Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects of drugs with different actions on adrenergic receptors: a comparison between alpha blockers and different types of beta blockers with and without vasodilating effect

Adrenoceptors and Hypertension

Hypertension is a very prevalent condition associated with high mortality and morbidity, secondary to changes resulting in blood vessels and resultant end-organ damage. Haemodynamic changes, including an initial rise in cardiac output followed by an increase in total peripheral resistance, denote the early changes associated with borderline or stage 1 hypertension, especially in young men. Increased sodium reabsorption leading to kidney damage is another mechanism proposed as one of the initial triggers for essential hypertension. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms include catecholamine-induced α1- and ß1-adrenoceptor stimulation, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation leading to endothelial dysfunction which is believed to lead to persistent blood pressure elevation.α1 blockers, α2 agonists, and ß blockers were among the first oral anti-hypertensives. They are no longer first-line therapy after outcome trials did not demonstrate any benefits over and above other agents, despite similar blood pressure reductions. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (or angiotensin receptor blockers), calcium channel blockers, and thiazide-like diuretics are now considered the first line of therapy, although adrenoceptor agents still have a role as second- or third-line therapy. The chapter also highlights hypertension in specific medical conditions such as pregnancy, phaeochromocytoma, hyperthyroidism, portal hypertension, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and ocular hypertension, to provide an overview for clinicians and researchers interested in the role of adrenoceptors in the pathophysiology and management of hypertension.

Development of an automated closed-loop β-blocker delivery system to stably reduce myocardial oxygen consumption without inducing circulatory collapse in a canine heart failure model: a proof of concept study

Beta-blockers are well known to reduce myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO₂) and improve the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients. However, its negative chronotropic and inotropic effects limit their use in the acute phase of HF due to the risk of circulatory collapse. In this study, as a first step for a safe β-blocker administration strategy, we aimed to develop and evaluate the feasibility of an automated β-blocker administration system. We developed a system to monitor arterial pressure (AP), left atrial pressure (P_LA), right atrial pressure, and cardiac output. Using negative feedback of hemodynamics, the system controls AP and P_LA by administering landiolol (an ultra-short-acting β-blocker), dextran, and furosemide. We applied the system for 60 min to 6 mongrel dogs with rapid pacing-induced HF. In all dogs, the system automatically adjusted the doses of the drugs. Mean AP and mean P_LA were controlled within the acceptable ranges (AP within 5 mmHg below target; P_LA within 2 mmHg above target) more than 95% of the time. Median absolute performance error was small for AP [median (interquartile range), 3.1% (2.2–3.8)] and P_LA [3.6% (2.2–5.7)]. The system decreased MVO₂ and P_LA significantly. We demonstrated the feasibility of an automated β-blocker administration system in a canine model of acute HF. The system controlled AP and P_LA to avoid circulatory collapse, and reduced MVO₂ significantly. As the system can help the management of patients with HF, further validations in larger samples and development for clinical applications are warranted.

Nwokocha C, Bórquez J, Simirgiotis MJ, Norambuena I, Chiong M, Paredes A. Polyphenolic Composition and Hypotensive Effects of Parastrephia quadrangularis (Meyen) Cabrera in Rat

Parastrephia quadrangularis (Pq), commonly called "Tola", is widely used in folk medicine in the Andes, including for altitude sickness. In this study, polyphenolic composition was determined, and hypotensive effects were measured; the ethnopharmacological use as hypotensive was related to the presence of phenolic compounds. For this purpose, male Sprague-Dawley rats (6 to 8 weeks of age, 160 to 190 g) were fed Pq extract (10 to 40 mg/kg) for 10 days through gavage. Blood pressures and heart rate were significantly (p < 0.01) reduced in normotensive rats receiving Pq extract (40 mg/kg body weight). Pq extract induced a negative inotropic effect, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation mediated by nitric oxide (NO). Furthermore, preincubation with Pq extract significantly decreased the cytosolic calcium on vascular smooth muscle cells A7r5 in response to L-phenylephrine (PE). Seven metabolites were isolated from the Pq extract, but three flavonoids (10^-4 M) showed similar vasodilation to the extract in intact rat aorta as follows: 5,3',4'-trihydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone (2); 3,5,4'-trihydroxy-7,8,3'-trimethoxyflavone (6); and 5,4'-dihydroxy-3,7,8,3'-tetramethoxyflavone (7). The Pq extract and compounds 2 and 7 significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the contraction to Bay K8644 (10 nM, an agonist of Ca_V1.2 channels). Administration of Pq decreased cardiac contractility and increased endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation.

