Narcotrend® depth of anesthesia monitoring in infants and children

Depth of anesthesia by Narcotrend® and postoperative characteristics in children undergoing cardiac surgery under extracorporeal circulation: a retrospective comparison of two anesthetic regimens

BACKGROUND

Depth of anesthesia may be insufficient in pediatric cardiac anesthesia if a total intravenous anesthetic regimen with opioids and midazolam is used during cardiopulmonary bypass. The advantages of sevoflurane-based balanced anesthesia may be (1) a more graduated regulation of the depth of anesthesia during cardiopulmonary bypass and (2) a reduction in postoperative ventilation time for children in comparison with total intravenous anesthesia.

AIM

To evaluate a possibly positive effect of sevoflurane-based balanced anesthesia in children undergoing cardiac surgery we analyzed whether this anesthetic regimen had a significant effect related to (1) depth of anesthesia, (2) the need for opioids during cardiopulmonary bypass as well as on postoperative characteristics such as (3) time of postoperative ventilation, and (4) duration of stay in the intensive care unit in comparison with total intravenous anesthesia.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, data from heart-lung machine protocols from 2013 to 2016 were compared according to anesthetic regimen (sevoflurane-balanced anesthesia, n = 70 vs. total intravenous anesthesia, n = 65). Children (age: 8 weeks to 14 years) undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were included. As a primary outcome measure, we compared Narcotrend^® system-extracted data to detect insufficient phases of anesthetic depth during extracorporeal circulation under moderate hypothermia. Postoperatively, we measured the postoperative ventilation time and the number of days in the intensive care unit. Furthermore, we analyzed patients' specific characteristics such as opioid consumption during cardiopulmonary bypass. Regression analysis relating primary objectives was done using the following variables: anesthetic regimen, age, severity of illness/surgery, and cumulative dosage of opiates during cardiopulmonary bypass.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in descriptive patient characteristics (age, body weight, height, and body temperature) between the two groups. Further, no significant differences were found in depth of anesthesia by analyzing phases of superficial B1-C2-electroencephalography Narcotrend^® data. No marked difference between the groups was observed for the duration of postoperative intensive care unit stay. However, the postoperative ventilation time (median (95% CI, hours)) was significantly lower in the sevoflurane-based balanced anesthesia group (6.0 (2.0-15.0)) than in the total intravenous anesthesia group (13.5 (7.0-25)). A higher dosage of opioids and midazolam was required in the total intravenous anesthesia group to maintain adequate anesthesia during cardiopulmonary bypass. Regression analysis showed an additional, significant impact of the following factors: severity of illness and severity grade of cardiac surgery (according to Aristotle) on the primary endpoint.

CONCLUSION

In children undergoing cardiac surgery in our department, the use of sevoflurane-balanced anesthesia during cardiopulmonary bypass showed no superiority of inhalational agents over total intravenous anesthesia with opioids and benzodiazepines preventing phases of superficial anesthesia, but a marked advantage for the postoperative ventilation time compared with total intravenous anesthesia.

The EEG signal: a window on the cortical brain activity

The accurate assessment of the depth of anesthesia, allowing a more accurate adaptation of the doses of hypnotics, is an important end point for the anesthesiologist. It is a particularly crucial issue in pediatric anesthesia, in the context of the recent controversies about the potential neurological consequences of the main anesthetic drugs on the developing brain. The electroencephalogram signal reflects the electrical activity of the neurons in the cerebral cortex. It is thus the key to assessment of the level of hypnosis. Beyond visual analysis, several monitoring devices allow an automated treatment of the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal, combining time and frequency domain analysis. Each of these monitors focuses on a specific combination of characteristics of the signal and provides the clinician with useful information that remains, however, partial. For a comprehensive approach of the EEG-derived indices, the main features of the normal EEG, in adults and children, will be presented in the awake state and during sleep. Age-related modifications accompanying cerebral maturation during infancy and childhood will be detailed. Then, this review will provide an update on how anesthetic drugs, particularly hypnotics, influence the EEG signal, and how the main available monitors analyze these drug-induced modifications. The relationships between pain, memory, and the EEG will be discussed. Finally, this review will focus on some specific EEG features such as the electrical epileptoid activity observed under sevoflurane anesthesia. The EEG signal is the best window we have on cortical brain activity and provides a fair pharmacodynamic feedback of the effects of hypnotics. However, the cortex is only one of several targets of anesthesia. Hypnotics and opiates, have also subcortical primary targets, and the EEG performances in the evaluation or prediction of nociception are poor. Monitoring subcortical structures in combination with the EEG might in the future allow a better evaluation and a more precise adaptation of balanced anesthesia.

