Significant savings in radiologic report turnaround time after implementation of a complete picture archiving and communication system (PACS)

System approach to prevent lost studies and improve radiology report turnaround time

Purpose

On our picture archiving and communication system worklist, there was no way to differentiate body imaging (BI) from musculoskeletal (MSK) MR pelvis examinations. They were listed on only the BI worklist. This resulted in ‘lost’ MSK MR pelvis studies with high report turnaround time (TAT). Some exams had preliminary reports with substantiative changes made days later when found. The goals of this project were to create a solution to prevent ‘lost’ exams and improve TAT.

Methods

A report of 3 months of MR pelvis studies was reviewed to determine time to first view by MSK radiologists, time of completion, time of preliminary report and time of final signature. Mean TAT was calculated and exams with delays in reporting resident misinterpretation recorded.

An MSK reserve flag was created for the BI radiologists to use when they found an MSK study on their worklist. The flag moved them onto the MSK reserve worklist. A second intervention included technologists placing the reserve on examination completion. After this, another 3 months of data was analysed.

Results

There was a significant improvement (p=0.0018) in time to view by MSK from preintervention mean of 1125 min (n=107) to postintervention mean of 526 min (n=127). There was also a significant improvement (p=0.0033) in time to view inpatient and Emergency department cases from 927 min to 357 min. Time from study completion to final signature also improved from a mean of 1764 min to 838 min, though not statistically significant (p=0.08). There were five cases of delay in reporting resident misinterpretation preintervention and none postintervention.

Conclusion

Our intervention shows the importance of modifying human and informatics factors to solve a patient safety issue. Introduction

It is About "Time": Academic Neuroradiologist Time Distribution for Interpreting Brain MRIs

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Efficiency is central to current radiology practice. Knowledge of report generation timing is essential for workload optimization and departmental staffing decisions. Yet little research evaluates the distribution of activities performed by neuroradiologists in daily work.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational study tracked radiologists interpreting 358 brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in an academic practice over 9 months. We measured the total duration from study opening to report signing and times for five activities performed during this period: image viewing, report transcription, obtaining clinical data, education, and other. Attendings, fellows, and residents reading studies independently and attendings over-reading trainee-previewed studies were observed.

RESULTS

Ten attendings, 12 fellows, and 13 residents spent a mean of 11, 18, and 16 minutes reading brain MRIs independently. Mean duration was significantly different comparing attendings in all assignments to fellows (18.36 ± 1.05 minutes, p = 0.0001) or residents (16.31 ± 1.11 minutes, p = 0.001) but not between fellows/residents. Mean duration among attendings reading independently versus over-reading trainees was not statistically different. Attendings spent the same time on image viewing (4.07-5.33 minutes) with or without trainees. Attending transcription time was shortest when over-reading trainees (2.24 minutes) and longest when reading independently (4.20 minutes), demonstrating benefit of the draft report. Fellows and Residents spent longer on image viewing (7.14 minutes and 8.06 minutes, respectively) and transcription (7.02 minutes and 5.40 minutes, respectively) than attendings reading independently.

CONCLUSION

Neuroradiologist time/activity distributions for reading brain MRI studies were measured, setting the stage to establish a benchmark for future reference and suggesting opportunities for greater efficiency. Furthermore, report production time can be decreased when a draft report is available.

Who PACS a Punch? The Role of the Picture Archiving and Communication System/Radiology Information System (PACS/RIS) in Quantifying Experiential Learning in Radiology Residency

The clinical logbook is the currently accepted tool for evaluating experiential learning (EL) in postgraduate radiology training programs internationally. The role of the picture archiving and communication system/radiology information system (PACS/RIS) in defining the complete EL portfolio of radiology residents has not been explored. To conduct a PACS/RIS-based analysis of the comprehensive clinical outputs of radiology residents, and to correlate outputs with residency recruitment criteria and exit examination performance. Retrospective, customized searches of the institutional PACS/RIS were conducted to determine the clinical outputs of radiology residents completing a standardized 4-year training program at a single institution in a middle-income country. The association between outputs and prior-to-residency radiology experience, prior-to residency completion of the primary examination, and performance in the exit examination were determined. Fifteen residents were included. Average clinical output was 8286 cases, with a wide range (6268-10460). Total output was not associated with first-time exit examination success (p=0.16). Residents with prior radiology experience tended to greater success at first exit examination attempt (10/11, 91% versus 2/4, 50%; p=0.09), despite lower average outputs (8138 versus 8695). Outputs were not associated with prior completion of the radiology primary examination (8263 versus 8378; p=0.87). This first PACS/RIS-based analysis of the complete clinical outputs of any radiology residency training program provides important baseline educational data, with the potential to inform discourses on specialty training internationally. It demonstrates the potential for the modern PACS/RIS to supersede the traditional logbook and to serve as a comprehensive EL portfolio for radiology residents.