Acute effects of intravenous dronedarone on electrocardiograms, hemodynamics and cardiac functions in anesthetized dogs

Dronedarone is a class III antiarrhythmic that has been used for management of atrial fibrillation in humans, but limited information was found in dogs. The objective of this study was to determine the acute effects of escalating concentrations of dronedarone on electrocardiograms (ECG), hemodynamics and cardiac mechanics in healthy dogs. A total of 7 beagle dogs were anesthetized with isoflurane and instrumented to obtain lead II ECG, pressures at ascending aorta, right atrium, pulmonary artery and left ventricle, and left ventricular pressure-volume relationship. Five dogs were given vehicle and followed by escalating doses of dronedarone (0.5, 1.0 and 2.5 mg/kg, 15 min for each dose), and two dogs were used as a vehicle-treated control. All parameters were measured at 15 min after the end of each dose. The results showed that all parameters in vehicle-treated dogs were unaltered. Dronedarone at 2.5 mg/kg significantly lengthened PQ interval (P<0.01), reduced cardiac output (P<0.01) and increased systemic vascular resistance (P<0.01). Dronedarone produced negative inotropy assessed by significantly lowered end-systolic pressure-volume relationship, preload recruitable stroke work, contractility index and dP/dtmax. It also impaired diastolic function by significantly increased end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship, tau and dP/dtmin. These results suggested that acute effects of dronedarone produced negative dromotropy, inotropy and lusitropy in anesthetized dogs. Care should be taken when given dronedarone to dogs, especially when the patients have impaired cardiac function.

Effects of tobacco constituents and psychological stress on the beta-adrenergic regulation of non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer: implications for intervention

This review summarizes current preclinical and clinical evidence in support of the hypothesis that smoking and psychological stress have significant cancer promoting effects on non small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer via direct and indirect effects on nicotinic receptor-regulated beta-adrenergic signaling. Evidence is provided that targeted pharmacological interference with the resulting hyperactive cAMP-dependent signaling by beta-blockers or by γ-aminobutyric acid as well as positive psychological influences may be highly effective in preventing and improving clinical outcomes of these cancers, provided that appropriate diagnostic protocols are followed to monitor systemic levels of stress neurotransmitters and cAMP.

Cardiac alpha1-adrenergic receptors: novel aspects of expression, signaling mechanisms, physiologic function, and clinical importance

Adrenergic receptors (AR) are G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that have a crucial role in cardiac physiology in health and disease. Alpha1-ARs signal through Gαq, and signaling through Gq, for example, by endothelin and angiotensin receptors, is thought to be detrimental to the heart. In contrast, cardiac alpha1-ARs mediate important protective and adaptive functions in the heart, although alpha1-ARs are only a minor fraction of total cardiac ARs. Cardiac alpha1-ARs activate pleiotropic downstream signaling to prevent pathologic remodeling in heart failure. Mechanisms defined in animal and cell models include activation of adaptive hypertrophy, prevention of cardiac myocyte death, augmentation of contractility, and induction of ischemic preconditioning. Surprisingly, at the molecular level, alpha1-ARs localize to and signal at the nucleus in cardiac myocytes, and, unlike most GPCRs, activate "inside-out" signaling to cause cardioprotection. Contrary to past opinion, human cardiac alpha1-AR expression is similar to that in the mouse, where alpha1-AR effects are seen most convincingly in knockout models. Human clinical studies show that alpha1-blockade worsens heart failure in hypertension and does not improve outcomes in heart failure, implying a cardioprotective role for human alpha1-ARs. In summary, these findings identify novel functional and mechanistic aspects of cardiac alpha1-AR function and suggest that activation of cardiac alpha1-AR might be a viable therapeutic strategy in heart failure.

