Antinociceptive effects of epidural and intravenous ketamine to somatic and visceral stimuli in rats

An anesthesia protocol for robust and repeatable measurement of behavioral visceromotor responses to colorectal distension in mice

Introduction

Visceral motor responses (VMR) to graded colorectal distension (CRD) have been extensively implemented to assess the level of visceral pain in awake rodents, which are inevitably confounded by movement artifacts and cannot be conveniently implemented to assess invasive neuromodulation protocols for treating visceral pain. In this report, we present an optimized protocol with prolonged urethane infusion that enables robust and repeatable recordings of VMR to CRD in mice under deep anesthesia, providing a two-hour window to objectively assess the efficacy of visceral pain management strategies.

Methods

During all surgical procedures, C57BL/6 mice of both sexes (8-12 weeks, 25-35 g) were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane inhalation. An abdominal incision was made to allow Teflon-coated stainless steel wire electrodes to be sutured to the oblique abdominal musculature. A thin polyethylene catheter (Φ 0.2 mm) was placed intraperitoneally and externalized from the abdominal incision for delivering the prolonged urethane infusion. A cylindric plastic-film balloon (Φ 8 mm x 15 mm when distended) was inserted intra-anally, and its depth into the colorectum was precisely controlled by measuring the distance between the end of the balloon and the anus. Subsequently, the mouse was switched from isoflurane anesthesia to the new urethane anesthesia protocol, which consisted of a bout of infusion (0.6 g urethane per kg weight, g/kg) administered intraperitoneally via the catheter and continuous low-dose infusion throughout the experiment at 0.15-0.23 g per kg weight per hour (g/kg/h).

Results

Using this new anesthesia protocol, we systematically investigated the significant impact of balloon depth into the colorectum on evoked VMR, which showed a progressive reduction with increased balloon insertion depth from the rectal region into the distal colonic region. Intracolonic TNBS treatment induced enhanced VMR to CRD of the colonic region (>10 mm from the anus) only in male mice, whereas colonic VMR was not significantly altered by TNBS in female mice.

Discussion

Conducting VMR to CRD in anesthetized mice using the current protocol will enable future objective assessments of various invasive neuromodulatory strategies for alleviating visceral pain.

More effective induction of anesthesia using midazolam-butorphanol-ketamine-sevoflurane compared with ketamine-sevoflurane in the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus)

The common marmoset has been increasingly used for research in the biomedical field; however, there is little information available regarding effective methods of anesthesia in this species. This study retrospectively analyzed 2 regimens of anesthesia induction: intramuscular injection of ketamine followed by inhalation of 5% sevoflurane, and intramuscular injection of midazolam, butorphanol and ketamine followed by inhalation of 5% sevoflurane. Anesthetic depth did not reach the surgical anesthesia stage in 7 out of 99 animals receiving the former regimen, whereas there were only 2 such animals out of 273 receiving the latter regimen. The latter regimen, when followed by maintenance anesthesia with 3% sevoflurane inhalation, was successfully used in various nociceptive procedures. These results indicate that the injection of a combination of midazolam, butorphanol and ketamine followed by inhalation of a high concentration of sevoflurane is effective for anesthesia induction in marmosets.

Does analgesia and condition influence immunity after surgery? Effects of fentanyl, ketamine and clonidine on natural killer activity at different ages

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cellular immunity varies in the perioperative period. We evaluated the effects of fentanyl, clonidine and ketamine at different time points after surgery and in animals in different conditions (young vs. old).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats undergoing laparotomy under sevoflurane anaesthesia were assigned to receive saline, fentanyl (40 microg kg(-1)), clonidine (10 microg kg(-1)) or ketamine (10 mg kg(-1)) 1 h before surgery. Natural killer (NK) activity was quantified at different time points (immediately or after 18, 24, 48, 72 h and 8 days) in vitro by the lysis of YAC-1 cells. In-vivo assessment included counting the number of lung metastases induced by the MADB-106 cells.

RESULTS

During the first 24 h after surgery, a rapid increase in NK activity was noted, followed by a significant depression returning to baseline at 8 days. Analgesics show specific effects: fentanyl depressed NK activity with or without surgery. Clonidine depressed NK activity in nonoperated animals and during the first 24 h after surgery. Ketamine depressed NK activity in nonoperated animals but, after surgery, this activity varied with the same time course as saline. Ketamine and clonidine significantly reduced the number of lung metastases in operated animals. Ketamine significantly reduced the number of metastases in old nonoperated animals. Finally, ageing has a significant negative influence.

