Efficacy of forced-air warming systems with full body blankets

Head cooling wrap could suppress the elevation of core temperature after cardiac surgery during forced-air warming in a pediatric intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

The main aim of the current trial was to explore our hypothesis that cooling head wraps lower the core temperature more effectively than ice packs on the head during forced-air warming after pediatric cardiac surgeries.

METHODS

This study was a single-center Randomized Controlled Trial. Participants were children with a weight ≤ 10 kg and hyperthermia during forced-air warming after cardiac surgeries. When the core temperature reached 37.5 °C, ice packs on the head (group C) or a cooling head wrap (group H) were used as cooling devices to decrease the core temperature. The primary outcome was the core temperature. The secondary outcomes were the foot surface temperature and heart rate. We measured all outcomes every 30 min for 240 min after the patient developed hyperthermia. We conducted two-way ANOVA as a pre-planned analysis and also the Bonferroni test as a post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were randomly assigned to groups C and H. The series of core temperatures in group H were significantly lower than those in group C (p < 0.0001), and post hoc analysis showed that there was no significant difference in core temperatures at T0 between the two groups and statistically significant differences in all core temperatures at T30-240 between the two groups. There was no difference between the two groups' surface temperatures and heart rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to ice packs on the head, head cooling wraps more effectively suppress core temperature elevation during forced-air warming after pediatric cardiac surgery.

The effect of rewarming on hemodynamic parameters and arterial blood gases of patients after open-heart surgery: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Hypothermia after open-heart surgery can have potential side effects for patients.

AIM

This study aimed to examine the effects of rewarming on patients' hemodynamic and arterial blood gases parameters after open-heart surgery.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was performed in 2019 on 80 patients undergoing open-heart surgery at Tehran Heart Center, Iran. The subjects were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to an intervention group (n=40) and a control group (n=40). After the surgery, the intervention group was warmed with an electric warming mattress while the control group warmed using a simple hospital blanket. The hemodynamic parameters of the two groups were measured 6 times and arterial blood gas was measured 3 times. Data were analyzed by independent samples t and Chi-squared tests, and repeated measures analysis.

RESULTS

Before the intervention, the two groups did not significantly differ in terms of hemodynamic and blood gas parameters. However, the two groups were significantly different in the mean heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, temperature, right and left lung drainage in the first half-hour, and the first to fourth hours after the intervention (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant difference between the mean arterial oxygen pressure of the two groups during and after rewarming (P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rewarming of patients after open-heart surgery can significantly affect hemodynamic and arterial blood gas parameters. Therefore, rewarming methods can be used safely to improve the patients' hemodynamic parameters after open-heart surgery.

Perioperative Prewarming: Heat Transfer and Physiology

To appreciate the strategy of prewarming, perioperative personnel should have a basic understanding of the physics of heat transfer and the thermoregulatory pathophysiology of anesthesia. The dominant cause of postinduction hypothermia is anesthesia-related redistribution of heat within the body; the role of cutaneous heat loss is minimal. Physiologic thermoregulatory system changes that occur in response to anesthesia make it almost impossible to reverse intraoperative hypothermia. However, prewarming is an effective strategy to prevent postinduction hypothermia from redistribution because it creates a temporary excess of heat in the body's peripheral thermal compartment. Perioperative nurses should implement active and passive prewarming strategies in accordance with the warming devices at their facility and available time. This article focuses on two major topics necessary to understand prewarming: the effect of anesthesia on postinduction thermoregulation and thermodynamic conditions that successful treatment strategies must exploit to produce desired outcomes.

Effect of preheating on the maintenance of body temperature in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial

Objective:

to evaluate the effect of preheating on the maintenance of body temperature of patients submitted to elective gynecological surgeries.

Method:

eighty-six patients were randomized, without blinding, to receive usual care (heating with a cotton sheet and blanket) or preheating with a forced air system for 20 minutes (38°C). All patients were actively heated during the intraoperative period. Data were collected from admission of the patient in the surgical center until the end of the surgery. Body temperature was measured during the preoperative and intraoperative periods with an infrared tympanic thermometer. A thermo-hygrometer was used to monitor air temperature and humidity of the operating room.

Results:

data indicated homogeneity between the groups investigated. There was no statistically significant difference between groups after preheating (p = 0.27). At the end of the surgery, the mean temperature of the groups studied was the same (36.8°C), with a statistically non-significant difference (p = 0.66).

Conclusion:

preheating with the heated forced air system had a similar effect to the usual care in the body temperature of patients submitted to elective gynecological surgeries. ClinicalTrials.gov n. NCT02422758. CAAE, n. 38320814.2.0000.5393.

Peri-operative warming devices: performance and clinical application

Since the adverse consequences of accidental peri-operative hypothermia have been recognised, there has been a rapid expansion in the development of new warming equipment designed to prevent it. This is a review of peri-operative warming devices and a critique of the evidence assessing their performance. Forced-air warming is a common and extensively tested warming modality that outperforms passive insulation and water mattresses, and is at least as effective as resistive heating. More recently developed devices include circulating water garments, which have shown promising results due to their ability to cover large surface areas, and negative pressure devices aimed at improving subcutaneous perfusion for warming. We also discuss the challenge of fluid warming, looking particularly at how devices' performance varies according to flow rate. Our ultimate aim is to provide a guide through the bewildering array of devices on the market so that clinicians can make informed and accurate choices for their particular hospital environment.