Circulatory therapeutics: use of antihypertensive agents and their effects on the vasculature

This review addresses the use of the different antihypertensive agents currently available and some in development, and their effects on the vasculature. The different classes of agents used in the treatment of hypertension, and the results of recent large clinical trials, dosing protocols and adverse effects are first briefly summarized. The consequences on blood vessels of the use of antihypertensive drugs and the differential effects on the biology of large and small arteries resulting in modulation of vascular remodelling and dysfunction in hypertensive patients are then described. Large elastic conduit arteries exhibit outward hypertrophic remodelling and increased stiffness, which contributes to raise systolic blood pressure and afterload on the heart. Small resistance arteries undergo eutrophic or hypertrophic inward remodelling, and impair tissue perfusion. By these mechanisms both large and small arteries may contribute to trigger cardiovascular events. Some antihypertensive agents correct these changes, which could contribute to improved outcome. The mechanisms that at the level of the vascular wall lead to remodelling and can be beneficially affected by antihypertensive agents will also be addressed. These include vasoconstriction, growth and inflammation. The molecular pathways contributing to growth and inflammation will be summarily described. Further identification of these signalling pathways should allow identification of novel targets leading to development of new and improved medications for the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

Alpha1-adrenergic blockers: current usage considerations

Alpha1-adrenergic-blocking drugs are effective in reducing blood pressure and do so in a fashion comparable to most other antihypertensive drug classes. These compounds are most effective in patients in the upright position, reducing systolic and diastolic pressures by 8%-10%. Alpha1-adrenergic-blocking drugs incrementally reduce blood pressure when combined with most drug classes and are the only antihypertensive drug class to improve plasma lipid profiles. Alpha1-adrenergic-blocking drugs are also accepted as important elements of the treatment plan for symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy. Dose escalation of an alpha1-adrenergic-blocking drug can trigger renal Na+ retention, and the ensuing volume expansion can attenuate its blood pressure-lowering effect. Orthostatic hypotension can occur with these compounds, particularly when a patient is volume-contracted. Dizziness, headache, and drowsiness are common side effects with alpha1-adrenergic blockers. A modest decline in the use of doxazosin and other alpha1-adrenergic-blocking drugs has occurred coincident to the early termination of the doxazosin treatment arm in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial.

Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Added to Previous Antihypertensive Agents on Arteries of Diabetic Hypertensive Patients

Lowering elevated blood pressure (BP) in diabetic hypertensive individuals decreases cardiovascular events. We questioned whether remodeling of resistance arteries from hypertensive diabetic patients would improve after 1 year of tight BP control with addition of either the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan or the β-blocker (BB) atenolol to previous therapy, which included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and/or calcium channel blockers. Twenty-eight hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients treated with oral hypoglycemic and antihypertensive agents (not receiving ARBs or BBs) were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment for 1 year with valsartan (80 to 160 mg) or atenolol (50 to 100 mg) daily, added to previous therapy. Resistance arteries dissected from gluteal subcutaneous tissues were assessed on a pressurized myograph. After 1 year of treatment, systolic and diastolic BP and glycemia were equally well controlled in the valsartan and atenolol groups. Endothelium-dependent and independent relaxation did not change in the treated groups. After 1 year of treatment, resistance artery media:lumen ratio decreased in the valsartan group (7.9±0.5% after versus 9.8±0.6% before; P <0.05) but not in the atenolol-treated group (9.9±0.9% versus 10.6±1%; P value not significant). Artery walls from atenolol-treated patients became stiffer, with no change in the valsartan-treated patients. In conclusion, similar intensive BP control for 1 year with valsartan was associated with improved structure of resistance arteries in diabetic hypertensive patients, whereas vessels from atenolol-treated patients exhibited unchanged remodeling and a stiffer wall. The addition of ARBs but not BBs to antihypertensive medications that may include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or calcium channel blockers results in an improvement in resistance artery remodeling in diabetic hypertensive patients.

