1
|
Potter GM, Siripurapu R, Herwadkar A, Abdulla S, Ikotun O, Broadhurst P, Woodward M, Bhalla RK, Glancz LJ, Hammerbeck-Ward CL, Rutherford SA, Pathmanaban ON, Roncaroli F, Colaco RJ, Pan S, Whitfield GA. Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma: Neuroradiologist's Guide to Diagnosis, Surgical Management, and Proton Beam Therapy. Radiographics 2024; 44:e240036. [PMID: 39298353 DOI: 10.1148/rg.240036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2024]
Abstract
Skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas are distinct types of rare, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors that share key principles of imaging investigation and multidisciplinary care. Maximal safe surgical resection is the treatment choice for each, often via an expanded endoscopic endonasal approach, with or without multilayer skull base repair. Postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy is frequently administered, usually with particle therapy such as proton beam therapy (PBT). Compared with photon therapy, PBT enables dose escalation while limiting damage to dose-limiting neurologic structures, particularly the brainstem and optic apparatus, due to energy deposition being delivered at a high maximum with a rapid decrease at the end of the penetration range (Bragg peak phenomenon). Essential requirements for PBT following gross total or maximal safe resection are tissue diagnosis, minimal residual tumor after resection, and adequate clearance from PBT dose-limiting structures. The radiologist should understand surgical approaches and surgical techniques, including multilayer skull base repair, and be aware of evolution of postsurgical imaging appearances over time. Accurate radiologic review of all relevant preoperative imaging examinations and of intraoperative and postoperative MRI examinations plays a key role in management. The radiology report should reflect what the skull base surgeon and radiation oncologist need to know, including distance between the tumor and PBT dose-limiting structures, tumor sites that may be difficult to access via the endoscopic endonasal route, the relationship between intradural tumor and neurovascular structures, and tumor sites with implications for postresection stability. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian M Potter
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Rekha Siripurapu
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Amit Herwadkar
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Sarah Abdulla
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Oluwaseun Ikotun
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Philip Broadhurst
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Mark Woodward
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Rajiv K Bhalla
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Laurence J Glancz
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Charlotte L Hammerbeck-Ward
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Scott A Rutherford
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Omar N Pathmanaban
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Federico Roncaroli
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Rovel J Colaco
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Shermaine Pan
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| | - Gillian A Whitfield
- From the Department of Radiology (G.M.P., P.B., M.W.) and ENT Surgery (R.K.B.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M13 9WL; Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom (R.S.); Department of Radiology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (A.H., S.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom (S.A.R., O.N.P.); University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom (O.I.); Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.G.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, United Kingdom (C.L.H-W.); Division of Neuroscience (F.R.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (G.A.W.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.J.C., S.P., G.A.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sami M, Yousuf M, Hashmi Q, Ahmad M, Ghilman M, Shareef H. Proton Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers. Cureus 2024; 16:e70752. [PMID: 39493189 PMCID: PMC11531088 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Head and neck (HnN) cancers are among the most common cancers in the world. Proton therapy (PT) is one of the latest advancements in the treatment modalities of cancers. Proton therapy is specifically used to treat HnN cancer patients due to its less toxic effects on the surrounding critical structures. Keeping in view the opportunities for further advancements, there is a lot of literature covering PT in HnN cancer patients. However, few compiled studies are not enough to compare the toxicities, overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and quality of life (QoL) of PT with that of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The objective of this review is to compile and summarize the literature available on the toxicities, OS, LC, and QoL in HnN cancer patients post PT. We have gathered and summarized the literature found under the keyword "proton therapy for head and neck cancers". Proton therapy is a preferable option over IMRT because it isolates tumors of the HnN, reduces exposure of healthy cells to radiation, and allows accurate tumor scanning using the pencil beam technique. In view of this article, we can say that PT is a preferable mode of radiotherapy for HnN cancer patients in view of its accuracy and lower incidents of acute and late toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qasim Hashmi
- Otolaryngology, Ruth K. M. Pfau, Civil Hospital Karachi, Karachi, PAK
| | | | - Mohammad Ghilman
- Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Civil Hospital Karachi, Karachi, PAK
| | - Huzaifa Shareef
- Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Civil Hospital Karachi, Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Goldberg S, Urell T, Tejada A, Nielsen GP, Hung YP, Adams J, Fullerton B, Caruso P, Patino M, Buch K, Rincon S, Sakai O, Tolia M, Ebb D, Cote G, Curry W, Giantsoudi D, MacDonald SM. Proton-Based Radiation Therapy for Skull Base Chondrosarcomas in Children and Adolescents: 40-Year Experience From the Massachusetts General Hospital. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)03401-1. [PMID: 39303998 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The literature on skull base chondrosarcoma (CHS) is scarce. We report outcomes for pediatric and young patients ≤22 years with base of skull CHSs treated with proton-based radiation therapy (PBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with PBRT between 1981 and 2023. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), chondrosarcoma-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control, and distal control. RESULTS Eighty-four patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 19 years (range, 6-22). Most patients (n = 79, 94%) had conventional CHS, whereas 5 (6%) had mesenchymal CHS. Nine patients (11%) underwent gross total resection, 64 (76%) subtotal resection, and 11 patients (13%) underwent biopsy. Twenty-four (29%) patients progressed before radiation therapy. The median prescription dose was 70 Gy (relative biological equivalent) (range, 50-79.7). At a median follow-up of 18.0 years (IQR, 9.2-26.2) from diagnosis, 11 patients recurred (7 local, 4 distant). Six patients died of disease. Five patients died of other causes. Ten-year OS, CSS, and PFS rates for all patients were 93.3%, 94.7%, and 88%, respectively. Twenty-year OS, CSS, and PFS rates for conventional CHS (n = 79) were 93.1%, 97.1%, and 89.2%, respectively. Mesenchymal histology was significantly associated with worse OS and PFS. Preradiation therapy tumor progression portended worse OS and CSS. Eight patients (9.9 %) experienced a late toxicity grade 3 or greater. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest cohort of pediatric base of skull CHSs in literature to date. High-dose PBRT after surgical resection achieves excellent disease control with minimal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrsini Ioakeim-Ioannidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiotherapy, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Saveli Goldberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tobias Urell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Athena Tejada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - G Petur Nielsen
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yin P Hung
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Judith Adams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Barbara Fullerton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul Caruso
- Deparment of Neuro-radiology, Lenox Hill Radiology and Medical Imaging Associates, New York, New York
| | - Manuel Patino
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen Buch
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sandra Rincon
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Osamu Sakai
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maria Tolia
- Department of Radiotherapy, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - David Ebb
- Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gregory Cote
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William Curry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Drosoula Giantsoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paganetti H, Simone CB, Bosch WR, Haas-Kogan D, Kirsch DG, Li H, Liang X, Liu W, Mahajan A, Story MD, Taylor PA, Willers H, Xiao Y, Buchsbaum JC. NRG Oncology White Paper on the Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)02974-2. [PMID: 39059509 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
This position paper, led by the NRG Oncology Particle Therapy Work Group, focuses on the concept of relative biologic effect (RBE) in clinical proton therapy (PT), with the goal of providing recommendations for the next-generation clinical trials with PT on the best practice of investigating and using RBE, which could deviate from the current standard proton RBE value of 1.1 relative to photons. In part 1, current clinical utilization and practice are reviewed, giving the context and history of RBE. Evidence for variation in RBE is presented along with the concept of linear energy transfer (LET). The intertwined nature of tumor radiobiology, normal tissue constraints, and treatment planning with LET and RBE considerations is then reviewed. Part 2 summarizes current and past clinical data and then suggests the next steps to explore and employ tools for improved dynamic models for RBE. In part 3, approaches and methods for the next generation of prospective clinical trials are explored, with the goal of optimizing RBE to be both more reflective of clinical reality and also deployable in trials to allow clinical validation and interpatient comparisons. These concepts provide the foundation for personalized biologic treatments reviewed in part 4. Finally, we conclude with a summary including short- and long-term scientific focus points for clinical PT. The practicalities and capacity to use RBE in treatment planning are reviewed and considered with more biological data in hand. The intermediate step of LET optimization is summarized and proposed as a potential bridge to the ultimate goal of case-specific RBE planning that can be achieved as a hypothesis-generating tool in near-term proton trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Walter R Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David G Kirsch
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michael D Story
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Rose M, Chen YL, MacDonald SM. The Use of Proton and Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Sarcomas. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:207-217. [PMID: 38508785 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
