Palliatieve zorg: de persoonlijke specialiteit van elke huisarts

The ACA training programme to improve communication between general practitioners and their palliative care patients: development and applicability

We describe the development of a new training programme on GP-patient communication in palliative care, and the applicability to GPs and GP Trainees. This ‘ACA training programme’ focuses on  A vailability of the GP for the patient,  C urrent issues that should be raised by the GP, and  A nticipating various scenarios. Evaluation results indicate the ACA training programme to be applicable to GPs and GP Trainees. The ACA checklist was appreciated by GPs as useful both in practice and as a learning tool, whereas GP Trainees mainly appreciated the list for use in practice.

Perceived barriers and facilitators for general practitioner-patient communication in palliative care: a systematic review

While effective general practitioner (GP)-patient communication is required for the provision of good palliative care, barriers and facilitators for this communication are largely unknown. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for GP-patient communication in palliative care. In a systematic review seven computerized databases were searched to find empirical studies on GP-patient communication in palliative care. Fifteen qualitative studies and seven quantitative questionnaire studies were included. The main perceived barriers were GPs' lack of availability, and patients' and GPs' ambivalence to discuss 'bad prognosis'. Main perceived facilitators were GPs being available, initiating discussion about several end-of-life issues and anticipating various scenarios. Lack of availability and failure to discuss former mistakes appear to be blind spots of GPs. GPs should be more forthcoming to initiate discussions with palliative care patients about prognosis and end-of-life issues. Empirical studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness of the perceived barriers and facilitators.

Palliative care for head and neck cancer patients in general practice

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study justify the goals of the Expert Centre such as the improvement of somatic and psychosocial care and consultation.

OBJECTIVE

A recent review showed that little attention is paid to palliative care for head and neck patients. The Erasmus MC has initiated an Expert Centre of Palliative Care Head and Neck Oncology with special interest in patient care, consultation and research. In this study the experience of general practitioners (GPs) in their care of palliative head and neck cancer patients before the start of the Expert Centre is assessed. The aim of the study was to find possible gaps in care and communication and to use GP's ideas to improve the centre's functioning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five GPs with a patient in their practice who died from head and neck cancer between January 2003 and July 2004 after being treated in the Erasmus MC were included. The GPs were asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding their experience in the care of palliative head and neck cancer patients, the communication between first- and third-line care providers and the work of both the GP and the specialist involved.

RESULTS

The response rate was 75%. The palliative stage lasted approximately 4 months. The GPs felt that symptom control was generally not sufficient. Also improvements were necessary in psychosocial care and in the communication between first- and third-line care providers. They also experienced gaps in their knowledge of specific head and neck oncologic palliative care.