Identification and characterization of nitric oxide synthase in Salmonella typhimurium

Physiological Roles of Nitrite and Nitric Oxide in Bacteria: Similar Consequences from Distinct Cell Targets, Protection, and Sensing Systems

Nitrite and nitric oxide (NO) are two active nitrogen oxides that display similar biochemical properties, especially when interacting with redox-sensitive proteins (i.e., hemoproteins), an observation serving as the foundation of the notion that the antibacterial effect of nitrite is largely attributed to NO formation. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that they are largely treated as distinct molecules by bacterial cells. Although both nitrite and NO are formed and decomposed by enzymes participating in the transformation of these nitrogen species, NO can also be generated via amino acid metabolism by bacterial NO synthetase and scavenged by flavohemoglobin. NO seemingly interacts with all hemoproteins indiscriminately, whereas nitrite shows high specificity to heme-copper oxidases. Consequently, the homeostasis of redox-sensitive proteins may be responsible for the substantial difference in NO-targets identified to date among different bacteria. In addition, most protective systems against NO damage have no significant role in alleviating inhibitory effects of nitrite. Furthermore, when functioning as signal molecules, nitrite and NO are perceived by completely different sensing systems, through which they are linked to different biological processes.

Coagulase-negative Staphylococci favor conversion of arginine into ornithine despite a widespread genetic potential for nitric oxide synthase activity

Within ecosystems that are poor in carbohydrates, alternative substrates such as arginine may be of importance to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). However, the versatility of arginine conversion in CNS remains largely uncharted. Therefore, a set of 86 strains belonging to 17 CNS species was screened for arginine deiminase (ADI), arginase, and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activities, in view of their ecological relevance. In fermented meats, for instance, ADI could improve bacterial competitiveness, whereas NOS may serve as an alternative nitrosomyoglobin generator to nitrate and nitrite curing. About 80% of the strains were able to convert arginine, but considerable inter- and intraspecies heterogeneity regarding the extent and mechanism of conversion was found. Overall, ADI was the most commonly employed pathway, resulting in mixtures of ornithine and small amounts of citrulline. Under aerobic conditions, which are more relevant for skin-associated CNS communities, several strains shifted toward arginase activity, leading to the production of ornithine and urea. The obtained data indeed suggest that arginase occurs relatively more in CNS isolates from a dairy environment, whereas ADI seems to be more abundant in strains from a fermented meat background. With some exceptions, a reasonable match between phenotypic ADI and arginase activity and the presence of the encoding genes (arcA and arg) was found. With respect to the NOS pathway, however, only one strain (Staphylococcus haemolyticus G110) displayed phenotypic NOS-like activity under aerobic conditions, despite a wide prevalence of the NOS-encoding gene (nos) among CNS. Hence, the group of CNS displays a strain- and condition-dependent toolbox of arginine-converting mechanisms with potential implications for competitiveness and functionality.

The diversity of microbial responses to nitric oxide and agents of nitrosative stress close cousins but not identical twins

Nitric oxide and related nitrogen species (reactive nitrogen species) now occupy a central position in contemporary medicine, physiology, biochemistry, and microbiology. In particular, NO plays important antimicrobial defenses in innate immunity but microbes have evolved intricate NO-sensing and defense mechanisms that are the subjects of a vast literature. Unfortunately, the burgeoning NO literature has not always been accompanied by an understanding of the intricacies and complexities of this radical and other reactive nitrogen species so that there exists confusion and vagueness about which one or more species exert the reported biological effects. The biological chemistry of NO and derived/related molecules is complex, due to multiple species that can be generated from NO in biological milieu and numerous possible reaction targets. Moreover, the fate and disposition of NO is always a function of its biological environment, which can vary significantly even within a single cell. In this review, we consider newer aspects of the literature but, most importantly, consider the underlying chemistry and draw attention to the distinctiveness of NO and its chemical cousins, nitrosonium (NO(+)), nitroxyl (NO(-), HNO), peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)), nitrite (NO(2)(-)), and nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)). All these species are reported to be generated in biological systems from initial formation of NO (from nitrite, NO synthases, or other sources) or its provision in biological experiments (typically from NO gas, S-nitrosothiols, or NO donor compounds). The major targets of NO and nitrosative damage (metal centers, thiols, and others) are reviewed and emphasis is given to newer "-omic" methods of unraveling the complex repercussions of NO and nitrogen oxide assaults. Microbial defense mechanisms, many of which are critical for pathogenicity, include the activities of hemoglobins that enzymically detoxify NO (to nitrate) and NO reductases and repair mechanisms (e.g., those that reverse S-nitrosothiol formation). Microbial resistance to these stresses is generally inducible and many diverse transcriptional regulators are involved-some that are secondary sensors (such as Fnr) and those that are "dedicated" (such as NorR, NsrR, NssR) in that their physiological function appears to be detecting primarily NO and then regulating expression of genes that encode enzymes with NO as a substrate. Although generally harmful, evidence is accumulating that NO may have beneficial effects, as in the case of the squid-Vibrio light-organ symbiosis, where NO serves as a signal, antioxidant, and specificity determinant. Progress in this area will require a thorough understanding not only of the biology but also of the underlying chemical principles.

