Outpatient radiofrequency catheter ablation

Recurrences of symptoms after AV node re-entrant tachycardia ablation: a clinical arrhythmia risk score to assess putative underlying cause

PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH

To identify clinical factors associated with the probability for each arrhythmic mechanism causing recurring symptoms after atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation. Slow pathway radiofrequency ablation is used to treat AVNRT. After ablation, recurrence of symptoms due to AVNRT or other arrhythmias can occur.

RESULTS

We studied 835 patients successfully treated with AVNRT ablation. Variables associated with each specific arrhythmia underlying symptom recurrence were studied by logistic regression. During a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 2 years, 136 (16%) patients had a recurrence of symptoms. Following invasive and non-invasive studies, symptoms were mostly attributed to sinus tachycardia, recurrence of AVNRT and atrial arrhythmias (respectively 4.7%, 5.2% and 6.1%). Older age and history of atrial fibrillation were associated with a markedly increased risk of symptom recurrence due to atrial arrhythmias (OR=15.58, 7.09-35.22, p<0.001) whereas younger age was associated with a higher risk of sinus tachycardia. A simple 3-item clinical score based on age categories and atrial fibrillation history efficiently predicted atrial arrhythmia (C-Index=0.82, 0.75-0.89) and sinus tachycardia (C-Index=0.83, 0.75-0.90). 8.3% of patients with scores=0 had atrial arrhythmias whereas 100% of patients with scores ≥4 had atrial arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

While recurrence of symptoms after successful AVNRT ablation is relatively frequent (16%), true AVNRT recurrence accounts for only 1/3 of these recurrences. A simple clinical score based on age and history of atrial fibrillation enables efficient risk stratification for symptom recurrence attributable to atrial arrhythmias and inappropriate sinus tachycardia.

Feasibility and safety of same-day home discharge after radiofrequency catheter ablation

Interventional cardiology in a day-case setting might reduce logistic constraints on hospital resources. However, in contrast with coronary angioplasty, few data support the feasibility and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RCA). The aim of this prospective, multicenter cohort study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of RCA in 1,342 patients (814 men; mean age 57 +/- 17 years) considered eligible for ambulatory RCA, according to specific set of criteria, for common atrial flutter (n = 632), atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (n = 436), accessory pathways (n = 202), and atrial tachycardia (n = 72). Patients suitable for early discharge (4 to 6 hours after uncomplicated RCA) were scheduled for 1-month follow-up. Predictive factors for delayed complications were studied by multivariate analysis. Of the 1,342 enrolled patients, 1,270 (94.6%) were discharged the same day and followed for 1 month; no deaths occurred, and the readmission rate was 0.79% (95% confidence interval 0.30% to 1.27%). Six patients had significant puncture complications, 2 presented with symptomatic delayed pulmonary embolism, and 2 had new onset of poorly tolerated atrial flutter. None of these complications was life threatening. Multivariate analysis did not identify any significant independent predictors for delayed complications. In conclusion, these data suggest that same-day discharge after uncomplicated RCA for routine supraventricular arrhythmias is safe and may be applicable in clinical practice. This approach is known to be associated with significant patient satisfaction and cost savings and can be considered a first-line option in most patients who undergo routine ablation procedures.