The unique physical and biological characteristics of proton and carbon ions allow for improved sparing of normal tissues, decreased integral dose to the body, and increased biological effect through high linear energy transfer. These properties are particularly useful for sarcomas given their histology, wide array of locations, and age of diagnosis. This review summarizes the literature and describes the clinical situations in which these heavy particles have advantages for treating sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melanie Rose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Yen-Lin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kotecha R, La Rosa A, Mehta MP. How proton therapy fits into the management of adult intracranial tumors. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S26-S45. [PMID: 38437667 PMCID: PMC10911801 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracranial tumors include a challenging array of primary and secondary parenchymal and extra-axial tumors which cause neurologic morbidity consequential to location, disease extent, and proximity to critical neurologic structures. Radiotherapy can be used in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage setting either with curative or palliative intent. Proton therapy (PT) is a promising advance due to dosimetric advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy with regards to normal tissue sparing, as well as distinct physical properties, which yield radiobiologic benefits. In this review, the principles of efficacy and safety of PT for a variety of intracranial tumors are discussed, drawing upon case series, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and randomized clinical trials. This manuscript explores the potential advantages of PT, including reduced acute and late treatment-related side effects and improved quality of life. The objective is to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence and clinical outcomes of PT. Given the lack of consensus and directives for its utilization in patients with intracranial tumors, we aim to provide a guide for its judicious use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Translational Medicine, Hebert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alonso La Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Orlandi E, Barcellini A, Vischioni B, Fiore MR, Vitolo V, Iannalfi A, Bonora M, Chalaszczyk A, Ingargiola R, Riva G, Ronchi S, Valvo F, Fossati P, Ciocca M, Mirandola A, Molinelli S, Pella A, Baroni G, Pullia MG, Facoetti A, Orecchia R, Licitra L, Vago G, Rossi S. The Role of Carbon Ion Therapy in the Changing Oncology Landscape-A Narrative Review of the Literature and the Decade of Carbon Ion Experience at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5068. [PMID: 37894434 PMCID: PMC10605728 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, 13 Asian and European facilities deliver carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for preclinical and clinical activity, and, to date, 55 clinical studies including CIRT for adult and paediatric solid neoplasms have been registered. The National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) is the only Italian facility able to accelerate both protons and carbon ions for oncological treatment and research. METHODS To summarise and critically evaluate state-of-the-art knowledge on the application of carbon ion radiotherapy in oncological settings, the authors conducted a literature search till December 2022 in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. The results of 68 studies are reported using a narrative approach, highlighting CNAO's clinical activity over the last 10 years of CIRT. RESULTS The ballistic and radiobiological hallmarks of CIRT make it an effective option in several rare, radioresistant, and difficult-to-treat tumours. CNAO has made a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge on CIRT delivery in selected tumour types. CONCLUSIONS After an initial ramp-up period, CNAO has progressively honed its clinical, technical, and dosimetric skills. Growing engagement with national and international networks and research groups for complex cancers has led to increasingly targeted patient selection for CIRT and lowered barriers to facility access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Fiore
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Iannalfi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Bonora
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Agnieszka Chalaszczyk
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Rossana Ingargiola
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Riva
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Scientific Directorate, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Piero Fossati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department for Basic and Translational Oncology and Haematology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Medical Physics Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Medical Physics Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Medical Physics Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Pella
- Bioengineering Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Bioengineering Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Giuseppe Pullia
- Radiobiology Unit, Research and Development Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Angelica Facoetti
- Radiobiology Unit, Research and Development Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO-European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Scientific Directorate, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Head & Neck Medical Oncology 3, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology & Haemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Vago
- Presidency, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- School of Pathology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Rossi
- General Directorate, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hong S, Mahajan A, Laack NN, Link MJ, Shinya Y, O'Brien E, Stokken JK, Janus JR, Choby GW, Van Gompel JJ. Comparison of Tumor Control After Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Pencil Beam Proton Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Clival Chordomas: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. World Neurosurg 2023; 178:e510-e519. [PMID: 37532022 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of proton radiation therapy (PRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and x-ray-based radiation with an SRS boost (XRT + SRS) for newly diagnosed clival chordoma. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent PRT or SRS in our facility were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 59 patients were identified (PRT, 36; SRS, 11; XRT + SRS, 12). The mean age (± standard deviation) was 46 ± 20 years, with 54% being male. The mean tumor diameter (± standard deviation) was 3.7 ± 1.5 cm, and 21 (36%) involved the lower clivus. Gross total or near-total resection was attained in 27 patients (46%), all of whom received PRT. PRT was administered with a median prescribed dose of 70.8 Gy (range, 66.0-76.0). SRS involved a median marginal dose of 16 Gy (range, 14-20) and a median maximal dose of 36 Gy (range, 30-45). The XRT + SRS group was treated with an SRS marginal dose of 12.5 Gy (range, 10-20), a maximal dose of 27 Gy (range, 20-40), and an XRT prescription dose of 50.4 Gy (range, 45.0-59.4). Fifteen recurrences were observed (PRT, 6; SRS, 5; XRT + SRS, 4). For the entire cohort (n = 59), recurrence was associated with the degree of resection (P = 0.042), but not with radiation groups (P = 0.98). For patients after subtotal resection or biopsy (n = 32), the SRS ± XRT group was associated with few recurrences (hazard ratio, 0.260; 95% confidence interval, 0.069-0.98; P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS Patients after subtotal resection or biopsy may benefit from the incorporation of SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukwoo Hong
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael J Link
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yuki Shinya
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erin O'Brien
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Janalee K Stokken
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Janus
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Garret W Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jamie J Van Gompel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Niemierko A, Kim DW, Tejada A, Urell T, Leahy S, Adams J, Fullerton B, Nielsen GP, Hung YP, Shih AR, Patino M, Buch K, Rincon S, Kelly H, Cunnane MB, Tolia M, Widemann BC, Wedekind MF, John L, Ebb D, Shin JH, Cote G, Curry W, MacDonald SM. Surgery and proton radiation therapy for pediatric base of skull chordomas: Long-term clinical outcomes for 204 patients. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:1686-1697. [PMID: 37029730 PMCID: PMC10484173 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on clinical outcomes for base of skull (BOS) chordomas in the pediatric population is limited. We report patient outcomes after surgery and proton radiotherapy (PRT). METHODS Pediatric patients with BOS chordomas were treated with PRT or combined proton/photon approach (proton-based; for most, 80% proton/20% photon) at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 1981 to 2021. Endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from local recurrence (LC), and freedom from distant failure (DC). RESULTS Of 204 patients, median age at diagnosis was 11.1 years (range, 1-21). Chordoma location included 59% upper and/or middle clivus, 36% lower clivus, 4% craniocervical junction, and 1% nasal cavity. Fifteen (7%) received pre-RT chemotherapy. Forty-seven (23%) received PRT, and 157 (77%) received comboRT. Median total dose was 76.7 Gy (RBE) (range, 59.3-83.3). At a median follow-up of 10 years (interquartile range, 5-16 years), 56 recurred. Median OS and PFS were 26 and 25 years, with 5-, 10-, and 20-year OS and PFS rates of 84% and 74%, 78% and 69%, and 64% and 64%, respectively. Multivariable actuarial analyses showed poorly differentiated subtype, radiographical progression prior to RT, larger treatment volume, and lower clivus location to be prognostic factors for worse OS, PFS, and LC. RT was well tolerated at a median follow-up of 9 years (interquartile range, 4-16 years). Side effects included 166 patients (80%) with mild/moderate acute toxicities, 24 (12%) patients with late toxicities, and 4 (2%) who developed secondary radiation-related malignancies. CONCLUSION This is the largest cohort of BOS chordomas in the literature, pediatric and/or adult. High-dose PRT following surgical resection is effective with low rates of late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel W Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Athena Tejada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tobias Urell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shannon Leahy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Judy Adams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barbara Fullerton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - G Petur Nielsen
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yin P Hung
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Angela R Shih
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Manuel Patino
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karen Buch
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sandra Rincon
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hilary Kelly
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary Beth Cunnane
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maria Tolia
- Department of Radiotherapy, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Brigitte C Widemann
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mary F Wedekind
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Liny John
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David Ebb
- Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John H Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gregory Cote
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William Curry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Iannalfi A, Riva G, Ciccone L, Orlandi E. The role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1161752. [PMID: 37350949 PMCID: PMC10283010 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The skull base is an anatomically and functionally critical area surrounded by vital structures such as the brainstem, the spinal cord, blood vessels, and cranial nerves. Due to this complexity, management of skull base tumors requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a team of specialists such as neurosurgeons, otorhinolaryngologists, radiation oncologists, endocrinologists, and medical oncologists. In the case of pediatric patients, cancer management should be performed by a team of pediatric-trained specialists. Radiation therapy may be used alone or in combination with surgery to treat skull base tumors. There are two main types of radiation therapy: photon therapy and particle therapy. Particle radiotherapy uses charged particles (protons or carbon ions) that, due to their peculiar physical properties, permit precise targeting of the tumor with minimal healthy tissue exposure. These characteristics allow for minimizing the potential long-term effects of radiation exposure in terms of neurocognitive impairments, preserving quality of life, and reducing the risk of radio-induced cancer. For these reasons, in children, adolescents, and young adults, proton therapy should be an elective option when available. In radioresistant tumors such as chordomas and sarcomas and previously irradiated recurrent tumors, particle therapy permits the delivery of high biologically effective doses with low, or however acceptable, toxicity. Carbon ion therapy has peculiar and favorable radiobiological characteristics to overcome radioresistance features. In low-grade tumors, proton therapy should be considered in challenging cases due to tumor volume and involvement of critical neural structures. However, particle radiotherapy is still relatively new, and more research is needed to fully understand its effects. Additionally, the availability of particle therapy is limited as it requires specialized equipment and expertise. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the available literature regarding the role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors.
Collapse
|
11
|
Tubin S, Fossati P, Mock U, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Flechl B, Pelak M, Georg P, Fussl C, Carlino A, Stock M, Hug E. Proton or Carbon Ion Therapy for Skull Base Chordoma: Rationale and First Analysis of a Mono-Institutional Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072093. [PMID: 37046752 PMCID: PMC10093149 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Skull base chordomas are radio-resistant tumors that require high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy, as can be delivered by particle therapy (protons and carbon ions). We performed a first clinical outcome analysis of particle therapy based on the initial 4-years of operation. Methods: Between August 2017 and October 2021, 44 patients were treated with proton (89%) or carbon ion therapy (11%). Prior gross total resection had been performed in 21% of lesions, subtotal resection in 57%, biopsy in 12% and decompression in 10%. The average prescription dose was 75.2 Gy RBE in 37 fractions for protons and 66 Gy RBE in 22 fractions for carbon ions. Results: At a median follow-up of 34.3 months (range: 1–55), 2-, and 3-year actuarial local control rates were 95.5% and 90.9%, respectively. The 2-, and 3-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 97.7%, 93.2%, 95.5% and 90.9%, respectively. The tumor volume at the time of particle therapy was highly predictive of local failure (p < 0.01), and currently, there is 100% local control in patients with tumors < 49 cc. No grade ≥3 toxicities were observed. There was no significant difference in outcome or side effect profile seen for proton versus carbon ion therapy. Five patients (11.4%) experienced transient grade ≤2 radiation-induced brain changes. Conclusions: The first analysis suggests the safety and efficacy of proton and carbon ion therapy at our center. The excellent control of small to mid-size chordomas underlines the effectiveness of particle therapy and importance of upfront maximum debulking of large lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slavisa Tubin
- MedAustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie Curie Strasse 5, 2700 W. Neustadt, Austria
- Correspondence:
| | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie Curie Strasse 5, 2700 W. Neustadt, Austria
| | - Ulrike Mock
- MedAustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie Curie Strasse 5, 2700 W. Neustadt, Austria
| | | | - Birgit Flechl
- MedAustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie Curie Strasse 5, 2700 W. Neustadt, Austria
| | - Maciej Pelak
- MedAustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie Curie Strasse 5, 2700 W. Neustadt, Austria
| | - Petra Georg
- Klinische Abteilung für Strahlentherapie—Radioonkologie, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Christoph Fussl
- Universitätsklinik für Radiotherapie und Radio-Onkologie der Paracelus Medizinischen Privatuniversität, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Antonio Carlino
- MedAustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie Curie Strasse 5, 2700 W. Neustadt, Austria
| | - Markus Stock
- MedAustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie Curie Strasse 5, 2700 W. Neustadt, Austria
| | - Eugen Hug
- MedAustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie Curie Strasse 5, 2700 W. Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center-a single-center experience. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:160-168. [PMID: 36149438 PMCID: PMC9876873 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02002-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the results of irradiation with protons versus irradiation with carbon ions in a raster scan technique in patients with skull base chordomas and to identify risk factors that may compromise treatment results. METHODS A total of 147 patients (85 men, 62 women) were irradiated with carbon ions (111 patients) or protons (36 patients) with a median dose of 66 Gy (RBE (Relative biological effectiveness); carbon ions) in 4 weeks or 74 Gy (RBE; protons) in 7 weeks at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) in Heidelberg, Germany. The median follow-up time was 49.3 months. All patients had gross residual disease at the beginning of RT. Compression of the brainstem was present in 38%, contact without compression in 18%, and no contact but less than 3 mm distance in 16%. Local control and overall survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier Method based on scheduled treatment (protons vs. carbon ions) and compared via the log rank test. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors. RESULTS During the follow-up, 41 patients (27.9%) developed a local recurrence. The median follow-up time was 49.3 months (95% CI: 40.8-53.8; reverse Kaplan-Meier median follow-up time 56.3 months, 95% CI: 51.9-60.7). No significant differences between protons and carbon ions were observed regarding LC, OS, or overall toxicity. The 1‑year, 3‑year, and 5‑year LC rates were 97%, 80%, and 61% (protons) and 96%, 80%, and 65% (carbon ions), respectively. The corresponding OS rates were 100%, 92%, and 92% (protons) and 99%, 91%, and 83% (carbon ions). No significant prognostic factors for LC or OS could be determined regarding the whole cohort; however, a significantly improved LC could be observed if the tumor was > 3 mm distant from the brainstem in patients presenting in a primary situation. CONCLUSION Outcomes of proton and carbon ion treatment of skull base chordomas seem similar regarding tumor control, survival, and toxicity. Close proximity to the brainstem might be a negative prognostic factor, at least in patients presenting in a primary situation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Dong M, Liu R, Zhang Q, Luo H, Wang D, Wang Y, Chen J, Ou Y, Wang X. Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:172. [PMID: 36284346 PMCID: PMC9594886 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas. Methods We searched for articles using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases from their inception to January 12, 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. Results We searched for 4378 candidate articles, of which 12 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 897 BSs patients who received carbon ion radiotherapy in the studies, 526 patients had chordoma, 255 patients had chondrosarcoma, 112 patients had osteosarcoma, and 4 patients had other sarcomas. The local control rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 98.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.961–1.009, I2 = 0%), 85.8% (95% CI = 0.687–1.030, I2 = 91%), 86% (95% CI = 0.763–0.957, I2 = 85.3%), 91.1% (95% CI = 0.849–0.974), 74.3% (95% CI = 0.666–0.820, I2 = 85.2%), and 64.7% (95% CI = 0.451–0.843, I2 = 95.3%), respectively. The overall survival rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 99.9% (95% CI = 0.995–1.004, I2 = 0%), 89.6% (95% CI = 0.811–0.980, I2 = 96.6%), 85% (95% CI = 0.750–0.950, I2 = 89.4%), 92.4% (95% CI = 0.866–0.982), 72.7% (95% CI = 0.609–0.844, I2 = 95.3%), and 72.1% (95% CI = 0.661–0.781, I2 = 46.5%), respectively. Across all studies, the incidence of acute and late toxicities was mainly grade 1 to grade 2, and grade 1 to grade 3, respectively. Conclusion As an advanced radiotherapy, carbon ion radiotherapy is promising for patients with bone sarcomas that are unresectable or residual after incomplete surgery. The data indicated that carbon ion radiotherapy was safe and effective for bone sarcomas, showing promising results for local control, overall survival, and lower acute and late toxicity. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021258480. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Dong
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
| | - Hongtao Luo
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Dandan Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuhang Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Junru Chen
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuhong Ou
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. .,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pahwa B, Medani K, Lu VM, Elarjani T. Proton beam therapy for skull base chordomas: a systematic review of tumor control rates and survival rates. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45:3551-3563. [PMID: 36181614 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01880-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The management of base of skull (BS) chordomas is a neurosurgical conundrum owing to their close proximity to the critical neurovascular structures. Surgical resection is the gold standard treatment followed by adjuvant radiotherapy which includes photon therapy, proton beam therapy (PBT), gamma knife radiosurgery, etc. PBT has become an unparalleled therapeutic modality in the management of BS chordomas. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the outcomes in BS chordoma patients who received PBT as a primary or adjuvant therapy. PubMed and Cochrane databases were screened till May 2022. Following the PRISMA guidelines, studies were reviewed thoroughly, and the data of the included study was extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS 9.4 with P value < .05 considered as significant. Sixteen studies with 752 patients were included. The majority of the patients were adults (> 18 years) with a male:female ratio of 1.2. The most common clinical features were cranial nerve (3rd, 6th, or 12th) palsy and hearing impairment. Ninety-five percent of the patients underwent surgical resection before PBT. The mean PBT dose received was 74.02 cGe (cobalt gray equivalent). Eighty percent of the patients showed a positive response to the therapy defined in terms of tumor regression. Five-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated as 76.6%, 79.6%, and 89%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed none of the factors had any significant association with 5-year LC. PBT is a growing therapeutic technique that has revolutionized the treatment of BS chordomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavya Pahwa
- University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Khalid Medani
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Victor M Lu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Turki Elarjani
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pompos A, Foote RL, Koong AC, Le QT, Mohan R, Paganetti H, Choy H. National Effort to Re-Establish Heavy Ion Cancer Therapy in the United States. Front Oncol 2022; 12:880712. [PMID: 35774126 PMCID: PMC9238353 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.880712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, we attempt to make a case for the establishment of a limited number of heavy ion cancer research and treatment facilities in the United States. Based on the basic physics and biology research, conducted largely in Japan and Germany, and early phase clinical trials involving a relatively small number of patients, we believe that heavy ions have a considerably greater potential to enhance the therapeutic ratio for many cancer types compared to conventional X-ray and proton radiotherapy. Moreover, with ongoing technological developments and with research in physical, biological, immunological, and clinical aspects, it is quite plausible that cost effectiveness of radiotherapy with heavier ions can be substantially improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnold Pompos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas (UT) Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Robert L. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- *Correspondence: Robert L. Foote,
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Quynh Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Hak Choy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas (UT) Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chondrosarcoma of the sella turcica: Case report and review. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2022.101523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
17
|
Holtzman AL, Bates JE, Morris CG, Rutenberg MS, Indelicato DJ, Tavanaiepour D, Mendenhall WM. Impact of Type of Treatment Center and Access to Care on Mortality and Survival for Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma. Skull Base Surg 2022; 83:328-338. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction In adults with skull base chordoma or chondrosarcoma, the impact of treatment center and access to care have not been well described in regard to perioperative mortality and survival.
Methods A query of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and review of 1,102 adults—488 with chordomas and 614 with chondrosarcomas—was performed. The Kaplan–Meier's product limit method and chi-square analysis, respectively, assessed overall survival and 30-day (30D) and 90-day (90D) mortalities.
Results For 925 patients who had surgery and available mortality data, the 30D and 90D mortality rates were 0.9 and 1.5%. Lower education level (p = 0.0185) and treatment at a nonacademic facility (p = 0.016) were associated with increased risk of 90-day mortality. Median follow-up was 52 months and analysis was dichotomized by histology. For those with skull base chordoma, patients from a larger metro size (p = 0.002), age below the median 52 years (p ≤ 0.001), and private insurance (<0.001) were associated with prolonged survival, whereas for skull base chondrosarcoma, the factors were treatment at an academic medical center (p = 0.001), high-volume center (p = 0.007), age below the median 52 years (p ≤ 0.001), higher income (p = 0.043), higher education (p = 0.017), and private insurance (p ≤ 0.001). Comparing high-, medium-, and low-volume centers, high-volume centers were most likely to be academic, deliver radiotherapy, escalate doses >70 Gy, and utilize proton radiotherapy consistent across both disease subsets.
Conclusion Higher educational attainment and treatment at an academic facility were associated with decreased 90D mortality for patients with skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma. For those with skull base chordoma, larger metro size, younger age, and private insurance were associated with prolonged survival; for those with chondrosarcoma, it was treatment at a high-volume or academic medical center, younger age, higher income or education, and private insurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L. Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - James E. Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Christopher G. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Michael S. Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Daniel J. Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Daryoush Tavanaiepour
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - William M. Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen ATC, Hong CBC, Narazaki DK, Rubin V, Serante AR, Ribeiro Junior U, de Lima LGCA, Coimbra BGMM, Cristante AF, Teixeira WGJ. High dose image-guided, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) for chordomas of the sacrum, mobile spine and skull base: preliminary outcomes. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:23-31. [PMID: 35451720 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04003-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report preliminary outcomes of high dose image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) in the treatment of chordomas of the sacrum, mobile spine and skull base. METHODS Retrospective analysis of chordoma patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT) in a single tertiary cancer center. Initial treatment was categorized as (A) Adjuvant or definitive high-dose RT (78 Gy/39fx or 24 Gy/1fx) vs (B) surgery-only or low dose RT. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of local failure. RESULTS A total of 31 patients were treated from 2010 through 2020. Median age was 55 years, tumor location was 64% sacrum, 13% lumbar, 16% cervical and 6% clivus. Median tumor volume was 148 cc (8.3 cm in largest diameter), 42% of patients received curative-intent surgery and 65% received primary RT (adjuvant or definitive). 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 48% in group A vs 83% in group B (p = 0.041). Tumor size > 330 cc was associated with local failure (SHR 2.2, 95% CI 1.12 to 7.45; p = 0.028). Eight patients developed distant metastases, with a median metastases-free survival of 56.1 months. 5-year survival for patients that received high dose RT was 72% vs 76% in patients that received no or low dose RT (p = 0.63). CONCLUSION Our study suggests high-dose photon IG-IMRT improves local control in the initial management of chordomas. Health systems should promote reference centers with clinical expertise and technical capabilities to improve outcomes for this complex disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Tsin Chih Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, 4SS, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01246-000, Brazil.