The first picture archiving and communication system in Lao People's Democratic Republic: Changes in the utilization rate of imaging tests in the first year after implementation

BACKGROUND

Implementation of the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) is more challenging in developing countries than in developed countries. Given that the first PACS in Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR) was successfully installed at the Children's Hospital of Lao PDR, we aimed to investigate whether the utilization rate of imaging tests increased after PACS implementation.

METHODS

PACS was implemented at the Children's Hospital of Lao PDR in December 2014. We compared the utilization rates of imaging tests including X-ray and ultrasound examinations between the pre-PACS period (from December 2013 to November 2014) and the post-PACS period (from December 2014 to November 2015). The utilization rate was defined as the number of imaging tests divided by the number of patients per month.

RESULTS

The average number of total imaging tests was 225.8/month (standard deviation [SD], 37.7) during the 1-year pre-PACS period and was 269.4/month (SD, 38.5) during the 1-year post-PACS period (P=0.0103). The utilization rate of total imaging tests significantly increased after PACS implementation (pre-PACS, 2.47%/month; post-PACS, 4.23%/month; P<0.0001). Increased utilization rates were observed for both X-rays (pre-PACS, 1.65%/month; post-PACS, 2.38%/month; P=0.0004) and ultrasound examinations (pre-PACS, 0.82%/month; post-PACS, 1.85%/month; P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of PACS at the Children's Hospital of Lao PDR resulted in a significant increase in the utilization rate of imaging tests, suggesting the indirect benefit of improved quality of care. Our findings showed that the benefits of PACS can be realized even in a resource-limited country such as Lao PDR.

Segmentation and Image Analysis of Abnormal Lungs at CT: Current Approaches, Challenges, and Future Trends

The computer-based process of identifying the boundaries of lung from surrounding thoracic tissue on computed tomographic (CT) images, which is called segmentation, is a vital first step in radiologic pulmonary image analysis. Many algorithms and software platforms provide image segmentation routines for quantification of lung abnormalities; however, nearly all of the current image segmentation approaches apply well only if the lungs exhibit minimal or no pathologic conditions. When moderate to high amounts of disease or abnormalities with a challenging shape or appearance exist in the lungs, computer-aided detection systems may be highly likely to fail to depict those abnormal regions because of inaccurate segmentation methods. In particular, abnormalities such as pleural effusions, consolidations, and masses often cause inaccurate lung segmentation, which greatly limits the use of image processing methods in clinical and research contexts. In this review, a critical summary of the current methods for lung segmentation on CT images is provided, with special emphasis on the accuracy and performance of the methods in cases with abnormalities and cases with exemplary pathologic findings. The currently available segmentation methods can be divided into five major classes: (a) thresholding-based, (b) region-based, (c) shape-based, (d) neighboring anatomy-guided, and (e) machine learning-based methods. The feasibility of each class and its shortcomings are explained and illustrated with the most common lung abnormalities observed on CT images. In an overview, practical applications and evolving technologies combining the presented approaches for the practicing radiologist are detailed.

