Propofol-induced neuroexcitation and receptor desensitization

Remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia: the current state of affairs

Remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH) is a part of a general opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) syndrome, seemingly resulting from abrupt cessation of continuous remifentanil infusion at rates equal or exceeding 0.3 mcg/kg/min. The intricate mechanisms of its development are still not completely understood. However, hyperactivation of the N -methyl d -aspartate receptor system, descending spinal facilitation and increased concentration of dynorphin (a κ-opioid ligand) are commonly proposed as possible mechanisms. Several ways of prevention and management have been suggested, such as slow withdrawal of remifentanil infusion, the addition of propofol, pretreatment with or concomitant administration of ketamine, buprenorphine, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (NSAIDs), methadone, dexmedetomidine. In clinical and animal studies, these strategies exhibited varying success, and many are still being investigated.

Anesthetic action on the transmission delay between cortex and thalamus explains the beta-buzz observed under propofol anesthesia

In recent years, more and more surgeries under general anesthesia have been performed with the assistance of electroencephalogram (EEG) monitors. An increase in anesthetic concentration leads to characteristic changes in the power spectra of the EEG. Although tracking the anesthetic-induced changes in EEG rhythms can be employed to estimate the depth of anesthesia, their precise underlying mechanisms are still unknown. A prominent feature in the EEG of some patients is the emergence of a strong power peak in the β-frequency band, which moves to the α-frequency band while increasing the anesthetic concentration. This feature is called the beta-buzz. In the present study, we use a thalamo-cortical neural population feedback model to reproduce observed characteristic features in frontal EEG power obtained experimentally during propofol general anesthesia, such as this beta-buzz. First, we find that the spectral power peak in the α- and δ-frequency ranges depend on the decay rate constant of excitatory and inhibitory synapses, but the anesthetic action on synapses does not explain the beta-buzz. Moreover, considering the action of propofol on the transmission delay between cortex and thalamus, the model reveals that the beta-buzz may result from a prolongation of the transmission delay by increasing propofol concentration. A corresponding relationship between transmission delay and anesthetic blood concentration is derived. Finally, an analytical stability study demonstrates that increasing propofol concentration moves the systems resting state towards its stability threshold.

Interactions of anesthetics with their targets: non-specific, specific or both?

What makes a general anesthetic a general anesthetic? We shall review first what general anesthesia is all about and which drugs are being used as anesthetics. There is neither a unique definition of general anesthesia nor any consensus on how to measure it. Diverse drugs and combinations of drugs generate general anesthetic states of sometimes very different clinical quality. Yet the principal drugs are still considered to belong to the same class of 'general anesthetics'. Effective concentrations of inhalation anesthetics are in the high micromolar range and above, and even for intravenous anesthetics they do not go below the micromolar range. At these concentrations, many molecular and higher level targets are affected by inhalation anesthetics, fewer probably by intravenous anesthetics. The only physicochemical characteristic shared by anesthetics is the correlation of their anesthetic potencies with hydrophobicity. These correlations depend on the group of general anesthetics considered. In this review, anesthetic potencies for many different targets are plotted against octanol/water partition coefficients as measure of hydrophobicity. Qualitatively, similar correlations result, suggesting several but weak interactions with proteins as being characteristic of anesthetic actions. The polar interactions involved are weak, being roughly equal in magnitude to hydrophobic interactions. Generally, intravenous anesthetics are noticeably more potent than inhalation anesthetics. They differ considerably more between each other in their interactions with various targets than inhalation anesthetics do, making it difficult to come to a decision which of these should be used in future studies as representative 'prototypical general anesthetics'.

Delayed onset refractory dystonic movements following propofol anesthesia

Neuroexcitation is an uncommon but well recognized side effect of propofol anesthesia and sedation. We present a patient who, despite an intact mental status and without any preexisting movement disorder, experienced delayed onset of involuntary dystonic movements involving head, neck and shoulder for 11 h following emergence from propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia.

