Management of chronic hepatitis B and C virus infections

Primary care physicians' approach to diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis B and hepatitis C patients

Background

Infections caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are considered to be important health problems worldwide. The purpose of this study was to measure the general practitioners (GPs)' basic knowledge on HBV and HCV risk factors in determining their practice about this subject.

Methods

A cross-sectional type questionnaire survey was carried out at all of 32 primary healthcare centers (PHCCs) in Samsun, Turkey, between March 1 and April 31, 2002. The questionnaires were sent to 160 GPs and 129 (80.6%) of them answered the questionnaires. Knowledge, role responsibility, self-efficacy and attitudes and beliefs regarding to viral hepatitis B and hepatitis C were asked.

Results

Most of the GPs had adequate knowledge about transmission of HBV and HCV and also about risk factors for transmission of viruses. Most of the GPs (83.7%) were aware of recommendations for approach to a baby, born from HBsAg positive mother. They have limited facilities in diagnosis of viral hepatitis. Of the participants, 108 (83.7%) expressed that they could not diagnose HBV infections and 126 (97.7%) of them stated that they could not make the diagnoses of HCV infection in their local healthcare centers. The knowledge about treatment of chronic viral hepatitis B (21.8%) and C patients (17.8%) with elevated ALT is not sufficient.

Conclusion

GPs' knowledge about risks of viral hepatitis was adequate in this study. They were not able to diagnose and follow up of these infections at PHCCs because of limited knowledge about chronic viral hepatitis and diagnostic facilities. GPs should be informed about current advice in diagnosis and treatment of chronic of HBV and HCV infections.

N/A

N/A

Pediatric issues in new therapies for hepatitis B and C

Two antiviral treatments have been approved for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in children: interferon (IFN)-alpha, 6 MU/m(2) three times a week subcutaneously for 6 months, and lamivudine, 3 mg/kg/d orally for 12 months. Twenty-six percent to 58% of children treated with IFN become HBV DNA negative, and up to 38% become negative to hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Lamivudine, a nucleoside analogue that blocks viral replication by inhibition of the HBV polymerase, has been associated with comparable rates of seroconversion of HBeAg to anti-HBe. Loss of surface antigen occurs in less than 5% of patients treated with lamivudine, compared with 3% to 33% in those treated with IFN-alpha. Fifty percent to 65% of children treated with lamivudine clear HBV DNA after 12 months of therapy, but relapse rates have not been clarified. Patients treated with lamivudine develop drug-resistant (YMDD) mutants in the HBV polymerase at the rate of 16% to 32% per year. No treatments for children with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been approved by the FDA. However, published reports describe treatment with IFN monotherapy and combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin. Trials of PEG-IFN alone or in combination with ribavirin are in progress. Given the lack of data regarding treatment of HCV in children, it is generally agreed among pediatric hepatologists that the optimal treatment is within the context of randomized, controlled trials.

Combined treatment with subcutaneous interferon-alpha, oral isoprinosine, and lamivudine for subacute sclerosing panencephalitis

We compared patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis who received treatment according to our protocol for at least 6 months (19 patients) with the patients who could not receive any treatment (13 patients). The treatment protocol consisted of oral isoprinosine (100 mg/kg/day), subcutaneous interferon alpha-2a (10 mU/m2/three times a week), and oral lamivudine (10 mg/kg/day). There were no statistical differences between the two groups according to Neurological Deficit Index, clinical stage, and average age on admission and also on the final evaluation after treatment. The mortality rates of both groups were similar: 3 (15.7%) for the treatment group and 6 (46%) for controls. The remission rates for the treatment and control groups were 7 of 19 (36.8%) and 0 of 13 (0%), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P = .036). The mean survival period of the treatment group was significantly longer than that of the control group (P = .01). In conclusion, this combination treatment protocol resulted in higher remission rates and longer survival periods when compared with controls, as well as a remission rate that was better than the spontaneous remission rate of 5%. For this reason, and as well as because interferon-alpha therapy has an easier route of application and a higher family compliance, we have considered this an alternative protocol for patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis.