Midazolam for caudal analgesia in children: comparison with caudal bupivacaine

Effect of Combined Epidural Morphine and Midazolam on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare analgesic effect of combined epidural morphine-midazolam with either drug alone on postoperative pain in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients were allocated in prospective randomized double-blind study to receive epidural analgesia. Patients received 5 mg morphine in morphine (Mor) group, 5 mg midazolam in midazolam (Mid) group, 5 mg morphine + 5 mg midazolam in morphine-midazolam (MM) group, 0.25% bupivacaine was added to injected solution with same volume in all groups. All groups were compared with time of first analgesic request, total analgesic consumption, number of epidural doses, postoperative Visual Analog Scale score, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Time of first analgesic request was 4 to 8 hours in Mid versus 12 to 23 and 14 to 24 hours in Mor and MM groups, respectively, with significant difference between Mid versus Mor ( P <0.001), Mid versus MM ( P <0.001), and Mor versus MM groups ( P <0.031). Analgesic consumption was more in Mid than Mor and MM groups, with significant difference between Mid versus Mor ( P <0.008), Mid versus MM ( P <0.001), with no significant difference between Mor and MM groups ( P <0.6). The number of epidural doses in Mid was 1 to 3 versus 1 to 3, and 1 to 2 in Mor and MM groups, respectively, with significant difference between Mid versus Mor ( P <0.025), Mid versus MM ( P <0.004), with no significant difference between Mor and MM groups ( P =1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of midazolam to epidural morphine prolonged time of first analgesic request and decreased total analgesic consumption.

Strategies for the treatment of acute benzodiazepine toxicity in a clinical setting: the role of antidotes

INTRODUCTION

Although not a potentially life-threatening poisoning, benzodiazepine (BZD) intoxication may be life-threatening in special situations/populations or those with background diseases.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to evaluate all possible treatment options available in the literature for the management of benzodiazepine poisoning with special attention to antidote administration. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register from 1 January 1980 to 10 November 2021 using keywords 'benzodiazepine,' 'poisoning,' 'toxicity,' 'intoxication,' and 'treatment.'

EXPERT OPINION

Careful patient selection, ideally by a clinical toxicologist, may decrease the complications of flumazenil and add to its efficacy. The cost-to-benefit ratio should be considered in every single patient who is a candidate for flumazenil administration. In case a decision has been made to administer flumazenil, careful consideration of the possible contraindications is essential. We recommend slow administration of low doses of flumazenil (0.1 mg/minute) to avoid complications or withhold the administration with development of first signs of adverse effects. The main treatment of benzodiazepine toxicity is conservative with administration of activated charcoal, monitoring of the vital signs, prevention of aspiration and development of deep vein thrombosis due to prolonged immobilization, and respiratory support.

Comparison of adjuvant pharmaceuticals for caudal block in pediatric lower abdominal and urological surgeries: A network meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Caudal block helps relieve pain after sub-umbilical surgery in pediatric patients; however, the duration for which it exerts its analgesic effect is limited. The addition of certain adjuvant agents to local anesthetics (LAs) that are used to administer caudal block can prolong postoperative analgesia. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficiencies and side effects of caudal adjuvants in the settings of pediatric lower abdominal and urological surgeries.

DESIGN

A network meta-analysis (NMA).

PATIENTS

One hundred and twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 6800 pediatric patients were included in the final analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Different adjuvant agents, namely clonidine, dexamethasone, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, ketamine, magnesium, midazolam, morphine, neostigmine, and tramadol.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. The secondary outcomes included the requirement for additional analgesia, analgesic consumption, and postoperative complications. The effects and rankings were evaluated using NMA and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve scores, respectively.

RESULTS

Neostigmine, dexmedetomidine, and dexamethasone were found to be the three most effective adjuvants that prolong the duration of analgesia for caudal block, and these adjuvants extended this duration by 8.9 h (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-10.7), 7.3 h (95% CI, 6.0-8.6), and 5.9 h (95% CI, 4.0-7.7), respectively. Caudal neostigmine was associated with an increase in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, whereas dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone showed no postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA provided evidence and suggested that dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone may be the most beneficial adjuvant pharmaceutics adding to LAs for caudal block in children. However, given the off-label status of caudal dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone, further high-quality RCTs are still warranted, especially to determine whether delayed neurological complications will occur.

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Dexamethasone versus Tramadol in Combination with Ropivacaine in Caudal Anesthesia for Children Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Background:

Caudal anesthesia has emerged as a reliable and effective anesthetic technique in the pediatric age group. However, the limited duration of action of the local anesthetic drugs proves to one of the major hindrances in the complete utilization of caudal block as an effective analgesic technique. To overcome this shortcoming, adjuvant drugs were introduced into clinical practice.

Aim:

Our aim was to determine which of the two drugs – dexamethasone and tramadol – serves as a better adjuvant for caudal analgesia in pediatric patients.

Settings and Design:

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study that comprised 90 American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I and II pediatric patients posted for lower abdominal surgeries.

Materials and Methods:

Ninety ASA physical status I and II children aged 5–12 years posted for lower abdominal surgeries were chosen. They were randomly divided into three groups – Group R received 0.5 ml.kg⁻¹ of 0.2% ropivacaine plus 0.9% normal saline; Group T received 0.5 ml.kg⁻¹ of 0.2% ropivacaine plus 2 mg.kg⁻¹ tramadol; and Group D received 0.5 ml.kg⁻¹ of 0.2% ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg.kg⁻¹ dexamethasone. Postoperative pain was assessed using a modified objective pain score and time to first rescue analgesia (duration of sensory block) was recorded. Postoperative sedation and any other postoperative adverse effects were noted.

Statistical Analysis:

Student's independent t-test was employed for comparing continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. Kruskal–Wallis test was used for postoperative pain and sedation score data.

Results:

The duration of sensory block was significantly longer with dexamethasone than tramadol. No significant postoperative sedation or any other adverse effect was noted in any patient.

Conclusion:

Dexamethasone is superior to tramadol as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for pediatric lower abdominal surgeries.

