Rectal pH in children

Development of an Optimal In vitro Release and Permeation Testing Method for Rectal Suppositories

Currently there are no compendial assays for testing drug release from rectal suppositories. It is therefore essential to study different in vitro release testing (IVRT) and in vitro permeation testing (IVPT) methods for identifying a suitable technique to compare in vitro drug release and to predict in vivo performance of rectal suppositories. In the present study, three different rectal suppository formulations of mesalamine (CANASA, Generic, and In-house) were studied for in vitro bioequivalence. All the different suppository products were characterized by performing weight variation, content uniformity, hardness, melting time, and pH tests. Viscoelastic behavior of the suppositories was also tested both in presence and absence of mucin. Four different IVRT techniques such as Dialysis, Horizontal Ussing Chamber, Vertical Franz cell, and USP apparatus 4. IVPT studies were performed using Horizontal Ussing chamber and Vertical Franz cell methods. Q1/Q2 equivalent products (CANASA, Generic) and a half-strength product were studied to understand the reproducibility, bio relevance, and discriminatory ability of the IVRT and IVPT methods. This study is the first of its kind where molecular docking studies were performed to determine the potential interactions of drug (mesalamine) with mucin, IVRT studies were conducted with and without the presence of mucin, and porcine rectal mucosa was used to perform IVPT tests. The USP 4 method and Horizontal Ussing chamber methods were found to be suitable IVRT and IVPT techniques, respectfully, for rectal suppositories. RLD (Reference Listed Drug) and Generic rectal suppositories were found to exhibit similar release rate and permeation profiles obtained from USP 4, and the IVPT studies, respectfully. Wilcoxon Rank Sum/Mann-Whitney rank test, conducted for the IVRT profiles obtained using USP 4 method, proved the sameness of RLD and Generic suppository products.

Expert design and desirability function approach for the development of diazepam thermally sensitive rectal gel

Aim: The aim of the present work was to develop an in situ thermosensitive rectal gel for diazepam by using Expert-design for improving three factors and a three-level process was formed by using a cold method. Methods & materials: Response surface design was utilized to investigate the effect of independent variables like sodium chloride (NaCl, X1), poloxamer 407 (F-127, X2) and diazepam (X3), on different dependent variables such as gelation temperature, mucoadhesive strength, drug content, along with permeation and stability. Results: The obtained results revealed that the addition of diazepam enhanced the gelation temperature of hydrogel while it decreased the gel strength and mucoadhesive force. Conclusion: It is suggested that in situ hydrogels may be suitable candidates for rectal delivery.

Physiological and Pharmaceutical Considerations for Rectal Drug Formulations

Although the oral route is the most convenient route for drug administration, there are a number of circumstances where this is not possible from either a clinical or pharmaceutical perspective. In these cases, the rectal route may represent a practical alternative and can be used to administer drugs for both local and systemic actions. The environment in the rectum is considered relatively constant and stable and has low enzymatic activity in comparison to other sections of the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, drugs can partially bypass the liver following systemic absorption, which reduces the hepatic first-pass effect. Therefore, rectal drug delivery can provide significant local and systemic levels for various drugs, despite the relatively small surface area of the rectal mucosa. Further development and optimization of rectal drug formulations have led to improvements in drug bioavailability, formulation retention, and drug release kinetics. However, despite the pharmaceutical advances in rectal drug delivery, very few of them have translated to the clinical phase. This review will address the physiological and pharmaceutical considerations influencing rectal drug delivery as well as the conventional and novel drug delivery approaches. The translational challenges and development aspects of novel formulations will also be discussed.

Rectal route in the 21st Century to treat children

The rectal route can be considered a good alternative to the oral route for the paediatric population because these dosage forms are neither to be swallowed nor need to be taste-masked. Rectal forms can also be administered in an emergency to unconscious or vomiting children. Their manufacturing cost is low with excipients generally regarded as safe. Some new formulation strategies, including mucoadhesive gels and suppositories, were introduced to increase patient acceptability. Even if recent paediatric clinical studies have demonstrated the equivalence of the rectal route with others, in order to enable the use of this promising route for the treatment of children in the 21st Century, some effort should be focused on informing and educating parents and care givers. This review is the first ever to address all the aforementioned items, and to list all drugs used in paediatric rectal forms in literature and marketed products in developed countries.

Screening paediatric rectal forms of azithromycin as an alternative to oral or injectable treatment

The aim of this study was to identify a candidate formulation for further development of a home or near-home administrable paediatric rectal form of a broad-spectrum antibiotic - specially intended for (emergency) use in tropical rural settings, in particular for children who cannot take medications orally and far from health facilities where injectable treatments can be given. Azithromycin, a broad-spectrum macrolide used orally or intravenously for the treatment of respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue infections, was selected because of its pharmacokinetic and therapeutic properties. Azithromycin in vitro solubility and stability in physiologically relevant conditions were studied. Various pharmaceutical forms, i.e. rectal suspension, two different rectal gels, polyethylene glycol (PEG) suppository and hard gelatin capsule (HGC) were assessed for in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioavailability in the rabbit. Azithromycin PEG suppository appears to be a promising candidate.

