The intubating laryngeal mask airway in fresh cadavers vs. paralysed anesthetised patients

Rescue supraglottic airway devices at caesarean delivery: What are the options to consider?

Tracheal intubation is considered the gold standard means of securing the airway in obstetric general anaesthesia because of the increased risk of aspiration. Obstetric failed intubation is relatively rare. Difficult airway guidelines recommend the use of a supraglottic airway device to maintain the airway and to allow rescue ventilation. Failed intubation is associated with a further increased risk of aspiration, therefore there is an argument for performing supraglottic airway-guided flexible bronchoscopic intubation (SAGFBI). The technique of SAGFBI has a high success rate in the non-obstetric population, it protects the airway and it minimises task fixation on repeated attempts at laryngoscopic tracheal intubation. However, after failed intubation via laryngoscopy, there is a lack of specific recommendations or indications for SAGFBI in current obstetric difficult airway guidelines in relation to achieving tracheal intubation. Our narrative review explores the issues pertaining to airway management in these cases: the use of supraglottic airway devices and the techniques of, and technical issues related to, SAGFBI. We also discuss the factors involved in the decision-making process as to whether to proceed with surgery with the airway maintained only with a supraglottic airway device, or to proceed only after SAGFBI.

Awake supraglottic airway guided flexible bronchoscopic intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: a case series and narrative review

Awake intubation is indicated in difficult airways if attempts at securing the airway after induction of general anesthesia may lead to harm due to potential difficulties or failure in those attempts. Conventional awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation is performed via the nasal, or less commonly, oral route. Awake oral flexible bronchoscopic intubation (FBI) via a supraglottic airway device (SAD) is a less common technique; we refer to this as ‘supraglottic airway guided’ FBI (SAGFBI). We describe ten cases with anticipated difficult airways in which awake SAGFBI was performed. After sedation and adequate airway topicalization, an Ambu Auragain^TM SAD was inserted. A flexible bronchoscope, preloaded with a tracheal tube, was then inserted through the SAD. Finally, the tracheal tube was railroaded over the bronchoscope, through the SAD and into the trachea. The bronchoscope and the SAD were carefully removed, whilst keeping the tracheal tube in-situ. The technique was successful and well tolerated by all patients, and associated complications were rare. It also offered the advantages of performing an ‘awake test insertion’ of the SAD, an ‘awake look’ at the periglottic region, and an ‘awake test ventilation.’ In certain patients, awake SAGFBI offers advantages over conventional awake FBI or awake videolaryngoscopy. More research is required to evaluate its success and failure rates, and identify associated complications. Its place in difficult airway algorithms may then be further established.

Suitability of a preserved human cadaver model for the simulation of facemask ventilation, direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a laboratory investigation

BACKGROUND

Using fresh or formalin-embalmed cadavers has not been generally accepted for the purposes of teaching airway management. We investigated whether cadavers 'preserved according Thiel's embalming method' (PATEM) are suitable for the simulation of facemask ventilation and tracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy.

METHODS

This observational cluster sampling, controlled simulation study, included eight PATEM cadavers and eight manikins in two clusters. Twenty experienced anaesthetists were randomly assigned to execute 80 facemask ventilations and 80 tracheal intubations in both groups. The ease of facemask ventilation was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was the composite outcomes of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.

RESULTS

The success rate at the first attempt at mask ventilation was 74% (59/80 attempts) on cadavers and 41% (33/80 attempts) on manikins (P<0.0001). Twenty one subjects received an oral airway in both groups and succeeded in facemask ventilation 20 times on cadavers and four times on manikins (P=0.004). Two-handed technique mask ventilation was required 24 times on manikins and once on cadavers (P=0.0016). In one attempt on a manikin the mask ventilation was impossible. Poor laryngeal view (Cormack-Lehane grade 3) occurred 14 times among cadavers (17.5%) and once in manikins (1.25%) (P=0.007), whereas difficulties in tracheal intubation were encountered 16 times in cadavers (20%) vs 17 times in manikins (21.25%) (P=0.84). In a subjective evaluation the participants preferred the cadaver model over the manikins (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PATEM cadavers were better suited for facemask ventilation and provided a more realistic environment for laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation than the studied manikins.