The effectiveness of service delivery initiatives at improving patients' waiting times in clinical radiology departments: a systematic review

We reviewed the literature for the impact of service delivery initiatives (SDIs) on patients' waiting times within radiology departments. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, INSPEC and The Cochrane Library for relevant articles published between 1995 and February, 2013. The Cochrane EPOC risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias on studies that met specified design criteria. Fifty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The types of SDI implemented included extended scope practice (ESP, three studies), quality management (12 studies), productivity-enhancing technologies (PETs, 29 studies), multiple interventions (11 studies), outsourcing and pay-for-performance (one study each). The uncontrolled pre- and post-intervention and the post-intervention designs were used in 54 (95%) of the studies. The reporting quality was poor: many of the studies did not test and/or report the statistical significance of their results. The studies were highly heterogeneous, therefore meta-analysis was inappropriate. The following type of SDIs showed promising results: extended scope practice; quality management methodologies including Six Sigma, Lean methodology, and continuous quality improvement; productivity-enhancing technologies including speech recognition reporting, teleradiology and computerised physician order entry systems. We have suggested improved study design and the mapping of the definitions of patient waiting times in radiology to generic timelines as a starting point for moving towards a situation where it becomes less restrictive to compare and/or pool the results of future studies in a meta-analysis.

Comprehensive review of the limitations of relative value unit measurements of productivity in academic departments

Measuring radiologist, especially sonologist, productivity has never been of greater interest than now, as radiology has moved from its historical status as a cost center to the largest revenue generator in most institutions. With more local institutional and federal oversight and regulation into the reimbursement and valuation of imaging procedures, including emphasis on outsourcing, overvalued procedures, and bundling, the ability to measure productivity and to draw meaningful conclusions from the data becomes increasingly imperative if we as radiologists and sonologists expect to contribute meaningfully to the process. This article presents a history of the "relative value unit" and discusses the valuation of radiologist/sonologist productivity in this era of ubiquitous high-technology implementation.

Mapping turnaround times (TAT) to a generic timeline: a systematic review of TAT definitions in clinical domains

BACKGROUND

Assessing turnaround times can help to analyse workflows in hospital information systems. This paper presents a systematic review of literature concerning different turnaround time definitions. Our objectives were to collect relevant literature with respect to this kind of process times in hospitals and their respective domains. We then analysed the existing definitions and summarised them in an appropriate format.

METHODS

Our search strategy was based on Pubmed queries and manual reviews of the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Studies were included if precise definitions of turnaround times were available. A generic timeline was designed through a consensus process to provide an overview of these definitions.

RESULTS

More than 1000 articles were analysed and resulted in 122 papers. Of those, 162 turnaround time definitions in different clinical domains were identified. Starting and end points vary between these domains. To illustrate those turnaround time definitions, a generic timeline was constructed using preferred terms derived from the identified definitions. The consensus process resulted in the following 15 terms: admission, order, biopsy/examination, receipt of specimen in laboratory, procedure completion, interpretation, dictation, transcription, verification, report available, delivery, physician views report, treatment, discharge and discharge letter sent. Based on this analysis, several standard terms for turnaround time definitions are proposed.

CONCLUSION

Using turnaround times to benchmark clinical workflows is still difficult, because even within the same clinical domain many different definitions exist. Mapping of turnaround time definitions to a generic timeline is feasible.

Effect of anesthesia and sedation on pediatric MR imaging patient flow

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of sedative and anesthetic administration on the duration and costs of pediatric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was approved by the institutional research ethics board; informed consent and/or assent was obtained from all participants or their parents. A patient flow study was conducted in a pediatric MR imaging clinic in which research assistants tracked participants' progress through the clinic. Demographic, visit process, and medication information was collected for 237 participants, categorized as awake, sedated, or anesthetized. The data were analyzed to (a) determine total visit duration differences, (b) investigate variations in visit stage durations according to patient type, and (c) estimate visit costs on the basis of human resource and medication use. Linear regression, the Shapiro-Wilk test, the two-tailed t test, and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test were used.

RESULTS

Complete data sets were obtained for 148 awake, 28 sedated, and 27 anesthetized participants. Data revealed 12 stage sequences among patient visits; dominant sequences differed according to patient category. An awake patient's average visit duration (2 hours 21 minutes) differed significantly from that of sedated (3 hours 38 minutes, P < .001) and anesthetized (4 hours 7 minutes, P < .001) patients; sedated and anesthetized visit durations did not differ significantly (P < .073), although this finding may be attributable to the small sample sizes. Variation in stage durations was also evident within and among patient types. Visit costs for sedated and anesthetized patients were 3.24 and 9.56 times higher, respectively, than those for awake patients. Costs for anesthetized patients were 2.95 times higher than those for sedated patients.

CONCLUSION

Visit durations were significantly longer for anesthetized and sedated patients. Anesthetized patients incurred the highest costs, followed by sedated patients.