| | - Carlos Bo Chur Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, 4SS, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Douglas Kenji Narazaki
- Department of Spine Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Virginio Rubin
- Department of Radiology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Ruggieri Serante
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, 4SS, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Ulysses Ribeiro Junior
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Alexandre Fogaça Cristante
- Department of Spine Surgery of Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - William Gemio Jacobsen Teixeira
- Department of Spine Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Muhonen EG, Yasaka TM, Lehrich BM, Goshtasbi K, Papagiannopoulos P, Tajudeen BA, St John MA, Harris JP, Hsu FP, Kuan EC. Impact of Treatment Modalities upon Survival Outcomes in Skull Base and Clival Chordoma: An NCDB Analysis. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 84:60-68. [PMID: 36743709 PMCID: PMC9897903 DOI: 10.1055/a-1733-9475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Skull base chordomas are locally aggressive malignant tumors derived from the notochord remnant. There are limited large-scale studies examining the role and extent of surgery and radiation therapy. Design Analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed to evaluate the survival outcomes of various treatments, and to assess for predictors of overall survival (OS). Participants This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients diagnosed with a clival/skull base chordoma between 2004 and 2015 in the NCDB. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results In all, 468 cases were identified. Forty-nine percent of patients received surgery and 20.7% had positive margins. Mean age at diagnosis was 48.4 years in the surgical cohort, and 55% were males. Of the surgical cohort, 33.8% had negative margins, 20.7% had positive margins, and 45.5% had unknown margin status. Age ≥ 65 (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-5.76; p < 0.001), diagnosis between 2010 and 2015 (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.90; p = 0.022), tumor size >5 cm (HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.26-4.15; p = 0.007), and government insurance (HR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.24-4.2; p = 0.008) were independent predictors of OS. When comparing surgery with or without adjuvant radiation, no survival differences were found, regardless of margin status ( p = 0.66). Conclusion Surgery remains the mainstay of therapy. Advanced age (>65 years), large tumor size, and government insurance were predictors of worse OS. Whereas negative margins and the use of adjuvant radiation did not appear to impact OS, these may very well reduce local recurrences. A multidisciplinary approach is critical in achieving optimal outcomes in this challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan G. Muhonen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Tyler M. Yasaka
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Brandon M. Lehrich
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Bobby A. Tajudeen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Maie A. St John
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Jeremy P. Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Frank P.K. Hsu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Edward C. Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States,Address for correspondence Edward C. Kuan, MD, MBA Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of CaliforniaIrvine, 101 The City Drive South Orange, CA 92868-3201United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Medrano M, Liu R, Zhao T, Webb T, Politte DG, Whiting BR, Liao R, Ge T, Porras-Chaverri MA, O'Sullivan JA, Williamson JF. Towards sub-percentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method. Med Phys 2022; 49:1599-1618. [PMID: 35029302 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the potential of a joint dual-energy CT reconstruction process (Statistical Image Reconstruction method built on a Basis Vector Model (JSIR-BVM)) implemented on a 16-slice commercial CT scanner to measure high spatial-resolution stopping-power ratio (SPR) maps with uncertainties of less than 1%. METHODS JSIR-BVM was used to reconstruct images of effective electron density and mean excitation energy from dual-energy CT (DECT) sinograms for ten high-purity samples of known density and atomic composition inserted into head and body phantoms. The measured DECT data consisted of 90 kVp and 140 kVp axial sinograms serially acquired on a Philips Brilliance Big Bore CT scanner without beam-hardening corrections. The corresponding SPRs were subsequently measured directly via ion chamber measurements on a MEVION S250 superconducting synchrocyclotron and evaluated theoretically from the known sample compositions and densities. Deviations of JSIR-BVM SPR values from their theoretically calculated and directly measured ground-truth values were evaluated for our JSIR-BVM method and for our implementation of the Hünemohr-Saito (H-S) DECT image-domain decomposition technique for SPR imaging. A thorough uncertainty analysis was then performed for 5 different scenarios (comparison of JSIR-BVM SPR/SP to International Commission on Radiation Measurements and Units (ICRU) benchmarks; comparison of JSIR-BVM SPR to measured benchmarks; and uncertainties in JSIR-BVM SPR/SP maps for patients of unknown composition) per the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) and the Guide to expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), including the impact of uncertainties in measured photon spectra, sample composition and density, photon cross-section and I-value models, and random measurement uncertainty. Estimated SPR uncertainty for three main tissue groups in patients of unknown composition and the weighted proportion of each tissue type for three proton treatment sites were then used to derive a composite range uncertainty for our method. RESULTS Mean JSIR-BVM SPR estimates deviated by less than 1% from their theoretical and directly measured ground-truth values for most inserts and phantom geometries except for high density Delrin and Teflon samples with SPR error relative to proton measurements of 1.1% and -1.0% (Head Phantom) and 1.1% and -1.1% (Body Phantom). The overall RMS deviations over all samples were 0.39% and 0.52% (head phantom) and 0.43% and 0.57% (body phantom) relative to theoretical and directly measured ground-truth SPRs, respectively. The corresponding RMS (maximum) errors for the image-domain decomposition method were 2.68% and 2.73% (4.68% and 4.99%) for the head phantom and 0.71% and 0.87% (1.37% and 1.66%) for the body phantom. Compared to H-S SPR maps, JSIR-BVM yielded 30% sharper and two-fold sharper images for soft tissues and bone-like surrogates, respectively, while reducing noise by factors of 6 and 3, respectively. The uncertainty (coverage factor k = 1) of the DECT-to-benchmark values comparison ranged from 0.5% to 1.5% and is dominated by scanning-beam photon-spectra uncertainties. An analysis of the SPR uncertainty for patients of unknown composition showed a JSIR-BVM uncertainty of 0.65%, 1.21%, and 0.77% for soft-, lung-, and bony-tissue groups which led to a composite range uncertainty of 0.6%-0.9%. CONCLUSIONS Observed JSIR-BVM SPR estimation errors were all less than 50% of the estimated k = 1 total uncertainty of our benchmarking experiment, demonstrating that JSIR-BVM high spatial-resolution, low-noise SPR mapping is feasible and is robust to variations in the geometry of the scanned object. In contrast, the much larger H-S SPR estimation errors are dominated by imaging noise and residual beam-hardening artifacts. While the uncertainties characteristic of our current JSIR-BVM implementation can be as large as 1.5%, achieving <1% total uncertainty is feasible by improving the accuracy of scanner-specific scatter-profile and photon-spectrum estimates. With its robustness to beam-hardening artifact, image noise and variations in phantom size and geometry, JSIR-BVM has the potential to achieve high spatial-resolution SPR mapping with sub-percentage accuracy and estimated uncertainty in the clinical setting. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Medrano
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Ruirui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Tyler Webb
- Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - David G Politte
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Bruce R Whiting
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Rui Liao
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Tao Ge
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Mariela A Porras-Chaverri
- Atomic, Nuclear and Molecular Sciences Research Center (CICANUM), University of Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica
| | - Joseph A O'Sullivan
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Jeffrey F Williamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pattankar S, Warade A, Misra BK, Deshpande RB. Long-term outcome of adjunctive Gamma Knife radiosurgery in skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: An Indian experience. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 96:90-100. [PMID: 35030499 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Skull-base chordomas (CD) and chondrosarcomas (CS) are locally-invasive tumors, have similar clinical presentations, while differing in their nature of growth and outcomes. In this study, we compare the long-term outcomes of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) as an adjunctive treatment modality for residual skull-base CD and CS. A retrospective analysis of clinico-radiological, pathological, radiotherapeutic and outcome data was carried out in patients who underwent adjunctive GKRS for residual skull-base CD and CS at P D Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, between 1997 and 2020. All 27 patients included had either histopathologically proven CD (20 patients) or CS (7 patients). Brachyury immunohistochemistry in CD specimens gave 70.6% positivity. Total sessions of GKRS in CD and CS groups were 22 and 7, respectively. Mean tumor volume and mean margin dose in CD group were 6.53 ± 4.18 cm3 and 15.95 ± 1.49 Gy respectively, while for CS group, they were 4.16 ± 2.79 cm3 and 18.29 ± 3.15 Gy. With mean follow-up periods of 5.25 ± 4.73 years and 6 ± 2.07 years respectively, the CD and CS groups showed 5-year progression free survival (PFS) of 56.8% and 57.1%, and a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 82.1% and 100%. Sub-group analysis in both CD and CS groups revealed a better 5-year PFS with the following factors - CS histopathology, patient age < 45 years, margin dose > 16 Gy, tumor volume < 7 cm3 (p-value < 0.05), gross total resection, and brachyury positivity. Adjunctive radiotherapy for skull-base CD and CS holds promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeev Pattankar
- Department of Neurosurgery & Gamma Knife, P D Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai 400016, India
| | - Anshu Warade
- Department of Neurosurgery & Gamma Knife, P D Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai 400016, India
| | - Basant K Misra
- Department of Neurosurgery & Gamma Knife, P D Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai 400016, India.
| | - Ramesh B Deshpande
- Department of Pathology, P D Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai 400016, India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gordon K, Gulidov I, Koryakin S, Smyk D, Makeenkova T, Gogolin D, Lepilina O, Golovanova O, Semenov A, Dujenko S, Medvedeva K, Mardynsky Y. Proton therapy with a fixed beamline for skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: outcomes and toxicity. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:238. [PMID: 34930352 PMCID: PMC8686536 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01961-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim This study presents an analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas treated with a fixed horizontal pencil proton beam. Background Chordomas (CAs) and chondrosarcomas (CSAs) are rare tumours that are usually located near the base of the skull and very close to the brain's most critical structures. Proton therapy (PT) is often considered the best radiation treatment for these diseases, but it is still a limited resource. Active scanning PT delivered via a fixed pencil beamline might be a promising option. Methods This is a single-centre experience describing the results of proton therapy for 31 patients with CA (n = 23) or CSA (n = 8) located near the base of the skull. Proton therapy was utilized by a fixed pencil beamline with a chair to position the patient between May 2016 and November 2020. Ten patients underwent resection (32.2%), 15 patients (48.4%) underwent R2 resection, and 6 patients had unresectable tumours (19.4%). In 4 cases, the tumours had been previously irradiated. The median PT dose was 70 GyRBE (relative biological efficacy, 1.1) [range, 60 to 74] with 2.0 GyRBE per fraction. The mean GTV volume was 25.6 cm3 [range, 4.2–115.6]. Patient demographics, pathology, treatment parameters, and toxicity were collected and analysed. Radiation-induced reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0. Results The median follow-up time was 21 months [range, 4 to 52]. The median overall survival (OS) was 40 months. The 1- and 2-year OS was 100%, and the 3-year OS was 66.3%. Four patients died due to non-cancer-related reasons, 1 patient died due to tumour progression, and 1 patient died due to treatment-related injuries. The 1-year local control (LC) rate was 100%, the 2-year LC rate was 93.7%, and the 3-year LC rate was 85.3%. Two patients with CSA exhibited progression in the neck lymph nodes and lungs. All patients tolerated PT well without any treatment interruptions. We observed 2 cases of ≥ grade 3 toxicity, with 1 case of grade 3 myelitis and 1 case of grade 5 brainstem injury. Conclusion Treatment with a fixed proton beam shows promising disease control and an acceptable toxicity rate, even the difficult-to-treat subpopulation of patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas requiring dose escalation.
