Die stentgeschützte perkutane Karotisangioplastie

Acute and prophylactic endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the USA. Up to 20% of all strokes are caused by internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. This article reviews the treatment of ICA stenosis, its indication, and its relevance for stroke prevention. The article also discusses the indication of ICA stenosis treatment in an acute stroke situation and offers pathophysiological commentary.

[Distal protection devices in carotid stent]

Endovascular treatment of carotid stenoses is increasingly used. Frequently temporary occlusion balloons or filters are placed distal to the stenosis to gain additional protection against cerebral emboli. There is still a scientific debate about the usefulness of such distal protection devices. The following contribution reviews existing techniques and their clinical results and should allow for a critical discussion and selection of current techniques and materials.

Behandlung der arteriosklerotischen Karotisstenose: ein �berblick

Endarterectomy for extracranial carotid stenosis has proven to be the method of choice for symptomatic patients suffering from ischemia (NASCET, ECST). The effectivity of the operation for asymptomatic stenosis seems to be likely since the publication of the first results of the ACST trial. The safety and efficiency of carotid stenting has not been proven so far and has to be evaluated in randomized trials comparing surgery and endovascular treatment. We provide an overview of the current trials and try to define the role of carotid stenting.

Endovascular Treatment of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Effect of Primary Stent Application on Debris Particle Release in Human Cadaveric Specimens

PURPOSE

To compare debris release with primary stent application (self-expanding stent application at stenosis and then balloon dilation through the opened stent) and that with secondary stent application (balloon angioplasty of stenosis and afterward additional stent application) for high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis in human cadaveric specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fresh human cadaveric internal carotid artery specimens were attached to a tube system. High-grade stenoses (>66%) were selected, randomized for primary or secondary stent application, and then treated, with fluoroscopic guidance, while the system was rinsed in a pulsating flow. Fluid was collected and filtered, and debris particles were examined with a light microscope. Particles were analyzed according to those consecutively caught by 100 x 100-microm and 11 x 11-microm mesh filters. Results were evaluated in relation to stent application. For statistical analyses of group differences, the exact Mann-Whitney U test was used.

RESULTS

Thirteen high-grade human cadaveric internal carotid artery stenoses were analyzed. Five specimens were randomly assigned to secondary stent application, and eight were assigned to primary stent application. No significant difference could be demonstrated for debris release with primary or secondary stent application. P values ranged from.051 to.754.

CONCLUSION

The reported superiority of primary stent application may not be related to debris reduction.