Neuromuscular blockade can be assessed accelerographically over the vastus medialis muscle in patients positioned prone

Acceleromyographic monitoring of neuromuscular block over the orbicularis oris muscle in anesthetized patients receiving vecuronium

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the level of neuromuscular block acceleromyographically over the orbicularis oris muscle.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

Operating room of a university-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

36 adult, ASA physical status I and II women scheduled for mastectomy with air-oxygen-isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to two groups. In the orbicularis oris group (n=18), the facial nerve was stimulated and movement of the orbicularis oris muscle was measured acceleromyographically. In the control group (n=18), adduction of the thumb was quantified mechanically.

MEASUREMENTS

Onset and recovery of neuromuscular block caused by vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg were compared between the groups.

MAIN RESULTS

Time to onset of neuromuscular block in the orbicularis oris group was significantly shorter than in the control group (176 + or - 52 vs. 220 + or - 34 sec, mean + or - SD; P = 0.004). Times to return of the first, second, third, or fourth (T1, T2, T3, or T4) response of train-of four (TOF), and recovery of T1/control were comparable between the groups. Train-of-four ratio (T4/T1) in the orbicularis oris group was significantly higher than in the control group 50 to 120 minutes after vecuronium administration (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Depth of neuromuscular block can be assessed acceleromyographically over the orbicularis oris muscle. Onset of neuromuscular block is quicker and recovery of TOF ratio is faster over the orbicularis oris muscle than at the thumb in patients receiving vecuronium.

Monitoring of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at the sternocleidomastoid muscle in anesthetized patients

PURPOSE

To assess the degree of neuromuscular block acceleromyographically at the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

METHODS

Eighteen adult patients scheduled for air-oxygen-sevoflurane-fentanyl and epidural anesthesia were studied. In the patients, the right accessory nerve and the sternocleidomastoid muscle were stimulated and the contraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle was evaluated acceleromyographically. Simultaneously, the response of the adductor pollicis muscle was measured electromyographically. Supramaximal stimulating current, degree of maximum neuromuscular block after vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg, and onset of or recovery from vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block were compared between the two muscles.

RESULTS

The supramaximal stimulating current at the sternocleidomastoid muscle was significantly higher than that at the adductor pollicis muscle (54.8 ± 7.1 vs. 33.7 ± 10.3 mA, mean ± SD, P < 0.001). The onset of neuromuscular block at the sternocleidomastoid muscle did not significantly differ from that at the adductor pollicis muscle (214 ± 117 vs. 161 ± 87 s, P = 0.131). The degree of maximum neuromuscular block at the sternocleidomastoid muscle was significantly less than that at the adductor pollicis muscle (93.6 ± 3.1 vs. 99.2 ± 2.5%, P < 0.001). During recovery from neuromuscular block, T1/control and train-of-four ratio measured at the sternocleidomastoid muscle were significantly higher than those at the adductor pollicis muscle 10-30 and 40-120 min after vecuronium, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The sternocleidomastoid muscle is more resistant to vecuronium than the adductor pollicis muscle. Recovery from neuromuscular block is faster at the sternocleidomastoid muscle than at the adductor pollicis muscle.

Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician

PURPOSE

To review established techniques and to provide an update on new methods for clinical monitoring of neuromuscular function relevant to anesthesia.

SOURCE

A PubMed search of relevant article for the period 1985-2005 was undertaken, and bibliographies were scanned for additional sources.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

There is no substitute for objective neuromuscular monitoring; for research purposes, mechanomyography (MMG) is the gold standard; however, the most versatile method in the clinical setting is acceleromyography since it can be applied at various muscles and has a long track record of clinical utility. Kinemyography is valid to monitor recovery of neuromuscular transmission at the adductor pollicis muscle (AP), whereas phonomyography is easy to apply to various muscles and shows promising agreement with MMG. Monitoring of the corrugator supercilii muscle (CS) may be used to determine the earliest time for tracheal intubation as it reflects laryngeal relaxation better than monitoring at the AP. Recovery of neuromuscular transmission is best monitored at the AP, since it is the last muscle to recover from neuromuscular blockade (NMB). If train-of-four (TOF) stimulation is used, a TOF-ratio > 0.9 should be the target before awakening the patient. If surgery or the type of anesthesia necessitates NMB of a certain degree, e.g., TOF-ratio = 0.25, monitoring of muscles which best reflect the degree of NMB at the surgical site is preferable.