Progress in clinical neurosciences: Status epilepticus: a critical review of management options

Although generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus (SE) is frequently seen, an evidence-based approach to management is limited by a lack of randomized clinical studies. Clinical practice, therefore, relies on a combination of expert recommendations, local hospital guidelines and dogma based on individual preference and past successes. This review explores selected and controversial aspects of SE in adults and provides a critical appraisal of currently recommended management strategies.

Dystonic reaction to propofol attenuated by benztropine (cogentin)

IMPLICATIONS

Neuroexcitatory movements associated with propofol anesthesia are well recognized. Here we report on the successful use of benztropine (2 mg) to abolish abnormal dystonic movements after propofol anesthesia. Forty-five case reports are reviewed, and a treatment strategy for abnormal movements during propofol anesthesia is provided.

Anesthesia for temporal lobe epilepsy surgery

Anesthetic considerations for temporal lobectomy for refractory epilepsy include ensuring a safe and comfortable perioperative experience for the patient, providing suitable operating conditions for the surgeon, avoiding interference with intraoperative electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings and facilitating intraoperative functional cortical mapping, if performed. Providing the conditions that simultaneously meet these requirements, using general anesthesia or local anesthesia with sedation, remains a significant challenge for the neuroanesthetist. We review issues pertinent to the choice of anesthetic technique for these procedures.

Awake craniotomy: controversies, indications and techniques in the surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy

In 1886, Victor Horsley excised an epileptogenic posttraumatic cortical scar in a 23-year-old man under general anaesthesia and discussed his choice of anaesthesia: "I have not employed ether in operations on man, fearing that it would tend to cause cerebral excitement; chloroform, of course, producing on the contrary, well-marked depression." His concerns regarding anaesthesia are reiterated 100 years later as evidenced by the ongoing controversy over the choice of anaesthetic in surgical procedures for epilepsy. The current controversies regarding the necessity for local anaesthesia in temporal lobe epilepsy operations concern the utility of electrocorticography in surgical decision making, its relationship to seizure outcome and the value of intraoperative language mapping in dominant temporal lobe resections. The increasing sophistication of pre-operative investigation and localization of both areas of epileptogenesis and normal brain function and the introduction of minimally invasive surgical techniques and smaller focal resections are changing the indications for local anaesthesia in temporal lobe epilepsy. Thus, indications which were previously absolute are now perhaps relative. This article reviews the current indications for craniotomy under local anaesthesia in the surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy.

Rats show unimpaired learning within minutes after recovery from single bolus propofol anesthesia

PURPOSE

To examine the learning ability of rats shortly after recovery from a bolus dose of propofol by assessing learning on a swim-to-platform task. Also, muscarinic blockade was used as a pharmacological test of whether learning shortly after propofol anesthesia resembles normal learning.

METHODS

Propofol anesthetized rats (15-20 mg x kg(-1) i.v.) were trained on a swim-to-platform task five to seven minutes after recovering from surgical anesthesia and tested two to three hours later In addition, the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine hydrobromide (5 mg x kg(-1) s.c.) was given to a subgroup of rats before testing. During 10 trials, the number of times a given rat took 10 sec or longer to locate and climb onto a visible platform was tabulated and counted as errors.

RESULTS

When trained shortly after recovery from the anesthetic, propofol anesthetized rats made 3.2 +/- 0.4 compared with 1.0 +/- 0.1 errors in controls (P < 0.0001). Two to three hours later both groups performed equally well. Rats trained after propofol anesthesia and given scopolamine before testing made 0.7 +/- 0.5 errors and performed as well as normal controls, 1.2 +/- 0.2 errors when subjected to the same procedures without propofol anesthesia, and better than scopolamine-treated untrained rats, 5.5 +/- 0.7 errors, (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Training five to seven minutes after recovery from propofol anesthesia resulted in normal retention of the swim- to-platform task. It also produced the same resistance to the disruptive effects of scopolamine as did training in rats that were not anesthetized. Thus, the ability to learn recovers rapidly after propofol anesthesia induced by a single intravenous bolus dose.