A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery

Introduction

Caudal epidural block is a reliable technique in paediatric patients but associated with various complications especially with higher concentration of drugs. We proposed a comparative study between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentration (0.125%) with clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) taken as adjuvant. We aimed to see duration of post-operative analgesia, degree of motor blockade and other associated complications.

Materials and Methods

Eighty paediatric patients (1-6 years), American society of anaesthesiologists grade I and II, undergoing infra-umbilical surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups of 40 each. Group A patients were given caudal levobupivacaine (0.125%) and Group B patients were given caudal ropivacaine (0.125%). Clonidine (1 mcg/kg) was taken as adjuvant in both the groups. Post-operative pain, sedation and motor blockade were assessed at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours using Observational Pain Scale, modified Bromage Scale and four-point sedation score, respectively. Any other complications were also noted.

Results

Motor blockade was not associated with any of the patients. Duration of post-operative sedation was similar in both the groups. Duration of post-operative analgesia was significantly higher in Group A (p < 0.0001). Adverse effects and complications were negligible in both the groups.

Conclusion

Both levobupivacaine and ropivacaine can be used safely at low concentration (0.125%) taking clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) as adjuvant in paediatric caudal epidural block without significant motor blockade and other complications, duration of post-operative analgesia being significantly higher in the levobupivacaine group.

A Comparative Clinical Study between Clonidine and Tramadol with Bupivacaine in Caudal Epidural for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Surgery

Context

Adjuvants to bupivacaine for single shot caudal block in children.

Aims

This study entitled was conducted to compare the effects of addition of tramadol to bupivacaine over addition of clonidine to bupivacaine as a single shot caudal block in children.

Settings and Design

Sixty children of ASA grade I and II in the age group of 2-12 years coming for various infra-umbilical surgeries were included.

Materials and Methods

They were divided into two groups of 30 each. Group BC received caudal bupivacaine 0.25% 0.5ml/kg with clonidine 2 mcg/kg Group BT received caudal bupivacaine 0.25% 0.5 ml/kg with tramadol 2 mg/kg. The main parameters studied were hemodynamic changes, duration of post-operative analgesia and incidence of adverse effects.

Statistical Analysis Used

The results of continuous variables are given as mean ± SD and proportion as percentage. The difference between the two groups was assessed by student's - t test and chi-square test.

Results

The mean duration of post-operative analgesia in group BT was statistically significant (P <0.001), reducing the requirement of analgesics in group BT. There was no difference in sedation score, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that caudal administration of bupivacaine 0.25% 0.5 ml/kg with tramadol 2 mg/kg resulted in superior analgesia with longer duration of action and reduced requirement of analgesics in first 24 hours postoperatively when compared with 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml/kg with clonidine 2 mcg/kg.

Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends

Although beneficial in acute and chronic pain management, the use of local anaesthetics is limited by its duration of action and the dose dependent adverse effects on the cardiac and central nervous system. Adjuvants or additives are often used with local anaesthetics for its synergistic effect by prolonging the duration of sensory-motor block and limiting the cumulative dose requirement of local anaesthetics. The armamentarium of local anesthetic adjuvants have evolved over time from classical opioids to a wide array of drugs spanning several groups and varying mechanisms of action. A large array of opioids ranging from morphine, fentanyl and sufentanyl to hydromorphone, buprenorphine and tramadol has been used with varying success. However, their use has been limited by their adverse effect like respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and pruritus, especially with its neuraxial use. Epinephrine potentiates the local anesthetics by its antinociceptive properties mediated by alpha-2 adrenoreceptor activation along with its vasoconstrictive properties limiting the systemic absorption of local anesthetics. Alpha 2 adrenoreceptor antagonists like clonidine and dexmedetomidine are one of the most widely used class of local anesthetic adjuvants. Other drugs like steroids (dexamethasone), anti-inflammatory agents (parecoxib and lornoxicam), midazolam, ketamine, magnesium sulfate and neostigmine have also been used with mixed success. The concern regarding the safety profile of these adjuvants is due to its potential neurotoxicity and neurological complications which necessitate further research in this direction. Current research is directed towards a search for agents and techniques which would prolong local anaesthetic action without its deleterious effects. This includes novel approaches like use of charged molecules to produce local anaesthetic action (tonicaine and n butyl tetracaine), new age delivery mechanisms for prolonged bioavailability (liposomal, microspheres and cyclodextrin systems) and further studies with other drugs (adenosine, neuromuscular blockers, dextrans).

B. S, Pandarpurkar S, Jajee P. Intrathecal Midazolam as an Adjuvant in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertensive Patients Undergoing an Elective Caesarean Section: A Clinical Comparative Study

Background

A pain-free postoperative period is essential following a caesarean section so new mothers may care for and bond with their neonates. Intrathecal adjuvants are often administered during this procedure to provide significant analgesia, but they may also have bothersome side effects. Intrathecal midazolam produces effective postoperative analgesia with no significant side effects.

Objectives

This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of intrathecal midazolam vs. plain bupivacaine as an adjunct to bupivacaine in pregnancy-induced hypertension patients scheduled for elective caesarean section.

Methods

Sixty patients diagnosed with pregnancy-induced hypertension on regular treatment who were scheduled for a caesarean section were randomly allocated into two groups: a control group (Group BC, n = 30) and a midazolam group (Group BM, n = 30). Both groups received 10 mg (2 mL) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Group BC received 0.4 mL of distilled water, while group BM received 0.4 mL (2 mg) of midazolam intrathecally. The duration of postoperative analgesia, analgesic requirements during the first 24 hours after surgery, onset times and durations of sensory and motor blocks, incidence of hypotension, vasopressor requirements, and side effects were recorded.

Results

Postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in the midazolam group compared to the control group (201.5 minutes vs. 357.6 minutes). The mean onset times of the sensory and motor blocks were significantly faster (P < 0.01) in the midazolam group compared to the control group. The mean times to attain the maximum sensory level and motor blocks were also significantly faster in the midazolam group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypotension was 6.6% in the midazolam group and 36.6% in the control group, which was highly significant. In addition, the number of patients with side effects was significantly lower in the midazolam group compared to the control group.

