Lysophosphatidic acid inhibits melanocyte proliferation via cell cycle arrest

Lysophosphatidic acid receptors 2 and 3 regulate erythropoiesis at different hematopoietic stages

Hematopoiesis, the complex developmental process that forms blood components and replenishes the blood system, involves multiple intracellular and extracellular mechanisms. We previously demonstrated that lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a lipid growth factor, has opposing regulatory effects on erythrocyte differentiation through activation of LPA receptors 2 and 3; yet the mechanisms underlying this process remain unclear. In this study, LPA₂ is observed that highly expressed in common myeloid progenitors (CMP) in murine myeloid cells, whereas the expression of LPA₃ displaces in megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors (MEP) of later stage of myeloid differentiation. Therefore, we hypothesized that the switching expression of LPA₂ and LPA₃ determine the hematic homeostasis of mammalian megakaryocytic-erythroid lineage. In vitro colony-forming unit assays of murine progenitors reveal that LPA₂ agonist GRI reduces the erythroblast differentiation potential of CMP. In contrast, LPA₃ agonist OMPT increases the production of erythrocytes from megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitor cells (MEP). In addition, treatment with GRI reduces the erythroid, CMP, and MEP populations in mice, indicating that LPA₂ predominantly inhibits myeloid differentiation at an early stage. In contrast, activation of LPA₃ increases the production of terminally differentiated erythroid cells through activation of erythropoietic transcriptional factor. We also demonstrate that the LPA₃ signaling is essential for restoration of phenylhydrazine (PHZ)-induced acute hemolytic anemia in mice and correlates to erythropoiesis impairment of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria Symptom (HGPS) premature aging expressed K562 model. Our results reveal the distinct roles of LPA₂ and LPA₃ at different stages of hematopoiesis in vivo, providing potentiated therapeutic strategies of anemia treatment.

Lysophospholipid receptors in cell signaling

There is increasing evidence that different phospholipids are involved in regulation of various cell processes and cell-cell interactions. Lysophospholipids (lysophosphatidic acid, lysophosphatidylcholine) and a number of lysosphingolipids play particular roles in these regulations. Their effects are mediated by specific G-protein-coupled receptors. G-Protein coupled signal transduction to the cell nucleus involving a chain of intracellular protein kinases induces the main effects in cells--growth, proliferation, survival, or apoptosis. This review summarizes recent data on various groups of lysophospholipid receptors and their cell signal transduction pathways.

Role of neuropeptide Y and its receptors in the progression of endocrine-related cancer

The neuropeptide Y (NPY) family of peptides, in addition to its many physiological actions, has also been involved in the modulation of tumor progression, with specific reference to endocrine-related cancers such as neuroendocrine tumors, breast and prostate cancers. These have been found either to express NPY receptors, or to secrete NPY-related peptides, or both. The study of the role of the NPY family of peptides in the biology of endocrine-related tumors, specifically concerning cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion and metastatization, may help to clarify some aspects of tumor pathophysiology, as well as to indicate novel diagnostic markers and therapeutical approaches.

Activation of the Y1 receptor by neuropeptide Y regulates the growth of prostate cancer cells

This study deals with the role of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the regulation of cell proliferation. NPY is expressed in the normal and tumoral prostate, but no data on its possible role in prostate cancer (PCa) progression are available. Therefore, we evaluated the direct effect of NPY on the growth of the human PCa cell lines LNCaP (androgen dependent) and DU145 and PC3 (androgen independent). All PCa cell lines expressed Y1-R gene and protein. NPY treatment reduced the proliferation of LNCaP and DU145 cells and increased that of PC3 cells. The Y1-R antagonist BIBP3226 abolished such effects, suggesting a mandatory role of Y1-R in this process. LNCaP cells showed elevated constitutive levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2, which were not affected by NPY. In DU145 cells, NPY stimulated a long-lasting ERK1/2 activation, whereas, in PC3 cells, this effect was rapid and transient and required activation of protein kinase C. Moreover, in both cell lines, pretreatment with BIBP3226 prevented the NPY-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, further supporting Y1-R involvement. NPY treatment reduced forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation only in PC3 cells and did not change intracellular calcium concentration in any PCa cell line. These data indicate that NPY may directly regulate PCa cell growth via Y1-R. The direction of this effect appears to be related to the time kinetics of MAPK activation, i.e. long-lasting vs. transient, and to the clone-specific involvement of other intracellular signals. These findings suggest that NPY-related mechanisms might play a relevant role in the progression of PCa, at both androgen dependent and independent stages.