[Prognostic significance of ST segment change in acute myocardial infarct]

Renal Dysfunction as a Predictor of Slow-Flow/No-Reflow Phenomenon and Impaired ST Segment Resolution After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Initial Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Grade 0

BACKGROUND

The slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon and impaired ST segment resolution (STR) following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) predict unfavorable prognosis and are characterized by obstruction of the coronary microvascular. Several predictors of slow-flow/no-reflow have been revealed, but few studies have investigated predictors of slow-flow/no-reflow and STR exclusively in acute myocardial infarction patients with initial Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Grade 0.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In all, 279 STEMI patients with initial TIMI Grade 0 were enrolled in the study. Slow-flow/no-reflow was defined as TIMI Grade <3 by angiography after PCI, and impaired STR was defined as STR <50% on an electrocardiogram after PCI. Slow-flow/no-reflow was observed in 31 patients. In multivariate analysis, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; odds ratio [OR] 0.97; P=0.007), a history of cerebrovascular disease (OR 4.65, P=0.007), time to recanalization ≥4 h (OR 2.76, P=0.023), and systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg (OR 3.45, P=0.046) were independent predictors of slow-flow/no-reflow. Impaired STR was observed in 102 of 248 patients with TIMI Grade 3. In multivariate analysis, eGFR (OR 0.94, P<0.001) and occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (OR 4.48, P<0.001) were independent predictors of impaired STR; eGFR was the only independent predictor of both slow-flow/no-reflow and impaired STR.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal dysfunction may be related to coronary microvascular dysfunction and obstruction.

ST resolution in a single electrocardiographic lead: a simple and accurate predictor of cardiac mortality in patients with fibrinolytic therapy for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The extent of ST-segment resolution in the 12-lead electrocardiograph (ECG) obtained early after reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) has been shown to predict short- and long-term mortalities. To improve the ease of this method in clinical practice, we sought to evaluate the optimal cutoffs and the prognostic value of ST resolution (STR) measured in a single ECG lead.

METHODS

In conjunction with the Intravenous nPA for the Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium Early (InTIME)-2 study, in which patients with an ST-elevation MI of <6 hours' duration were treated with alteplase or lanoteplase, 12-lead ECGs were obtained at baseline and 90 minutes after the start of fibrinolytic therapy in 3030 patients.

RESULTS

There was a close correlation between the extent of the sum STR and single-lead ST-elevation resolution ( r = 0.94). The optimal cutoffs for definition of single-lead complete, partial, and no-STR groups were 70% and 50% for anterior infarcts and 70% and 20% for inferior infarcts. The cardiac 30-day mortality rates for the 2 sets of risk groups by sum or single-lead STR were as follows: no resolution, 9.5% vs 10.3%; partial resolution, 5.0% vs 3.6%; complete resolution, 2.0% vs 1.2%. The predictive power was significantly better for single-lead STR.

CONCLUSIONS

ST resolution obtained in a single lead is an easy and accurate prognosticator of cardiac 30-day mortality in patients with ST-elevation MI. It is therefore useful for early identification of low- and high-risk subgroups after fibrinolysis and as a surrogate end point in clinical trials.

[Prediction of outcome in ST elevation myocardial infarction by the extent of ST segment deviation recovery. Which method is best?]

Simple and rapid measures are needed for timely assessment of the quality of reperfusion therapy early after fibrinolysis in acute STEMI. Sum ST segment elevation resolution (sum STR) categorized into the three groups of low risk (complete ST resolution), medium risk (partial ST resolution), and high risk (no ST resolution) has become an established method to predict infarct size, left ventricular function, epicardial vessel patency, and mortality. However, measurement of the sum of ST elevation from all leads of repeated ECG's is time-consuming. For routine practice more simple measures are needed. This report summarizes recent findings on direct comparisons between different modes of evaluation of ST segment deviation recovery employed for risk stratification in large-scale mortality trials. With respect to predictive accuracy combined with simplicity, two methods were superior to the conventional model of sum STR: 1) ST segment deviation resolution in only the one ECG lead showing the maximal deviation (single lead STR), and 2) the existing ST segment deviation in the single ECG lead of maximum deviation present 90 or 180 min after start of fibrinolysis (max STE). In multivariate analyses the ST segment deviation recovery models including sum STR were significant independent predictors of short- and long-term mortality. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting mortality the analysis of single lead STR and max STE performed better than sum STR. After categorization into risk groups patients are best classified by max STE. With an ECG recorded at 90 min in 2719 patients, the proportion of patients of sum STR, single lead STR, and max STE were 40, 34, and 43% in the low risk groups, and 24, 31, and 25% in the high risk groups. Cardiac mortality rates at 30 days were 2.0, 1.2, and 1.0% in low risk versus 9.6, 10.3, and 12.8% in the high risk groups, respectively. Long-term mortality with a followup of 5 years was best predicted by max STE risk groups.

CONCLUSION

Single lead STR and max STE are very simple, inexpensive, non-invasive, and highly reliable measures which provide very strong early prognostic information. The relationship between degree of ST segment deviation recovery and subsequent mortality is remarkably consistent. Both methods perform better than sum STR in predicting mortality. They can be used for very early risk stratification and can form a basis for an individual treatment of patients after fibrinolysis for STEMI within 6 hours of symptom onset. Of the two methods max STE is even simpler to use and has better accuracy in predicting outcome.

Resolution of ST-segment elevation in acute myocardial infarction--early prognostic significance after thrombolytic therapy. Results from the COBALT trial

In acute myocardial infarction, early identification of patients at a high mortality risk is important for planning further therapeutic strategies. Previous studies have demonstrated that the extent of early resolution of ST-segment elevation may represent a simple, quick and noninvasive assessment to identify high risk groups of patients. In a subgroup of the COBALT Study population (Continuous Infusion vs Double Bolus Administration of Alteplase), ST-segment elevation was measured before and 90 to 120 minutes after treatment with alteplase. The subgroup of n = 1,760 patients was not different from the total COBALT population of n = 7169 patients regarding most clinical parameters except Killip Class before treatment. However, the overall 30-day mortality differed significantly between the main study and the substudy (7.76% vs 3.52%; p < 0.001). Three groups of ST-segment resolution were defined: 1. complete resolution (resolution > or = 70%; 762 patients), 2. partial resolution (< 70% and > 30%; 491 patients), 3. no resolution (< 30%; 507 patients). Mortality rate at 30 days for complete, partial and no resolution of ST-segment elevation was 1.31%, 4.28% and 6.11%, respectively (p < 0.001). While this significant correlation between the extent of ST-segment resolution and mortality could be observed for inferior acute myocardial infarction, it could not be found in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction. This in part may be due to a selection bias that leads to an extremely divergent mortality rate of anterior acute myocardial infarction in the main study and the substudy (10.1% vs 3.94%; p < 0.0001). Despite this limitation, resolution of ST-segment elevation in acute myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy allows to identify patients at a high mortality risk and may help to select patients for early invasive procedures such as PTCA. Patients with complete ST-segment resolution showed a particularly low mortality rate, irrespective of the alteplase regimen used (front-loaded alteplase vs double bolus alteplase).