Collapse
|
23
|
Rimmer RA, Mace JC, Andersen PE, Cetas JS, Ciporen JN, Dogan A, Smith TL, Geltzeiler M. Determinants of survival in sinonasal and skull base chondrosarcoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2021; 12:699-713. [PMID: 34704402 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chondrosarcomas are rare, malignant chondroid tumors that can occur in the sinonasal and skull base regions. Surgery is a mainstay of treatment, but complete resection can be challenging because of the close proximity of critical neurovascular structures. Because of their rarity and relatively indolent nature, optimal treatment regimens are not established. Our objective was to assess determinants of survival for sinonasal and skull base chondrosarcomas utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS The NCDB (2004-2017) was queried for cases of sinonasal and skull base chondrosarcoma. Multivariate hazard regression modeling was used to identify significant predictors of 60-month and 120-month overall survival (OS). RESULTS Seven hundred thirty-six cases met inclusion criteria. OS for all treatment types was 84.7% [SE±0.02] at 60 months and 75.6% [SE±0.02] at 120 months. Surgery with or without adjuvant treatment was found to associate with highest OS at 60 and 120 months. For patients receiving adjuvant radiation during treatment, proton therapy had significantly better OS at 60 months (95.4% [SE±0.03] vs 82.3% [SE±0.03], -2 = 5.27; p = 0.02) and 120 months (85.1% [SE±0.08] vs 72.8% [SE±0.05], -2 = 4.11; p = 0.04) compared with conventional external beam. After adjustment for primary site, multivariate Cox regression modeling (n = 561) identified cofactors significantly associated with variation in mortality risk at 60 and 120 months, including age, Charlson-Deyo total score ≥ 3, insurance provision status, and tumor grade. CONCLUSIONS Sinonasal and skull base chondrosarcoma are primarily treated with surgery with favorable OS. Adjuvant treatment may be required and proton radiation was associated with improved 60-month and 120-month survival compared with conventional radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan A Rimmer
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Jess C Mace
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Peter E Andersen
- Division of Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Justin S Cetas
- Division of Skull Base and Cerebrovascular, Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Jeremy N Ciporen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University-Tuality Healthcare, Hillsboro, OR
| | - Aclan Dogan
- Division of Skull Base and Cerebrovascular, Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gordon KB, Smyk DI, Gulidov IA. Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: State of the Problem and Development Prospects (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2021; 13:70-80. [PMID: 34603766 PMCID: PMC8482826 DOI: 10.17691/stm2021.13.4.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy (PT) due to dosimetric characteristics (Bragg peak formation, sharp dose slowdown) is currently one of the most high-tech techniques of radiation therapy exceeding the standards of photon methods. In recent decades, PT has traditionally been used, primarily, for head and neck cancers (HNC) including skull base tumors. Regardless of the fact that recently PT application area has significantly expanded, HNC still remain a leading indication for proton radiation since PT’s physic-dosimetric and radiobiological advantages enable to achieve the best treatment results in these tumors. The present review is devoted to PT usage in HNC treatment in the world and Russian medicine, the prospects for further technique development, the assessment of PT’s radiobiological features, a physical and dosimetric comparison of protons photons distribution. The paper shows PT’s capabilities in the treatment of skull base tumors, HNC (nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, oropharynx, and laryngopharynx, etc.), eye tumors, sialomas. The authors analyze the studies on repeated radiation and provide recent experimental data on favorable profile of proton radiation compared to the conventional radiation therapy. The review enables to conclude that currently PT is a dynamic radiation technique opening up new opportunities for improving therapy of oncology patients, especially those with HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K B Gordon
- Senior Researcher, Proton Therapy Department; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 4 Koroleva St., Kaluga Region, Obninsk, 249036, Russia
| | - D I Smyk
- Junior Researcher, Proton Therapy Department; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 4 Koroleva St., Kaluga Region, Obninsk, 249036, Russia
| | - I A Gulidov
- Professor, Head of the Proton Therapy Department; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 4 Koroleva St., Kaluga Region, Obninsk, 249036, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Soule E, Baig S, Fiester P, Holtzman A, Rutenberg M, Tavanaiepour D, Rao D. Current Management and Image Review of Skull Base Chordoma: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. J Clin Imaging Sci 2021; 11:46. [PMID: 34513210 PMCID: PMC8422542 DOI: 10.25259/jcis_139_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Chordomas of the skull-base are typically slow-growing, notochord-derived tumors that most commonly originate along the clivus. Skull base chordoma is treated with surgery and radiotherapy. Local recurrence approaches 50% at 10 years. Radiologists play a critical role in diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up. Surgeons and radiation oncologists rely on radiologists for pre-operative delineation of tumor and adjacent anatomy, identification of post-treatment changes and disease recurrence, and radiation treatment effects. This review provides an overview of clinical characteristics, surgical anatomy, indications for radiotherapy, identification of treatment complications, and patterns of disease recurrence for radiologists to provide value in the management of these lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Soule
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Saif Baig
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Peter Fiester
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Adam Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Michael Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Daryoush Tavanaiepour
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Dinesh Rao
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Particle Radiotherapy for Skull Base Chondrosarcoma: A Clinical Series from Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174423. [PMID: 34503233 PMCID: PMC8430859 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Skull-base chondrosarcoma is a rare locally aggressive or malignant group of cartilaginous neoplasm. The standard of care consists of surgery and high-dose radiation therapy, better if with particle, due to their radioresistance and proximity to organs at risk such as brainstem and optic pathways. Due to the rarity of the tumor and its site, outcomes in terms of local control and toxicity of patients with this malignancy after receiving particle therapy has been documented only in a limited number of series with a restricted number of patients, in particular with regard to carbon ions. The aim of our retrospective study is to assess the role of particle therapy (protons and carbon ions) after surgery in our Institute in skull-base chondrosarcomas. Abstract Background: The standard treatment for skull base chondrosarcoma (SB-CHS) consists of surgery and high-dose radiation therapy. Our aim was to evaluate outcome in terms of local control (LC) and toxicity of proton therapy (PT) and carbon ion (CIRT) after surgery. Materials and methods: From September 2011 to July 2020, 48 patients underwent particle therapy (67% PT, 33% CIRT) for SB-CHS. PT and CIRT total dose was 70 GyRBE (relative biological effectiveness) in 35 fractions and 70.4 GyRBE in 16 fractions, respectively. Toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5). Results: After a median follow-up time of 38 months, one local failure (2%) was documented and the patient died for progressive disease. Overall, 3-year LC was 98%. One (2%) and 4 (8%) patients experienced G3 acute and late toxicity, respectively. White-matter brain changes were documented in 22 (46%) patients, but only 7 needed steroids (G2). No patients had G3 brain toxicity. No G4–5 complications were reported. We did not find any correlation between high-grade toxicity or white-matter changes and characteristics of patients, disease and surgery. Conclusions: PT and CIRT appeared to be effective and safe treatments for patients with SB-CHS, resulting in high LC rates and an acceptable toxicity profile.
