[Radiotherapy in the early stage of Dupuytren's disease. The indications, technic and long-term results]

Dupuytren's Disease–Etiology and Treatment

BACKGROUND

The worldwide prevalence of Dupuytren's disease (DD) is 8%. DD is a chronic disease for which there is no cure. Various treatments are available.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and Embase.

RESULTS

Genetic factors account for 80% of the factors involved in causing this disease. Diabetes mellitus, hepatic diseases, epilepsy, and chronic occupational use of vibrating tools are also associated with it. Limited fasciectomy is the most common treatment and is considered the reference standard. Possible complications include persistent numbness in areas where the skin has been elevated, cold sensitivity, and stiffness, with a cumulative risk of 3.6 -39.1% for all complications taken together. The recurrence rate at 5 years is 12-73%. Percutaneous needle fasciotomy is the least invasive method, with more rapid recovery and a lower complication rate than with limited fasciectomy. 85% of patients have a recurrence after an average of 2.3 years. Radiotherapy can be given before contractures arise in patients with high familial risk, or postoperatively in selected patients with a very high individual risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Although DD is not curable, good treatments are available. Recurrences reflect the pathophysiology of the disease and should not be considered complications of treatment. When counseling patients about the available treatment options, particularly the modalities and timing of surgery, the physician must take the patient's degree of suffering into account. Nowadays, fast recovery from surgery and less postoperative pain are a priority for many patients. Different surgical methods can be used in combination. It remains difficult to predict the natural course and the time to postoperative recurrence in individual patients; these matters should be addressed in future studies.

Complications after treating Dupuytren's disease. A systematic literature review

The objective of this study was to review the incidence of complications associated with different treatment options for patients with Dupuytren's disease. In a systematic literature review, the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Scopus databases were searched for clinical studies reporting complications after collagenase treatment, percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF), fasciectomy and dermofasciectomy. The incidence of complications was extracted from each study and stratified by procedure. From a total of 2251 references, 113 studies were analyzed and included with complication incidences varying from 0% to 100%. The highest number of nerve and vessel lesions were reported after fasciectomy, whereas the highest rate of edema was after collagenase injection. Accidental skin tears were mostly associated with collagenase and PNF treatment. Pooled complication incidences were 17.4% (95% CI: 11.7-23.1) for fasciectomy, 78.0% (95% CI: 59.6-96.4) for collagenase treatment, 18.9% (95% CI: -5.5-43.3) for PNF and 11.6% (95% CI: 0.0-23.2) for dermofasciectomy. Due to inconsistencies in reporting complications as well as the lack of a standardized definition, the literature does not provide evidence in favor of a specific procedure for Dupuytren's disease. A standardized definition of complications is required to improve the comparability of published results.

To remember: Radiotherapy - a successful treatment for early Dupuytren's disease

Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a common fibroproliferative condition of the hand which tends to cause progressive digital flexion contracture. Therapeutic strategies to treat the disease include radiotherapy, injections of collagenase clostridium histolyticum, needle fasciotomy and extended surgical intervention dependent on involvement and duration of the disease. We have reviewed the literature with the aim to assess the conditions and effects of radiotherapy in DD. In early stages of the disease, radiotherapy resulted in regression of symptoms/a lack of progression found on average in 40% (range 10-85%)/81% (range 50-100%) of the patients with recurrence rates of only 12-31% after long-term follow-up (>4 years). These results proved to be significantly better than in the untreated patients with natural course of the disease (about 50% progression after a follow-up of 5-6 years). Long-term side-effects (skin dryness) are observed on average in one quarter of the patients, but are well tolerated. Local occurrence of malignancies has not been reported yet. Due to severe functional impairment leading to individual suffering and the high economic burden, treatment of DD in early stages is necessary and radiation therapy represents an effective, safe and economic treatment option.

Radiotherapy for non-malignant disorders: state of the art and update of the evidence-based practice guidelines

Every year in Germany about 50,000 patients are referred and treated by radiotherapy (RT) for "non-malignant disorders". This highly successful treatment is applied only for specific indications such as preservation or recovery of the quality of life by means of pain reduction or resolution and/or an improvement of formerly impaired physical body function owing to specific disease-related symptoms. Since 1995, German radiation oncologists have treated non-malignant disorders according to national consensus guidelines; these guidelines were updated and further developed over 3 years by implementation of a systematic consensus process to achieve national upgraded and accepted S2e clinical practice guidelines. Throughout this process, international standards of evaluation were implemented. This review summarizes most of the generally accepted indications for the application of RT for non-malignant diseases and presents the special treatment concepts. The following disease groups are addressed: painful degenerative skeletal disorders, hyperproliferative disorders and symptomatic functional disorders. These state of the art guidelines may serve as a platform for daily clinical work; they provide a new starting point for quality assessment, future clinical research, including the design of prospective clinical trials, and outcome research in the underrepresented and less appreciated field of RT for non-malignant disorders.