[Proposed difficult airway teaching methodology. Presentation of an interactive fresh frozen cadaver model]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to present a methodology based on the use of fresh-frozen cadavers for training in the management of the airway, and to evaluate the degree of satisfaction among learning physicians.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

About 6 fresh-frozen cadavers and 14 workstations were prepared where participants were trained in the different skills needed for airway management. The details of preparation of the cadavers are described. The level of satisfaction of the participant was determined using a Likert rating scale of 5 points, at each of the 14 stations, as well as the overall assessment and clinical usefulness of the course.

RESULTS

The mean overall evaluation of the course and its usefulness was 4.75 and 4.9, out of 5, respectively. All parts of the course were rated above 4 out of 5. The high level of satisfaction of the course remained homogeneous in the 2 editions analysed. The overall satisfaction of the course was not finally and uniquely determined by any of its particular parts.

CONCLUSION

The fresh cadaver model for training physicians in techniques of airway management is a proposal satisfactory to the participant, and with a realism that approaches the live patient.

Acquisition of basic fiberoptic intubation skills with a virtual reality airway simulator

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that a virtual reality (VR) airway simulator (the AccuTouch Virtual Reality Bronchsocopy Simulator; Immersion Medical, Gaithersburg, MD) can be used to teach residents basic fiberoptic intubation (FOI) skills effectively.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

University anesthesiology department.

INTERVENTION

Supervised training was done using a VR airway simulator.

MEASUREMENTS

Time to intubation before and after a 4-day training period using an adult VR FOI scenario and time to intubation using a fresh human cadaver two weeks after the training experience were measured.

MAIN RESULTS

Residents were able to significantly improve time to intubation in the VR scenario (114 vs 75 seconds; P = 0.001). Novices differed from experienced attending anesthesiologists in time to intubation in the VR scenario, before but not after training (114 vs 79 seconds compared with 75 vs 72 seconds). Novices who had been trained with the simulator performed significantly faster in the cadaver than novices who had not (24 vs 86 seconds; P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was no difference in time to intubation in the cadaver between trained novices and experienced attending anesthesiologists (24 vs 23 seconds; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Use of a VR airway simulator enables anesthesia residents to acquire basic FOI skills comparable to those of experienced anesthesiologists in a human cadaver.

Education and training in airway management

Despite the use of alternative training methods and efforts to structure training, it remains a challenge to ensure that every anaesthesia trainee gains sufficient experience in the use of core techniques of airway management. As less time is spent in the operating room during training, it becomes less likely that trainees will be exposed to an adequate number of challenging airway cases that enable them to practise advanced techniques of airway management under supervision. Nowadays the only way to overcome this deficit in anaesthesia training is to prepare trainees as well as possible outside the operating room so that clinical training opportunities can be used most effectively when they arise. Sufficient training can only be ensured when the required equipment and time are provided. Therefore, particularly in the light of increasing economic pressures, it is necessary to address the responsibilities of everyone involved in the training process. Here, we critically review traditional and recent modalities of anaesthesia training, assess their value, and describe a multi-modal approach to airway management education.

Teaching consultants airway management skills

Airway management skills are integral to the practice of anaesthesiology and also to the practice of emergency medicine and allied health professions such as respiratory care, emergency medical technology, and emergency and critical care nursing. The basic information to be taught is the same but the level of detail will vary depending on the audience. The learning process usually involves progression from didactic lessons to skills training on inanimate models to supervised clinical practice. Modalities that may be used for skills training include cadavers, recently dead patients, videotapes, mannequins, simulators and virtual reality trainers. To maintain knowledge and skills, review and possible retraining should be conducted on an approximately annual basis.