CONCLUSION

Surgery, analgesics and co-existing conditions significantly influence cellular immunity. The importance of these changes varies with time. Fentanyl had a worse influence than clonidine and ketamine, but seemed equally protective against the development of metastases.

The improvement of the anti-hyperalgesic effect of ketamine and of its isomers by the administration of ifenprodil

Intrathecal or epidural administration of NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors antagonists, in special ketamine and ifenprodil are used to control moderate to severe hyperalgesia in humans. Activation of NMDA receptor usually requires binding of two agonists, glutamate and glycine, in different receptor subunits. Ketamine is a NMDA receptor antagonist and acts at phencyclidine site in NR1 subunit while ifenprodil is a selective NR2B subunit antagonist of NMDA receptor. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacological interactions between ketamine or its isomers and ifenprodil, when intrathecally co-administrated, to reduce prostaglandin E(2)-induced hyperalgesia in rat's hind paw. The intrathecal administration of ketamine, its isomers R(-) or S(+), or ifenprodil-induced anti-hyperalgesic effects in a dose-related manner. Ifenprodil, in a dose that did not induce significant effect when administrated alone, significantly improved the anti-hyperalgesic effect of ketamine or its isomers. The other way round, ketamine or S(+) ketamine, but not R(-) ketamine, in a dose that did not induce significant effect when administrated alone, improved the anti-hyperalgesic effect of ifenprodil. However, by comparing ED(50)s (half maximal effective doses), ifenprodil-induced potentiation of ketamine was significantly greater than ketamine-induced potentiation of ifenprodil. The findings of this present study suggest that intrathecal administration of very small doses of ifenprodil, just before and ketamine significantly improves its anti-hyperalgesic effect and this association could be useful to control inflammatory pain with less undesirable effects.

Effects of preoperative epidural administration of racemic ketamine for analgesia in sheep undergoing surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of preoperative epidural administration of racemic ketamine to provide analgesia in sheep undergoing experimental hind limb orthopedic surgery.

ANIMALS

12 adult sheep (weight range, 51.4 to 67.2 kg).

PROCEDURE

Sheep were anesthetized with guaifenesin, thiopental, and isoflurane; after induction of anesthesia, sheep received a lumbosacral epidural injection of ketamine (1 mg/kg; n = 6) or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (1 mL/7 kg; 6 [control group]). Respiratory and cardiovascular variables were recorded before and at intervals during and for 6 hours after anesthesia. During that 6-hour postoperative period, analgesia was evaluated subjectively with a numeric ranking scale that included assessments of comfort, posture, movement, and response to wound palpation; buprenorphine was administered when a score > 3 (maximum score, 10) was achieved. Rectal temperature, heart and respiratory rates, and lameness were evaluated daily for 2 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

At all evaluations, cardiovascular and respiratory variables were comparable between the 2 groups. Compared with control sheep, time to first administration of rescue analgesic was significantly longer and total dose of buprenorphine administered during the 6- hour postoperative period was significantly decreased for ketamine-treated sheep. During the second week following surgery, ketamine-treated sheep had significantly less lameness than control sheep.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In sheep undergoing hind limb surgery, preoperative epidural administration of ketamine appears to provide analgesia in the immediate postoperative period and has residual analgesic effects, which may contribute to more rapid return of normal function in surgically treated limbs.

Pre-Emptive Epidural Ketamine or S(+)-Ketamine in Post-incisional Pain in Dogs: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pre-emptive analgesic effects of epidural ketamine or S(+)-ketamine on post-incisional hyperalgesia.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized study.

ANIMALS

Twenty-four mongrel dogs (1-5 years, weighing 11.9+/-1.8 kg).

METHODS

Dogs were anesthetized with propofol (5 mg/kg intravenously) and a lumbosacral epidural catheter was placed. Dogs were randomly allocated to 3 groups, each with 8 dogs. The control group (CG) was administered saline solution (0.3 mL/kg); the ketamine group (KG) ketamine (0.6 mg/kg); and the S(+)-ketamine group (SG) S(+)-ketamine (0.6 mg/kg). The final volume was adjusted to 0.3 mL/kg in all groups. Five minutes after the epidural injection a surgical incision was made in the common pad of the right hind limb and was immediately closed with simple interrupted nylon suture. Respiratory (RR) and heart (HR) rates, rectal temperature (T), sedation (S), lameness score, and mechanical nociceptive threshold by von Frey filaments were evaluated before the propofol anesthesia and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 minutes and then at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after epidural injection.

