1
|
Zangoue M, Sabertanha A, Younesi Z. Comparing the Effect of Intrathecal Injection of Meperidine, Meperidine-Bupivacaine, and Bupivacaine Alone on Pain Severity and Hemodynamic Parameters after Elective Cesarean Section. Anesth Pain Med 2022; 12:e117090. [PMID: 36937179 PMCID: PMC10016131 DOI: 10.5812/aapm-117090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the effect of meperidine and bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamic changes prior to anesthesia and compare it with post-intervention. Methods In this clinical trial, the rate of postoperative analgesia on 90 healthy women candidates for elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia was evaluated by meperidine, bupivacaine, and a combination of these two drugs. The study was conducted on 90 patients, including 30 patients receiving injection of meperidine, 30 patients receiving injection of bupivacaine, and 30 patients receiving injection of meperidine plus bupivacaine. Nausea, vomiting, headache, itching, and shortness of breath were also recorded. Results The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure in the meperidine group were significantly lower than those detected before the intervention (P < 0.05). The mean SpO2 index was significantly decreased in meperidine and meperidine+bupivacaine groups (P < 0.05). The prevalence of nausea, vomiting and itching was higher in meperidine group compared to those in the other two groups (P = 0.032). Conclusions In sum, the prevalence of nausea, vomiting, and itching in the meperidine group was higher than those in the other two groups. Due to almost equal performance of meperidine and meperidine plus bupivacaine in analgesia, the stabilization of other hemodynamic indices in the meperidine plus bupivacaine group, and the decline in the prevalence of nausea, vomiting, and itching, this combination may have been a good alternative to meperidine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malihe Zangoue
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
| | - Amir Sabertanha
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
| | - Zahra Younesi
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
- Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Edinoff AN, Kaplan LA, Khan S, Petersen M, Sauce E, Causey CD, Cornett EM, Imani F, Moradi Moghadam O, Kaye AM, Kaye AD. Full Opioid Agonists and Tramadol: Pharmacological and Clinical Considerations. Anesth Pain Med 2021; 11:e119156. [PMID: 34692448 PMCID: PMC8520671 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.119156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Opioids are mu receptor agonists and have been an important part of pain treatment for thousands of years. In order to use these drugs appropriately and successfully in patients, whether to control pain, to treat opiate-induced side effects, or opiate withdrawal syndromes, a solid understanding of the pharmacology of such drugs is crucial. The most recognized full agonist opioids are heroin, morphine, codeine, oxycodone, meperidine, and fentanyl. Phenanthrenes refer to a naturally occurring plant-based compound that includes three or more fused rings. The opioids derived from the opium plant are phenanthrene derivatives, whereas most synthetic opioids are simpler molecules that do not have multiple rings. Methadone acts as a synthetic opioid analgesic similar to morphine in both quality and quantity; however, methadone lasts longer and in oral form, has higher efficacy, and is considered a diphenylheptane. Fentanyl is a strong synthetic phenylpiperdine derivative that exhibits activity as a mu-selective opioid agonist approximately 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine. Meperidine is another medication which is a phenylpiperdine. Tramadol is considered a mixed-mechanism opioid drug, as it is a centrally acting analgesic that exerts its effects via binding mu receptors and blocking the reuptake of monoamines. Some of the most common adverse effects shared among all opioids are nausea, vomiting, pruritus, addiction, respiratory depression, constipation, sphincter of Oddi spasm, and miosis (except in the case of meperidine). Chronic opioid usage has also established a relationship to opioid-induced hypogonadism and adrenal suppression. Physicians must be stewards of opioid use and use opioids only when necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber N. Edinoff
- Louisiana State University Health Science Center Shreveport, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Leah A. Kaplan
- Louisiana State University Shreveport, School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Sami Khan
- American University of the Caribbean, School of Medicine, USA
| | - Murray Petersen
- Louisiana State University Health Science Center Shreveport, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Emily Sauce
- Louisiana State University New Orleans, School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | - Elyse M. Cornett
- Louisiana State University Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Farnad Imani
- Pain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Omid Moradi Moghadam
- Pain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Adam M. Kaye
- Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA, USA
| | - Alan D. Kaye