Treating Hypertension With Cardioprotective Therapies

Hypertension is both a disease and risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and each 20/10 mm Hg rise in blood pressure (BP) doubles the risk for CVD. Although BP reduction through lifestyle modification and/or antihypertensive therapy has been shown to dramatically reduce the risk for CVD, recent evidence has shown that many patients with hypertension do not have adequate BP control. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) provides comprehensive guidelines on the diagnosis, classification, and management of hypertension and related CV conditions. The JNC 7 guidelines recommend that most patients receive first-line therapy with thiazide diuretics, but the majority of patients will require 2 or more antihypertensive agents to achieve adequate BP control. The selection of additional antihypertensive therapies should be based on the presence of concomitant CV and metabolic conditions as well as patient-specific factors such as race. An important role exists for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and beta-blockers, particularly in patients with comorbid CV or metabolic conditions. Clinical evidence suggests that these agents may offer benefits beyond simple BP lowering. Furthermore, synergies among antihypertensive classes may improve BP control and combination therapy may also permit the use of smaller doses of each medication and reduce the risk of dose-related adverse effects.

Beta-blocker treatment of patients with diastolic heart failure and arterial hypertension. A prospective, randomized, comparison of the long-term effects of atenolol vs. nebivolol

We compared the effects of 6 months administration of atenolol or nebivolol on resting and exercise hemodynamic parameters and maximal exercise capacity, in 26 patients with hypertension and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (ejection fraction >50%, end-diastolic diameter <60 mm and increased pulmonary wedge pressure at rest and/or at peak exercise). Both atenolol and nebivolol administration was associated with a significant decrease in the resting and peak exercise heart rate and blood pressure and in LV mass, with an increase in the E/A ratio. This latter effect was greater with nebivolol. Nebivolol was associated with an increase in the peak VO(2), VO(2) at the anaerobic threshold and with a decrease in the VE/VCO(2) ratio. With regards to the hemodynamic parameters, compared to patients on atenolol, those on nebivolol showed a lower reduction in the cardiac index, a greater increase in the stroke volume index and a decline in the mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary wedge pressure, both at rest and peak exercise. Thus, although the two beta-blockers have a similar antihypertensive action, nebivolol administration was associated with a greater hemodynamic improvement, compared to atenolol.

Long-term treatment with nebivolol improves arterial reactivity and reduces ventricular hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of long-term nebivolol therapy on high blood pressure, impaired endothelial function in aorta, and damage observed in heart and conductance arteries in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). For this purpose, SHR were treated for 9 weeks with nebivolol (8 mg/kg per day). Untreated SHR and Wistar Kyoto rats were used as hypertensive and normotensive controls, respectively. The left ventricle/body weight ratio was used as an index of cardiac hypertrophy, and to evaluate vascular function, responses induced by potassium chloride, noradrenaline, acetylcholine, and sodium nitroprusside were tested on aortic rings. Aortic morphometry and fibrosis were determined in parallel by a quantitative technique. Systolic blood pressure, measured by the tail-cuff method, was lower in treated SHR than in the untreated group (194 +/- 3 versus 150 +/- 4 mm Hg). The cardiac hypertrophy index was significantly reduced by the treatment. In aortic rings, treatment with nebivolol significantly reduced the maximal response to both KCl and NA in SHR. In vessels precontracted with phenylephrine relaxant, activity due to acetylcholine was higher in normotensive rats than in SHR and the treatment significantly improved this response. The effect of sodium nitroprusside on aortic rings was similar in all groups. Medial thickness and collagen content were significantly reduced in comparison with SHR. In conclusion, the chronic antihypertensive effect of nebivolol in SHR was accompanied by an improvement in vascular structure and function and in the cardiac hypertrophy index.