Conclusions

Intrathecal midazolam 2 mg provides significantly longer and effective postoperative analgesia with no side effects.

A comparison of ropivacaine, ropivacaine with tramadol and ropivacaine with midazolam for post-operative caudal epidural analgesia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Caudal epidural analgesia is the most commonly used method of post-operative analgesia in children undergoing subumbilical surgeries. Many additive drugs have been used to prolong the post-operative analgesia. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of tramadol or midazolam addition to caudal ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing subumbilical surgeries.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomised, double-blinded comparative study, sixty children of either gender, in the age group of 1-5 years and scheduled for elective subumbilical surgeries were randomly divided into three groups of twenty each. Children in Group R received an epidural injection of 1 mL/kg of 0.2% plain ropivacaine whereas children in Group RT received an epidural injection of 2 mg/kg of tramadol plus 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine and Group RM received an epidural injection of 50 μg/kg midazolam plus 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine. The primary outcome variable was the duration of time to rescue analgesia. The secondary outcome variables were motor block, sedation score and urinary retention. Statistical comparison among the three groups was performed using one-way ANOVA with post hoc analysis using Bonferroni. For qualitative variables, Chi-square test was used. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean duration of time to rescue analgesia was significantly longer (P < 0.001) in Group RT (913 ± 315.5 min) and Group RM (769.2 ± 331.9 min) compared to Group R (437.75 ± 75.68 min). However, there was no significant difference in the duration of time to rescue analgesia between RT and RM groups. Motor block and sedation scores were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of tramadol or midazolam to caudal epidural ropivacaine prolongs the duration of analgesia without causing significant side effects.

The efficacy of different doses of Midazolam added to Lidocaine for upper extremity Bier block on the sensory and motor block characteristics and postoperative pain

Objective:

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of different doses of midazolam on anesthesia and analgesia quality when added to lidocaine during the intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA).

Methods:

One hundred and forty patients underwent hand surgery were randomly allocated into four groups to receive 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the control Group L-C (n = 35), 30 μg/kg midazolam plus 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the midazolam Group L-M₁ (n = 35), 40 μg/kg midazolam plus 3 mg/kg 2% lidocaine diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the midazolam Group L-M₂ (n = 35), and 50 μg/kg midazolam plus 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the midazolam Group L-M₃ (n = 35). Sensory and motor block and recovery times, tourniquet pain, intra-operative analgesic requirement, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded.

Findings:

Onset time of sensory and motor block in L-M₃ Group was shorter than the L-M₂ and L-M₁ and L-C Groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, prolonged sensory (P = 0.005) and motor recovery time (P = 0.001) in L-M₃ were longer than the other groups. Intra-operative VAS score and intra-operative fentanyl consumption in L-M₃ were lower than the other groups (P < 0.001). The numbers of patients needed to pethidine in Group L-M₃ were significantly less compared with the other groups (P = 0.035). VAS scores were significantly lower in Group L-M₃ in different time intervals in the postoperative period compared with the other groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Addition of 50 μg/kg midazolam for IVRA (Group L-M₃) enhanced intra-operative analgesia and improved anesthesia quality better than other groups receiving lower midazolam doses as well as a control group.

The effectiveness of pudendal nerve block versus caudal block anesthesia for hypospadias in children

BACKGROUND

Caudal block (CB) has some disadvantages, one of which is its short duration of action after a single injection. For hypospadias repair, pudendal nerve block (PNB) might be a suitable alternative since it has been successfully used for analgesia for circumcision. We evaluated PNB compared with CB as measured by total analgesic consumption 24 hours postoperatively.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blinded study, patients were randomized into 2 groups, either receiving CB or nerve stimulator-guided PNB. In the PNB group, patients were injected with 0.3 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 µg/kg clonidine. In the CB group, patients were injected with 1 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 µg/kg clonidine. Analgesic consumption was assessed during the first 24 hours postoperatively. The "objective pain scale" developed by Hannalah and Broadman was used to assess postoperative pain.

RESULTS

Eighty patients participated in the study, 40 in each group. The mean age in the PNB group was 3.1 (1.1) years and in the CB group was 3.2 (1.1) years. The mean weights in the PNB and CB groups were 15.3 (2.8) kg and 15.3 (2.2) kg, respectively. The percentage of patients who received analgesics during the first 24 hours were significantly higher in the CB (70%) compared with the PNB group (20%, P < 0.0001). The average amount of analgesics consumed per patient within 24 hours postoperatively was higher in the CB group (paracetamol P < 0.0001, Tramal P =0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received PNB had reduced analgesic consumption and pain within the first 24 hours postoperatively compared with CB.

Neuraxial analgesia in neonates and infants: a review of clinical and preclinical strategies for the development of safety and efficacy data

Neuraxial drugs provide robust pain control, have the potential to improve outcomes, and are an important component of the perioperative care of children. Opioids or clonidine improves analgesia when added to perioperative epidural infusions; analgesia is significantly prolonged by the addition of clonidine, ketamine, neostigmine, or tramadol to single-shot caudal injections of local anesthetic; and neonatal intrathecal anesthesia/analgesia is increasing in some centers. However, it is difficult to determine the relative risk-benefit of different techniques and drugs without detailed and sensitive data related to analgesia requirements, side effects, and follow-up. Current data related to benefits and complications in neonates and infants are summarized, but variability in current neuraxial drug use reflects the relative lack of high-quality evidence. Recent preclinical reports of adverse effects of general anesthetics on the developing brain have increased awareness of the potential benefit of neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia to avoid or reduce general anesthetic dose requirements. However, the developing spinal cord is also vulnerable to drug-related toxicity, and although there are well-established preclinical models and criteria for assessing spinal cord toxicity in adult animals, until recently there had been no systematic evaluation during early life. Therefore, in the second half of this review, we present preclinical data evaluating age-dependent changes in the pharmacodynamic response to different spinal analgesics, and recent studies evaluating spinal toxicity in specific developmental models. Finally, we advocate use of neuraxial drugs with the widest demonstrable safety margin and suggest minimum standards for preclinical evaluation before adoption of new analgesics or preparations into routine clinical practice.