The PAxpress is an effective ventilatory device but has an 18% failure rate for flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation in anesthetized paralyzed patients

PURPOSE

The PAxpress is a new, single-use, extraglottic airway device. We evaluate: 1) insertion success rates; 2) airway sealing pressure, ventilatory capability and calculated mucosal pressures (in vitro minus in vivo intracuff pressure) at 30-60 mL cuff inflation volume; 3) the feasibility of lightwand-guided tracheal intubation; and 4) the incidence of mucosal trauma.

METHODS

Ninety anesthetized, paralyzed adults were studied. Airway management was by senior anesthesiologists with no prior experience with the PAX, but considerable experience with extraglottic airway devices and the flexible-lightwand.

RESULTS

Insertion was successful at the first attempt in 95.5% (86/90) and at the second attempt in 4.5% (4/90). Mean +/- SD airway sealing pressure at 30, 40, 50 and 60 mL cuff inflation volume was 27 +/- 8, 29 +/- 9, 32 +/- 9 and 35 +/- 7 cm H(2)O respectively; expired tidal volume at airway sealing pressure was 16 +/- 6, 18 +/- 6, 19 +/- 5 and 19 +/- 6 mL.kg(-1); and calculated mucosal pressure was 38 +/- 14, 55 +/- 20, 56 +/- 19 and 57 +/- 20 cm H(2)O. Airway sealing pressure, expired tidal volume at airway sealing pressure and calculated mucosal pressures increased with cuff inflation volume (all: P < or = 0.0002). Esophageal leak was detected in 9% (8/90), but only at peak pressures > or = 35 cm H(2)O and cuff inflation volumes > or = 40 mL. Lightwand-guided intubation was successful in 82% (74/90) of patients. Mild, moderate and severe blood staining was detected in 40% (36/90), 15% (13/90) and 1% (1/90) respectively. Blood staining was more frequent after adjusting maneuvers (22/54 vs 32/36, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The PAX has a high insertion success rate and is an effective ventilatory device with a low risk of gastric insufflation, but has a moderately high failure rate for lightwand-guided intubation and is associated with a relatively high incidence of mucosal trauma. Mucosal pressures may exceed pharyngeal perfusion pressure.

Training in airway management

Management of the airway is central to the practice of anaesthesia, yet trainees frequently feel poorly trained in this area. A large range of skills needs to be acquired, but there are often problems providing training on live patients. We review the different modalities available for training and assessment in airway management.

Intubating laryngeal mask airway

The Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) was introduced into clinical practice in 1997 following numerous clinical trials involving 1110 patients. The success rate of blind intubation via the device after two attempts is 88% in "routine" cases. Successful intubation in a variety of difficult airway scenarios, including awake intubation, has been described, with the overall success rate in the 377 patients reported being approximately 98%. The use of the ILMA by the novice operator has also been investigated with conflicting reports as to its suitability for emergency intubation in this setting. Blind versus visualized intubation techniques have also been investigated. These techniques may provide some benefits in improved safety and success rates, although the evidence is not definitive. The use of a visualizing technique is recommended, especially whilst experience with intubation via the ILMA is being gained. The risk of oesophageal intubation is reported as 5% and one death has been described secondary to the complications of oesophageal perforation during blind intubation. Morbidity described with the use of the ILMA includes sore throat, hoarse voice and epiglottic oedema. Haemodynamic changes associated with intubation via the ILMA are of minimal clinical consequence. The ILMA is a valuable adjunct to the airway management armamentarium, especially in cases of difficult airway management. Success with the device is more likely if the head of the patient is maintained in the neutral position, when the operator has practised at least 20 previous insertions and when the accompanying lubricated armoured tube is used.

Airway management outside the operating room

The choice of airway device for resuscitation depends on the skill of the user, the equipment available, the conscious state of the patient, the location of the patient and the probable cause of the cardiorespiratory arrest. Extraglottic airway devices are recommended by the European and American Resuscitation Councils for use when intubation skills are lacking. In this review, we discuss recent research relevant to the use of extraglottic airway devices in resuscitation.