Nitric-oxide synthase: A cytochrome P450 family foster child

Nitric-oxide synthase (NOS), the enzyme responsible for mammalian NO generation, is no cytochrome P450, but there are striking similarities between both enzymes. First and foremost, both are heme-thiolate proteins, employing the same prosthetic group to perform similar chemistry. Moreover, they share the same redox partner, a diflavoprotein reductase, which in the case of NOS is incorporated with the oxygenase in one polypeptide chain. There are, however, also conspicuous differences, such as the presence in NOS of the additional cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin, which is applied as an auxiliary electron donor to prevent decay of the oxyferrous complex to ferric heme and superoxide. In this review similarities and differences between NOS and cytochrome P450 are analyzed in an attempt to explain why NOS requires BH4 and why NO synthesis is not catalyzed by a member of the cytochrome P450 family.

Involvement of nitric oxide synthase in sucrose-enhanced hydrogen peroxide tolerance of Rhodococcus sp. strain APG1, a plant-colonizing bacterium

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) tolerance of Rhodococcus sp. strain APG1, previously isolated from the aquatic fern Azolla pinnata, was examined in relation to nitric oxide (NO) production by cells cultured on a variety of C sources. Cells inoculated onto A. pinnata fronds established a surface-sterilant resistant density of 2-4x10(7) cells g(-1) without causing disease. Compared to cultures containing glucose, fructose, mannitol, or glycerol, those provided only with sucrose displayed, on a per C basis, substantially lower (<10%) growth yields and higher resistance to H2O2. NO, a positive regulator of catalase synthesis in bacteria, was produced in larger amounts in sucrose-grown cells as evidence by eightfold greater per cell accumulations in the medium of nitrite (NO2-), a stable oxidation product of NO. Addition to cells of L-arginine, the substrate for nitric oxide synthase (NOS), stimulated production of NO, detected both by fluorometric reaction with diaminofluorescein-FM diacetate (DAF-FM DA) and by increased levels of NO2- in the culture medium. These results suggest that sucrose may enhance H2O2 tolerance of Rhodococcus APG1 by increasing cellular NO producing capacity. We propose a regulatory role for NOS in promoting tolerance of Rhodococcus APG1 to oxidative stress in the phyllosphere.

Purification and characterization of nitric oxide synthase from Staphylococcus aureus

We previously reported the presence of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6538P whose activity was induced by methanol. In the present study, the methanol-induced NOS was purified 900-fold from S. aureus by means of Mono Q ion exchange column, 2',5'-ADP-agarose affinity column, and Superdex 200HR gel permeation column chromatography. The purified bacterial NOS showed two protein bands with 67 and 64 kDa molecular mass on SDS-PAGE. However, the molecular mass of the NOS was 135 kDa on Superdex 200HR gel permeation column chromatography, indicating that the native enzyme exists as a heterodimer. This bacterial NOS had K(m) value of 13.4x10(-6) M for L-arginine and V(max) of 35.3 nmol min(-1) mg(-1) protein. In addition, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, flavin adenine dinucleotide, flavin mononucleotide, tetrahydrobiopterin, calmodulin and Ca(2+) were required as cofactors in the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline, and NOS inhibitors selectively inhibited the activity of the purified NOS.