THE McCASH TECHNIQUE FOR DUPUYTREN'S DISEASE: OUR EXPERIENCE

This study presents the clinical outcomes of 35 hands with Dupuytren's Disease treated with the McCash technique between 1990 and 2009. Of the 31 patients (28 males and three females, mean age 53 yrs), four patients had bilateral involvement (12.9%). Thirty hands had no previous medical or surgical treatment for the disease, while the remaining five hands had been operated on at least once. The mean contracture of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint improved from 42.14° to 1.83°, while that of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint improved from 62.60° to 7.09°. All wounds healed within a mean 9.8 weeks. Sensory evaluation revealed no permanent numbness. With realistic expectations, clear documentation, meticulous surgical technique and implementation of a demanding post-operative rehabilitation program, an acceptable outcome may be achieved with the McCash technique for Dupuytren's disease.

Recent Surgical and Medical Advances in the Treatment of Dupuytren's Disease - A Systematic Review of the Literature

Dupuytren’s disease (DD) is a type of fibromatosis which progressively results in the shortening and thickening of the fibrous tissue of the palmar fascia. This condition which predominantly affects white-northern Europeans has been identified since 1614. DD can affect certain activities of daily living such as face washing, combing hair and putting hand in a glove. The origin of Dupuytren’s contracture is still unknown, but there are a number of treatments that doctors have come across throughout the years. Historically surgery has been the mainstay treatment for DD but not the only one. The objective is to make a structured review of the most recent advances in treatment of DD including the surgical and medical interventions. We have looked at the most relevant published articles regarding the various treatment options for DD. This review has taken 55 articles into consideration which have met the inclusion criteria. The most recent treatments used are multi-needle aponeurotomy, extensive percutaneous aponeurotomy and lipografting, injecting collagenase Clostridium histolyticum, INF-gamma and shockwave therapy as well as radiotherapy. Each of these treatments has certain advantages and drawbacks and cannot be used for every patient. In order to prevent this condition, spending more time and money in the topic is required to reach better and more consistent treatments and ultimately to eradicate this disease.

Radiotherapy in early-stage Dupuytren's contracture. Long-term results after 13 years

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In early-stage Dupuytren's contracture, radiotherapy is applied to prevent disease progression. Long-term outcome and late toxicity of the treatment were evaluated in a retrospective analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 12/1982 and 02/2006, 135 patients (208 hands) were irradiated with orthovoltage (120 kV; 20 mA; 4-mm Al filter), in two courses with five daily fractions of 3.0 Gy to a total dose of 30 Gy; separated by a 6- to 8-week interval. The extent of disease was described according to a modified classification of Tubiana et al. Long-term outcome was analyzed at last follow-up between 02/2008 and 05/2008 with a median follow-up of 13 years (range, 2-25 years). Late treatment toxicity and objective reduction of symptoms as change in stage and numbers of nodules and cords were evaluated and used as evidence to assess treatment response.

RESULTS

According to the individual stages, 123 cases (59%) remained stable, 20 (10%) improved, and 65 (31%) progressed. In stage N 87% and in stage N/I 70% remained stable or even regressed. In more advanced stages, the rate of disease progression increased to 62% (stage I) or 86% (stage II). 66% of the patients showed a long-term relief of symptoms (i.e., burning sensations, itching and scratching, pressure and tension). Radiotherapy did not increase the complication rate after surgery in case of disease progression and only minor late toxicity (skin atrophy, dry desquamation) could be observed in 32% of the patients. There was no evidence for a second malignancy induced by radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

After a mean follow-up of 13 years radiotherapy is effective in prevention of disease progression and improves patients' symptoms in early-stage Dupuytren's contracture (stage N, N/I). In case of disease progression after radiotherapy, a "salvage" operation is still feasible.

Radiotherapy optimization in early-stage Dupuytren's contracture: first results of a randomized clinical study

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy (RT) can prevent progression of Dupuytren's contracture (DC). It is unknown whether there is a dose response and which dose is sufficient. Herein, the 1-year results of a prospective randomized trial are presented which compared two different RT dose concepts with each other.

