Neutralising antibodies to granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in carcinoma patients following GM-CSF combination therapy

Risk Factors, Hyaluronidase Expression, and Clinical Immunogenicity of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase PH20, an Enzyme Enabling Subcutaneous Drug Administration

Multiple FDA-approved and clinical-development stage therapeutics include recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) to facilitate subcutaneous administration. As rHuPH20-reactive antibodies potentially interact with endogenous PH20, we investigated rHuPH20 immunogenicity risk through hyaluronidase tissue expression, predicted B cell epitopes, CD4+ T cell stimulation indices and related these to observed clinical immunogenicity profiles from 18 clinical studies. Endogenous hyaluronidase PH20 expression in humans/mice was assessed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), quantitative RT-PCR, and deep RNA-Seq. rHuPH20 potential T cell epitopes were evaluated in silico and confirmed in vitro. Potential B cell epitopes were predicted for rHuPH20 sequence in silico, and binding of polyclonal antibodies from various species tested on a rHuPH20 peptide microarray. Clinical immunogenicity data were collected from 2643 subjects. From 57 human adult and fetal tissues previously screened by RT-PCR, 22 tissue types were analyzed by deep RNA-Seq. Hyaluronidase PH20 messenger RNA expression was detected in adult human testes. In silico analyses of the rHuPH20 sequence revealed nine T cell epitope clusters with immunogenic potential, one cluster was homologous to human leukocyte antigen. rHuPH20 induced T cell activation in 6-10% of peripheral blood mononuclear cell donors. Fifteen epitopes in the rHuPH20 sequence had the potential to cross-react with B cells. The cumulative treatment-induced incidence of anti-rHuPH20 antibodies across clinical studies was 8.8%. Hyaluronidase PH20 expression occurs primarily in adult testes. Low CD4+ T cell activation and B cell cross-reactivity by rHuPH20 suggest weak rHuPH20 immunogenicity potential. Restricted expression patterns of endogenous PH20 indicate low immunogenicity risk of subcutaneous rHuPH20.

Immunogenicity of Biotherapeutics: Causes and Association with Posttranslational Modifications

Today, potential immunogenicity can be better evaluated during the drug development process, and we have rational approaches to manage the clinical consequences of immunogenicity. The focus of the scientific community should be on developing sensitive diagnostics that can predict immunogenicity-mediated adverse events in the small fraction of subjects that develop clinically relevant anti-drug antibodies. Here, we discuss the causes of immunogenicity which could be product-related (inherent property of the product or might be picked up during the manufacturing process), patient-related (genetic profile or eating habits), or linked to the route of administration. We describe various posttranslational modifications (PTMs) and how they may influence immunogenicity. Over the last three decades, we have significantly improved our understanding about the types of PTMs of biotherapeutic proteins and their association with immunogenicity. It is also now clear that all PTMs do not lead to clinical immunogenicity. We also discuss the mechanisms of immunogenicity (which include T cell-dependent and T cell-independent responses) and immunological tolerance. We further elaborate on the management of immunogenicity in preclinical and clinical setting and the unique challenges raised by biosimilars, which may have different immunogenic potential from their parent biotherapeutics.

Detection of anti-cytokine antibodies and their clinical relevance

Cytokines regulate many aspects of cell growth and differentiation and play pivotal roles in the orchestration of immune defence against invading pathogens. Though 'self' proteins, they are potentially immunogenic and can give rise to anti-cytokine autoantibodies (aCA). The main foci of the article are a critical summary of the various methodologies applied for detecting and measuring aCA and a broad review of studies of the occurrence, characterization and clinical relevance of aCA in normal healthy individuals, patients with autoimmune diseases or microbial infections and aCA in patients whose disease is treated with recombinant cytokine products. The need for technical and methodological improvement of assays, including validation and standardization, together with approaches to harmonize calculation and reporting of results is also discussed.

The multifaceted role of Th17 lymphocytes and their associated cytokines in cancer

While the role of T helper 17 lymphocytes (Th17) in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases and in infectious immunity has been relatively well defined, the impact of these cells and their associated cytokines on cancer development is still under debate. Although multiple reports have indicated that Th17 can promote anticancer immunity, others have argued that these cells may exhibit tumor-promoting properties. This dichotomy in the function of Th17 lymphocytes in cancer may be related to the versatile nature of these cells, being capable of differentiating into either proinflammatory Th1 or suppressive FoxP3-expressing Treg cells or hybrid T cell subsets depending on the underlying environmental conditions. In the current review, we examine the role of Th17 lymphocytes and Th17-associated cytokines in cancer and discuss how factors that control their final lineage commitment decision may influence the balance between their tumor-promoting versus tumor-suppressing properties.

