw/bw) ratio, and TNF and IL-6 levels were measured. Four micrograms/kg of octreotide was administered subcutaneously at the time of induction of pancreatitis and 24 or 48 h later. Rats were sacrificed 6, 24, 48, or 72 h after the operation.

RESULTS

The serum amylase level and pancreatic weight to body weight ratio were decreased significantly in the octreotide-treated group. The serum TNF level was decreased significantly in the octreotide-treated group as compared with the control group at 6, 24, and 48 h (0.6 +/- 1.5, 2.0 +/- 3.3, and 0 vs 50 +/- 15.5, 37.5 +/- 18.4, and 13.1 +/- 12.5 U/mL, respectively). The ascites TNF level was decreased to 0 in the octreotide-treated group and was elevated in the control group at 72 h (28.0 +/- 49.0 U/mL). IL-6 production in ascites was extremely high in both groups at 6 h (80,000 +/- 43,817 pg/mL and 58,500 +/- 33,335 pg/mL), but the difference was not significant.