1
|
Gershuny V, Florian J, van der Schrier R, Davis MC, Salcedo P, Wang C, Burkhart K, Prentice K, Shah A, Racz R, Patel V, Matta M, Ismaiel O, Boughner R, Ford KA, Rouse R, Stone M, Sanabria C, Dahan A, Strauss DG. Effect of midazolam co-administered with oxycodone on ventilation: a randomised clinical trial in healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2025:S0007-0912(25)00008-X. [PMID: 39986981 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2024] [Revised: 10/24/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benzodiazepines can exacerbate opioid-induced respiratory depression by furthering the decrease in central respiratory drive and causing loss of upper airway patency potentially leading to airway obstruction. This study aimed to determine if co-administration of benzodiazepines and opioids significantly decreases hypercapnic ventilation compared with opioids alone. METHODS We conducted a randomised, double-blind, four-period crossover trial in 20 healthy participants to assess whether i.v. midazolam (0.0375 mg kg-1 in the first five participants; 0.075 mg kg-1 in 15 participants) plus oral oxycodone (10 mg), compared with oxycodone alone, decreases minute ventilation at an end-tidal carbon dioxide (Pco2) of 7.3 kPa using modified Read rebreathing methodology. RESULTS Midazolam administered with oxycodone, compared with oxycodone alone, did not significantly decrease minute ventilation at an end-tidal Pco2 of 7.3 kPa (23.5 vs 25.2 L min-1; mean difference -1.7 L min-1, one-sided 95% confidence interval -∞ to 1.6; P=0.21). However, midazolam plus oxycodone increased resting end-tidal Pco2 compared with oxycodone alone (5.8 vs 5.6 kPa; mean difference 0.2 kPa, 95% confidence interval 0.0-0.4). Nine of 15 (60%) participants fell asleep or snored on midazolam plus oxycodone, compared with 0 of 15 (0%) on oxycodone alone. CONCLUSIONS Midazolam co-administered with oxycodone did not decrease hypercapnic ventilation, compared with oxycodone alone, but did affect tidal volume, ventilatory frequency, and resting end-tidal Pco2. These findings support the hypothesis that benzodiazepines influence ventilation by inducing relaxation of the respiratory muscles and highlight the need for additional investigations to elucidate the potential for upper airway obstruction when benzodiazepines and opioids are co-administered. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04310579.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Gershuny
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Jeffry Florian
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Michael C Davis
- Division of Psychiatry, Office of Neuroscience, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Pablo Salcedo
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Celine Wang
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Keith Burkhart
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Kristin Prentice
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA; Booz Allen Hamilton, McLean, VA, USA
| | - Aanchal Shah
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA; Booz Allen Hamilton, McLean, VA, USA
| | - Rebecca Racz
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Vikram Patel
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Murali Matta
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Omnia Ismaiel
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Kevin A Ford
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Rodney Rouse
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Marc Stone
- Division of Psychiatry, Office of Neuroscience, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Albert Dahan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - David G Strauss
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Masneuf S, Buetler J, Koester C, Crestani F. Role of α1- and α2-GABA(A) receptors in mediating the respiratory changes associated with benzodiazepine sedation. Br J Pharmacol 2012; 166:339-48. [PMID: 22044283 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01763.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The molecular substrates underlying the respiratory changes associated with benzodiazepine sedation are unknown. We examined the effects of different doses of diazepam and alprazolam on resting breathing in wild-type (WT) mice and clarified the contribution of α1- and α2-GABA(A) receptors, which mediate the sedative and muscle relaxant action of diazepam, respectively, to these drug effects using point-mutated mice possessing either α1H101R- or α2H101R-GABA(A) receptors insensitive to benzodiazepine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Room air breathing was monitored using whole-body plethysmography. Different groups of WT mice were injected i.p. with diazepam (1-100 mg·kg(-1) ), alprazolam (0.3, 1 or 3 mg·kg(-1) ) or vehicle. α1H101R and α2H101R mice received 1 or 10 mg·kg(-1) diazepam or 0.3 or 3 mg·kg(-1) alprazolam. Respiratory frequency, tidal volume, time of expiration and time of inspiration before and 20 min after drug injection were analysed. KEY RESULTS Diazepam (10 mg·kg(-1) ) decreased the time of expiration, thereby increasing the resting respiratory frequency, in WT and α2H101R mice, but not in α1H101R mice. The time of inspiration was shortened in WT and α1H101R mice, but not in α2H101R mice. Alprazolam (1-3 mg·kg(-1) ) stimulated the respiratory frequency by shortening expiration and inspiration duration in WT mice. This tachypnoeic effect was partially conserved in α1H101R mice while absent in α2H101R mice. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS These results identify a specific role for α1-GABA(A) receptors and α2-GABA(A) receptors in mediating the shortening by benzodiazepines of the expiratory and inspiratory phase of resting breathing respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Masneuf
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Frei FJ, Hammer J, Schibler A, Doerig R, Erb TO. Impact of depth of propofol anaesthesia on functional residual capacity and ventilation distribution in healthy preschool children. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:503-8. [PMID: 17327254 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Propofol is commonly used in children undergoing diagnostic interventions under anaesthesia or deep sedation. Because hypoxaemia is the most common cause of critical deterioration during anaesthesia and sedation, improved understanding of the effects of anaesthetics on pulmonary function is essential. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different levels of propofol anaesthesia on functional residual capacity (FRC) and ventilation distribution. METHODS In 20 children without cardiopulmonary disease mean age (SD) 49.75 (13.3) months and mean weight (SD) 17.5 (3.9) kg, anaesthesia was induced by a bolus of i.v. propofol 2 mg kg(-1) followed by an infusion of propofol 120 microg kg(-1) min(-1) (level I). Then, a bolus of propofol 1 mg kg(-1) was given followed by a propofol infusion at 240 microg kg(-1) min(-1) (level II). FRC and lung clearance index (LCI) were calculated at each level of anaesthesia using multibreath analysis. RESULTS The FRC mean (SD) decreased from 20.7 (3.3) ml kg(-1) at anaesthesia level I to 17.7 (3.9) ml kg(-1) at level II (P < 0.0001). At the same time, mean (SD) LCI increased from 10.4 (1.1) to 11.9 (2.2) (P = 0.0038), whereas bispectral index score values decreased from mean (SD) 57.5 (7.2) to 35.5 (5.9) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Propofol elicited a deeper level of anaesthesia that led to a significant decrease of the FRC whereas at the same time the LCI, an index for ventilation distribution, increased indicating an increased vulnerability to hypoxaemia.
Collapse
|