Collapse
|
27
|
Kim KS, Wu HG. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy? Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:621-634. [PMID: 34176253 PMCID: PMC8291184 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Charged-particle therapy (CPT) such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) exhibit substantial physical and biological advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy. As it can reduce the amount of radiation irradiated in the normal organ, CPT has been mainly applied to pediatric cancer and radioresistent tumors in the eloquent area. Although there is a possibility of greater benefits, high set-up cost and dearth of high level of clinical evidence hinder wide applications of CPT. This review aims to present recent clinical results of PBT and CIRT in selected diseases focusing on possible indications of CPT. We also discussed how clinical studies are conducted to increase the number of patients who can benefit from CPT despite its high cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hong-Gyun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul,
Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hug EB, Pelak M, Frank SJ, Fossati P. A Review of Particle Therapy for Skull Base Tumors: Modern Considerations and Future Directions. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:168-178. [PMID: 34285944 PMCID: PMC8270106 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Skull base tumors constitute one of the established indications for particle therapy, specifically proton therapy. However, a number of prognostic factors, practical clinical management issues, and the emerging role of carbon ion therapy remain subjects of active clinical investigation. This review summarizes these topics, assesses the present status, and reflects on future research directions focusing on the management of chordomas, one of the most aggressive skull base tumors. In addition, the role of particle therapy for benign tumors of the skull base, including pituitary adenoma and acoustic neuroma, is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugen B Hug
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Maciej Pelak
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Steven J Frank
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Holtzman AL, Rotondo RL, Rutenberg MS, Indelicato DJ, De Leo A, Rao D, Patel J, Morris CG, Mendenhall WM. Clinical Outcomes Following Dose-Escalated Proton Therapy for Skull-Base Chordoma. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:179-188. [PMID: 34285945 PMCID: PMC8270096 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00066.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of external-beam proton therapy (PT) on local control and survival in patients with skull-base chordoma. Materials and Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients with skull-base chordoma treated with definitive or adjuvant high-dose PT and updated their follow-up when feasible. We assessed overall survival, disease-specific survival, local control, and freedom from distant metastasis. Radiotherapy toxicities were scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results A total 112 patients were analyzed, of whom 105 (94%) received PT and 7 (6%) received combined proton-photon therapy between 2007 and 2019. Eighty-seven patients (78%) underwent a subtotal resection, 22 (20%) a gross total resection, and 3 (3%) a biopsy alone. The median radiotherapy dose was 73.8 Gy radiobiologic equivalent (GyRBE; range, 69.6-74.4). Ninety patients (80%) had gross disease at radiotherapy and 7 (6%) were treated for locally recurrent disease following surgery. Median follow-up was 4.4 years (range, 0.4-12.6); for living patients, it was 4.6 years (range, 0.4-12.6), and for deceased patients, 4.1 years (range, 1.2-11.2). At 5 years after radiotherapy, the actuarial overall survival, disease-specific survival, local control, and freedom from distant metastasis rates were 78% (n = 87), 83% (n = 93), 74% (n = 83), and 99% (n = 111), respectively. The median time to local progression was 2.4 years (range, 0.8-7). Local control and disease-specific survival by resection status was 95% versus 70% (P = 0.28) and 100% versus 80% (P = 0.06) for gross total, versus subtotal, resection or biopsy alone, respectively. There were no serious acute toxicities (grade ≥ 3) related to radiotherapy. Conclusion High-dose PT alone or after surgical resection for skull-base chordoma reaffirms the favorable 5-year actuarial local control rate compared with conventional techniques with acceptable late-complication–free survival. Outcomes following gross total resection and adjuvant PT were excellent. Further follow-up of this cohort is necessary to better characterize long-term disease control and late toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ronny L Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Michael S Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Alexandra De Leo
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Dinesh Rao
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jeet Patel
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Parzen JS, Li X, Zheng W, Ding X, Kabolizadeh P. Proton Therapy for Skull-Base Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas: Initial Results From the Beaumont Proton Therapy Center. Cureus 2021; 13:e15278. [PMID: 34194880 PMCID: PMC8235689 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background:Skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas are rare tumors that arise directly adjacent to important critical structures. Appropriate management consists of maximal safe resection followed by postoperative dose-escalated radiation therapy. Proton beam therapy is often employed in this context to maximize the sparing of organs at risk, such as the brainstem and optic apparatus. Methods: This is a single-institutional experience treating skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas with postoperative pencil beam scanning proton therapy. We employed a simultaneous integrated boost to the gross tumor volume (GTV) for increased conformality. Demographic, clinicopathologic, toxicity, and dosimetry information were collected. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), v. 4.0. Results: Between 2017 and 2020, 13 patients were treated with postoperative proton therapy. There were 10 patients with chordoma (77%) and three with chondrosarcoma (23%). A gross total resection was achieved in six (60%) patients with chordoma and one patient with chondrosarcoma (33%). Nine patients (69%) received postoperative therapy, whereas four (31%) received treatment at recurrence/progression following re-excision. The median dose to the GTV was 72.4 cobalt-Gray equivalents (range, 70.0 to 75.8). The mean GTV was 3.4 cc (range, 0.2-38.7). There were no grade 3 or greater toxicities. One patient developed grade 2 temporal lobe necrosis. At 10.7 months' median follow-up (range, 2.1-30.6), the rates of local control and overall survival were 100%. Conclusions: Proton beam therapy with pencil beam scanning and simultaneous integrated boost to the GTV affords excellent early local control with the suggestion of low morbidity. This method deserves consideration as an optimal method for limiting dose to adjacent organs at risk and delivering clinically effective doses to the treatment volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob S Parzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Proton Therapy Center, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, USA
| | - Xiaoqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Proton Therapy Center, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, USA
| | - Weili Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Proton Therapy Center, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, USA
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Proton Therapy Center, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, USA
| | - Peyman Kabolizadeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Proton Therapy Center, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lee SU, Yang K, Moon SH, Suh YG, Yoo GS. Patterns of Proton Beam Therapy Use in Clinical Practice Between 2007 and 2019 in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:935-943. [PMID: 34015892 PMCID: PMC8524026 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a state-of-the-art technology employed in radiotherapy (RT) for cancer patients. This study characterized how PBT has been used in clinical practice in Korea. Materials and Methods Patients who received any type of RT between 2007 and 2019 were identified from the radiation oncology registry of the two PBT facilities operating in Korea (National Cancer Center and Samsung Medical Center). The χ2 test was used to identify patient- and treatment-related characteristics associated with the receipt of PBT. Results A total of 54,035 patients had been treated with some form of RT in the two institutions, of whom 5,398 received PBT (10.0%). The number of patients who receive PBT has gradually increased since PBT first started, from 162 patients in 2007 to 1304 patients in 2019. Among all types of cancer, PBT use in liver cancer has been steadily increasing from 20% in 2008-2009 to 32% in 2018-2019. In contrast, that in prostate cancer has been continuously decreasing from 20% in 2008-2009 to <10% in 2018-2019. Male sex, very young or old age, stage I-II disease, residency in non-capital areas, a definitive setting, a curative treatment aim, enrollment in a clinical trial, re-irradiation and insurance coverage were significantly associated with the receipt of PBT (all p < 0.05). Conclusion Since PBT started in Korea, the number of patients receiving PBT has increased to more than 1,000 per year and treatment indications have expanded. Liver cancer is the most common primary tumor among all PBT cases in Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Uk Lee
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyungmi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Ho Moon
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yang-Gun Suh
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Iannalfi A, D'Ippolito E, Riva G, Molinelli S, Gandini S, Viselner G, Fiore MR, Vischioni B, Vitolo V, Bonora M, Ronchi S, Petrucci R, Barcellini A, Mirandola A, Russo S, Vai A, Mastella E, Magro G, Maestri D, Ciocca M, Preda L, Valvo F, Orecchia R. Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy in skull base chordomas: a prospective study based on a dual particle and a patient-customized treatment strategy. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1348-1358. [PMID: 32193546 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate results in terms of local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profile and to better identify factors influencing clinical outcome of skull base chordoma treated with proton therapy (PT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). METHODS We prospectively collected and analyzed data of 135 patients treated between November 2011 and December 2018. Total prescription dose in the PT group (70 patients) and CIRT group (65 patients) was 74 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) delivered in 37 fractions and 70.4 Gy(RBE) delivered in 16 fractions, respectively (CIRT in unfavorable patients). LC and OS were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, to identify prognostic factors on clinical outcomes. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 44 (range, 6-87) months, 14 (21%) and 8 (11%) local failures were observed in CIRT and PT group, respectively. Five-year LC rate was 71% in CIRT cohort and 84% in PT cohort. The estimated 5-year OS rate in the CIRT and PT group was 82% and 83%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, gross tumor volume (GTV), optic pathways, and/or brainstem compression and dose coverage are independent prognostic factors of local failure risk. High rate toxicity grade ≥3 was reported in 11% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Particle radiotherapy is an effective treatment for skull base chordoma with acceptable late toxicity. GTV, optic pathways, and/or brainstem compression and target coverage were independent prognostic factors for LC. KEY POINTS • Proton and carbon ion therapy are effective and safe in skull base chordoma.• Prognostic factors are GTV, organs at risk compression, and dose coverage.• Dual particle therapy and customized strategy was adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Iannalfi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Emma D'Ippolito
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Riva
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Rosaria Fiore
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Bonora
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Rachele Petrucci
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefania Russo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vai
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mastella
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Davide Maestri
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Preda
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mizumoto M, Fuji H, Miyachi M, Soejima T, Yamamoto T, Aibe N, Demizu Y, Iwata H, Hashimoto T, Motegi A, Kawamura A, Terashima K, Fukushima T, Nakao T, Takada A, Sumi M, Oshima J, Moriwaki K, Nozaki M, Ishida Y, Kosaka Y, Ae K, Hosono A, Harada H, Ogo E, Akimoto T, Saito T, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Matsuo T, Matsumura A, Masaki H, Hosoi H, Shigematsu N, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs): JASTRO and JSPHO Guidelines. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102209. [PMID: 33984606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are often treated with a multidisciplinary approach. This includes use of radiotherapy, which is important for local control, but may also cause adverse events in the long term, including second cancer. The risks for limited growth and development, endocrine dysfunction, reduced fertility and second cancer in children and AYAs are reduced by proton beam therapy (PBT), which has a dose distribution that decreases irradiation of normal organs while still targeting the tumor. To define the outcomes and characteristics of PBT in cancer treatment in pediatric and AYA patients, this document was developed by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology and National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohei Nakao
- Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Takada
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Moriwaki
- Department of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Department of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ako Hosono
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akira Matsumura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Patel S, Nunna RS, Ryoo JS, Ansari D, Chaudhry NS, Mehta AI. Outcomes and Patterns of Care in Adult Skull Base Chondrosarcoma Patients in the United States. World Neurosurg 2021; 150:71-83. [PMID: 33785427 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chondrosarcomas of the skull base are rare intracranial tumors of chondroid origin. The rarity of these lesions has made it difficult to form a consensus on optimal treatment regimens. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes in patients with chondrosarcoma of the skull base. METHODS Patients with diagnosis codes for chondrosarcoma of the skull base were queried from the National Cancer Database for the years 2004-2016. Outcomes were investigated using Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses, and survival curves were generated for comparative visualization. RESULTS A total of 718 patients with chondrosarcoma of the skull base were identified. Mean overall survival (OS) in these patients was 10.7 years. Older age and presence of metastases were associated with worsened OS. Of patients, 83.3% received surgical intervention, and both partial resection and radical resection were associated with significantly improved OS (P < 0.001). Neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy improved OS; however, patients who received proton-based radiation and patients who received high-dose radiation (≥6000 cGy) had significantly improved OS compared with patients who received traditional radiation. CONCLUSIONS In the largest study to our knowledge of skull base chondrosarcoma to date, both partial resection and radical resection significantly improved OS, thus supporting the goal of maximal safe resection to preserve vital neurovascular structures without sacrificing outcome. In patients who received radiotherapy, proton-based modalities and high-dose radiation were associated with increased OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saavan Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ravi S Nunna