Intrathecal midazolam as supplementary analgesia for chronic lumbar pain--15 years' experience

BACKGROUND

The antinociceptive effect of intrathecal midazolam is based on its affecting spinal gamma-amino butyric acid receptors.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain and failed back surgery syndrome after a single-shot intrathecal administration of midazolam.

DESIGN

A prospective, open-label study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The analgesic effect was determined using a patient questionnaire during subsequent visits to the pain therapy service. We classified at least a 50% pain reduction with improved quality of life and improved functional condition as a positive outcome.

RESULTS

Between 1995 and 2010, we performed 500 administrations: 227 administrations in 57 male patients and 273 administrations in 69 female patients. We performed 81 administrations for chronic low back pain and 419 administrations for failed back surgery syndrome. The average age of our patients was 50 years (range 28 to 86). The dose administered ranged from 2 to 5 mg of midazolam. The analgesic effect lasted 9.7 weeks on average, ranging from 1 week to 3 years; the most common reported duration was between 4 and 12 weeks (3 months). In 65% of patients, we achieved pain relief lasting 4 weeks or longer; in 13%, the administration provided no analgesic effect at all. The incidence of side effects (drowsiness, nausea, headache, or transient worsening of complaints) was rather low.

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal midazolam is a useful supplement to standard analgesic therapy with opioids, non-opioids, or spinal steroids.

Preemptive analgesic effects of midazolam and diclofenac in rat model

The aim of the present study was to investigate the preemptive analgesic effects of intraperitoneally administrated midazolam and diclofenac, before acute and inflammatory induced pain in rat model. One hundred twenty-eight (n=8 in each group) male Sprague Dawley rats were included in the study. Paw movements in response to thermal stimulation or paw flinching in response to formalin injection were compared after midazolam (0.1, 1, 5 and 10 mg/kg) and diclofenac (10 mg/kg), intraperitoneal administration. Saline was used as a control. Preemptive analgesic effect was significant in both tests when diclofenac and midazolam was administrated before the pain stimuli (p<0.01 and p<0.001). Intraperitoneal injection of midazolam in doses 5 and 10 mg/kg, increase the response time in hot plate test and decrease the number of flinches in formalin test (p<0.01 vs. p<0.001). ED50 of midazolam (with diclofenac) in hot plate test was 2.02 mg/kg (CI95% =-3.47-5.03 mg); and, 0.9 mg/kg (CI95% =-0.87-4.09 mg) in phase I and 0.7 mg/kg (CI95% = 0.48-6.63 mg) in phase II, in formalin test.Intraperitoneally administered midazolam and diclofenac had preemptive analgesic effects on acute thermal, and inflammatory induced pain in rats.

Efficacy of bupivacaine-neostigmine and bupivacaine-tramadol in caudal block in pediatric inguinal herniorrhaphy

BACKGROUND

Limited duration of analgesia is among the limitations of single caudal injection with local anesthetics. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bupivacaine in combination with either neostigmine or tramadol for caudal block in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy.

METHODS

In a double-blinded randomized trial, sixty children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy were enrolled to receive a caudal block with either 0.25% bupivacaine (1 ml x kg(-1)) with neostigmine (2 microg x kg(-1)) (group BN) or tramadol (1 mg x kg(-1)) (group BT). Hemodynamic variables, pain and sedation scores, additional analgesic requirements, and side effects were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Duration of analgesia was longer in group BT (17.30 +/- 8.24 h) compared with group BN (13.98 +/- 10.03 h) (P = 0.03). Total consumption of rescue analgesic was significantly lower in group BT compared with group BN (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation between groups. Adverse effects excluding the vomiting were not observed in any patients.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, tramadol (1 mg x kg(-1)) compared with neostigmine (2 microg x kg(-1)) might provide both prolonged duration of analgesia and extended time to first analgesic in caudal block.

Pharmacologic management of acute pediatric pain

The accurate assessment and effective treatment of acute pain in children in the hospital setting is a high priority. During the past 2 to 3 decades, pediatric pain management has gained tremendous knowledge with respect to the understanding of developmental neurobiology, developmental pharmacology the use of analgesics in children, the use of regional techniques in children, and of the psychological needs of children in pain. A wide range of medications is available to treat a variety of pain types. This article provides an overview of the most common analgesic medications and techniques used to treat acute pain in children.

Two different doses of caudal neostigmine co-administered with levobupivacaine produces analgesia in children

SUMMARY BACKGROUND

This study was aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy duration of analgesia, and side effects of two different doses of caudal neostigmine used with levobupivacaine in children.

METHODS

Sixty boys, between 5 months and 5 years, undergoing genitourinary surgery were allocated randomly to one of three groups (n =20 each). Group I patients received caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine (1 ml.kg(-1)) alone. Groups II and III patients received neostigmine (2 and 4 microg.kg(-1) respectively) together with levobupivacaine used in the same does as Group I. Pain scores were assessed using Children's and Infant's Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) at 15th (t(1)) min after arrival to postanesthetic care unit, and 1st (t(2)), 2nd (t(3)), 3rd (t(4)), 4th (t(5)), 8th (t(6)), 16th (t(7)), and 24th (t(8)) hour postoperatively. Duration of analgesia, amount of additional analgesic (paracetamol), score of motor blockade and complications were recorded for 24 h postoperatively, and compared between groups.

RESULTS

CHIPPS scores were higher during t(2), t(3), t(6), t(7), and t(8) periods, duration of analgesia was shorter, and total analgesic consumption was higher in Group I compare to neostigmine groups (P < 0.05). Duration of postoperative analgesia and total analgesic consumption were similar in Groups II and III (P > 0.05). Adverse effects were not different between three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Caudal neostigmine in doses of 2 and 4 microg.kg(-1) with levobupivacaine extends the duration of analgesia without increasing the incidence of adverse effects, and 2 microg.kg(-1) seems to be the optimal dose, as higher dose has no further advantages.