RESULTS

There were no differences in RR, HR, T, or S between groups. Motor blockade of the hind limbs was observed during 20+/-3.6 minutes in KG and during 30.6+/-7.5 minutes in SG (mean+/-SD). Mechanical force applied to obtain an aversive response was higher from 45 minutes to 12 hours in KG and from 60 to 90 minutes in SG, when compared with CG.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-emptive epidural ketamine induced no alterations in RR and HR, and reduced post-incisional hyperalgesia for a longer time than did S(+) ketamine.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although anesthetic and analgesic potency of S(+) ketamine is twice that of ketamine, the racemic form is seemingly better for post-incisional hyperalgesia.

Improvement of Pain Treatment After Major Abdominal Surgery by Intravenous S(+)-Ketamine

The use of intraoperative racemic ketamine for pain prevention after abdominal surgery is controversial. We compared one preincisional i.v. injection of S(+)-ketamine with its preincisional and repeated intraoperative use in 45 patients undergoing surgery with epidural and general anesthesia. S(+)-ketamine is a new drug formulation that contains the more potent S(+)-stereoisomer of ketamine. Patients were randomized to receive placebo, 0.5 mg/kg preincisional S(+)ketamine, or 0.5 mg/kg preincisional and 0.2 mg/kg intraoperative S(+)-ketamine repeated at 20-min intervals. In the postoperative period, epidural ropivacaine (2 mg/mL; 0.12 mL.kg(-1).h(-1)) was infused for pain therapy. Patients who received repeated S(+)-ketamine reported smaller pain scores than those who received placebo after awakening and 3 and 6 h later (P < or = 0.05). Fewer patients with repeated S(+)-ketamine required additional analgesics than those with placebo (P < or = 0.05). Cumulative consumption of additional diclofenac and dextropropoxyphene at 24 h was less after single (P < 0.05) and repeated (P < 0.05) S(+)-ketamine versus placebo. After awakening, patients who received repeated S(+)-ketamine reported being in a better mood than those in the other groups (P < 0.05). No psychotomimetic side effects were noted. In conclusion, preincisional and repeated intraoperative small-dose S(+)-ketamine added to general and epidural anesthesia causes better postoperative pain relief than general and epidural anesthesia alone.

IMPLICATIONS

After major visceral surgery, preincisional and repeated intraoperative small-dose S(+)-ketamine added to general and epidural anesthesia causes better postoperative pain relief than general and epidural anesthesia alone.

Analgesic effects and pharmacokinetics of a low dose of ketamine preoperatively administered epidurally or intravenously

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effects and pharmacokinetics of epidural versus intravenous administration of low doses of ketamine.

METHODS

45 patients scheduled for selective gastrectomy were randomly assigned into 3 groups: 0.5mg/kg ketamine administered epidurally (Kepi group), 0.5 mg/kg ketamine administered intravenously (Kiv group), or 10ml normal saline administered epidurally (Ctr group). Analgesic effects were evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at rest, time to first request for analgesic (TFA), and subsequent morphine consumption. The plasma concentration of ketamine was measured with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in the Kepi and Kiv groups. The elimination half-life of ketamine was calculated.

RESULTS

Patients in the Kepi group had significantly lower VAS pain scores, longer TFA, and lower morphine consumption than patients in the Kiv or Ctr groups. Compared with intravenous administration, epidural administration of ketamine resulted in higher plasma concentrations from 90 minutes to 48 hours after injection, and much longer elimination half-life of ketamine, but a lower maximum plasma concentration of ketamine.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that epidural administration of a low dose of ketamine provides more effective analgesic effects as seen post-operatively than intravenous administration. The prolonged half-life and high plasma sustained concentration of epidural ketamine might account for the difference in analgesic effects.

Preoperative epidural ketamine in combination with morphine does not have a clinically relevant intra- and postoperative opioid-sparing effect

In this prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of preincisional administration of epidural ketamine with morphine compared with epidural morphine alone for postoperative pain relief after major upper-abdominal surgery. We studied 50 ASA I and II patients undergoing major upper-abdominal procedures. These patients were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups: patients in Group 1 received epidural morphine 50 microg/kg, whereas those in Group 2 received epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg combined with 50 microg/kg of morphine 30 min before incision. Intraoperative analgesia was provided in addition, with IV morphine, and the requirement was noted. A blinded observer using a visual analog scale for pain assessment observed patients for 48 h after surgery. Additional doses of epidural morphine were provided when the visual analog scale score was more than 4. Analgesic requirements and side effects were compared between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, sex, weight, or duration or type of the surgical procedures. The intraoperative morphine requirement was significantly (P = 0.018) less in Group 2 patients (median, 6.8 mg; range, 3-15 mg) compared with patients in Group 1 (median, 8.3 mg; range, 4.5-15 mg). The time for the first requirement of analgesia was significantly (P = 0.021) longer (median, 17 h; range, 10-48 h) in Group 2 patients than in Group 1 (median, 12 h; range, 4-36 h). The total number of supplemental doses of epidural morphine required in the first 48 h after surgery was comparable (P = 0.1977) in both groups. Sedation scores were similar in both groups. One patient in Group 2 developed hallucinations after study drug administration. None of the patients in either group developed respiratory depression. Other side effects, such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting, were also similar in both groups. Although the addition of ketamine had synergistic analgesic effects with morphine (reduced intraoperative morphine consumption and prolonged time for first requirement of analgesia), there was no long- lasting preemptive benefit seen with this combination (in terms of reduction in supplemental analgesia) for patients undergoing major upper-abdominal procedures.

