[Locally advanced prostate carcinoma (T2b-T4 N0) without and with clinical evidence of local progression (Tx N+) with lymphatic metastasis. Is radiotherapy for pelvic lymphatic metastasis indicated or not?]

A comparison of forward and inverse planned conformal, multi segment and intensity modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate and pelvic nodes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Full inverse planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may be indicated to treat concave targets like prostate and pelvic nodes, because concave dose distributions cannot be generated with conformal radiotherapy (CRT). We investigated whether this concave dose distribution can be produced using simplified forward planned multi segment radiotherapy (MSRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CRT, MSRT and IMRT dose distributions were calculated and compared for five patients treated in our current IMRT prostate and pelvic node dose escalation trial. The same beam arrangement was used for CRT, MSRT and IMRT, increasing the number of segments. The MSRT concave dose distribution was realised regarding left and right pelvic nodes as two separate targets. The IMRT dose distribution had been used to treat the patients using a step and shoot delivery.

RESULTS

Contrary to CRT, forward planned MSRT concave dose distributions had improved target coverage at lower or equivalent bowel doses than inverse planned IMRT. The five MSRT beams had a maximum of three segments per beam. Both lateral beams had two segments to deliver the two dose levels to prostate and nodes. The posterior field needed a third segment to avoid using a central block. The two anterior oblique beams needed a third segment to account for the different beam weighting because the nodes were irradiated partially using four and partially using five beams. Inverse planned IMRT used up to 15 segments in any one beam, with an average of 11.4 per beam.

CONCLUSIONS

Concave dose distributions for prostate and pelvic node treatment were generated using forward planned multi segment techniques. The plans met clinical constraints used in our IMRT protocol. MSRT presented a significant advantage over both CRT and IMRT.

Long-term outcome after elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics and local dose escalation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To report the 8-year outcome of local dose escalation using high-dose-rate conformal brachytherapy combined with elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred forty-four consecutively treated men (1986-1992) were recorded prospectively. Twenty-nine (20.14%) patients had T1b-2a tumors, and 115 (79.86%) patients had T2b-3 tumors according to, respectively, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer 1992. All patients had a negative nodal status, proven by CT or MRI. The mean initial PSA value was 25.61 ng/mL (Initial value for 41.66% of patients was <10 ng/mL, for 21.52% was 10-20 ng/mL, and for 32.63% was >20 ng/mL). The total dose applied by external beam radiotherapy was 50 Gy in the pelvis and 40 Gy in the prostate. The high-dose-rate brachytherapy was delivered in two fractions, which were incorporated into the external beam treatment (after 20-Gy and 40-Gy external beam radiotherapy dose). The dose per fraction was 15 Gy for the PTV1 (peripheral prostate zone) and 9 Gy for the PTV2 (entire prostatic gland). Any patient free of clinical or biochemical evidence of disease was termed bNED. Actuarial rates of outcome were calculated by Kaplan-Meier and compared using the log-rank. Cox regression models were used to establish prognostic factors of the various measures of outcome.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 8 years (range 60-171 months). The overall survival rate was 71.5%, and the disease-free survival rate was 82.6%. The bNED survival rate was 72.9%. Freedom from local recurrence for T3 stage was 91.3%, whereas for G3 lesions it was 88.23%. Freedom from distant recurrence for T3 stage was 82.6% and for G3 lesions 70.59%. Univariate survival analyses revealed that low stage (T1-2), low grade (G1-2), no hormonal therapy, initial PSA value less than 40 ng/mL, and PSA normalization <1.0 ng/mL after irradiation were associated with long survival. In multivariate analyses, initial PSA value, PSA kinetics after radiation therapy, and no adjuvant hormonal treatment were independent prognostic factors. Grade 3 late radiation toxicity (according to RTOG/EORTC scoring scheme) was 2.3% for the genitourinary system in terms of cystitis and 4.10% for the gastrointestinal system in terms of proctitis. Grades 4 and 5 genitourinary/gastrointestinal morbidity was not observed. A history of transurethral resection of the prostate with a median interval of less than 6 months from radiotherapy was associated with a high risk of genitourinary toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The 8-year results confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of combined elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics and local dose escalation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cure of localized and especially high-risk prostate cancer.