Rectal pH in well and unwell infants

Prompt antibiotic treatment for infants with sepsis has the potential to save lives. A rectal formulation of an antibiotic could be used at a village level before referral to hospital. The development of such a preparation needs to take into account the rectal pH of infants that will affect drug partitioning and absorption. Rectal pH measurements were taken in 100 well and 45 unwell infants. We also measured rectal pH in 14 infants sequentially over the course of their illness. The mean rectal pH was 6.75 with no significant difference in well or unwell infants. The mean (95% CI) rectal pH of well neonates was significantly lower than that of older infants (>28 days): 6.47 (6.29-6.65) vs. 6.90 (6.68 to 7.12) p = 0.003.

Pharmacokinetics of rectal paracetamol after repeated dosing in children

Twenty-three children (aged between 9 weeks and 11 yr) were given paracetamol suppositories 25 mg kg-1 every 6 h (maximum 5 days) after major surgery and serum and saliva concentrations were measured. There was a good correlation (r = 0.91, P < 0.05) between saliva and serum concentrations. A one-compartment linear model with first-order elimination and absorption and lag-time was fitted to the data (ADAPT II). At steady state, the mean (SD) concentration was 15.2 (6.8) mg litre-1. Mean (SD) time to reach 90% of the steady state concentration was 11.4 (8.6) h. Body weight, age and body surface area were well correlated (P < 0.05) with clearance and apparent volume of distribution. There was no evidence of accumulation leading to supratherapeutic concentrations during this dosing schedule for a mean of approximately 2-3 days.

Alternative routes of drug administration--advantages and disadvantages (subject review). American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Drugs

During the past 20 years, advances in drug formulations and innovative routes of administration have been made. Our understanding of drug transport across tissues has increased. These changes have often resulted in improved patient adherence to the therapeutic regimen and pharmacologic response. The administration of drugs by transdermal or transmucosal routes offers the advantage of being relatively painless.12 Also, the potential for greater flexibility in a variety of clinical situations exists, often precluding the need to establish intravenous access, which is a particular benefit for children.

This statement focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of alternative routes of drug administration. Issues of particular importance in the care of pediatric patients, especially factors that could lead to drug-related toxicity or adverse responses, are emphasized.

Premedication for ambulatory surgery in preschool children: a comparison of oral midazolam and rectal thiopentone

Seventy five ASA 1 and 2 children, aged between six months and five years were randomized to receive oral midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1, rectal thiopentone 35 mg.kg-1 or no premedication to compare the safety and efficacy of, and parental attitudes to, both premedicants. Cardio-respiratory variables were from the time of premedication to awakening from anaesthesia. In addition, anxiety and sedation scores and patients' acceptance of both premedicant and mask at induction, were all recorded using four-point rating scales. Times to recovery and discharge, and parental satisfaction with the premedication their child had received were also recorded. Children receiving rectal thiopentone had higher sedation scores and were more accepting of the mask than were the other two groups (P < 0.001). Their acceptance of the premedication was similar to that of the midazolam group. Times to spontaneous eye opening and discharge were longer in the thiopentone group (P < 0.005). Parental preoperative satisfaction rating was higher for thiopentone, but not midazolam, than no premedication (P < 0.05). When asked their premedication preferences for subsequent general anaesthetics, a higher proportion of parents whose children were not premedicated requested an alternative regimen (P < 0.01). In conclusion the study found that premedication with rectal thiopentone provided superior induction characteristics to oral midazolam, but with a longer recovery period.

Efficacy of rectal midazolam for the sedation of preschool children undergoing laceration repair

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of rectal midazolam as sedation for laceration repair in preschool children in the pediatric emergency department.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-four anxious children aged 14 to 51 months with face or scalp lacerations 3 cm or less in length requiring two or more sutures and behavior scores of 3 or more.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects received 0.45 mg/kg rectal midazolam or saline placebo rectally followed by a topical anesthetic 15 minutes before repair.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients received rectal midazolam, and 18 received placebo. The groups were similar in age, race, gender, laceration length and location, entry behavior score, and entry anxiety score. Ten patients in the rectal midazolam group and 1 in the placebo group achieved adequate sedation (P < .001). Median behavior scores during suturing were more favorable in the rectal midazolam group (P = .003 and P = .08, respectively). Two patients in the rectal midazolam group experienced inconsolable agitation after the repair. None of the patients suffered cardiopulmonary complications.

CONCLUSION

Rectal midazolam is an effective method of sedation for facilitating uncomplicated laceration repair in preschool children. However, physicians must be aware of the possibility of paradoxical reactions when using midazolam in children.