IMPLICATIONS

Ketamine added to epidural morphine given before surgery can decrease postoperative pain by its preemptive effect, opioid potentiation, and prevention of acute opioid tolerance. A single epidural bolus of 1 mg/kg of ketamine with morphine given before major upper-abdominal surgery did not result in a clinically relevant reduction in postoperative pain relief.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of epidural ketamine combined with morphine for postoperative analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of epidural ketamine and morphine compared with epidural morphine alone for postoperative pain relief following major upper abdominal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING

Tertiary care referral and teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

46 ASA physical status I and II patients who underwent major upper abdominal procedures.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups: patients in Group 1 received epidural morphine 50 microg/kg whereas patients in Group 2 received epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg combined with 50 microg/kg of morphine postoperatively.

MEASUREMENTS

A blinded observer using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment followed up patients for 48 hours postoperatively. Top-up dose of epidural morphine was provided when VAS was higher than 4. Analgesic requirements and side effects were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Only 40 patients completed the study. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, gender, weight, duration, or type of surgical procedure or intraoperative opioid requirements. Onset of analgesia was faster (p < 0.001) in Group 2 (11 min) than in Group 1 patients (25 min). The time for first requirement of analgesia was significantly (p < 0.01) longer (19.8 +/- 9.8 hours) in Group 2 patients than Group 1 (12.8 +/- 6.2 hours). Total number of supplemental doses of epidural morphine required in the first 48 hours postoperatively was also significantly less (p < 0.005) in Group 2 compared to Group 1. Patients in Group 2 had higher sedation scores than Group I patients for the first 2 hours postoperatively. None of the patients in either group developed hallucinations or respiratory depression. Other side effects such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg to morphine 50 microg/kg improved analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery without increasing side effects.

Low doses of epidural ketamine or neostigmine, but not midazolam, improve morphine analgesia in epidural terminal cancer pain therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine analgesia and adverse effects of combination epidural pain therapy consisting of administration of morphine with either low dose of ketamine, neostigmine, or midazolam in terminal cancer pain patients.

DESIGN

Randomized double-blind study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

48 terminal cancer patients suffering from chronic pain.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to one of four groups (n = 12). The concept of visual analog scale (VAS), which consisted of a 10-cm line with 0 equaling "no pain at all" and 10 equaling "the worst possible pain" was introduced. All patients were taking oral amitriptyline 50 mg at bedtime. Pain was initially treated with epidural morphine 2 mg twice daily (12-hr intervals) to maintain the VAS below 4/10. Afterwards, VAS scores > or = 4/10 at any time were treated by adding the epidural study drug (2 ml), which was administered each morning, just after the 2-mg epidural morphine administration. The control group (CG) received 2 mg of epidural morphine (2 ml). The ketamine group (KG) received 0.2 mg/kg epidural ketamine (2 ml). The neostigmine group (NG) received 100 micrograms epidural neostigmine (2 ml). The midazolam group (MG) received 500 micrograms epidural midazolam (2 ml). Patients received the study drugs on a daily basis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Duration of effective analgesia was measured as time from the study drug administration to the first patient's VAS score > or = 4/10 recorded in days. The groups were demographically the same. The VAS pain scores prior to the treatment were also similar among groups. Only the patients in the KG demonstrated lower VAS scores compared to the MG (p = 0.018). Time since the epidural study drug administration until patient complaint of pain VAS > or = 4/10 was higher for both the KG and NG compared to the CG (KG > CG, p = 0.049; NG > CG; p = 0.0163). Only the KG used less epidural morphine compared to the CG during the period of study (25 days) (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The association of either low-dose epidural ketamine or neostigmine (but not midazolam) to epidural morphine increased the duration of analgesia in the population studied (gt;20 days) compared to the CG and MG (8 to 10 days) when administered in the early stages of terminal cancer pain therapy, without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.