Effect of amlodipine compared to atenolol on small arteries of previously untreated essential hypertensive patients

In a previous retrospective study, long-term treatment of essential hypertensive patients with a slow-release calcium channel blocker resulted in normal resistance artery structure and endothelial function, which did not occur with a beta-blocker. In the present prospective study, 19 previously untreated essential hypertensive patients (aged 47 +/- 2 years, 75% male) were treated for 1 year in a double-blind randomized study with the long-acting calcium channel blocker amlodipine or the beta-blocker atenolol. Resistance arteries (lumen diameter, 150 to 350 microm) dissected from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies were studied on a pressurized myograph. Blood pressure (BP) control (129 +/- 2/85 +/- 2 mm Hg) was identical in both groups for the last 6 months of the study. After 1 year of treatment with amlodipine, the media-to-lumen ratio (M/L) of resistance arteries decreased from 7.89% +/- 0.40% to 6.81% +/- 0.41% (P < .05). Acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation tended to improve from 84.3% +/- 5.5% to 90.5% +/- 4.8% (P = .06), whereas sodium nitroprusside-induced relaxation was unchanged in the patients treated with amlodipine. In the beta-blocker-treated group there was no significant change in M/L or acetylcholine-induced relaxation. In conclusion, treatment with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine corrected altered resistance artery structure and tended to improve endothelial function in essential hypertensive patients, whereas similar good control of BP with the beta-blocker atenolol did not. Whether the vascular protective effect of amlodipine will result in improved outcomes in hypertension remains to be demonstrated.

Effect of crossing over hypertensive patients from a beta-blocker to an angiotensin receptor antagonist on resistance artery structure and on endothelial function

BACKGROUND

Treatment of essential hypertensive patients with an AT1 angiotensin receptor antagonist has previously resulted in correction of resistance artery structure and endothelial function, whereas in a parallel group treated with the beta-blocker atenolol there was no improvement of altered vascular structure and function. To test the hypothesis that patients previously treated with atenolol could present improvement of vascular structure and endothelial function if they were subjected to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, we crossed over hypertensive patients that had been randomized to treatment with the beta-blocker atenolol to treatment with the AT1 antagonist irbesartan, and studied small artery structure and endothelial function before and after treatment.

METHODS

Eleven essential hypertensive patients (51 +/- 2 years, range 38-65; 75% male) that had previously been randomized to treatment with atenolol and treated for 1 year with good blood pressure control, were crossed over to treatment with the AT1 antagonist irbesartan for 1 year. Small resistance arteries were dissected from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies that were performed before and after 1 year of treatment. The structure and endothelial function of the resistance arteries were studied on a pressurized myograph.

RESULTS

Blood pressure control (129 +/- 3.3/85 +/- 1.8 mmHg) was identical to that achieved previously with atenolol (131 +/- 3.3/84 +/- 1.1 mmHg). Following 1 year of treatment, the arterial media width to lumen ratio (M/L) of resistance arteries (lumen diameter, 150-350 microm), which had remained unchanged under atenolol treatment, decreased from 8.44 +/- 0.45% when patients were on atenolol, to 6.46 +/- 0.30%, P < 0.01, when patients received irbesartan. Maximal acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation was 81.1 +/- 4.1% when patients were on atenolol, unchanged from before starting treatment with the beta-blocker, and was normalized by irbesartan (to 94.8 +/- 2.0%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Crossing over essential hypertensive patients with well-controlled blood pressure from the beta-blocker atenolol to the AT1 receptor antagonist irbesartan resulted in correction of previously persistently altered vascular structure and endothelial function, suggesting a structural and endothelial vascular protective effect of antihypertensive treatment with the AT1 receptor antagonist.