Monitoring the anaesthetic depth in children - an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are several commercially available electroencephalogram-derived devices for monitoring anaesthesia depth. This article reviews all published studies describing their use in children; first assessing studies of performance in measuring anaesthesia depth in observational, physiological studies and then describing relevant outcome studies. There is also a brief discussion of why they might be useful, what physiological problems may arise and what the reader should be wary of in the methodology of these studies. The subject is approached from a clinical perspective.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are several physiological studies suggesting that for older children the bispectral index, entropy, Narcotrend index, cerebral state index and A-line ARX index all change with induction of anaesthesia, and have reasonable correlations with doses of anaesthetic agent. There is consistent evidence that the performances are substantially poorer in infants. Some of these devices have been demonstrated to reduce anaesthesia drug consumption and hasten recovery in older children.

SUMMARY

The bispectral index is the most widely studied, but at this stage there is no evidence to suggest any one device is substantially superior to any other. There may be a role emerging for their use in older children, but their use in infants cannot be supported.

Comparative evaluation of Bispectral Index and Narcotrend Index in children below 5 years of age

BACKGROUND

The use of electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring devices for assessing the depth of hypnosis is most difficult in children under 5 years of age.

METHODS

Forty five children aged 0-60 months were included in a prospective observational study. A direct comparison of the processed EEG variables Bispectral Index (BIS, version 3.4) and Narcotrend Index (NI, version 2.0AF) was to be achieved by simultaneous recording. The ability of these parameters to differentiate between various clinical states was evaluated by using the prediction probability (P(k)). Age-related effects on the BIS and NI were analyzed by dividing the children into three age groups: 0-6, 7-18 and 19-60 months.

RESULTS

The preanesthesia, conscious children were differentiated from anesthetized patients by the BIS and NI with no overlap (P(k) = 1.0). In the awake period the BIS was superior to the NI (P(k) to differentiate 'end of anesthesia' from 'awakening' was 0.97 vs 0.73 respectively; P = 0.002). Patients aged 7-18 months showed higher BIS and NI values in the course of anesthesia than the younger and older children (P = 0.001). On awakening, children aged 0-6 months showed the lowest mean BIS (n.s.) and NI (P = 0.006) values.

CONCLUSIONS

The BIS currently seems to be superior to the NI, but age-related processing algorithms of the raw EEG must be implemented in both BIS and NI in order to be useful in children younger than 5 years of age.

Depth of Anesthesia Monitoring

Depth-of-anesthesia monitoring with EEG or EEG combined with mLAER is becoming widely used in anesthesia practice. Evidence shows that this monitoring improves outcome by reducing the incidence of intra-operative awareness while reducing the average amount of anesthesia that is administered, resulting in faster wake-up and recovery, and perhaps reduced nausea and vomiting. As with any monitoring device, there are limitations in the use of the monitors and the anesthesiologist must be able to interpret the data accordingly. The limitations include the following. The currently available monitoring algorithms do not account for all anesthetic drugs, including ketamine, nitrous oxide and halothane. EMG and other high-frequency electrical artifacts are common and interfere with EEG interpretation. Data processing time produces a lag in the computation of the depth-of-anesthesia monitoring index. Frequently the EEG effects of anesthetic drugs are not good predictors of movement in response to a surgical stimulus because the main site of action for anesthetic drugs to prevent movement is the spinal cord. The use of depth-of-anesthesia monitoring in children is not as well understood as in adults. Several monitoring devices are commercially available. The BIS monitor is the most thoroughly studied and most widely used, but the amount of information about other monitors is growing. In the future, depth-of-anesthesia monitoring will probably help in further refining and better understanding the process of administering anesthesia.