Introducing PACS to the late majority. A longitudinal study

The purpose of this study was to study whether the benefits from introducing a picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) reported by innovators and early adopters also can be achieved by a hospital belonging to the "late majority" and to see whether such benefits are sustained, using report turnaround time (RTAT) as an indicator. Activity-related data was retrieved from the radiology information system (RIS) over a 2-year period. The median RTAT for preliminary reports was initially reduced from 12 to 2 h then increased to 3 h. For final reports, the median RTAT was initially reduced from 23 to 13 h then gradually reverted back to 22 h. Innovators and early adopters demonstrate not only that positive results can be achieved but also the importance of involving key personnel. We believe that such involvement and the focus on wider organizational concerns are important when introducing PACS to the late majority, both for achieving and sustaining positive results.

Picture archiving and communication systems lead to sustained improvements in reporting times and productivity: results of a 5-year audit

AIM

To evaluate the impact of picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) on reporting times and productivity in a large teaching hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reporting time, defined as the time taken from patient registration to report availability, and productivity, defined as the number of reports issued per whole time equivalent (WTE) radiologist per month, were studied for 2 years pre- and 3 years post-PACS installation. Mean reporting time was calculated for plain radiographs and specialist radiology techniques [computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, and nuclear medicine]. Productivity, total department workload, and unreported film rates were also assessed. Pre- and post-PACS findings were compared.

RESULTS

Between 2002-2006 the number of radiological patient episodes increased by 30% from 11,531/month to 15,057/month. This was accompanied by a smaller increase in WTE reporting radiologists, from 32 to 37 (15%). Mean reporting times have improved substantially post-PACS, plain radiograph reporting time decreased by 26% (from 6.8 to 5 days; p=0.002) and specialty modalities by 24% (4.1 to 3.1 days; p<0.001). Radiologist productivity has increased by 18% (337 films to 407 films/WTE radiologist/month). Unreported films have decreased from 5 to 4% for plain radiographs and are steady for specialty modalities (< 1%). In most areas improvements have been sustained over a 3-year period.

CONCLUSION

Since the introduction of PACS, reporting times have decreased by 25% and the productivity improved by 18%. Sustained improvements are felt to reflect the efficiencies and cultural change that accompanied the introduction of PACS and digital dictation.

Challenges to radiology resident education in the new era

Over the past decade, there have been many developments that have changed the practice of radiology and the education of radiology residents. These include workforce issues, the institution of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hours restrictions, the increased use of night float systems, and the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems as well as voice recognition. This article reviews the impact on resident education, summarizes potential problems introduced by these changes, and examines proposed solutions.

Impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity

This study was conducted to measure the impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity. The radiology information system (RIS) database was interrogated to calculate the time interval between image production and dictation for every exam performed during three 90-day periods (the 3 months preceding PACS implementation, the 3 months immediately following PACS deployment, and a 3-month period 1 year after PACS implementation). Data were obtained for three exam types: chest radiographs, abdominal CT, and spine MRI. The mean dictation turnaround times obtained during the different pre- and post-PACS periods were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Productivity was also determined for each period and for each exam type, and was expressed as the number of studies interpreted per full-time equivalent (FTE) radiologist. In the immediate post-PACS period, dictation turnaround time decreased 20% (p < 0.001) for radiography, but increased 13% (ns) for CT and 28% (p < 0.001) for MRI. One year after PACS was implemented, dictation turnaround time decreased 45% (p < 0.001) for radiography and 36% (p < 0.001) for MRI. For CT, 1 year post-PACS, turnaround times returned to pre-PACS levels. Productivity in the immediate post-PACS period increased 3% and 38% for radiography and CT, respectively, whereas a 6% decrease was observed for MRI. One year after implementation, productivity increased 27%, 98%, and 19% in radiography, CT, and MRI, respectively. PACS benefits, namely, shortened dictation turnaround time and increased productivity, are evident 1 year after PACS implementation. In the immediate post-PACS period, results vary with the different imaging modalities.