- Louisiana State University Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Forget P, Borovac JA, Thackeray EM, Pace NL. Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthetics in adult surgical patients: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 12:CD003006. [PMID: 31786810 PMCID: PMC6885375 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003006.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal anaesthesia has been implicated as one of the possible causes of neurological complications following surgical procedures. This painful condition, occurring during the immediate postoperative period, is termed transient neurological symptoms (TNS) and is typically observed after the use of spinal lidocaine. Alternatives to lidocaine that can provide high-quality anaesthesia without TNS development are needed. This review was originally published in 2005, and last updated in 2009. OBJECTIVES To determine the frequency of TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine and compare it with other types of local anaesthetics by performing a meta-analysis for all pair-wise comparisons, and conducting network meta-analysis (NMA) to rank interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Elsevier Embase, and LILACS on 25 November 2018. We searched clinical trial registries and handsearched the reference lists of trials and review articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing the frequency of TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine to other local anaesthetics. Studies had to have two or more arms that used distinct local anaesthetics (irrespective of the concentration and baricity of the solution) for spinal anaesthesia in preparation for surgery. We included adults who received spinal anaesthesia and considered all pregnant participants as a subgroup. The follow-up period for TNS was at least 24 hours. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Four review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. Three review authors independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies. We performed meta-analysis for all pair-wise comparisons of local anaesthetics, as well as NMA. We used an inverse variance weighting for summary statistics and a random-effects model as we expected methodological and clinical heterogeneity across the included studies resulting in varying effect sizes between studies of pair-wise comparisons. The NMA used all included studies based on a graph theoretical approach within a frequentist framework. Finally, we ranked the competing treatments by P scores. MAIN RESULTS The analysis included 24 trials reporting on 2226 participants of whom 239 developed TNS. Two studies are awaiting classification and one is ongoing. Included studies mostly had unclear to high risk of bias. The NMA included 24 studies and eight different local anaesthetics; the number of pair-wise comparisons was 32 and the number of different pair-wise comparisons was 11. This analysis showed that, compared to lidocaine, the risk ratio (RR) of TNS was lower for bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, and ropivacaine with RRs in the range of 0.10 to 0.23 while 2-chloroprocaine and mepivacaine did not differ in terms of RR of TNS development compared to lidocaine. Pair-wise meta-analysis showed that compared with lidocaine, most local anaesthetics were associated with a reduced risk of TNS development (except 2-chloroprocaine and mepivacaine) (bupivacaine: RR 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.28; 12 studies; moderate-quality evidence; 2-chloroprocaine: RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.51; 2 studies; low-quality evidence; levobupivacaine: RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.69; 2 studies; low-quality evidence; mepivacaine: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.18 to 5.82; 4 studies; very low-quality evidence; prilocaine: RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 4 studies; moderate-quality evidence; procaine: RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.52; 2 studies; moderate-quality evidence; ropivacaine: RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.78; 2 studies; low-quality evidence). We were unable to perform any of our planned subgroup analyses due to the low number of TNS events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Results from both NMA and pair-wise meta-analysis indicate that the risk of developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia is lower when bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, and ropivacaine are used compared to lidocaine. The use of 2-chloroprocaine and mepivacaine had a similar risk to lidocaine in terms of TNS development after spinal anaesthesia. Patients should be informed of TNS as a possible adverse effect of local anaesthesia with lidocaine and the choice of anaesthetic agent should be based on the specific clinical context and parameters such as the expected duration of the procedure and the quality of anaesthesia. Due to the very low- to moderate-quality evidence (GRADE), future research efforts in this field are required to assess alternatives to lidocaine that would be able to provide high-quality anaesthesia without TNS development. The two studies awaiting classification and one ongoing study may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrice Forget
- University of AberdeenInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and NutritionAberdeenUK
- NHS GrampianDepartment of AnaesthesiaAberdeenUK
| | - Josip A Borovac
- University of SplitSchool of MedicineSoltanska 2SplitCroatia21000
| | - Elizabeth M Thackeray
- University of UtahDepartment of Anesthesiology30 North 1900 East, Room 3C444Salt Lake CityUTUSA84132‐2304
| | - Nathan L Pace
- University of UtahDepartment of Anesthesiology30 North 1900 East, Room 3C444Salt Lake CityUTUSA84132‐2304