Comparison of caudal epidural bupivacaine with bupivacaine plus tramadol and bupivacaine plus ketamine for postoperative analgesia in children

This study compared the effect of single-dose caudal epidural bupivacaine, bupivacaine plus ketamine and bupivacaine plus tramadol for postoperative pain management in children having surgery for inguinal hernia. Following ethics committee approval and informed parental consent, 75 children ASA PS I and II, between three and nine years of age and scheduled for elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair with general anaesthesia were recruited. The patients were randomly divided into three groups to receive 0.5 ml/kg caudal bupivacaine 0.25% (group B), bupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 1 mg/kg (group BT) or bupivacaine 0.25% plus ketamine 0.5 mg/kg (group BK). The injections were performed under general anaesthesia. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry, respiratory rate and sedation and pain scores were recorded at defined intervals following recovery from anaesthesia. The groups were similar in age, weight and duration of operation (P >0.05). No patient experienced hypotension, bradycardia or respiratory depression. Duration of analgesia was (mean+/-SD) 6.5+/-4.1 h in group B, 9.2+/-3.9 h in group BK, and 8.5+/-3.1 h in group BT (P <0.05). More patients in group B required supplementary analgesics in the first 24 h (P <0.05). Sedation scores were comparable in all groups. Incidence of emesis and pruritus was similar in all the groups. Caudally administered 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% plus ketamine or bupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 1 mg/kg provided significantly longer duration of analgesia without an increase in the adverse effects when compared to bupivacaine alone.

Improved postoperative analgesia with coadministration of preoperative epidural ketamine and midazolam

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess postoperative pain regulation and pharmacokinetic effects of preoperative administration of ketamine and midazolam.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized clinical study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

46 ASA physical status I and II patients (age, 26-58 yrs), scheduled for gastrectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: a preoperative epidural injection of 10 mL (1) ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) solution (Ket group); (2) ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) plus midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) solution (KM group); or (3) normal saline solution (Ctr group).

MEASUREMENTS

Analgesic effects were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at rest, time to first request for analgesic (TFA), and morphine consumption during the initial postoperative time of 48 hours. Plasma concentration of ketamine in the Ket group and the KM group was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the elimination half-life of ketamine was calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Compared with the Ctr group, the Ket and KM groups had lower VAS pain scores, longer TFA, and lower morphine consumption. The KM group had the longest TFA and the lowest morphine consumption of the three groups. The KM group also had higher plasma concentrations of ketamine 90 to 240 minutes after injection, and a longer elimination half-life of ketamine, than did the Ket group.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative epidural coadministration of a low dose of ketamine with midazolam is more effective in relieving postoperative pain than using ketamine alone. In addition, epidural midazolam prolongs the elimination of ketamine.

Caudal Additives in Pediatrics: A Comparison Among Midazolam, Ketamine, and Neostigmine Coadministered with Bupivacaine

Single-shot "kiddie caudal" with bupivacaine alone is losing popularity because of its duration of 4-8 h. In a prospective randomized double-blind clinical study, we assessed and compared the efficacy of ketamine, midazolam, and neostigmine coadministered with bupivacaine in a caudal epidural to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief. Eighty children (ASA status I) aged 5-10 yr undergoing unilateral inguinal herniotomy were allocated randomly in equal numbers (n = 20) into 4 groups to receive a caudal injection of 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) with or without ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), midazolam (50 microg/kg), and neostig-mine (2 microg/kg), after the induction of standardized general anesthesia without premedication. Monitoring for pain, sedation, postoperative nausea/vomiting, dizziness, and pruritus was performed by anesthesiologists blinded to the study allocation. The time to first analgesic administration (paracetamol syrup) was longer (P < 0.05) in the bupivacaine-neostigmine group and the bupivacaine-midazolam group than in the other groups. Undesirable effects, such as emesis, pruritus, and dizziness, were comparable in all groups. However, the incidence of hallucination was more frequent in the bupivacaine-ketamine group compared with the other groups. This study shows that single-shot caudal coadministration of bupivacaine-neostigmine and bupivacaine-midazolam was associated with an extended duration of postoperative pain relief.

The use of intrathecal midazolam in humans: a case study of process

Early preclinical work demonstrated the potential role of spinal benzodiazepine pharmacology in regulating spinal nociceptive transmission. We review this preclinical activity and the evolving implementation of intrathecal midazolam in humans for pain management. Important elements in this development for use in humans are issues pertinent to safety and the preclinical reports that have increased our understanding of intrathecal midazolam toxicity. We seek to emphasize the time course of these studies and how they merged to provide enabling data that drove the clinical implementation. In the case of midazolam, we point to the potential issues that arose when preclinical safety data were unreasonably ignored and how consideration of preclinical safety data can serve to facilitate drug development by demonstrating reasonable safety profiles that document the minimal degree of potential risk to the patient. Issues that are of continuing relevance to the use of intrathecal midazolam, including issues of formulation and kinetics, are considered.

IMPLICATIONS

The intrathecal use of midazolam has evolved over 20 years though a combination of preclinical and clinical investigations. We review the time course of this development to define critical elements that should be pursued in reducing the risk associated with the clinical use of a novel spinal drug.