Intubating laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomized triple crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized male and female adult patients

We determined the optimal size of intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILM) for ventilation and blind tracheal intubation in men and women. We also determined the distance the tracheal tube needs to protrude beyond the distal aperture to ensure that the cuff is through the vocal cords. Fifty male and 50 female anesthetized, paralyzed patients (ASA physical status I or II, aged 18-80 yr) were studied. Three operators (A, B, and C) were involved for the purposes of blinding. The size 3, 4, or 5 ILM was inserted into each patient in random order by Operator A, and the quality of ventilation was scored (adequate, suboptimal, or failed) by Operator B. The fiberoptic position (correct, too shallow, or too deep) and the distance between the distal aperture and the vocal cords was determined by Operator B. A single attempt at blind intubation was made by Operator C. Operators B and C were blinded to the size of the ILM. Operator C was also blinded to the information recorded by Operator B. All ILMs were inserted into the laryngopharynx at the first attempt. For men and women, the ventilation score was smaller for the Size 3 than the Size 4 or 5 (all: P < 0.002). For men, correct positioning was less common with the Size 3 than the Size 4 or 5 (both: P < 0.02). For women, correct positioning was similar among sizes. For men, tracheal intubation was successful less frequently with the Size 3 (84%) than the Size 4 (100%) or 5 (98%) (both: P < or = 0.01). For women, tracheal intubation success was similar among sizes (Size 3, 4, and 5: 86%, 96%, and 92%, respectively). Intubation was always successful if the ILM was correctly positioned and always failed if it was too shallow or deep. In both male and female patients, the distance between the distal aperture and the vocal cords increased with increasing ILM size (all: P < 0.04) and patient height (P < 0.0001) and was always longer for men (all: P < 0.0001). The overall mean distance (95% confidence interval) that the tracheal tube needed to protrude was 10-12 cm (8-13 cm) in men and 8-11 cm (8-12 cm) in women. We conclude that for men, the Size 4 and 5 ILMs are better than the Size 3 for ventilation and blind intubation. For women, the Size 4 and 5 ILMs are better than the Size 3 for ventilation, but there is no difference among sizes for blind intubation. The length the tracheal tube must protrude from the distal aperture to ensure that the cuff is completely through the vocal cords is 8-13 cm, depending on ILM size, the tracheal tube size, and the sex and height of the patient.

IMPLICATIONS

For men, the Size 4 and 5 intubating laryngeal mask airways are better than the Size 3 for ventilation and blind tracheal intubation. For women, the Size 4 and 5 are better than the Size 3 for ventilation, but there is no difference among sizes for blind intubation. The length the tracheal tube must protrude from the distal aperture of the intubating laryngeal mask airway to ensure that the cuff is completely through the vocal cords is 8-13 cm, depending on the size of the mask and tracheal tube and on the sex and height of the patient.

Initial experience of emergency physicians using the intubating laryngeal mask airway: a case series

OBJECTIVE

Although the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) is widely available, its use by emergency physicians (EPs) has not been reported. The authors report the initial experience of EPs using the ILMA. A review of their experience and the relevant anesthesia literature provides a basis for EPs to use the ILMA more confidently and effectively.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and January 2001, the ILMA was used on a convenience sample of emergency department (ED) patients undergoing "routine" intubations, and "rescue" situations, after failed rapid-sequence intubation (RSI). Patients were identified from the ED resuscitation case database. Chart review and intubating physician interviews focused on success of the device, complications encountered, and "pearls" of the device's use as perceived by the intubating physician.

RESULTS

Ventilation with the appropriate-size ILMA occurred in less than 15 seconds in all "routine" intubations; tracheal intubation was subsequently accomplished in less than 1 minute. Eight of nine "routine" patients had blind tracheal intubation through the ILMA. One patient required fiberoptic bronchoscopy to guide the endotracheal tube into the trachea. Of the "rescue" intubations, all patients (n = 7) were successfully ventilated and five were successfully intubated using the ILMA.

CONCLUSIONS

In this case series, the ILMA was easy to use in acute resuscitations, and proved to be invaluable in cases of failed RSI.