Picture archiving and communication system and its impact on image viewing in physical therapy practice

Imaging plays an increasing role in physical therapy (PT) practice. We sought to determine if picture archiving and communication system (PACS) deployment would increase the proportion of imaging studies viewed by physical therapists (PTs) at the point of care and to assess PTs' perception of the value of access to imaging information. The study was performed in a 720-bed urban teaching hospital where an average of 2,000 rehabilitation visits per month are performed by 12 PTs. We compared the proportion of imaging studies viewed by PTs before and after PACS implementation. We surveyed PTs to assess their perception on the value of access to imaging studies. Film library records pre-PACS and web server audit trail post-PACS implementation were reviewed to measure access. Chi-square was used to compare proportions and trends. During the 3-month period before PACS usage, PTs viewed 1% (6/505) of imaging studies, citing time as the primary barrier. Post-PACS, the proportion of imaging studies viewed rose from 28% (95/344, second month) to 84% (163/192, fifth month) (p < 0.0001, chi-square). Most PTs believed that access to imaging studies has high value and has a positive impact on clinical practice. Physical therapists rarely viewed imaging studies before PACS due to time barriers. They viewed more imaging studies (84%) post-PACS and felt that access to imaging studies has a positive impact on clinical practice. Further studies are needed to assess whether PACS enhances PTs' clinical decision making and improves patient outcomes.

MRI of meniscal lesions: soft-copy (PACS) and hard-copy evaluation versus reviewer experience

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to compare diagnostic performance, reviewer confidence, and time requirements in the MRI diagnosis of meniscal tears for three types of reviewers and two types of image documentations (PACS vs hard copies).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An experienced musculoskeletal radiologist (reviewer 1), a fellow in musculoskeletal radiology (reviewer 2), and a junior staff member in orthopedic surgery (reviewer 3) evaluated MR images displayed on PACS monitors and hard copies independently and in a blinded fashion with regard to the presence or absence of meniscal tears. Seventy-one patients (mean age, 45.4 years; range, 16-80 years) were consecutively included if they had undergone both MRI of the knee and arthroscopy within 4 months. Arthroscopy was the standard of reference. Evaluation time and the reviewer's confidence in his or her diagnosis (Visual Analogue Scale, possible values of 0-100) were determined.

RESULTS

Accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities in diagnosing meniscal tears were 80-87%, 63-85%, and 87-93% for soft copies and 82-85%, 64-76%, and 87-94.0%, respectively, for hard copies. Intrareviewer differences between PACS and hard copies were not significant for any of the three reviewers (McNemar tests). Reviewer 3 was less sensitive but more specific in the diagnosis of meniscal tears than reviewers 1 and 2. This difference was significant for both the PACS and hard copies. The reviewers' confidence in their diagnoses and evaluation times were not significantly different for PACS and hard copies (analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc analysis).

CONCLUSION

Differences in the diagnostic performance of suspected meniscal tears depend on reviewer experience rather than on the type of documentation.

Impact of PACS deployment strategy on dictation turnaround time of chest radiographs

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to measure the impact of a picture archive and communication system (PACS) on dictation turnaround time of chest radiographs in a multisite hospital and relate variations across sites to local factors and implementation strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The multisite hospital is composed of three sites. Dictation turnaround time was calculated by using data obtained from the radiology information system for examinations performed during three 90-day periods (immediately before PACS implementation, immediately after PACS implementation, and 1 year after implementation). Productivity, expressed as number of examinations dictated per full-time-equivalent radiologist, also was calculated. For each 3-month period, average interval delay was calculated. Values for average interval delay obtained during the different pre- and post-PACS periods were compared by using analysis of variance. This was done for each hospital.

RESULTS

In the immediate post-PACS period at site 1, dictation turnaround time decreased 5% (P < .05), whereas productivity decreased 16.5%. The implementation strategy was revised for the next two sites, and dictation turnaround time decreased 21% (P < .001) in both sites in the immediate post-PACS period. Productivity increased 2% and 3% in these sites. One year after implementation, decreases in turnaround ranged from 28% to 55% (P < .001) in the three sites.

CONCLUSION

Our experience suggests that PACSs cannot be isolated from their contexts; therefore, implementation strategy matters in the realization of projected benefits. In addition, regardless of differences in film-based environments before PACS, all three sites benefited from conversion to filmless operation, with the greatest benefits seen in the site that was least efficient before implementation.