High titer autoantibodies to GM-CSF in patients with AML, CML and MDS are associated with active disease

Antibodies to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can be induced when GM-CSF is used as an adjuvant to solid tumor vaccination. Neutralizing anti-GM-CSF IgG has been associated with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP), and secondary PAP has been linked to myeloid leukemia. We studied 69 patients with acute myeloid leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome, including 19 patients who received GM-CSF with peptide antigen and incomplete Freund's adjuvant in a vaccine trial for the presence or induction of anti-GM-CSF antibodies. Anti-GM-CSF IgG were present in 36 (52%) patients with myeloid leukemia compared to only 1 of 33 (3%) healthy subjects (P=0.008) and in none of 6 patients with lymphoid leukemia (P=0.0001). Antibody titers were unaffected by vaccination. Anti-GM-CSF IgA and IgM were found in 33 and 20% of patients, respectively; IgA from two patients neutralized GM-CSF. Strikingly, while anti-GM-CSF IgG titers were higher in patients with active disease (n=52) versus those in complete remission (n=14, P=0.0009), GM-CSF expression was not increased in either group. These data are first to show that anti-GM-CSF antibodies of multiple isotypes are present in patients with active myeloid leukemia without PAP and may be useful markers of disease activity.

Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. Part 1: impact of product handling

The patents of first-generation biopharmaceutical proteins are expiring, creating opportunities for biosimilar products. Unlike conventional generic pharmaceuticals, the development of biosimilar products is far more complex and requires more than a simple demonstration of pharmacological bioequivalence to establish efficacy and safety. The main concern with biosimilar products, as for any therapeutic protein, is immunogenicity and with it the potential for serious clinical sequelae. In the absence of adequate predictors of immunogenicity outside the clinical trial setting, biosimilar products should be evaluated in the same way that any novel pharmaceutical is evaluated. Herein, the factors involved in breaking host tolerance following administration of a therapeutic protein are discussed. The impact of product handling on immunogenicity is considered in the context of some hard-fought lessons that have helped to shape the current era of biopharmaceutical manufacturing, packaging, distribution, storage, and quality assurance.

Significance of neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta during treatment of multiple sclerosis: expert opinions based on the Proceedings of an International Consensus Conference

On August 30, 2002, an international panel of neurologists who specialize in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was convened in Paris (France) to discuss the issue of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to interferon beta (IFN-beta) therapy in patients with MS. The goals of this meeting were to: (i) review the most recent clinical information on NAb, (ii) come to a consensus on the clinical relevance of NAb in the management of patients with MS receiving IFN-beta therapy, and (iii) establish a framework for the development of patient management guidelines based on scientific consensus. The meeting was chaired by Hans-Peter Hartung (Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany) and Huub Schellekens (Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands). This article summarizes the opinions of the expert panel on a number of key issues raised at the meeting.

A comparative evaluation of nasal and parenteral vaccine adjuvants to elicit systemic and mucosal HIV-1 peptide-specific humoral immune responses in cynomolgus macaques