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - James S Ryoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Darius Ansari
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nauman S Chaudhry
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ankit I Mehta
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hu Y, Ding X, Shen J, Bues M, Liu W, Kang Y, Leng S, Yu L. Feasibility of using megavoltage computed tomography to reduce proton range uncertainty: A simulation study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:131-140. [PMID: 33608992 PMCID: PMC7984486 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To demonstrate that variation in chemical composition has a negligible effect on the mapping curve from relative electron density (RED) to proton stopping power ratio (SPR), and to establish the theoretical framework of using Megavoltage (MV) computed tomography (CT), instead of kilovoltage (kV) dual energy CT, to accurately estimate proton SPR. Methods A simulation study was performed to evaluate the effect of chemical composition variation on kVCT number and proton SPR. The simulation study involved both reference and simulated human tissues. The reference human tissues, together with their physical densities and chemical compositions, came from the ICRP publication 23. The simulated human tissues were created from the reference human tissues assuming that elemental percentage weight followed a Gaussian distribution. For all tissues, kVCT number and proton SPR were obtained through (a) theoretical calculation from tissue’s physical density and chemical composition which served as the ground truth, and (b) estimation from RED using the calibration curves established from the stoichiometric method. Deviations of the estimated values from the calculated values were quantified as errors in using RED to estimate kVCT number and proton SPR. Results Given a chemical composition variation of 5% (1σ) of the nominal percentage weights, the total estimation error of using RED to estimate kVCT number was 0.34%, 0.62%, and 0.77% and the total estimation error of using RED to estimate proton SPR was 0.30%, 0.22%, and 0.16% for fat tissues, non‐fat soft tissues and bone tissues, respectively. Conclusion Chemical composition had a negligible effect on the method of using RED to determine proton SPR. RED itself is sufficient to accurately determine proton SPR. MVCT number maintains a superb linear relationship with RED because it is highly dominated by Compton scattering. Therefore, MVCT has great potential in reducing the proton range uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanle Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Xiaoning Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Yixiu Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Shuai Leng
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lifeng Yu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Niemierko A, Schuemann J, Niyazi M, Giantsoudi D, Maquilan G, Shih HA, Paganetti H. Brain Necrosis in Adult Patients After Proton Therapy: Is There Evidence for Dependency on Linear Energy Transfer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:109-119. [PMID: 32911019 PMCID: PMC7736370 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate if radiographic imaging changes defined as necrosis correlate with regions in the brain with elevated linear energy transfer (LET) for proton radiation therapy treatments with partial brain involvement in central nervous system and patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty patients with head and neck, skull base, or intracranial tumors who underwent proton therapy between 2004 to 2016 with a minimum prescription dose of 59.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) and with magnetic resonance imaging changes indicative of brain necrosis after radiation therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Each treatment plan was recalculated using Monte Carlo simulations to provide accurate dose distributions as well as 3-dimensional distributions of LET. To assess the effect of LET on radiographic imaging changes several voxel-based analyses were performed. RESULTS In this patient cohort, LET adjusted for dose was not found to be associated with risk of brain necrosis. CONCLUSIONS A voxel-based analysis of brain necrosis as an endpoint is difficult owing to uncertainties in the origin of necrosis, timing of imaging, variability in patient specific radiosensitivity, and the simultaneous effect of dose and LET. Even though it is expected that the LET and thus relative biological effectiveness increases at the end of range, effects in patients might be small compared with interpatient variability of radiosensitivity and might be obscured by other confounding factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, partner site Munich, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Drosoula Giantsoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Genevieve Maquilan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Turner BE, Schüler E, Chang SD, Harsh GR, Soltys SG. Intracranial Autograft Fat Placement to Separate the Optic Chiasm from Tumor to Improve Stereotactic Radiotherapy Dosimetry. World Neurosurg 2020; 146:80-84. [PMID: 33130141 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy for intracranial lesions is constrained by dose to neurologic organs at risk. CASE DESCRIPTION We report 2 cases, a newly diagnosed chondrosarcoma and a previously irradiated meningioma, with tumors that abutted the optic chiasm following subtotal resection. Definitive radiotherapy would have required either undercoverage of the tumor or treatment of the chiasm with doses posing an unacceptable risk of blindness. Therefore, the patients underwent open surgery with placement of an abdominal fat autograft to provide space between the tumor and the optic structures at risk. Patients received definitive fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. For each patient, we retrospectively compared the treated plan (with fat autograft) to a second plan generated using the pre-autograft imaging, maintaining similar tumor coverage. For the chondrosarcoma, the fat autograft reduced the optic chiasm maximum dose by 21% (70.4 Gy to 55.3 Gy). For the reirradiated peri-optic meningioma, the optic chiasm maximum dose was reduced by 10% (50.8 Gy to 45.9 Gy), the left optic nerve by 17% (48.9 Gy to 40.4 Gy), and the right optic nerve by 30% (32.3 Gy to 22.6 Gy). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate the utility of abdominal fat autograft placement to maximize coverage of tumor while minimizing dose to intracranial organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon E Turner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Emil Schüler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Griffith R Harsh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Palmer JD, Gamez ME, Ranta K, Ruiz-Garcia H, Peterson JL, Blakaj DM, Prevedello D, Carrau R, Mahajan A, Chaichana KL, Trifiletti DM. Radiation therapy strategies for skull-base malignancies. J Neurooncol 2020; 150:445-462. [PMID: 32785868 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03569-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The management of skull base malignancies continues to evolve with improvements in surgical technique, advances in radiation delivery and novel systemic agents. METHODS In this review, we aim to discuss in detail the management of common skull base pathologies which typically require multimodality therapy, focusing on the radiotherapeutic aspects of care. RESULTS Technological advances in the administration of radiation therapy have led to a wide variety of different treatment strategies for the treatment of skull base malignances, with outcomes summarized herein. CONCLUSION Radiation treatment plays a key and critical role in the management of patients with skull base tumors. Recent advancements continue to improve the risk/benefit ratio for radiotherapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - M E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - K Ranta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - H Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - J L Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - D M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - D Prevedello
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - R Carrau
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - A Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - K L Chaichana
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - D M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. .,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Saini G, Shukla R, Sood KS, Shukla SK, Chandra R. Role of Proton Beam Therapy in Current Day Radiation Oncology Practice. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractProton beam therapy (PBT), because of its unique physics of no–exit dose deposition in the tissue, is an exciting prospect. The phenomenon of Bragg peak allows protons to deposit their almost entire energy towards the end of the path of the proton and stops any further dose delivery. Braggs peak equips PBT with superior dosimetric advantage over photons or electrons because PBT doesn’t traverse the target/body but is stopped sharply at an energy dependent depth in the target/body. It also has no exit dose. Because of no exit dose and normal tissue sparing, PBT is hailed for its potential to bring superior outcomes. Pediatric malignancies is the most common malignancy where PBT have found utmost application. Nowadays, PBT is also being used in the treatment of other malignancies such as carcinoma prostate, carcinoma breast, head and neck malignancies, and gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Despite advantages of PBT, there is not only a high cost of setting up of PBT centers but also a lack of definitive phase-III data. Therefore, we review the role of PBT in current day practice of oncology to bring out the nuances that must guide the practice to choose suitable patients for PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gagan Saini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| | - Rashmi Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| | - Kanika S. Sood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sujit K. Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ritu Chandra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Koto M, Ikawa H, Kaneko T, Hagiwara Y, Hayashi K, Tsuji H. Long-term outcomes of skull base chordoma treated with high-dose carbon-ion radiotherapy. Head Neck 2020; 42:2607-2613. [PMID: 32472716 PMCID: PMC7496814 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We evaluated the long‐term efficacy and safety of carbon‐ion radiotherapy (C‐ion RT) for skull base chordoma, a rare neoplasm. Methods Thirty‐four patients with skull base chordoma who were treated with C‐ion RT were prospectively enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. C‐ion RT was delivered with 60.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 16 fractions at four fractions per week. Results The median follow‐up period was 108 months. The 5‐ and 9‐year local control rates were 76.9% and 69.2%, respectively. The 5‐ and 9‐year overall survival rates were 93.5% and 77.4%, respectively. Regarding grade 3 or more severe late reactions, one patient developed a grade 3 mucosal ulcer, two developed grade 4 ipsilateral optic nerve injuries, and one developed a grade 5 mucosal ulcer at 9 years and 3 months after C‐ion RT. Conclusion C‐ion RT with 60.8 Gy (RBE)/16 fractions is a promising treatment option for inoperable skull base chordoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Koto
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Hiroaki Ikawa
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Takashi Kaneko
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Yasuhito Hagiwara
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Kazuhiko Hayashi
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yaniv D, Soudry E, Strenov Y, Cohen MA, Mizrachi A. Skull base chordomas review of current treatment paradigms. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 6:125-131. [PMID: 32596658 PMCID: PMC7296475 DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chordomas are locally invasive neoplasms, arising from notochordal remnants and can appear anywhere along the axial skeleton. Local recurrences are common, and distant metastases may occur years after the initial presentation. Methods Literature review of current treatment strategies for chordomas of the skull base. Results Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and complete resection has paramount importance for prognosis. When complete resection is not achieved recurrent disease is common. The anatomical complexity of the skull base makes resection complex. Endonasal endoscopic approaches to the clivus has become increasingly favored in recent years although addressing reconstruction of the skull base to prevent CSF leak may be challenging. Evidence suggests that radiotherapy should not be considered as a primary single modality when trying to achieve cure of the disease. Nonetheless, immediate post-operative radiotherapy improves survival. Many strategies have been suggested to preserve sensitive vital structures in the skull base during treatment but as for survival there is no evidence of advantage when comparing adjuvant therapy with photon radiotherapy, gamma knife surgery, proton beam therapy, and carbon ion radiation therapy. There is no evidence to support cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of chordomas but targeted therapies have started to show promise. Several optional molecular targets exist. Brachyury is overexpressed in 95% of chordomas but not in other mesenchymal neoplasms. However, its precise role in chordoma pathogenesis is currently unclear, and its cellular location in the nucleus makes it difficult to target. The inhibition of brachyury in chordoma cell lines induces growth arrest and apoptosis. This does not have clinical application to date. There are retrospective results with different molecular targeted therapies for advanced chordomas with some effectiveness. Conclusion Despite improvements made in the past 10 years in our knowledge of chordoma biology, available therapies still offer a limited benefit. There is an unmet need for new therapeutic options for patients with advanced disease. Therefore, patients with advanced disease should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials when and where available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Yaniv
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ethan Soudry
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yulia Strenov
- Department of Pathology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aviram Mizrachi
