Intravenous ketorolac vs diclofenac for analgesia after maxillofacial surgery

Tramadol versus ketorolac for pain management after third molar surgery

Objectives:

To compare the analgesic efficacy of preoperative intravenous (IV) ketorolac versus tramadol in preventing postoperative pain after mandibular third molar surgery.

Methodology:

Two hundred patients in the age group of 18–40 years with asymptomatic impacted mandibular molars were randomly allocated into one of the two groups (100 in each group) and underwent third molar surgery under local anesthesia. Group I received IV ketorolac 30 mg and Group II received IV tramadol 50 mg preoperatively. The difference in postoperative pain was assessed by five primary end points: pain intensity being measured hourly by Wong-Baker pain assessment scale for 6 h, onset of analgesia, duration of action, total number of analgesics consumed, and patient's global assessment.

Results:

Throughout the 6 h investigation period, patients reported significantly lower pain intensity scores, longer duration of action, lesser postoperative analgesic consumption, and better global assessment in ketorolac when compared to tramadol group. Patients in the ketorolac group significantly performed better than the tramadol group in terms of all parameters except onset of analgesia. All the drug-related complications were mild and did not require any investigation.

Conclusion:

The result of the present study shows that preoperative IV ketorolac 30 mg is more effective than tramadol 50 mg for postoperative pain following third molar surgery.

Preoperative intravenous tramadol versus ketorolac for preventing postoperative pain after third molar surgery

The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of a single-dose of preoperative intravenous tramadol versus ketorolac in preventing pain after third molar surgery. Sixty-four patients undergoing elective third molar surgery were randomly assigned into one of the two groups (32 in each group): Group I received tramadol 50 mg, and Group 2 received ketorolac 30 mg intravenously preoperatively before the surgery. After injection of the study drugs, a standard intravenous sedation technique was administered and the impacted third molars were removed under local anaesthetic. The difference in postoperative pain was assessed by four primary end-points: pain intensity as measured by a 100-mm visual analogue scale hourly for 12 h, median time to rescue analgesic, postoperative acetaminophen consumption, and patient's global assessment. Throughout the 12-h investigation period, patients reported significantly lower pain intensity scores in the ketorolac versus tramadol group (P = 0.05, Mann-Whitney U-test). Patients also reported significantly longer median time to rescue analgesic (9.0 h versus 7.0 h, P = 0.007, log rank test), lesser postoperative acetaminophen consumption (P = 0.02, Mann-Whitney U-test) and better global assessment (P = 0.01, chi2 test) for the ketorolac versus tramadol group. Preoperative intravenous ketorolac 30 mg is more effective than tramadol 50 mg in the prevention of postoperative dental pain.

Treatment of postoperative pain in oral and maxillofacial surgery

We questioned 75 patients after inpatient oral and maxillofacial operations to find out how satisfied they were with the extent to which their pain had been controlled. Seventy (93%) had had postoperative pain. In 33 (47%), it was moderate and in 24 (34%), severe. Analgesic drugs were not given immediately to 6 of the 24 patients who requested them. Seventeen (24%) reported that the pain was worse than they had expected, but 74 of the 75 patients were satisfied with the pain control they received. We conclude that patients' expectations of pain control are low and that questions about satisfaction should not be used in isolation.

Single dose oxycodone and oxycodone plus paracetamol (acetominophen) for acute postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Oxycodone is a strong opioid agonist which is useful for the management of severe pain. It is becoming increasingly important to assess the relative efficacy and harm caused by different treatments. This can be determined when an analgesic is compared with control under similar clinical circumstances.

OBJECTIVES

To quantitatively assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of single-dose oxycodone and oxycodone plus paracetamol in randomised trials in acute postoperative pain.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Published reports were identified from Medline, Biological Abstracts, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the Oxford Pain Relief Database. Additional studies were identified from the reference lists of retrieved reports.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were: full journal publication, clinical trial, random allocation of adult patients to treatment groups, double blind design, moderate to severe baseline pain, postoperative administration of study drugs, treatment arms which included oxycodone or oxycodone plus paracetamol and placebo (or active control for which comparable efficacy data exist), and oral, intramuscular or intravenous administration of study drugs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Summed pain intensity and pain relief data over 4-6 hours were extracted and converted into dichotomous information yielding the number of patients obtaining at least 50% pain relief. Estimates of relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat were calculated. Single-dose adverse effect data were collected.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-seven reports were identified. Seven reports met the inclusion criteria; all assessed oral oxycodone. For efficacy, a significant benefit of active drug over placebo was shown for all doses of oxycodone and oxycodone plus paracetamol, except oxycodone 5 mg. For adverse effects, the number of patients reporting adverse effects was extracted for each dose of active drug versus placebo. When these data were pooled for the individual doses significantly more adverse effects with active drug than with placebo were shown for all doses, except oxycodone 5 mg and its combination with paracetamol 325 mg. This was also shown for drowsiness/somnolence. Significantly more nausea, vomiting and dizziness/lightheadedness were reported with oxycodone 10 mg plus paracetamol (650 mg and 1000 mg) than with placebo.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose oral oxycodone, with or without paracetamol, appears to be of comparable efficacy to intramuscular morphine and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Central nervous system adverse effects were common.