Sedation with Midazolam Leads to Reduced Pain After Dental Surgery

Our principal objective in this study was to evaluate the potential pain reducing effect of i.v. midazolam in patients undergoing oral surgery. One-hundred-twenty-five patients with impacted mandibular third molars requiring removal under local anesthetic were randomized into 2 groups. The first group (n = 64) was administered i.v. midazolam by titration until a clinical end-point of conscious sedation followed by local anesthetic before surgery; the second group (n = 61) was the control and was administered only local anesthetic before surgery. The surgery was performed in a standardized manner in both groups by the same surgeon. Outcome measures were four primary end-points: pain intensity as assessed by a 100-mm visual analogue scale and a 4-point categorized scale hourly for 8 h, time to first analgesic, total analgesic (ibuprofen) consumption over the first 48 h, and a 5-point categorical patient global assessment scale (0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = very good, and 4 = excellent). Throughout the 8-h investigation period, patients in the midazolam group reported significantly lower pain intensity scores than those in the control group (19.0 +/- 13.2 mm versus 28.1 +/- 12.8 mm, P < 0.05). The patients in the midazolam group also reported significantly longer time to first analgesic (165.5 +/- 56.5 min versus 202.2 +/- 79.0 min, P < 0.05), less analgesic consumption (1275 +/- 364 mg versus 1688 +/- 407 mg, P < 0.001) and better patient global assessment (3.34 +/- 0.8 versus 2.4 +/- 0.9, P < 0.001). We conclude that systemically administered midazolam is effective in reducing postoperative pain after third molar surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

In this observer blinded study, we found that i.v. midazolam treatment (0.09 mg/kg) has a pain-reducing effect after third molar surgery, thus improving postoperative pain management.

Improvement in postoperative pain relief by the addition of midazolam to an intrathecal injection of buprenorphine and bupivacaine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intrathecal injections of the benzodiazepine midazolam have been reported to cause antinociception in animals and pain relief in human beings, including the potentiation of opioid analgesia. This study compared the efficacy of the addition of midazolam to a mixture of buprenorphine and bupivacaine used for spinal anaesthesia.

METHODS

The study was prospective, randomized, and observer blinded. It involved 60 patients (30 per group), ASA I and II, age 20-40 yr, undergoing minor and intermediate lower abdominal surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomized into two groups: the control group received a spinal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine (15 mg) plus buprenorphine (0.15 mg) and the experimental group received a spinal injection of the same two drugs and doses but supplemented with intrathecal midazolam (2 mg).

RESULTS

The duration of postoperative analgesia in the control group was 9.24 +/- 2.57 h (mean +/- SEM), and 21.33 +/- 12.69 h in the midazolam treated group (P < 0.001). Patients treated with intrathecal midazolam had better pain relief judged by visual analogue score on coughing (P = 0.0013) and a nursing mobility score (P < 0.0001). Adverse effects were minor and their incidence was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that intrathecal midazolam 2 mg improves the quality and duration of postoperative pain relief afforded by intrathecal buprenorphine and bupivacaine.

Caudal bupivacaine supplemented with caudal or intravenous clonidine in children undergoing hypospadias repair: a double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Clonidine is used increasingly in paediatric anaesthetic practice to prolong the duration of action of caudal block with a local anaesthetic agent. Which route of administration of clonidine is the most beneficial remains unknown. We compared the effects of caudal and i.v. clonidine on postoperative analgesia produced by caudal bupivacaine after hypospadias repair.

METHODS

Forty-six children (ASA I or II) aged 24-104 months received standardized premedication with midazolam, a general anaesthetic and a caudal block with bupivacaine 0.25%, 0.5 ml kg(-1). The children were randomized in a double-blind fashion to two groups: the i.v. group received clonidine 2 micro g kg(-1) i.v. and simultaneously the same volume of saline caudally. The caudal group received clonidine 2 micro g kg(-1) caudally and a similar volume of saline i.v. After surgery, all children received acetaminophen 20 mg kg(-1) rectally or orally 6-hourly and were given a patient-controlled or nurse-controlled analgesia (PCA/NCA) pump with i.v. morphine (bolus of 25 micro g kg(-1) and an 8-min lockout period with no background infusion). Monitoring of scores for pain, sedation, motor block, and postoperative nausea and vomiting was performed by nurses blinded to the study allocations. Time to first activation of the PCA/NCA pump and 0-24 h and 24-48 h morphine consumption were also recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-four children completed the study. Age, weight and duration of anaesthesia and surgery were similar in the two groups. The median (range) time to first activation of the PCA/NCA pump was similar in the two groups: 425 (150-1440) min in the i.v. group and 450 (130-1440) min in the caudal group. The number of children not requiring postoperative morphine was four and seven respectively. Morphine consumption during 0-24 h and 24-48 h was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The analgesic effect of clonidine 2 micro g kg(-1) as an adjunct to caudal block with bupivacaine 0.25%, 0.5 ml kg(-1) is similar whether administered i.v. or caudally.

Neuraxial blocks for anaesthesia and analgesia in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of regional techniques in paediatric anaesthesia has increased dramatically. Our aim is to produce a comprehensive review of the recent literature on neuraxial blockade in infants and children, focusing on three topics: choice of local anaesthetic and adjunct drugs, technical aspects and complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current literature shows a trend towards using the single isomers (levobupivacaine or ropivacaine) rather than racemic bupivacaine. In addition, opioids as adjuncts are being challenged by clonidine and ketamine, which have more benign side effects. The spread of radiopaque dye within the epidural space (which may mimic that of local anaesthetic solutions) appears to be highly variable, although distribution is related to the volume injected. Recent techniques (e.g. ultrasound or stimulating catheters) have been developed to accurately identify the position of epidural catheters. In contrast to adults, neuraxial blockade using local anaesthetic solutions is associated with stable cardiovascular variables, even in children with congenital heart disease. Although the incidence of complications associated with paediatric neuraxial blockade is low, the potential risks must always be considered.

SUMMARY

It is likely that the use of epidural ketamine or clonidine as adjuncts to local anaesthetics will grow. Alternatives, such as midazolam, may offer advantages in particular circumstances, although rigorous evaluation of the safety of these solutions when injected along the neuraxis and the development of formulations without preservatives are needed. The use of stimulating caudal catheters or ultrasound-guided techniques appears to offer promising options for the future to more accurately position catheters.