METHODS

129 patients (67 males; 62 females) were entered in this study: 69 had bilateral and 60 uni-lateral involvement of DC accounting for 198 irradiated hands. According to Tubiana's classification, 73 hands had Stage N (nodules/cords, no extension deficit = flexion deformity), 61 had Stage N/I (< or = 10 degrees deficit), 59 had Stage I (11-45 degrees deficit), and 5 had Stage II (46-90 degrees deficit) DC. Prophylactic RT was randomly delivered; in Group A, 63 patients (95 hands) received 10 x 3 Gy (total dose, 30 Gy) in 2 series (5 x 3Gy) separated by 8 weeks; in Group B, 66 patients (103 hands) received 7 x 3 Gy (total dose, 21 Gy) in 1 series within 2 weeks. Orthovoltage RT (120 kV) was applied using standard cones and individual shielding of uninvolved areas of the palm. Relevant patient and disease parameters were equally distributed in both groups. Evaluation (toxicity, efficacy) was performed at 3 and 12 months after RT. Subjective (patient's opinion) and objective parameters (palpation, measurements, and comparative photographs) were applied to assess treatment response. Minimum follow-up (FU) was 1 year.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity was minimal, but slightly more pronounced in Group B. Seventy-six (38%) hands developed skin reactions CTC 1 degrees (A, 30; B, 46); and 12 (6%) had skin reactions CTC 2 degrees (A, 4; B, 8). Chronic side effects were limited to dryness, desquamation, skin atrophy, and change of sensation (LENT 1 degrees ) in 9 (5%) sites without differences between the two groups. At 3 and 12 months after RT, subjective and objective reduction of symptoms, nodules, and cords occurred in both groups (p < 0.01) with no differences between the groups: in Group A, 55 (56%) sites regressed, 35 (37%) remained stable, and 7 (7%) progressed, whereas in Group B, 55 (53%) regressed, 39 (38%) remained stable, and 9 (9%) progressed at 12 months FU (NS). Overall and mean number of nodules, cords, and skin changes decreased at 3 and 12 months. The "treatment failure" rate at 1 year was 16 of 198 (8%), but only 4 (2%) sites required hand surgery for disease progression. Seven of 60 patients with unilateral DC received prophylactic RT for the initially uninvolved, contralateral hand due to progression of DC.

CONCLUSION

Both prophylactic RT concepts have been well accepted and tolerated by patients. Within the first year, they were equally effective to prevent further disease progression of DC and obtain considerable symptomatic improvement. Although 1-year results suggest similar response rates for both treatment groups, long-term FU of > 5 years has to be awaited for final assessment and recommendation of an optimized RT treatment schedule.

The molecular and cellular biologic basis for the radiation treatment of benign proliferative diseases

Since its discovery, radiation has been used to treat numerous ailments, including many benign conditions. The most susceptible disorders have included keloids, heterotopic bone formation, and, most recently, vascular restenosis. These disorders are proliferative in nature and fall under the category of excessive wound healing or scar formation after trauma. In addition, radiation has been used for its immunosuppressive quality, eg, in organ transplantation to suppress graft rejection and in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. In this article, we have chosen keloids as an archetype for radiation use with benign conditions; the radiation inhibition of vascular restenosis will be used as a prototype to explore a paradigm for the molecular and cellular basis of radiation treatment for selected benign disorders. Vascular restenosis is currently one of the new frontiers of radiation therapy and offers opportunities to explore the role of inflammatory or immune cell responses in benign conditions that lead to excessive fibrogenesis and require treatment. The pathophysiology of surgical wound healing has not been avidly studied in the radiobiologic laboratory setting. However, the paradigm we propose for the effectiveness of radiation treatment for benign conditions is based on the model offered by Clark. He describes three phases of molecular and cellular events in which an inflammatory phase precedes the fibrogenic phase, occurs within hours of injury, and continues for weeks. We postulate that the radiosensitive targets within the vascular milieu are the monocyte/macrophages that would otherwise act as the trigger for the induced cytokine cascade, leading to the myofibroblast being recruited from a quiescent to a proliferative phase, resulting in fibrogenesis.

Radiation treatment of benign mesenchymal disease

The benign mesenchymal diseases, for which radiation is often quite effective in halting progression or achieving complete and permanent resolution, include neoplastic and nonneoplastic processes (eg, giant cell tumor of bone to keloid). Radiation oncologists have been reluctant to employ radiation in the management of patients with benign disease for several reasons: (1) the small but nonzero risk of late appearance of radiation-induced malignant tumors; (2) were radiation subsequently required to be employed in the same region of the body for treatment of a separate and independent neoplasm, the radiation dose might have to be reduced to an ineffective level; and (3) nonmalignant tissue changes that might appear at quite remote times and complicate healing of surgical wounds. Currently a liberalization of the use of radiation is in progress because of the clinical seriousness of many benign processes for which radiation yields a major therapeutic benefit. This reassessment of radiation oncology in the United States has been stimulated by the much wider application of radiation for patients with a wide spectrum of benign diseases in several European countries. This article considers the major indications and the expected outcomes from radiation treatment of benign mesenchymal diseases. For benign neoplasms that are locally progressive, the radiation dose is usually in the range 50 to 60 Gy administered at 1.8 to 2.0 Gy/fraction, five fractions per week. The response is characteristically quite slow, and the long-term local control probability is high (80%). Further, the response probability is not sensitive to lesion size, in contrast to malignant tumors of the mesenchymal tissues. For the nonneoplastic processes managed in some instances by radiation, the doses recommended are usually in the range of 6 to 12 Gy as single-dose or 20 to 25 Gy as fractionated dose irradiation. The efficacy of such treatment tends to be equal to or less than that noted for the benign neoplastic diseases.