Radiologists' reading times using PACS and using films: one practice's experience

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To measure the change in radiologists' productivity in terms of interpretation time per examination when using picture archiving and communication system (PACS) workstations in a particular private practice, Valley Radiologists, Ltd, as part of a feasibility study and subsequent business plan to implement a digital enterprise.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Time to process a series of exams was measured for 18 radiologists during an uninterrupted period of a working day. Radiologists in the practice served in multiple locations. The data were analyzed in aggregate and by modality (plain film, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging). Average time per exam, with and without PACS, was measured for each modality. Regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of PACS on radiologist productivity.

RESULTS

The mean time to process an exam was 1.4 minutes (SE = 0.04) for plain film, 1.96 minutes (SE = 0.14) for ultrasound, 5.08 minutes (SE = 0.44) for computed tomography, and 6.83 minutes (SE = 0.31) for magnetic resonance imaging. Regression results indicate that PACS had no effect on the time taken to read a series of exams.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering a PACS purchase or implementation, decrease in radiologists' time to process an examination may not be realized. In this specific practice setting, we did not find evidence that PACS workstations alone, without any other changes in workflow design, improved radiologists' interpretation time.

Impact of PACS and voice-recognition reporting on the education of radiology residents

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The introduction of picture archiving and communication system (PACS) has decreased the time needed to interpret radiology examinations resulting in an increased workflow. Because of concerns that the increase in exam throughput and the use of voice recognition may have a negative impact upon radiology resident education, a survey was conducted to assess the impact of PACS and voice recognition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Residents at four diagnostic radiology training programs were surveyed. Survey topics included resident demographics, didactic and technical issues, and areas for improvement.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four residents were polled with 42 respondents (42/134, 31.3%). The majority have been using PACS for more than 1 year (29/41, 70.7%) to interpret 75-100% of cases (33/39, 84.6%). A majority believed PACS is a superior teaching tool to printed film (28/38, 73.7%). However, only a minority (9/40, 22.5%) indicated that PACS was always used to contain teaching files and to conduct departmental conferences (5/40, 12.5%). The majority of respondents believed PACS have decreased the time needed to interpret diagnostic examinations (33/41, 80.5%). A majority (80.6%, 25/31) indicated that voice recognition takes more time than the traditional dictation and transcription process, where 51.3% (20/39, 51.3%) felt that voice recognition works well less than 50% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents believe that PACS has positively affected their learning experience but indicate that it can be better utilized for resident education. Residents believe that voice recognition is less reliable and more time consuming than the traditional dictation system.

Multi-detector computed tomography and 3-dimensional imaging in a multi-vendor picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) environment

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To show the impact of the introduction of multi-detector computed tomography (CT) on radiologic workflow and to demonstrate how this reflects on picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) requirements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Production measurements were obtained from different CT scanners (first two single-slice CT scanners; from December 2001 single and 4-slice CT; from April 2002 single and 16-slice CT) in number of patients from the radiologic information system. Implications on our PACS were recorded in terms of images and studies stored. Furthermore, our PACS design was made so that optimal use of 3-dimensional imaging within the radiologic workflow was possible. Finally, the number of non-diagnosed studies were recorded every day since the start of the transition to a filmless radiology department.

RESULTS

This PACS design achieved a high level of integration between simple viewing and advanced 3-dimensional imaging and is optimized for handling large amounts of data. Overall increase of patients scanned with CT from January 2002-December 2003 was 54%. The number of series increased by 286% from December 2001-April 2003 and by 130% from April 2002-December 2003. From January 2002-February 2003, the number of images per patient increased from 175 to 450 (157%). Non-diagnosed studies decreased from about 100-120 before to practically zero after PACS implementation.

CONCLUSION

PACS significantly increases productivity because of availability of the images and elimination of certain manual tasks. These results show that although the amount of examinations increases significantly with the introduction of MDCT, simultaneous introduction of PACS and filmless operation allows radiologists to handle the growth in workload.