Disparate effects of carvedilol versus metoprolol treatment of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats on endothelial function of resistance arteries

In human hypertension, blockade of beta-adrenoceptors does not improve resistance artery structure or endothelial dysfunction. We tested in hypertensive rats the hypothesis that carvedilol, a beta-blocker with antioxidant properties, would improve endothelial dysfunction, whereas the beta1-selective blocker, metoprolol, would not. Twenty-week-old SHRSP were treated orally for 10 weeks with carvedilol (50 mg/kg/day) or metoprolol (100 mg/kg/day), with or without hydralazine (25 mg/kg/day), the latter because neither beta-blocker was a very effective blood pressure-lowering agent in this model. Mesenteric arteries (lumen, <300 microm) were studied on a pressurized myograph. After 10 weeks, untreated SHRSP had a systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) of 239+/-3 that was unaffected by carvedilol or metoprolol treatment but decreased (p < 0.05) by hydralazine (187+/-4), carvedilol + hydralazine (221+/-3), and metoprolol + hydralazine (197+/-3). Carvedilol alone improved endothelium-dependent relaxation of resistance arteries, as elicited by the lowest concentration of acetylcholine studied (10(-7) M), whereas metoprolol had no effect. Hydralazine improved endothelial function as elicited by acetylcholine at a dose of 10(-6) M, also found under cotreatment with carvedilol but attenuated by cotreatment with metoprolol. Carvedilol or metoprolol alone had no significant effect on endothelium-independent relaxation produced by a nitric oxide donor (sodium nitroprusside). However, vessels from rats treated with carvedilol + hydralazine exhibited significantly greater relaxation than those from rats treated with metoprolol + hydralazine. These data suggest that carvedilol may have favorable effects on hypertension-related endothelial dysfunction not observed with metoprolol. Neither drug corrected small artery structure in SHRSP.

Correction of arterial structure and endothelial dysfunction in human essential hypertension by the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan

BACKGROUND

Structural and functional alterations of the vasculature may contribute to complications of hypertension. Because angiotensin II may be pivotal in some of these vascular abnormalities, we tested the hypothesis that the angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonist losartan, in contrast to the beta-blocker atenolol, would correct resistance artery abnormalities in patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nineteen untreated patients with mild essential hypertension (47+/-2 years, range 30 to 65 years; 57% male) were randomly assigned in double-blind fashion to losartan or atenolol treatment for 1 year. Nine age/sex-matched normotensive subjects were also studied. Both treatments reduced blood pressure to a comparable degree (losartan, from 149+/-4.1/101+/-1.6 to 128+/-3.6/86+/-2.2 mm Hg, P<0.01; atenolol, from 150+/-4.0/99+/-1.2 to 130+/-3.2/84+/-1.4 mm Hg, P<0.01). Resistance arteries (luminal diameter 150 to 350 microm) dissected from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies were studied on a pressurized myograph. After 1 year of treatment, the ratio of the media width to lumen diameter of arteries from losartan-treated patients was significantly reduced (from 8.4+/-0.4% to 6.7+/-0.3%, P<0.01). Arteries from atenolol-treated patients exhibited no significant change (from 8. 3+/-0.3% to 8.8+/-0.5% after treatment). Endothelium-dependent relaxation (acetylcholine-induced) was normalized by losartan (from 82.1+/-4.9% to 94.7+/-1.1%, P<0.01) but not by atenolol (from 80. 4+/-2.7% to 81.7+/-4.6%). Endothelium-independent relaxation (by sodium nitroprusside) was unchanged after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The AT(1) antagonist losartan corrected the altered structure and endothelial dysfunction of resistance arteries from patients with essential hypertension, whereas the beta-blocker atenolol had no effect.

Reduction of resistance artery stiffness by treatment with the AT(1)-receptor antagonist losartan in essential hypertension