Cynomolgus macaques were immunized by either the intramuscular (i.m.) or intranasal (i.n.) route with a HIV-1 peptide-based immunogen (C4-V3 89.6P) alone, or formulated with novel adjuvants to evaluate the ability of the adjuvants to augment peptide-specific systemic and mucosal immune responses. A mutant cholera toxin, CT-E29H, or the combination of recombinant human IL-1alpha (rhIL-1alpha) protein and recombinant human GM-CSF (rhGM-CSF) protein were tested as adjuvants for i.n. immunization, while a stable emulsion of a synthetic monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) analogue (RC529-SE) plus rhGM-CSF protein was tested as an adjuvant for i.m. immunization. Macaques immunized i.n. with peptide alone failed to elicit an anti-C4-V3 89.6P antibody response in serum. In contrast, all the tested peptide/adjuvant formulations elicited peptide-specific immune responses. RC529-SE/rhGM-CSF elicited the highest peak anti-peptide IgG geometric mean titer in serum (1:32,768 at week 25) followed by rhIL-1alpha/rhGM-CSF (1:1217 at week 10) and CT-E29H (1:256 at week 25). Measurable SHIV neutralizing antibody responses were detectable in only one macaque immunized i.m. with peptide formulated with RC529-SE/rhGM-CSF. Macaques immunized by the i.n. route with peptide in combination with CT-E29H failed to elicit measurable antibody responses at nasal or genital mucosal surfaces. In contrast, antibody responses at the nasal and genital mucosa were detected in macaques immunized by the i.n. route with peptide in combination with rhIL-1alpha/rhGM-CSF. However, antibody responses at the nasal and genital mucosa were highest in macaques immunized parenterally with peptide in combination with the adjuvants RC529-SE/rhGM-CSF. These results suggest that parenteral vaccine administration in combination with the appropriate adjuvant formulation can elicit vaccine-specific humoral immune responses in both systemic and mucosal compartments.

Induction of neutralising antibodies restricts the use of human granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor for vaccine studies in rhesus macaques

Granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a valuable adjuvant to enhance induction of cellular immune responses in rodents. Less information is available regarding its use as an adjuvant in primates or humans. We explored recombinant human GM-CSF for potential vaccine studies in rhesus macaques and focused on its effect on peripheral monocytes as progenitors of dendritic cells and its potential immunogenicity. Application of human GM-CSF to nine animals led to an average 32-fold increase in monocyte numbers. This was not observed upon re-treatment, which coincided with GM-CSF-specific neutralising antibodies. These also neutralised the activity of rhesus macaque GM-CSF. The data underscore the need to use species-specific GM-CSF for immunomodulation in primates.

Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: clinical implications and future prospects

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic proteins have revolutionized the treatment of many diseases. In the near future, many more therapeutic proteins are likely to become available for an increasingly wide range of indications.

OBJECTIVES

This article reviews the incidence, causes, and consequences of formation of antibodies to therapeutic proteins and suggests ways to address issues surrounding immunogenicity.

METHODS

Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were performed, covering the period 1990 to May 2002. Search terms included immunogenicity, antibodies, and the names of specific therapeutic proteins and classes of therapeutic proteins. Bibliographies of retrieved articles were not searched.

RESULTS

All exogenous proteins, including therapeutic ones, have the potential to cause antibody formation. The reported incidence of antibody formation with therapeutic proteins varies widely between proteins and between studies (depending on the assay techniques used). The clinical consequences of antibody formation vary with the type of antibody present; for example, neutralizing antibodies are more likely to cause loss of efficacy than nonneutralizing antibodies. The immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins can be influenced by many factors, including the genetic background of the patient, the type of disease, the type of protein (human or nonhuman), the presence of conjugates or fragments, the route of administration, dose frequency, and duration of treatment. Manufacturing, handling, and storage can introduce contaminants, or alter the 3-dimensional structure of the protein via oxidation or aggregate formation. Various means have been suggested by which therapeutic proteins might be modified to reduce their immunogenicity, including PEGylation, site-specific mutagenesis, exon shuffling, and humanization of monoclonal antibodies. In the future, it may even be possible to predict the immunogenicity of new therapeutic proteins more accurately, using specifically designed animal models, including nonhuman primates and transgenic mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Scientists and clinicians are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of assessing the immunogenicity of new molecules as they are introduced, and of existing molecules whenever they are modified or their manufacturing process is changed. Immune responses to therapeutic proteins are usually only of clinical significance if they are associated with the development of treatment resistance. Although various means to reduce the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins have been suggested, monitoring for antibodies during clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance remains an important issue for all therapeutic proteins.

Bioequivalence and the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals

The expiry of the first patents for recombinant-DNA-derived biopharmaceuticals will open the possibility of marketing generics, if they can be shown to be essentially similar to the innovator product. However, as shown by the problem of immunogenicity, the properties of biopharmaceuticals are dependent on many factors, including downstream processing and formulation. Products from different sources cannot be assumed to be bioequivalent, even if identical genes are expressed in the same host cells and similar production methods are used. Some of the influencing factors are still unknown, which makes it impossible to completely predict biological behaviour, such as immunogenicity, which can sometimes lead to serious side effects.