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lu VM, O'Connor KP, Mahajan A, Carlson ML, Van Gompel JJ. Carbon ion radiotherapy for skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of local control, survival, and toxicity outcomes. J Neurooncol 2020; 147:503-513. [PMID: 32206977 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03464-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is an emerging radiation therapy to treat skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. To date, its use is limited to a few centers around the world, and there has been no attempt to systematically evaluate survival and toxicity outcomes reported in the literature. Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively assess these outcomes. METHODS A systematic search of seven electronic databases from inception to November 2019 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against pre-specified criteria. Outcomes were then pooled by random-effects meta-analyses of proportions. RESULTS A total of nine studies provided unique metadata for assessment, with six originating from Heidelberg, Germany. The surveyed cohort size was 632 patients, with 389 (62%) chordomas and 243 (38%) chondrosarcomas of the skull base. Across all studies, median cohort age at therapy and female proportion were 46 years and 51% respectively. Estimates of local control incidence at 1-, 5-, and 10-years in chordoma-only studies were 99%, 80%, and 56%, and in chondrosarcoma-only studies were 99%, 89%, and 88%. Estimates of overall survival probability at 1-, 5-, and 10-years in chordoma-only studies were 100%, 94%, and 78%, and in chondrosarcoma-only studies were 99%, 95%, and 79%. The incidence of early and late toxicity (Grade ≥ 3) ranged from 0 to 4% across all study groups. CONCLUSIONS The emerging use of CIRT to treat skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas appear promising with regard to tumor control, overall survival, and risk profile of early and late toxicity. The current literature suffers from the fact only a few centers in the world currently employ this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Lu
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Kyle P O'Connor
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew L Carlson
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jamie J Van Gompel
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tonse R, Chilikuri S, Shamurailatpam D, Jalali R. Introduction of Image‑Guided Pencil Beam for Skull Base Tumors in India: A Report of Two Cases and a Brief Review of the Literature. Neurol India 2020; 68:42-44. [PMID: 32129241 DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.279680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Chordoma and chondrosarcoma are locally aggressive tumors occurring in one-third cases at the base of the skull. These tumors often recur locally with significant morbidity and mortality. The mainstay of treatment is maximal safe tumor debulking. However, in spite of gross total resection, these tumors are likely to recur. Hence, adjuvant radiation is provided to reduce the risk of local recurrence and to improve outcomes. These tumors are considered relatively radioresistant; hence, high doses of radiation are generally required during treatment. However, the presence of several important structures around the lesion poses a major challenge with respect to covering the target with the prescribed high dose. In this regard, protons, for their physical and dosimetric advantages, have become the accepted modality of treatment in these tumors. With the evolution of proton beam therapy (PBT) over the years, especially pencil beam scanning techniques; which result in an extremely high conformal intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT), robust and Monte Carlo optimization, computational algorithms, and biological modelling are the significant advances which have further enhanced the value of this technology and have improved outcomes. Herein, we would like to report our experience of two cases of skull base tumors treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy at our center along with a review of the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raees Tonse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Srinivas Chilikuri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Rakesh Jalali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Albano L, Losa M, Flickinger J, Mortini P, Minniti G. Radiotherapy of Parasellar Tumours. Neuroendocrinology 2020; 110:848-858. [PMID: 32126559 DOI: 10.1159/000506902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Parasellar tumours represent a wide group of intracranial lesions, both benign and malignant. They may arise from several structures located within the parasellar area or they may infiltrate or metastasize this region. The treatment of the tumours located in these areas is challenging because of their complex anatomical location and their heterogenous histology. It often requires a multimodal approach, including surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and medical therapy. Due to the proximity of critical structures and the risks of side effects related to the procedure, a successful surgical resection is often not achievable. Thus, RT plays a crucial role in the treatment of several parasellar tumours. Conventional fractionated RT and modern radiation techniques, like stereotactic radiosurgery and proton beam RT, have become a standard management option, in particular for cases with residual or recurrent tumours after surgery and for those cases where surgery is contraindicated. This review examines the role of RT in parasellar tumours analysing several techniques, outcomes and side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Albano
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Neurology, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Losa
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - John Flickinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy,
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center San Pietro Hospital, Rome, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kremenevski N, Schlaffer SM, Coras R, Kinfe TM, Graillon T, Buchfelder M. Skull Base Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas. Neuroendocrinology 2020; 110:836-847. [PMID: 32541136 DOI: 10.1159/000509386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Skull base chordomas account for less than 0.2% and chondrosarcomas for less than 0.15% of all intracranial tumors. Although their clinical and imaging presentations are similar, they derive from different origins. Chordomas arise from embryonic remnants of the primitive notochord and chondrosarcomas from primitive mesenchymal cells or from the embryonic rest of the cranial cartilaginous matrix. Both entities are characterized by infiltration and destruction of the surrounding bone and soft tissue and a high locoregional recurrence rate. Chondrosarcomas, when treated with similar complex strategies, display a much better prognosis than chordomas. The overall survival is approximately 65% for chordomas and 80% for chondrosarcomas at 5 years and 30 and 50%, respectively, at 10 years. Chordomas are divided into the following 3 histological types: classical (conventional), chondroid, and dedifferentiated. Chondrosarcomas have conventional, mesenchymal, clear cell, and dedifferentiated subgroups. Both tumor entities often present with nonspecific symptoms, and headaches are the most reported initial symptom. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are required to determine the tumor localization and the extent of tumor growth. The treatment philosophy is to maximize tumor resection, minimize morbidity, and preserve function. Neurosurgical approaches commonly used for the resection of intracranial chordomas and chondrosarcomas are transsphenoidal, transbasal, cranio-orbitozygomatic, transzygomatic extended middle fossa, transcondylar, and transmaxillary approaches. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas are not sensitive to chemotherapy and there are no approved drugs for their treatment. The present treatment concept is a combination of surgical resection with a maximal excision and preserving patients' quality of life by adjuvant radiotherapy for both chordomas and chondrosarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Kremenevski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany,
| | | | - Roland Coras
- Institute of Neuropathology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Mehari Kinfe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Graillon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, CHU Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Michael Buchfelder
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
[From bench to bedside for new treatment paradigms in chordomas: An update]. Bull Cancer 2019; 107:129-135. [PMID: 31882268 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Chordomas are rare malignant tumours, which typically occur in the axial skeleton and skull base. They arise from embryonic remnants of the notochord. They constitute less than 5 % of primary bone tumours. They are characterised by their locally aggressive potential with high frequency of recurrences and a median overall survival of 6 years. The initial therapeutic strategy must be discussed in an expert centre and may involve surgery, preoperative radiotherapy, exclusive radiotherapy or therapeutic abstention. Despite this, more than 50 % of patients will be facing recurrences with few therapeutic options available at this advanced stage. This review aims to outline current treatment options available in chordomas, as well as discussing potentiality of new therapeutic approaches through their molecular characterization and the comprehension of their immunological environment.
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Bone sarcomas are rare tumors arising in bone, representing only a small fraction of solid malignant tumors. Desmoids are benign, infiltrative soft tissue neoplasms. Because of their scarcity and a paucity of data, the management of these tumors can be challenging, especially for clinicians who infrequently encounter these tumors. This article reviews the current literature regarding the diagnosis, work-up, and treatment of these uncommon mesenchymal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy M Brownstein
- Francis H. Burr Proton Beam Therapy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 30 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Thomas F DeLaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 30 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Oh D. Proton therapy: the current status of the clinical evidences. PRECISION AND FUTURE MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.23838/pfm.2019.00058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
49
|
Shafai-Erfani G, Lei Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang T, Zhong J, Liu T, McDonald M, Curran WJ, Zhou J, Shu HK, Yang X. MRI-Based Proton Treatment Planning for Base of Skull Tumors. Int J Part Ther 2019; 6:12-25. [PMID: 31998817 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00062.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To introduce a novel, deep-learning method to generate synthetic computed tomography (SCT) scans for proton treatment planning and evaluate its efficacy. Materials and Methods 50 Patients with base of skull tumors were divided into 2 nonoverlapping training and study cohorts. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging pairs for patients in the training cohort were used for training our novel 3-dimensional generative adversarial network (cycleGAN) algorithm. Upon completion of the training phase, SCT scans for patients in the study cohort were predicted based on their magnetic resonance images only. The SCT scans obtained were compared against the corresponding original planning computed tomography scans as the ground truth, and mean absolute errors (in Hounsfield units [HU]) and normalized cross-correlations were calculated. Proton plans of 45 Gy in 25 fractions with 2 beams per plan were generated for the patients based on their planning computed tomographies and recalculated on SCT scans. Dose-volume histogram endpoints were compared. A γ-index analysis along 3 cardinal planes intercepting at the isocenter was performed. Proton distal range along each beam was calculated. Results Image quality metrics show agreement between the generated SCT scans and the ground truth with mean absolute error values ranging from 38.65 to 65.12 HU and an average of 54.55 ± 6.81 HU and a normalized cross-correlation average of 0.96 ± 0.01. The dosimetric evaluation showed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) within planning target volumes for dose-volume histogram endpoints and other metrics studied, with the exception of the dose covering 95% of the target volume, with a relative difference of 0.47%. The γ-index analysis showed an average passing rate of 98% with a 10% threshold and 2% and 2-mm criteria. Proton ranges of 48 of 50 beams (96%) in this study were within clinical tolerance adopted by 4 institutions. Conclusions This study shows our method is capable of generating SCT scans with acceptable image quality, dose distribution agreement, and proton distal range compared with the ground truth. Our results set a promising approach for magnetic resonance imaging-based proton treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghazal Shafai-Erfani
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Yingzi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Yinan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Jim Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Mark McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Hui-Kuo Shu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Niyazi M, Niemierko A, Paganetti H, Söhn M, Schapira E, Goldberg S, Adams J, Kim V, Oh KS, Hwang WL, Lu HM, Belka C, Busse PM, Loeffler JS, Shih HA. Volumetric and actuarial analysis of brain necrosis in proton therapy using a novel mixture cure model. Radiother Oncol 2019; 142:154-161. [PMID: 31563411 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE High-dose fractionated radiotherapy is often necessary to achieve long-term tumor control in several types of tumors involving or within close proximity to the brain. There is limited data to guide on optimal constraints to the adjacent nontarget brain. This investigation explored the significance of the three-dimensional (3D) dose distribution of passive scattering proton therapy to the brain with other clinicopathological factors on the development of symptomatic radiation necrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with head and neck, skull base, or intracranial tumors who underwent proton therapy (minimum prescription dose of 59.4 Gy(RBE)) with collateral moderate to high dose radiation exposure to the nontarget brain were retrospectively reviewed. A mixture cure model with respect to necrosis-free survival was used to derive estimates for the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model while adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS Of 179 identified patients, 83 patients had intracranial tumors and 96 patients had primary extracranial tumors. The optimal dose measure obtained to describe the occurrence of radiation necrosis was the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) with parameter a = 9. The best-fit parameters of logistic NTCP models revealed D50 = 57.7 Gy for intracranial tumors, D50 = 39.5 Gy for extracranial tumors, and γ50 = 2.5 for both tumor locations. Multivariable analysis revealed EUD and primary tumor location to be the strongest predictors of brain radiation necrosis. CONCLUSION In the current clinical volumetric data analyses with multivariable modelling, EUD was identified as an independent and strong predictor for brain radiation necrosis from proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Söhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Emily Schapira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Saveli Goldberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judith Adams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vince Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin S Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William L Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hsiao-Ming Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul M Busse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jay S Loeffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|