Biphasic action of midazolam on GABAA receptor-mediated responses in rat sacral dorsal commissural neurons

The effect of the benzodiazepine agonist midazolam on gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor-mediated currents was investigated in neurons acutely dissociated from the rat sacral dorsal commissural nucleus (SDCN) using the nystatin-perforated patch-recording configuration under voltage-clamp conditions. Midazolam displayed a biphasic effect on GABA responses. Low concentrations of midazolam (1nM-10 microM) reversibly potentiated GABA (3 microM)-activated Cl(-) currents (I(GABA)) in a bell-shaped manner, with the maximal facilitary effect at 0.1 microM; whereas at higher concentrations (above 10 microM), midazolam had an antagonistic effect on I(GABA). Our further study indicated that midazolam changed GABA(A) receptor affinity to GABA and the effects of midazolam on I(GABA) were voltage-independent. The benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, flumazenil, abolished the facilitary effect of low concentrations of midazolam rather than the antagonism of I(GABA) induced by high doses of midazolam. In addition, activation of protein kinase C prevented the inhibitory effect of midazolam at higher concentrations, but did not influence the effect of midazolam at low concentrations. These results indicate that midazolam interacts with another distinct site other than the central benzodiazepine receptors on GABA(A) receptors as an antagonist at higher concentrations in SDCN neurons.

Nonopioid additives to local anaesthetics for caudal blockade in children: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Caudal epidural injection with local anaesthetics is a popular regional technique used in infants and children. A disadvantage of caudal blockade is the relatively short duration of postoperative analgesia. Opioids have traditionally been added to increase the duration of analgesia but have been associated with unacceptable side-effects. A number of nonopioid additives have been suggested to increase the duration of analgesia.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized control trials comparing the use of local anaesthetic to local anaesthetic with nonopioid additives for caudal blockade in children. The increase in duration of analgesia and side-effects were compared.

RESULTS

The addition of clonidine to the local anaesthetic solution produces an increase in the duration of analgesia following caudal blockade in children (pooled weighted mean difference of 145 min with 95% confidence interval of 132-157 min). Side-effects include sedation and the potential for neonatal respiratory depression. Ketamine and midazolam further increase the duration of analgesia, however, the potential for neurotoxicity remains a concern.

CONCLUSION

The evidence examined shows an increased duration of analgesia with clonidine, ketamine and midazolam. However, we are not convinced that the routine use of these adjuvants in the setting of elective outpatient surgery shows improved patient outcome. It is unclear if the potential for neurotoxicity is outweighed by clinical benefits. Further testing, including large clinical trials, is required before recommending routine use of nonopioid additives for caudal blockade in children.

Comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine or midazolam-bupivacaine mixtures with plain bupivacaine for caudal anaesthesia in children

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intensity and effectiveness of 0.75 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% with the addition of fentanyl or midazolam for caudal block in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy.

METHODS

Seventy-five children were allocated randomly to three groups to receive a caudal block with either 0.25% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1 microg.kg(-1) (group BF) or with midazolam 50 microg.kg(-1) (group BM) or bupivacaine alone (group B) after induction of anaesthesia. Haemodynamic parameters, degree of pain, additional analgesic requirements and side-effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean systolic arterial pressure at 10, 20, 30 min after caudal block was higher in group B compared with groups BF and BM. Mean intraoperative heart rate was lower in group BF than the other groups. Adequate analgesia was obtained in all patients (100%) in group BF, 23 patients (92%) in group BM and 21 patients (84%) in group B (P > 0.05). The time to recovery to an Aldrete score of 10 was significantly shorter in group B than group BM (P < 0.05). Although not significant, it was also shorter in group B than group BF. There was no difference in additional analgesic requirements between the groups in the first 24 h. Sedation score was higher in the midazolam group at 60 and 90 min postoperatively than the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Caudal block with 0.75 ml.kg(-1) 0.25% bupivacaine and 50 microg.kg(-1) midazolam or 1 microg.kg(-1) fentanyl provides no further analgesic advantages to bupivacaine alone when administered immediately after induction of anaesthesia in children undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Caudal neostigmine, bupivacaine, and their combination for postoperative pain management after hypospadias surgery in children

In a randomized, double-blinded study, we examined the analgesic efficacy of caudal neostigmine, bupivacaine, or a mixture of both drugs in 60 children. After the induction of general anesthesia, children were allocated randomly into three groups (n = 20) to receive a caudal injection of either 0.25% bupivacaine 1 mL/kg, with or without neostigmine 2 micro g/kg, or neostigmine 2 micro g/kg in normal saline 1 mL/kg. Intraoperatively, children receiving caudal bupivacaine or a bupivacaine/neostigmine mixture maintained hemodynamic stability, required less inhaled anesthetics, and had a shorter recovery time compared with the caudal neostigmine alone. Postoperatively, the caudal bupivacaine/neostigmine mixture resulted in superior analgesia compared with the other two groups. Recovery to first rescue analgesic times were (mean +/- SD) 22.8 +/- 2.9 h, 8.1 +/- 5.9 h, and 5.2 +/- 2.1 h in the bupivacaine/neostigmine, bupivacaine, and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, the bupivacaine and neostigmine groups received more doses of paracetamol than the bupivacaine/neostigmine group to maintain adequate analgesia in the first 24 postoperative h. Postoperative vomiting occurred in 25%, 10%, and 30% in the caudal bupivacaine/neostigmine, bupivacaine, and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.01). We conclude that caudal neostigmine 2 micro g/kg provides postoperative analgesia comparable to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

Caudal neostigmine 2 micro g/kg provides postoperative analgesia comparable to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery. Co-administration of the two drugs is associated with extended postoperative analgesia and reduced need for supplementary analgesics.

Midazolam induces expression of c-Fos and EGR-1 by a non-GABAergic mechanism

Gene expression changes induced by general anesthetics have not been extensively examined. In this investigation, we treated rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells with IV anesthetics, and assessed expression of immediate early gene products, c-Fos and EGR-1, by immunoblot analysis. Thiopental, ketamine, propofol, and diazepam did not significantly change the expression level of c-Fos and EGR-1. In contrast, midazolam dose- and time-dependently induced expression of c-Fos and EGR-1, which was not affected by antagonists of the benzodiazepine receptors, flumazenil and PK11195. The midazolam-induced c-Fos and EGR-1 expression was abolished by PD98059, an inhibitor for mitogen- activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase, suggesting the involvement of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs). Immunoblot analysis demonstrated that midazolam induces phosphorylation and activation of ERKs. These results indicate that midazolam induces the expression of c-Fos and EGR-1, by activation of ERKs through a mechanism independent from gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors, in PC12 cells, and suggest the possibility that midazolam can induce long-term changes of neural functions by changing gene expression.