In spontaneously hypertensive rats resistance artery structure, endothelial dysfunction and geometry-independent wall stiffness were reduced by an angiotensin AT(1)-receptor antagonist. In previous studies of human hypertension, interruption of the renin-angiotensin system corrected small artery structure and endothelial dysfunction, whereas the beta-blocker atenolol did not. We hypothesized that the AT(1)R antagonist losartan, but not the beta-blocker atenolol, would reduce stiffness of gluteal subcutaneous small arteries in essential hypertensive patients. Seventeen untreated mild essential hypertensive patients (47+/-2 years; 75% male) were randomly assigned in double-blind fashion to losartan or atenolol treatment for one year. Small, resistance size arteries were studied on pressurized myographs. Blood pressure (mmHg) was reduced (p<0.01) from 145 +/- 4/101 +/- 2 and 147 +/- 6/98 +/- 2 to 128 +/- 4/86 +/- 2 and 131 +/- 3/84 +/- 1 by losartan and atenolol, respectively. The media/lumen ratio of small arteries was unaffected by atenolol (8.3+/-0.3% before and 8.8+/-0.5% after treatment). In contrast, losartan reduced media/lumen ratio from 8.4+/-0.4% to 6.7+/-0.3% (p<0.01). Whereas isobaric elastic modulus was unaffected by either treatment, geometry-independent stiffness (slope of elastic modulus vs. stress) was reduced from 9.7+/-1.2 to 6.1+/-0.9 (P<0.05) under losartan treatment, but was unchanged by atenolol (8.2+/-1.3 to 7.8+/-0.6). In conclusion, treatment with losartan reduced stiffness and structural alterations of subcutaneous resistance arteries of previously untreated essential hypertensive patients, whereas atenolol failed to do so.

Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of metoprolol and carvedilol in hypertensive patients

Metoprolol and carvedilol are widely used in the treatment of hypertension, but no randomized comparison of their hemodynamic activity has been previously reported. Their comparative effects on heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and echocardiographically determined aortic and femoral artery blood flow were measured at rest and at 2 and 24 hours after the first dose of each drug, and again after 4 weeks of sustained monotherapy in 12 male and 12 female patients, aged 36-68 years with uncomplicated sustained hypertension according to a randomized single-blind protocol. Nine patients in each drug group achieved the target diastolic blood pressure of < 90 mmHg on the initial doses of each drug; this was achieved in the remainder following doubling of each dose. Neither drug occasioned withdrawal of any patient due to adverse reactions. Both drugs significantly reduced heart rate, although the reduction at 2 hours was significantly greater after metoprolol than after carvedilol. Both drugs reduced systolic pressure throughout the study; the reduction at 2 hours was significantly greater after carvedilol than after metoprolol. In contrast, the diastolic blood pressure was persistently reduced only by carvedilol. The cardiac output, determined as the aortic systolic blood flow, after carvedilol was not significantly different from pretreatment values throughout the study but was significantly reduced in the metoprolol-treated patients at each point of measurement. After metoprolol the systemic and femoral vascular resistances derived from conventional formulae were consistently and significantly increased over pretreatment values throughout the study and were significantly greater than in the carvedilol group at all measurement points. The hemodynamic differences between these two beta-blocking drugs may be explained by the additional vasodilator activity of carvedilol associated with its alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocking activity. The long-term clinical and prognostic implications of these pharmacodynamic differences between beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with and without additional vasodilator activity in the treatment of hypertensive patients remain to be determined.

Long-term hemodynamic effects at rest and during exercise of newer antihypertensive agents and salt restriction in essential hypertension: review of epanolol, doxazosin, amlodipine, felodipine, diltiazem, lisinopril, dilevalol, carvedilol, and ketanserin

Hypertension is due to disturbance of the complex interplay between numerous known and unknown mechanisms that normally control blood pressure. Antihypertensive agents may, therefore, reduce blood pressure through widely different actions and, at the same time, elicit counterregulatory responses. This is a review of the long-term hemodynamic effects at rest as well as during exercise of nine relatively new antihypertensive compounds: a beta-blocker (epanolol), an alpha-receptor blocker (doxazosin), two double-acting compounds (dilevalol and carvedilol), three calcium antagonists (amlodipine, felodipine, and diltiazem), an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril), a serotonin antagonist (ketanserin), and low-salt diet as a nonpharmacological treatment in 171 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The results in the treatment groups are compared to the hemodynamic changes seen in 28 hypertensive patients left untreated for 10 years. The patient populations of the different groups were comparable. The invasive hemodynamic technique, including intraarterial blood pressure recording and measurements of cardiac output by Cardigreen, was the same in all studies. While blood pressure remained nearly unchanged in the untreated group, all antihypertensive compounds induced significant and sustained blood pressure reduction both at rest and during exercise. The modest reduction (3-5%) in blood pressure during a low-salt diet was also statistically significant. This review shows the multiplicity of the long-term hemodynamic changes, ranging from a reduction in cardiac output to peripheral vasodilatation, during chronic antihypertensive therapy. In untreated hypertensives, the cardiac output is reduced by 1-2% per year and total peripheral resistance is increased by 2-3% per year. The review also focuses on counterregulatory responses and modify the initial reduction in blood pressure after drug treatment for hypertension. It is concluded that proper understanding of the hemodynamic effects of antihypertensive agents is useful in the selection of the right treatment for specific groups of hypertensive patients.