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin YC, Chen CY, Liao YM, Liao AHW, Lin PC, Chang CC. Preventing shivering with adjuvant low dose intrathecal meperidine: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7:15323. [PMID: 29127294 PMCID: PMC5681692 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14917-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the pros and cons of adjuvant low dose intrathecal meperidine for spinal anaesthesia. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials using trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the incidence of reduced rescue analgesics, shivering, pruritus, nausea and vomiting when applying adjuvant intrathecal meperidine. Twenty-eight trials with 2216 patients were included. Adjuvant intrathecal meperidine, 0.05-0.5 mg kg-1, significantly reduced incidence of shivering (relative risk, RR, 0.31, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.24 to 0.40; TSA-adjusted RR, 0.32, 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.41). Intrathecal meperidine also effectively reduced need for intraoperative rescue analgesics (RR, 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.64; TSA-adjusted RR, 0.27, 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.91) and the incidence of pruritus was unaffected (RR, 2.31, 95% CI, 0.94 to 5.70; TSA-adjusted RR, 1.42, 95% CI, 0.87 to 2.34). However, nausea and vomiting increased (RR, 1.84, 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.64; TSA-adjusted RR, 1.72, 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.23; RR, 2.23, 95% CI, 1.23 to 4.02; TSA-adjusted RR,1.96, 95% CI, 1.20 to 3.21). Under TSA, these results provided a sufficient level of evidence. In conclusion, adjuvant low dose intrathecal meperidine effectively attenuates spinal anaesthesia-associated shivering and reduces rescue analgesics with residual concerns for the nausea and vomiting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Cih Lin
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, 110, Taiwan
- School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yu Chen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, 110, Taiwan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Humanities in Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Mei Liao
- School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, 112, Taiwan
| | - Alan Hsi-Wen Liao
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, 110, Taiwan
| | - Pi-Chu Lin
- School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan
- Master Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan
| | - Chuen-Chau Chang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
- School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
- Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Basurto Ona X, Uriona Tuma SM, Martínez García L, Solà I, Bonfill Cosp X. Drug therapy for preventing post-dural puncture headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD001792. [PMID: 23450533 PMCID: PMC8406520 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001792.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-dural (post-lumbar or post-spinal) puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common complications of diagnostic, therapeutic or inadvertent lumbar punctures. Many drug options have been used to prevent headache in clinical practice and have also been tested in some clinical studies, but there are still some uncertainties about their clinical effectiveness. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of drugs for preventing PDPH in adults and children. SEARCH METHODS The search strategy included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 5), MEDLINE (from 1950 to May 2012), EMBASE (from 1980 to May 2012) and CINAHL (from 1982 to June 2012). There was no language restriction. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effectiveness of any drug used for preventing PDPH. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Review authors independently selected studies, assessed risks of bias and extracted data. We estimated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. We calculated a 95% confidence interval (CI) for each RR and MD. We did not undertake meta-analysis because participants' characteristics or assessed doses of drugs were too different in the included studies. We performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. MAIN RESULTS We included 10 RCTs (1611 participants) in this review with a majority of women (72%), mostly parturients (women in labour) (913), after a lumbar puncture for regional anaesthesia. Drugs assessed were epidural and spinal morphine, spinal fentanyl, oral caffeine, rectal indomethacin, intravenous cosyntropin, intravenous aminophylline and intravenous dexamethasone.All the included RCTs reported data on the primary outcome, i.e. the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture. Epidural morphine and intravenous cosyntropin reduced the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture when compared to placebo. Also, intravenous aminophylline reduced the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture when compared to no intervention, while intravenous dexamethasone increased it. Spinal morphine increased the number of participants affected by pruritus when compared to placebo, and epidural morphine increased the number of participants affected by nausea and vomiting when compared to placebo. Oral caffeine increased the number of participants affected by insomnia when compared to placebo.The remainder of the interventions analysed did not show any relevant effect for any of the outcomes.None of the included RCTs reported the number of days that patients stayed in hospital. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Morphine and cosyntropin have shown effectiveness for reducing the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture, when compared to placebo, especially in patients with high risk of PDPH, such as obstetric patients who have had an inadvertent dural puncture. Aminophylline also reduced the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture when compared to no intervention in patients undergoing elective caesarean section. Dexamethasone increased the risk of PDPH, after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section, when compared to placebo. Morphine also increased the number of participants affected by adverse events (pruritus and nausea and vomiting)There is a lack of conclusive evidence for the other drugs assessed (fentanyl, caffeine, indomethacin and dexamethasone).These conclusions should be interpreted with caution, owing to the lack of information, to allow correct appraisal of risk of bias and the small sample sizes of studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Basurto Ona