CONCLUSION

Objective methods should be used to monitor neuromuscular function in clinical anesthesia. Acceleromyography offers the best compromise with respect to ease of use, practicality, versatility, precision and applicability at various muscles. The CS is the optimal muscle to determine the earliest time for intubation, e.g., for rapid sequence induction.

Monitoring neuromuscular blockade at the vastus medialis muscle using phonomyography

PURPOSE

The vastus medialis muscle has been recently proposed as a new site for monitoring neuromuscular blockade (NMB). The purpose of this study is to compare NMB at the vastus medialis with the adductor pollicis muscle using phonomyography (PMG).

METHODS

Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study. Anesthesia was induced with remifentanil 0.25 to 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), followed by propofol 2 to 2.5 mg(-1) x kg(-1) iv. Analgesia was provided by remifentanil 0.05 to 0.25 microg x kg (-1) x min(-1) iv throughout surgery. A small piezo-electric microphone was attached to the middle of the thenar mass of the right hand to record acoustic signals produced by the contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle. A second microphone was fixed to the medial part of the thigh, 10 cm over the patella, to record the response from the vastus medialis muscle. The ulnar nerve and the im branches of the femoral nerve were stimulated using train-of-four stimulation every 12 sec. Onset, maximum effect, and offset of neuromuscular block were measured after mivacurium 0.2 mg x kg(-1) iv and compared.

RESULTS

At the vastus medialis muscle, the onset of NMB was significantly shorter at 1.9 +/- 0.6 min vs 2.8 +/- 0.7 min, the maximum effect less pronounced at 85 +/- 11% vs 96 +/- 2% and recovery of NMB to 25%, 75%, 90% of twitch control height more rapid than at the adductor pollicis muscle at 17 +/- 2.2 min vs 21.6 +/- 4.2 min, 26.7 +/- 6.5 vs 21 +/- 4.1 min and 30.7 +/- 6.6 vs 35.9 +/- 7.1 min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PMG can be used to measure NMB at the vastus medialis muscle. We found a shorter onset time, less pronounced maximum effect and more rapid recovery of NMB at the vastus medialis muscle than at the adductor pollicis muscle.

Train-of-Four Stimulation for Adductor Pollicis Neuromuscular Monitoring Can Be Applied at the Wrist or Over the Hand

Adductor pollicis stimulation over the ulnar nerve at the wrist is the standard method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Stimulation over a muscle is believed to cause direct muscle contraction, but evidence for this is lacking. In this study we sought to determine whether direct muscle stimulation occurred during stimulation of the adductor pollicis in the hand and whether the responses were comparable to those observed with stimulation at the wrist. In 20 patients anesthetized with sevoflurane, 1 pair of stimulating electrodes was positioned over the ulnar nerve at the wrist. A second pair was placed between the first and second metacarpals on the palmar and dorsal aspects of the hand. The acceleromyographic response was monitored. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered. Train-of-four (TOF) stimulations were applied at the wrist site until maximal blockade. Then, stimulation was applied to the hand site. During recovery, both sites were monitored alternately. After injection of rocuronium, 17 of 20 patients showed no twitch response at either site. One patient had a response at both stimulation sites, and two patients had responses only at the wrist site. With a Bland and Altman analysis, TOF ratios during recovery at the hand showed a bias of 0.5% and limits of agreement of +/-11.8% as compared with the wrist. Stimulation in the hand causes no direct muscle stimulation because the response is no more than that produced by stimulation at the wrist. Both sites yield comparable TOF ratios.