Posterior tibial nerve and median nerve somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during carotid endarterectomy

Monitoring in carotid endarterectomy

Cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy occurs via several mechanisms: inadequate collateral blood flow during carotid cross-clamping, thromboembolism due to carotid manipulation, and/or rethrombosis at the surgical site. Perioperative strokes increase not only the morbidity of endarterectomy but also its short- and long-term mortality. However, while several predictors of cerebral ischemia have been identified, precise individual risk is hard to assess. Since nonselective shunting during carotid cross-clamping is neither risk-free nor eliminates perioperative stroke, it is advisable to apply intraoperative monitoring techniques for detection and reversal of cerebral ischemia, which may occur at various stages of the procedure. This chapter addresses the methods available for monitoring, with an emphasis on neurophysiologic techniques, which are preferable given their direct assessment of how a decrease in cerebral blood flow impacts brain function. These include electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials, and transcranial motor evoked potentials. Details regarding the methodology, advantages, disadvantages, and interpretation of these tests will be discussed within the anatomic, physiologic, surgical, and anesthetic contexts.

Limitations of median nerve somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Hypoperfusion during carotid artery cross-clamping (CC) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may result in the major complication of perioperative stroke. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (MNSSEP) monitoring, which is an established method for the prediction of cerebral ischemia, has low sensitivity in detecting such hypoperfusion. In this study the authors sought to explore the limitations of MNSSEP monitoring compared to tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potential (TNSSEP) monitoring for the detection of CC-related hypoperfusion.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent unilateral CEA with routine shunt use. All patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance angiography and were monitored for intraoperative cerebral ischemia by using MNSSEP, TNSSEP, and carotid stump pressure during CC. First, the frequency of MNSSEP and TNSSEP changes during CC were analyzed. Subsequently, variables related to stump pressure were determined by using linear analysis and those related to each of the somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) changes were determined by using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients (mean age 74 years) were included in the study. TNSSEP identified a greater number of SSEP changes during CC than MNSSEP (20.2% vs 11.7%; p < 0.05). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that hypoplasia of the contralateral proximal segment of the anterior cerebral artery (A1 hypoplasia) (p < 0.01) and hypoplasia of the ipsilateral precommunicating segment of the posterior cerebral artery (P1 hypoplasia) (p = 0.02) independently and negatively correlated with stump pressure. Both contralateral A1 hypoplasia (OR 26.25, 95% CI 4.52-152.51) and ipsilateral P1 hypoplasia (OR 8.75, 95% CI 1.83-41.94) were independently related to the TNSSEP changes. However, only ipsilateral P1 hypoplasia (OR 8.76, 95% CI 1.61-47.67) was independently related to MNSSEP changes.

CONCLUSIONS

TNSSEP monitoring appears to be superior to MNSSEP in detecting CC-related hypoperfusion. Correlation with stump pressure and SSEP changes indicates that TNSSEP, and not MNSSEP monitoring, is a reliable indicator of cerebral ischemia in the territory of the anterior cerebral artery.

Perioperative stroke

PURPOSE

Perioperative stroke is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with an incidence that may be underappreciated. In this review, we examine the significance, pathophysiology, risk factors, and evidence-based recommendations for the prevention and management of perioperative stroke.

SOURCE

This is a narrative review based on literature from the PubMed database regarding perioperative stroke across a broad surgical population. The Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care recently published evidence-based recommendations for perioperative management of patients at high risk for stroke; these recommendations were analyzed and incorporated into this review.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The incidence of overt perioperative stroke is highest in patients presenting for cardiac and major vascular surgery, although preliminary data suggest that the incidence of covert stroke may be as high as 10% in non-cardiac surgery patients. The pathophysiology of perioperative stroke involves different pathways. Thrombotic stroke can result from increased inflammation and hypercoagulability; cardioembolic stroke can result from disease states such as atrial fibrillation, and tissue hypoxia from anemia can result from the combination of anemia and beta-blockade. Across large-scale database studies, common risk factors for perioperative stroke include advanced age, history of cerebrovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and renal disease. Recommendations for prevention and management of perioperative stroke are evolving, though further work is needed to clarify the role of proposed modifiable risk factors such as perioperative anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, appropriate transfusion thresholds, and perioperative beta-blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative stroke carries a significant clinical burden. The incidence of perioperative stroke may be higher than previously recognized, and there are diverse pathophysiologic mechanisms. There are many opportunities for further investigation of the pathophysiology, prevention, and management of perioperative stroke.

Somatosensory-evoked potential asymmetry in medullary ischemia during cervical spine surgery

This report describes how somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) can detect acute medullary ischemia during cervical spine surgery. This article describes how asymmetric SEP intraoperative monitoring changes can localize medullary ischemia. Localization of change was validated by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A 68-year-old man underwent cervical posterior fusion with monitoring of bilateral SEPs of the upper and lower extremities. The SEPs disappeared during initial exposure of the C1 lamina. Changes were asymmetric in degree and duration. Brain MRI postoperatively demonstrated bilateral posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) territory infarcts involving the left lateral medulla. This illustrates how intraoperative SEP monitoring can provide important information on the functional integrity of brainstem structures even during cervical surgery. A knowledge of medullary anatomy and vascular territories is necessary for interpreting SEP changes. In cervical surgery, SEPs incidentally monitor the integrity of the brainstem while monitoring the spinal cord. The asymmetry of SEP change seen here was consistent with medullary level impairment, where the vascular territory is lateralized in contrast to the symmetric anterior spinal artery territory.

Monitoring of the Brain and Spinal Cord

IOM has become commonly used by many surgeons to enhance their intraoperative decision making and reduce the morbidity and mortality of selected procedures. The ability to perform these tests rests on the anesthesiologist's ability to provide the patient with an anesthetic plan that provides comfort and monitoring. When events occur, the anesthesiologist's knowledge and ability to manipulate the patient's physiologic condition become integral to the decision making. A good understanding of the neural anatomy, impact of physiology, and anesthetic medications can allow effective IOM and good team decision making when changes in IOM occur.