[Efficacy of a novel warming blanket: prospective randomized trial]

BACKGROUND

Perioperative hypothermia is a common complication of general anesthesia and occurs in up to 50 % of patients during ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery. In this prospective, randomized controlled study the hypothesis that a new conductive warming blanket (Barrier® EasyWarm®, Mölnlycke Health Care Erkrath, Germany) is better in reducing the incidence of perioperative hypothermia in ENT surgery than insulation with a conventional hospital duvet alone was tested.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After approval of the local ethics committee and written informed consent 80 patients with a planned procedure time between 1 and 3 h were recruited. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium and the core temperature was measured using an esophageal temperature probe. Patients in the study group were warmed at least 30 min prior to induction of anesthesia using the novel warming blanket (Barrier® EasyWarm®) and patients in the control group were insulated with a standard hospital duvet. Data were tested using Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. Time-dependent changes in core temperature were evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Scheffé's test. Results are expressed as mean ± SD or as median and interquartile range (IQR) as appropriate. A p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

The ANOVA did not identify a significantly higher core temperature in the study group at any time point. Furthermore, Fisher's exact test showed no differences in the incidence of intraoperative (12 out of 29 versus 10 out of 32 patients, p = 0.44) or postoperative hypothermia (12 out of 29 versus 9 out of 32 patients, p = 0.30) between the groups. No adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In the studied patient group the new conductive warming blanket (Barrier® EasyWarm®) showed no superiority compared to conventional thermal insulation alone.

Forced-air warming: technology, physical background and practical aspects

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is an ever-increasing number of forced-air warming devices available in the market. However, there is also a paucity of studies that have investigated the physical background of these devices, making it difficult to find the most suitable ones.

RECENT FINDINGS

Heat flow produced by power units depends on the air temperature at the nozzle and the airflow. The heat transfer from the blanket to the body surface depends on the heat exchange coefficient, the temperature gradient between the blanket and the body surface and the area that is covered. Additionally, the homogeneity of heat distribution inside the blanket is very important. The lower the temperature difference between the highest and the lowest blanket temperature, the better the performance of the blanket.

SUMMARY

The efficacy of a forced-air warming system is mainly determined by the design of the blankets. A good forced-air warming blanket can easily be detected by measuring the temperature difference between the highest blanket temperature and the lowest blanket temperature. This temperature difference should be as low as possible. Because of the limited efficacy of forced-air warming systems to prevent hypothermia, patients must be prewarmed for 30-60 min even if a forced-air warming system is used during the operation. During the operation, the largest blanket that is possible for the operation should be used.

Resistive-polymer versus forced-air warming: comparable efficacy in orthopedic patients

BACKGROUND

Several adverse consequences are caused by mild perioperative hypothermia. Maintaining normothermia with patient warming systems, today mostly with forced air (FA), has thus become a standard procedure during anesthesia. Recently, a polymer-based resistive patient warming system was developed. We compared the efficacy of a widely distributed FA system with the resistive-polymer (RP) system in a prospective, randomized clinical study.

METHODS

Eighty patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery were randomized to either FA warming (Bair Hugger warming blanket #522 and blower #750, Arizant, Eden Prairie, MN) or RP warming (Hot Dog Multi-Position Blanket and Hot Dog controller, Augustine Biomedical, Eden Prairie, MN). Core temperature, skin temperature (head, upper and lower arm, chest, abdomen, back, thigh, and calf), and room temperature (general and near the patient) were recorded continuously.

RESULTS

After an initial decrease, core temperatures increased in both groups at comparable rates (FA: 0.33 degrees C/h +/- 0.34 degrees C/h; RP: 0.29 degrees C/h +/- 0.35 degrees C/h; P = 0.6). There was also no difference in the course of mean skin and mean body (core) temperature. FA warming increased the environment close to the patient (the workplace of anesthesiologists and surgeons) more than RP warming (24.4 degrees C +/- 5.2 degrees C for FA vs 22.6 degrees C +/- 1.9 degrees C for RP at 30 minutes; P(AUC) <0.01).

CONCLUSION

RP warming performed as efficiently as FA warming in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

What determines the efficacy of forced-air warming systems? A manikin evaluation with upper body blankets

BACKGROUND

Forced-air warming has gained acceptance as an effective means to prevent perioperative hypothermia. However, little is known about the influence of air flow and air temperature at the nozzle and the influence of heat distribution in the blankets on the efficacy of these systems.

METHODS

We conducted a manikin study with heat flux transducers using five forced-air warming systems to determine the factors that are responsible for heat transfer from the blanket to the manikin.

RESULTS

There was no relation between air temperature at the nozzle of the power unit and the resulting heat transfer. There was also no relation between the air flow at the nozzle of the power unit and the resulting heat transfer. However, all blankets performed best at high air flows above 19 L/s. The heat exchange coefficient, the mean temperature gradient between the blanket and the manikin correlated positively with the resulting heat transfer and the difference between the minimal and maximal blanket temperature correlated negatively with the resulting heat transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of forced-air warming systems is primarily determined by the blanket. Modern power units provide sufficient heat energy to maximize the ability of the blanket to warm the patient. Optimizing blanket design by optimizing the mean temperature gradient between the blanket and the manikin (or any other surface) with a very homogeneous temperature distribution in the blanket will enable the manufacturers to develop better forced-air warming systems.