IMPLICATIONS

Gene expression changes induced by anesthetics in neuronal cells have not been noticed. We demonstrate that a large concentration of midazolam can induce expression of immediate early genes by a non-GABAergic mechanism in PC12 cells, suggesting that the administration of midazolam might lead to long-term changes of neural functions by changing gene expression.

The effects of benzodiazepines on human opioid receptor binding and function

We performed in vitro studies to investigate the potential interaction of benzodiazepines with cloned human opioid receptor subtypes. Midazolam, chlordiazepoxide, and diazepam directly displaced [(3)H]-diprenorphine binding from kappa and delta receptors, but not mu receptors, whereas flumazenil was inactive. These benzodiazepines also stimulated (35)S-GTPgammaS binding in membranes containing human kappa receptors, and the effect of midazolam was prevented by a selective kappa antagonist. Midazolam was also weakly active at delta-receptor activation, whereas all three were inactive at mu receptors. The results suggest that the analgesic efficacy reported for intrathecal benzodiazepines may be attributed, in part, to direct interaction with kappa-opioid receptors.

IMPLICATIONS

Several human and animal studies have shown analgesic effects of benzodiazepines after spinal injection. Our results show that large concentrations of midazolam, chlordiazepoxide, and diazepam displace the binding of [(3)H]-diprenorphine-an opiate radioligand from kappa receptors. In an in vitro functional assay, midazolam is a weak agonist at the delta-opioid receptor, whereas all three benzodiazepines are kappa-opioid agonists. These findings may partially explain the mechanism of benzodiazepine-induced spinal analgesia.

Promising non-narcotic analgesic techniques for labour

Epidural analgesia and spinal analgesia are the most effective techniques for relieving labour pain. Basically, local anaesthetics (i.e. bupivacaine) and opioids (i.e. fentanyl or sufentanil), especially when combined, produce excellent analgesia with minimal motor blockade. However, none of these agents is devoid of side-effects and analgesia remains sometimes imperfect, suggesting that new drugs would be welcome. Adrenalin and clonidine act on a2-adrenoceptors in the spinal cord and both have been found to improve analgesia. These two drugs have already been used in many patients and studies because the absence of neurotoxicity has been well documented. Clonidine looks more attractive, although sedation and hypotension limit its use. Other analgesic drugs are promising alternatives but are still at an experimental or very early clinical stage. Neostigmine and ketamine (without preservative) are not neurotoxic while midazolam neurotoxicity is still controversial. Intravenous remifentanil might prove useful when neuraxial analgesia is contraindicated.

Pharmacologic pain management in children: a review of intervention research

In the past decade, an explosion of interest in pediatric pain has resulted in the proliferation of research studies. This review examines 41 studies that focus on pharmacologic interventions in children during the last decade. Criteria for inclusion in this paper were studies that (1) tested a pharmacological intervention prospectively, (2) were conducted with children only, (3) had a sample size over 30, (4) randomly assigned participants to two or more groups, and (5) provided sufficient methodological and statistical detail for critique. Studies focused on postoperative and procedural pain, were conducted most frequently with pre-school-aged children or older, and demonstrated the efficacy of pharmacologic interventions.

Effects of midazolam on pain sensations in the face

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the effects of midazolam, a sedative, on tactile and pain sensations on the skin of the chin.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-seven volunteers were segregated into four groups; the first group was the control group; the second to fourth groups were administered 0.025 mg/kg, 0.05 mg/kg, and 0.075 mg/kg of midazolam, respectively, as a bolus injection. All volunteers reclined in a dental chair for the experiment. Tactile and pain sensations were determined over time after injection of midazolam, the former using von Fray thread, the latter using an esthesiometer.

RESULTS

Thresholds of tactile sensitivity and of pain were statistically significantly different from control values at 10 minutes after injection of midazolam in the 0.05 mg/kg group and in the 0.075 mg/kg group.

CONCLUSION

Although 0.025 mg/kg of midazolam produced sedation, at least 0.05 mg/kg of this agent was required to alter the thresholds for perception of tactile and painful stimulation.

Spinal anaesthesia with midazolam in the rat

PURPOSE

This study examined in an animal model whether intrathecal midazolam, alone or with fentanyl, can achieve anaesthesia sufficient for laparotomy, comparable to lidocaine. Effects on consciousness and whether anaesthesia was segmental were also examined. The haemodynamic and respiratory changes were compared with those of intrathecal lidocaine or intrathecal fentanyl alone.

METHODS

Sixty Wistar strain rats, with nylon catheters chronically implanted in the lumbar subarachnoid theca, were divided into six groups. Group 1 (n = 12) received 75 microL intrathecal lidocaine 2%. Group 2 (n = 12) received 75 microL intrathecal midazolam 0.1%, Group 3 (n = 12) received intrathecal 37.5 microL midazolam 0.1%, plus 37.5 microL fentanyl 0.005%. Group 4 (n = 12) received intrathecal 50 microL fentanyl 0.005%. Group 5 (n = 6) received 75 microL midazolam 0.1% iv. Group 6 (n = 6) received halothane 0.6% in oxygen by inhalation.

RESULTS

Both groups that received intrathecal midazolam, alone or combined with fentanyl, developed effective segmental sensory and motor blockade of the hind limbs and abdominal wall, sufficient for a pain-free laparotomy procedure. Neither of these groups, unlike the group that received intrathecal lidocaine, developed a reduction in blood pressure or change in heart rate at the time of maximal sensory or motor blockade, nor were there changes in the arterial blood gases or respiratory rate.

CONCLUSION

Midazolam, when injected intrathecally, produces reversible, segmental, spinally mediated antinociception, sufficient to provide balanced anaesthesia for abdominal surgery.