Validation of serological tests forHelicobacter pylori infection in an Irish population

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Using Invasive and Noninvasive Approaches

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) as gram-negative and spiral microorganism is responsible for colonization in the gastric microniche for more than 50% of world population. Recent studies have shown a critical role of H. pylori in the development of peptic ulcers, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and gastric cancer. Over the past decade, there has been a sharp interest to use noninvasive tests in diagnosis of the H. pylori infection. During the years after discovery by Marshall and Warren, it has been frequently declared that the rapid urease test (RUT) is one of the cheapest and rapid diagnostic approaches used in detecting the infection. Although the specificity and sensitivity are durable for this test, clinical experiences had shown that the ideal results are only achieved only if we take biopsies from both corpus and antrum at the same time. Given the diagnosis of the H. pylori in clinical samples, gastroenterologists are facing a long list of various molecular and nonmolecular tests. We need more in-depth researches and investigations to correctly generalize rapid and accurate molecular tests determining both bacterial identity and antibiotic resistance profile.

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.

An evaluation of a serologic test with a current infection marker of Helicobacter pylori before and after eradication therapy in Chinese

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Development of an accurate and less cumbersome noninvasive method to detect current Helicobacter pylori infection is essential in clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the CIM test, also known as the Assure H. pylori Rapid Test (Genelabs Diagnostics Pty. Ltd., Singapore), for the diagnosis of current H. pylori infection before and after eradication therapy in Chinese population.

METHODS

A total of 452 eligible people were recruited for this study in Jiangsu Province, China. Each individual underwent a 13C urea breath test (13C-UBT). For the evaluation of CIM test after eradication, 115 H. pylori-positive outpatients were treated with 1-week triple therapy. One month after the end of therapy, the patients underwent 13C-UBT again, and the CIM-test was performed 1, 3, and 6 months after the end of therapy. Its performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy) were determined using the 13C-UBT as a gold standard for H. pylori diagnosis.

RESULTS

H. pylori was detected in 221 (65.6%) of the 337 people by 13C-UBT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the CIM test were 93.2%, 90.5%, 94.9%, 87.5%, and 92.3%, respectively, using 13C-UBT as a gold standard. One month after eradication therapy, the sensitivity, specificity of CIM test were only 50% and 66.7%, 66.7% and 84.6% 3-month after eradication therapy and the sensitivity, specificity increased to 85.7% and 96.9%, respectively, when CIM test was used 6 months after the end of anti-H. pylori therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The CIM test is a simple, rapid, accurate, cheap, and near-people test. It may be satisfactory for detecting H. pylori infection in cases without eradication therapy, but it could not differentiate the past or current infection correctly within 6 months after anti-H. pylori therapy.

Optimal serological tests for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in the Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Numerous serological tests for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection have been developed. However, many perform poorly when evaluated in the Chinese population.

AIM

To search for optimal serological tests for the detection of H. pylori infection in Chinese patients.

METHODS

Consecutive dyspeptic patients referred for upper endoscopy were recruited. During endoscopy, gastric biopsies were taken for the CLOtest and histological examination. Patients were then given a 13C-urea breath test. Sera were used to test for H. pylori infection, employing three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (pylori DTect, HP IgG and GAP IgG). Results were compared with the gold standard defined by the CLOtest, histology and 13C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

Among the 142 patients (47 male, 95 female; mean age, 49 years) recruited, 81 (57%) were H. pylori-positive, 57 (40%) were H. pylori-negative and four (3%) were defined to be indeterminate. Using a self-defined cut-off value after calculation, the best accuracies for the pylori DTect, HP IgG and GAP IgG tests were 97%, 91% and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The pylori DTect test is an optimal serological test for the detection of H. pylori infection in Hong Kong Chinese patients. The HP IgG test may be used as an alternative.

Multiserotype enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as a diagnostic aid for periodontitis in large-scale studies

Periodontitis is a common chronic oral infection caused by gram-negative bacteria, including Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Periodontitis evokes inflammatory host response locally in the periodontium but also systemically. The systemic humoral antibody response against oral pathogens can conveniently be measured by an immunoassay. The aim of the study was to measure serum immunoglobulin G class antibodies against A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in which mixtures of several serotypes of the pathogens were used as antigens to avoid biasing of the results in favor of a particular strain. For A. actinomycetemcomitans the antigen consisted of six strains representing serotypes a, b, c, d, and e and one nonserotypeable strain. In the P. gingivalis ELISA, antigens representing serotypes a, b, and c were used. Serum samples from 90 subjects, including 35 samples from patients with diagnosed periodontitis, 10 samples from periodontally healthy controls, and 45 samples from randomly selected apparently healthy volunteers (referred to as "healthy subjects"), were tested. For both pathogens the antibody levels (means +/- standard deviations) of the patients--xpressed as area under the dilution curve--were significantly higher than those for healthy controls or healthy subjects, with values for A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis, respectively, as follows: patients, 22.60 +/- 9.94 mm(2) and 26.72 +/- 11.13 mm(2); healthy controls, 9.99 +/- 3.92 mm(2) and 6.90 +/- 3.38 mm(2); and healthy subjects, 16.85 +/- 6.67 mm(2) and 8.51 +/- 4.23 mm(2). The serotype mixture ELISA is suitable for measuring antibodies against periodontal pathogens in large epidemiological studies in order to evaluate the role of periodontitis as a risk factor for other diseases.

Office laboratory procedures, office economics, parenting and parent education, and urinary tract infection

We once again review four areas of interest to office-based pediatricians: office laboratory procedures, office economics, parenting and patient education, and urinary tract infections. Sean Elliott reviews the current status of the Clinical Laboratories Improvement Amendments (CLIA) and their continuing impact on physician office laboratories. Eve Shapiro reviews office economics, this year focusing on managed care, the physician workforce, practice management, and health care financing for the uninsured. Anna Binkiewicz provides an update on parenting and parent education, with recent reports on nutrition and childhood immunizations. Richard Wahl again reviews recent research on urinary tract infection, discussing voiding physiology, dysfunctional voiding patterns, acute urinary retention, urine collection techniques, diagnosis in young infants, and antibiotic prophylaxis.