- Emergency Department, Hospital de Figueres, Fundació Salut Empordà, Figueres, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pöpping DM, Elia N, Marret E, Wenk M, Tramèr MR. Opioids added to local anesthetics for single-shot intrathecal anesthesia in patients undergoing minor surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Pain 2012; 153:784-793. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2011] [Revised: 11/21/2011] [Accepted: 11/28/2011] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
7
|
Zaric D, Pace NL. Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthetics. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD003006. [PMID: 19370578 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003006.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal anaesthesia has been in use since 1898. During the last decade there has been an increase in the number of reports implicating lidocaine as a possible cause of temporary and permanent neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia. Follow up of patients who received uncomplicated spinal anaesthesia revealed that some of them developed pain in the lower extremities after an initial full recovery. This painful condition that occurs in the immediate postoperative period was named 'transient neurologic symptoms' (TNS). OBJECTIVES To study the frequency of TNS and neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine compared to other local anaesthetics. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2008); MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008); EMBASE (1980 to week 35, 2008); LILACS (August 2008); and handsearched the reference lists of trials and review articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomized and quasi-randomized studies comparing the frequency of TNS and neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine as compared to other local anaesthetics. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies. MAIN RESULTS Sixteen trials reporting on 1467 patients, 125 of whom developed TNS, were included in the analysis. The use of lidocaine for spinal anaesthesia increased the risk of developing TNS. There was no evidence that this painful condition was associated with any neurologic pathology; the symptoms disappeared spontaneously by the fifth postoperative day. The relative risk (RR) for developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine as compared to other local anaesthetics (bupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, and 2-chloroprocaine) was 7.31 (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.16 to 12.86). Mepivacaine was found to give similar results as lidocaine and was therefor omitted from the overall comparison to diminish the heterogeneity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The risk of developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine was significantly higher than when bupivacaine, prilocaine, or procaine were used. The term 'transient neurological symptoms' implies neurologic pathology. Failing identification of the pathogenesis of TNS, consideration should be given to choosing a neutral descriptive term which does not imply a particular causation. One study about the impact of TNS on patient satisfaction and functional impairment demonstrated that non-TNS patients were more satisfied and had less functional impairment after surgery than TNS patients, but this did not influence their willingness to recommend spinal anaesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dusanka Zaric
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Denmark, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Frederiksberg, Denmark, 2000.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Movafegh A, Soroush AR, Navi A, Sadeghi M, Esfehani F, Akbarian-Tefaghi N. The Effect of Intravenous Administration of Dexamethasone on Postoperative Pain, Nausea, and Vomiting After Intrathecal Injection of Meperidine. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:987-9. [PMID: 17377120 DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000257926.07491.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different drugs have been used to enhance postoperative neuraxial opioid analgesia and reduce adverse effects. METHODS We randomized 60 patients into 2 groups to receive either 2 mL saline or 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone IV before the administration of intrathecal anesthesia (15 mg and meperidine 15 mg). After surgery, patients were asked to score their pain at 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. The presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus and respiratory depression were recorded. RESULTS The total dose of diclofenac (P < 0.05), visual analog scale pain score at 6-h intervals (P < 0.001), and the incidence of PONV (P < 0.05) were significantly lower in the dexamethasone group. CONCLUSIONS Administration of IV dexamethasone prior to intrathecal meperidine injection enhances analgesia and reduces PONV.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use
- Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
- Anesthesia, Spinal
- Anesthetics, Local
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
- Antiemetics/administration & dosage
- Antiemetics/therapeutic use
- Bupivacaine
- Dexamethasone/administration & dosage
- Dexamethasone/therapeutic use
- Diclofenac/therapeutic use
- Double-Blind Method
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Drug Therapy, Combination
- Hernia, Inguinal/surgery
- Humans
- Incidence
- Injections, Intravenous
- Injections, Spinal
- Male
- Meperidine/administration & dosage
- Meperidine/therapeutic use
- Pain Measurement
- Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control
- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/epidemiology
- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Movafegh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr. Ali Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Intrathecal opioids are widely used as useful adjuncts in the treatment of acute and chronic pain, and a number of non-opioid drugs show promise as analgesic drugs with spinal selectivity. In this review we examine the historical development and current use of intrathecal opioids and other drugs that show promise for treating pain in the perioperative period. The pharmacology and clinical use of intrathecal morphine and other opioids is reviewed in detail, including dosing guidelines for specific surgical procedures and the incidence and treatment of side effects associated with these drugs. Available data on the use of non-opioid drugs that have been tested intrathecally for use as analgesics are also reviewed. Evidence-based guidelines for dosing of intrathecal drugs for specific surgical procedures and for the treatment of the most common side effects associated with these drugs are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Rathmell
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zaric D, Christiansen C, Pace NL, Punjasawadwong Y. Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthetics. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD003006. [PMID: 16235310 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003006.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal anaesthesia has been in use since the turn of the late nineteenth century. During the last decade there has been an increase in the number of reports implicating lidocaine as a possible cause of temporary and permanent neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia. Follow-up of patients who received uncomplicated spinal anaesthesia revealed that some of them developed pain in the lower extremities after an initial full recovery. This painful condition that occurs in the immediate postoperative period was named "transient neurologic symptoms" (TNS). OBJECTIVES To study the frequency of TNS and neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine, compared to other local anaesthetics. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2005); MEDLINE (1966 to January 2005); EMBASE (1980 to week 6, 2005); LILACS (March 2005); and handsearched the reference lists of trials and review articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomized and pseudo-randomized studies comparing the frequency of TNS and of neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine as compared to other local anaesthetics. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies. MAIN RESULTS Fifteen trials, reporting 1437 patients, 120 of whom developed transient neurologic symptoms, were included in the analysis. The use of lidocaine for spinal anaesthesia increased the risk of developing TNS. There was no evidence that this painful condition was associated with any neurologic pathology; the symptoms disappeared spontaneously by the fifth postoperative day. The relative risk (RR) for developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine as compared to other local anaesthetics (bupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine) was 7.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.02, 12.75). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The risk of developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine was significantly higher than when bupivacaine, prilocaine and procaine were used. The term "TNS", which implies a positive neurologic finding, should not be used for this painful condition. One study about the impact of TNS on patient satisfaction and functional impairment demonstrated that non-TNS patients were more satisfied and had less functional impairment after surgery than TNS patients, but this did not influence their willingness to recommend spinal anaesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Zaric
- Frederiksberg Hospital, Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Ndr. Fasanvej 57, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alhashemi JA, Kaki AM. Effect of intrathecal tramadol administration on postoperative pain after transurethral resection of prostate. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91:536-40. [PMID: 14504156 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tramadol administered epidurally has been demonstrated to decrease postoperative analgesic requirements. However, its effect on postoperative analgesia after intrathecal administration has not yet been studied. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the effect of intrathecal tramadol administration on pain control after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was studied. METHODS Sixty-four patients undergoing TURP were randomized to receive bupivacaine 0.5% 3 ml intrathecally premixed with either tramadol 25 mg or saline 0.5 ml. After operation, morphine 5 mg i.m. every 3 h was administered as needed for analgesia. Postoperative morphine requirements, visual analogue scale for pain at rest (VAS) and sedation scores, times to first analgesic and hospital lengths of stay were recorded by a blinded observer. RESULTS There were no differences between the groups with regard to postoperative morphine requirements (mean (SD): 10.6 (7.9) vs 9.1 (5.5) mg, P=0.38), VAS (1.6 (1.2) vs 1.2 (0.8), P=0.18) and sedation scores (1.2 (0.3) vs 1.2 (0.2), P=0.89). Times to first analgesic (6.3 (6.3) vs 7.6 (6.2) h, P=0.42) and length of hospital stay (4.7 (2.8) vs 4.4 (2.2) days, P=0.66) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION Intrathecal tramadol was not different from saline in its effect on postoperative morphine requirements after TURP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Alhashemi
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, King Abdulaziz University, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, PO Box 31648, Jeddah 21418, Saudi Arabia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fassoulaki A, Sarantopoulos C. Intrathecal meperidine. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46:1096-7. [PMID: 10566938 DOI: 10.1007/bf03013216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|