A comparison of the intubating and standard laryngeal mask airways for airway management by inexperienced personnel

Twenty-four inexperienced participants were timed inserting the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal mask airway in 75 anaesthetised subjects. Adequacy of ventilation was assessed on a three-point scale. The pressure at which a leak first developed around the device's cuff was also measured. There was no significant difference in insertion time or the likelihood of achieving adequate ventilation between devices. However, the intubating laryngeal mask airway was better at providing adequate ventilation without audible leak (58/75 (77%) vs. 42/75 (56%); p = 0.009). The median (range [IQR]) pressure at which an audible leak developed was higher for the intubating laryngeal mask airway, 34.5 (14-40 [29-40]) cmH2O, than for the laryngeal mask airway, 27.5 (14-40 [22-33]) cmH2O (p < 0.001). The intubating laryngeal mask airway is worthy of further consideration as a tool for emergency airway management for inexperienced personnel.

Patient status and time to intubation in the assessment of prehospital intubation performance

Assessment of paramedic endotracheal intubation (ETI) performance often does not account for varied clinical conditions or the time required to complete the procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the utility of patient status and time to intubation (TTI) for evaluating prehospital ETI performance.

METHODS

Paramedic charts were reviewed for the period January-December 1998. Patient clinical status was defined as cardiac arrest (absence of perfusing rhythm) or non-cardiac arrest (presence of perfusing rhythm). Method, route, and success of ETI were noted. The TTI was determined as the elapsed time from on-scene arrival to securing of the endotracheal tube. Time elapsed from on-scene arrival to emergency department arrival was noted for instances of failed ETI. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimator).

RESULTS

Computer records were available for 26,026 patient contacts. Of 893 documented ETI attempts, 771 (86%) were successful. The ETI success rate was significantly higher (p<0.001) for cardiac arrests (551 of 591, 93.2%) than for non-cardiac arrests (220 of 302, 72.9%). Median TTIs were 5 minutes (95% CI: 5, 5) for cardiac arrests and 17 minutes (95% CI: 14, 20) for non-cardiac arrests; this difference was significant (p<0.001). For non-cardiac arrests, ETI success was significantly (p = 0.002) higher for orotracheal intubation (OTI) (168 of 214, 78.5%) than for nasotracheal intubation (NTI) (52 of 88, 59.1%). Median TTIs were 15 minutes (95% CI: 13, 17) for OTI and 25 minutes (95% CI: 23, 27) for NTI; this difference was significant (p = 0.002). For non-cardiac arrests, the difference i

The intubating laryngeal mask airway: effect of handle elevation on efficacy of seal, fibreoptic position, blind intubation and airway protection

We conducted three studies to test the hypothesis that elevation of the intubating laryngeal mask (ILM) handle increases efficacy of seal, changes fibreoptic position, prevents aspiration of regurgitated fluid and improves intubation. In study 1, the ILM was inserted into 20 paralysed, anaesthetized patients and 20 cadavers. Oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position were measured at an intracuff pressure of 0, 60 and 120 cm H2O with 0, 20 and 40 N of elevation force. In study 2, the oesophageal pressure at which regurgitation and aspiration occurred was measured in 20 cadavers with the ILM at the above intracuff pressures and elevation forces and 10 cadavers without the ILM (controls). In study 3, ease of blind intubation (first attempt only) was determined in 20 paralysed, anaesthetized patients at 0 and 40 N elevation force. In study 1, there was a significant increase in oropharyngeal leak pressure with increasing elevation force at an intracuff pressure of 0 and 60 cm H2O. There were no changes in fibreoptic position. Oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position were similar between patients and cadavers. In study 2, oesophageal pressure for regurgitation and aspiration was usually greater for the ILM than controls (all: P < 0.05. Aspiration and regurgitation usually occurred at the same oesophageal pressure. In study 3, blind intubation was more successful at 0 N than 40 N (15/20 v 8/20, P = 0.03). We conclude that elevation of the ILM handle has little clinical utility other than as a temporary measure to improve the efficacy of the seal.