[Cosmetic results of breast conserving therapy for breast carcinoma. Treatment results from the Heidelberg Radiation Clinic in the years 1984 to 1992]

Predictors of early poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer: initial results of a prospective cohort study at a single institution

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore features of patients reporting early poor aesthetic outcome after simple breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 709 patients shortly after breast-conserving surgery. Aesthetic outcome was measured by aesthetic status scores of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale. Clinical, surgical, and pathologic variables were assessed to identify predictors of poor aesthetic outcome.

RESULTS

Poor aesthetic outcome was reported by 46 (6.5%) patients, and 209 (29%) patients reported an intermediate aesthetic outcome. A single factor analysis of variance showed a negative impact of higher specimen weight (P < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following significant risk factors for poor aesthetic outcome: 12 o'clock positioning of tumor localization, a tumor behind the nipple areolar complex (NAC), fishmouth-shaped incision with resection of the NAC, quadrantectomy, central segmental resection, and pT stages 3 and 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated statistically independent associations between poor aesthetic outcome and tumor position in the inner half of the breast or behind the NAC, quadrantectomy, and pT stages 3 and 4.

CONCLUSION

Poor aesthetic outcome is relatively rare shortly after breast-conserving surgery, but predictable in specific situations.

Factors influencing cosmetic results after breast conserving management (Turkish experience)

We aimed to determine predictive factors affecting cosmetic results after breast conserving management in breast cancer. Data on 96 patients with 97 breast cancer cases, who had been admitted to Uludağ University M.A. Radiotherapy Center between October 1995 and December 1998 and managed with breast-conserving treatment, were analysed to determine the factors affecting cosmetic outcome. Possible factors affecting cosmesis were grouped as patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related. Mann-Whitney U test was used in univariate analyses whereas logistic regression was used in multivariate analyses. Median follow-up time was 29.5 months ranging between 11 and 53 months and median age at admission was 50 (range 22-84). Cosmetic results were grouped in five categories; excellent; good; fair; poor and, very poor, using criteria, such as presence of fibrosis, telangiectasia, shape of breast, asymmetry, status of areola, pigmentation. Treated breasts were scored by the patients, three radiation oncologists and a breast surgeon independently. In the analysis performed using scores given by the patients, cases with scores 3 and above (unsatisfactory) were compared with cases with scores below 3 (satisfactory). Eighty-two patients (84%) considered cosmetic result as satisfactory (excellent/good) whereas 15 patients (16%) considered unsatisfactory (fair/poor/very poor). In univariate analysis using Mann-Whitney U test, type of surgery (P=0.0655) was the statistically significant factors affecting cosmetic results. In multivariate analysis using logistic regression, tumor quadrant (P=0.0060) and elapsed radiation therapy days (P=0.0090) were the most significant factors. Median values were taken into consideration for the scores given by the physicians and cases with scores 3 and above (unsatisfactory) were compared with cases with scores below 3 (satisfactory). Eighty-two cases were evaluated as satisfactory (84%) whereas 15 cases were unsatisfactory (16%). In this set of data, patient age (P=0.0144), menopausal status (P=0.0111), institution which surgery was performed (P=0.0045), type of surgery (P=0.0044), placement of metallic clips (P=0.0083) and skin fibrosis (P=0.038) were found to be significant in univariate analysis using Mann-Whitney U test. In multivariate analysis using logistic regression, institution where surgery took place (P=0.0015), menopausal status (P=0.0087) and telangiectasia (P=0.0657) were the most significant factors.

Boost irradiation of breast carcinoma: teletherapy vs. brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

The results of adjuvant radiotherapy including a boost dose after breast-conserving surgery of mamma carcinoma were retrospectively analysed to relate local tumor control, survival, and cosmetic results to the boost technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 229 female patients who were treated in the period 1986--1997. Group A consisted of patients where the primary irradiation was hyperfractionated (two fractions per day) and the boost was applied by reduced portals, also at two fractions per day. In group B the 'boost' was applied interstitially intraoperatively and the 'primary' irradiation followed at one fraction per day. The cosmetic results and the late changes to the mamma were the subjects of follow-up examinations and were assessed using the EORTC score.

RESULTS

129 patients formed group A, median follow-up 4.2 years, and 100 patients with median follow-up of 9.4 years formed group B. 59% of group A and 60% of group B were in stage pT1, 38% and 39% were in pT2, and 25% and 39% were in stage N1 or N2 (no significant differences). Tumors were mostly poorly to moderately differentiated. The upper outer quadrant was most afflicted. Local recurrence occurred in two and five cases, lymph-node recurrence in two cases each, while there were ten and 12 cases of distant metastases. There were no deaths in group A and in group B six with obvious distant metastases and eight with other causes of death. The cosmetic results and late side-effects (induration, teleangiectasis, ulcers) were significantly worse in the interstitial group B. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the total applied dose significantly affected the severity of late radiation side-effects. The cosmetic results worsened with time, the tendency for lymph edemas in the irradiated side increased. Induration decreased continuously after pure teletherapy but increased continuously after interstitial therapy. These trends did not change in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both therapy schemes resulted in successful local tumor control with good cosmetic results and few side effects, but the interstitial boost therapy was clearly less favourable. Longer-term follow-up is required to compare the late side-effects even further.