Modest antihypertensive effect of epanolol, a beta 1-selective receptor blocker with beta 1 agonist activity: an acute and long-term hemodynamic study at rest and during exercise and double crossover comparison with atenolol on ambulatory blood pressure

Beta-blockers with less cardiodepressive effect than traditional nonselective beta(1+2)-blocking agents could be useful in the treatment of hypertension, provided the reduction in blood pressure was satisfactory. Epanolol, a selective beta 1-receptor blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, induced a fall in intraarterial pressure of 8% at rest sitting and 11% during 100 W bicycle exercise after the first dose of 200 mg in 12 patients with essential hypertension. Heart rate, stroke index, and cardiac index initially fell by 14%, 11%, and 23%, respectively. The total peripheral resistance index increased by 21% after 2 hours, and then reverted towards the pretreatment level. After 10 months of epanolol treatment (mean 300 mg/day), the reduction in arterial pressure was 5% at rest and 10% during exercise. Cardiac index and heart rate were still reduced 14-21%, while total peripheral resistance was unchanged or slightly increased (2-10%). Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure was higher on epanolol (300 mg/day) than on atenolol (150 mg/day) treatment (137/97 vs. 128/91 mmHg). Thus, the achieved blood pressure reduction induced by epanolol was moderate, while other characteristics of beta-receptor blockade, in particular, the reduction of heart rate and cardiac output, were maintained. This suggests that the compound may be useful for other cardiovascular disorders, e.g., angina pectoris in patients without hypertension or cardiac arrhythmia.

Single and repeated doses of the vasodilator/β-adrenergic antagonist, carvedilol, block cirazoline- and isoproterenol-mediated hemodynamic responses in the conscious rat

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of carvedilol, a beta 1&2-adrenergic blocker and vasodilator, on cirazoline-mediated changes in arterial blood pressure and isoproterenol-mediated changes in heart rate after acute and chronic administration. Conscious, chronically instrumented male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with carvedilol (1 mg/kg, IV), prazosin (0.3 mg/kg, IV), or propranolol (1 mg/kg, twice daily for 8 days. After administration of the first dose of carvedilol on day 1, the vasopressor response to cirazoline (60 +/- 3 mmHg predrug) and the isoproterenol-induced tachycardia (152 +/- 13 beats/min predrug) were blocked (e.g., 7 +/- 4 mmHg postdrug and 11 +/- 3 beats/min postdrug, respectively). After the administration of carvedilol on day 8, the cirazoline vasopressor response was 2 +/- 1 mmHg and the isoproterenol-induced tachycardia was 4 +/- 3 beats/min, indicating effective alpha 1- and beta-adrenergic blockade after chronic dosing with carvedilol. Prazosin blocked the cirazoline-induced vasopressor response on both days 1 and 8 but had no effect on the isoproterenol-induced tachycardia. Propranolol blocked the isoproterenol-induced tachycardia on both days 1 and 8 but had no effect on the cirazoline vasopressor response. These data indicate that only carvedilol effectively blocked both alpha- and beta-adrenergic hemodynamic responses and that the antagonism of these responses with carvedilol was not diminished after chronic dosing of twice-a-day treatment for 8 days.