[Conventional techniques for analgesia: opioids and non-opioids. Indications, adverse effects and monitoring]

Morphine dosage must be carefully adapted in patients with renal failure or severe liver failure. The i.v. route is used for morphine titration in the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU), or for analgesia in children. Systematic (not on demand) intramuscular or subcutaneous morphine must be administered at intervals not longer than 4 hours. Dosage is best determined after i.v. titration in the PACU. Codeine, administered orally, is metabolised into morphine. Codeine has almost no effect in 7% of Caucasians and at least 15% of Asians. Nalbuphine, which has a sedative effect and a short half-life, is mainly used in children. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is used orally or rectally, most often in combination with codeine. Paracetamol dosage is 60-90 mg.kg-1.d-1, including a 20 mg (orally), or 40 mg (rectally) loading dose. Its therapeutic ratio is low, with a potential hepatic toxicity. Dosage must be lowered in alcoholics or in patients under isoniazide therapy. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are powerful antinociceptive agents. Their use must be restricted to the first 5 postoperative days. Their major contraindications are kidney failure, risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, coagulation disorders, allergy. They also have a marked morphine sparing effect and reduce therefore the respiratory depression induced by morphine.

Comparison of the effect of intravenous ketoprofen, ketorolac and diclofenac on platelet function in volunteers

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit prostaglandin synthesis which may result in impaired platelet function. Because NSAIDs have different abilities to inhibit cyclo-oxygenases we compared the effect of intravenous ketoprofen, ketorolac and diclofenac on platelet function in volunteers.

METHODS

Ten healthy male volunteers were given ketoprofen 1.4 mg x kg(-1), ketorolac 0.4 mg x kg(-1) and diclofenac 1.1 mg x kg(-1) in saline i.v. on three different occasions, at more than one-week intervals, in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Platelet function was evaluated before (sample 0), 2 (sample 2) and 24 h (sample 3) after the beginning of the infusion.

RESULTS

Two of the volunteers had no secondary platelet aggregation in their aggregation curves before the experiment (sample 0, studied three times) and their results were excluded from the final analysis. Diclofenac inhibited adrenaline (0.9 microg x m[-1]) induced platelet aggregation less (median maximal aggregation 22.5%) than ketoprofen (18.3%) and ketorolac (15.7%) (P<0.05) in sample 2. In the ketorolac group in sample 3 an impairment of adrenaline (0.9 microg x ml[-1]) induced platelet aggregation was still seen (26.7%) (P<0.05) but not in the other groups. Diclofenac did not affect adenosine diphosphate (ADP) induced platelet aggregation. However, ketorolac caused an impairment in ADP (3 microM and 6 microM) induced platelet aggregation and ketoprofen in ADP (6 microM) induced platelet aggregation in sample 2. Bleeding time was prolonged (P<0.05) after ketoprofen and ketorolac (sample 2) but not after diclofenac. Platelet retention on glass beads was unaffected by the tested drugs.

CONCLUSION

Ketoprofen, ketorolac and diclofenac caused a reversible platelet dysfunction. Diclofenac had the mildest effect, while platelet dysfunction was still seen 24 h after the beginning of ketorolac.

Ketorolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in pain management

Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with strong analgesic activity. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac has been extensively evaluated in the postoperative setting, in both hospital inpatients and outpatients, and in patients with various other acute pain states. After major abdominal, orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery or ambulatory laparoscopic or gynaecological procedures, ketorolac provides relief from mild to severe pain in the majority of patients and has similar analgesic efficacy to that of standard dosages of morphine and pethidine (meperidine) as well as less frequently used opioids and other NSAIDs. The analgesic effect of ketorolac may be slightly delayed but often persists for longer than that of opioids. Combined therapy with ketorolac and an opioid results in a 25 to 50% reduction in opioid requirements, and in some patients this is accompanied by a concomitant decrease in opioid-induced adverse events, more rapid return to normal gastrointestinal function and shorter stay in hospital. In children undergoing myringotomy, hernia repair, tonsillectomy, or other surgery associated with mild to moderate pain, ketorolac provides comparable analgesia to morphine, pethidine or paracetamol (acetaminophen). In the emergency department, ketorolac attenuates moderate to severe pain in patients with renal colic, migraine headache, musculoskeletal pain or sickle cell crisis and is usually as effective as frequently used opioids, such as morphine and pethidine, and other NSAIDs and analgesics. Subcutaneous administration of ketorolac reduces pain in patients with cancer and seems particularly beneficial in pain resulting from bone metastases. The acquisition cost of ketorolac is greater than that of morphine or pethidine; however, in a small number of studies, the higher cost of ketorolac was offset when treatment with ketorolac resulted in a reduced hospital stay compared with alternative opioid therapy. The tolerability profile of ketorolac parallels that of other NSAIDs; most clinically important adverse events affect the gastrointestinal tract and/or renal or haematological function. The incidence of serious or fatal adverse events reported with ketorolac has decreased since revision of dosage guidelines. Results from a large retrospective postmarketing surveillance study in more than 20,000 patients demonstrated that the overall risk of gastrointestinal or operative site bleeding related to parenteral ketorolac therapy was only slightly higher than with opioids. However, the risk increased markedly when high dosages were used for more than 5 days, especially in the elderly. Acute renal failure may occur after treatment with ketorolac but is usually reversible on drug discontinuation. In common with other NSAIDs, ketorolac has also been implicated in allergic or hypersensitivity reactions. In summary, ketorolac is a strong analgesic with a tolerability profile which resembles that of other NSAIDs. When used in accordance with current dosage guidelines, this drug provides a useful alternative, or adjuvant, to opioids in patients with moderate to severe pain.