Automated recognition of lateral from PA chest radiographs: saving seconds in a PACS environment

Images acquired in a two-view digital chest examination are frequently not electronically distinguishable. As a result the lateral and posterioanterio (PA) images are often improperly positioned on a PACS work station. A series of 1998 chest radiographs (999 lateral, 999 PA or AP) were used to develop a neural network classifier. The images were down-sampled to 16 x 16 matrices, and a feed-forward neural network was trained and tested using the "leave-one-out" method. Using five nodes in the hidden layer, the neural network correctly identified 987 of the 999 test cases (98.8%) (average of six runs). The simple architecture and speed of this technique suggests that it would be a useful addition to PACS work station software. The accumulated time saved by correctly positioning the lateral and PA chest images on the work station monitors in accordance with each radiologist's hanging protocols was estimated to be about 1 week of radiologist time per year.

Review and interpretation of MR imaging studies with PACS: creating uniform series descriptors for radiologists and referring physicians

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify a limited set of standardized descriptors for various MR image series on a picture archiving and communications system (PACS) and to apply these descriptors to both existing and newly acquired MR images.

CONCLUSION

Of the 47,028 MR image series in our PACS, approximately 2500 had been assigned unique descriptors, and nearly 82% of the descriptors had a frequency of appearance of less than 5%. We reduced the number of descriptors to 146 without loss of essential information. Use of standardized descriptors may facilitate identification of various MR image series.

Impact of pager notification on report verification times

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on times of verification (TOVs) by a pager notification system (PNS) that informs physicians when reports are available for signature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An automated PNS was implemented in the authors' department in November 2000. Monthly report verification times of each physician were collected for 3 months in the years before and after initiation of the PNS. Radiologists enrolled in the PNS and those who were not were assigned into two groups for analysis. Mean TOVs for the two sets of 3 months and for the two groups were calculated and differences recorded. Two-tailed t tests were used to assess for statistical differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 37 radiologists voluntarily enrolled in the PNS (group 1). Mean TOV was 26.75 hours (standard deviation [SD] = 17.76) for these physicians before and 14.48 hours (SD = 11.86) after the PNS was employed (P < .01). For those physicians who did not enroll in the PNS, mean TOV was 11.53 hours (SD = 5.55) before and 9.77 hours (SD = 9.86) after the PNS was employed (P = .33). Both the absolute and percentage reductions in TOVs were significantly greater for those physicians enrolled in the PNS than for those who were not (P = .035). Twenty-three of 29 (79%) physicians who used the PNS showed a reduction in their report turnaround times.

CONCLUSION

Linking the PNS with the radiology information system to notify physicians of unsigned reports was effective in reducing report verification times.

Too few radiologists?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to model the supply and demand for diagnostic radiologists over the next 30 years under alternative scenarios.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used responses from the American College of Radiology's 2000 Survey of Diagnostic Radiologists and Radiation Oncologists to determine the current age distribution and activity of diagnostic radiologists. The numbers entering the profession were projected using three assumptions: no change in training programs, reduction of residency to 3 years (or otherwise increasing the annual number of graduates by one third), and elimination of most fellowship programs. Demand projections assume a 5% shortage in 2001 and depend on growth rates of the population, aging, scenarios of growth of age-standardized demand, and the effect of possibly productivity-enhancing technologies such as PACS (picture archiving and communication systems).

RESULTS

Only a one-third increase in annual graduates materially increases the work-force relative to current training patterns. In all cases, the growth rate of the demand for radiologists far outstrips the supply over a 30-year horizon. In the shorter term, projections of current trends point to an increasing shortage, but rapid major productivity increases could produce a surplus.

CONCLUSION

Those in the field of diagnostic radiology should consider measures to mitigate the increasing shortage, while monitoring developments that might signal departures from current trends in supply and demand.

Enhanced visualization processing: effect on workflow

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Soft-copy viewing of digital radiographs allows for image processing to improve visualization of anatomy and lesions, but it can take more time than film-based viewing. Enhanced visualization processing (EVP) was developed to increase the latitude of an image without reducing the vital contrast, potentially reducing the need for the radiologist to manipulate images. This study examined the influence of processing radiographic images with EVP on workflow in a picture archiving and communications system (PACS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Portable computed radiographic chest images were obtained and processed either with EVP or without. A security camera with a videocassette recorder was positioned above the PACS workstation. Four radiologists reviewed the images during their normal work schedule. The current diagnostic image was used to determine if the case contained EVP or non-EVP images. The videotapes of the sessions were reviewed to determine diagnostic viewing times and how zoom and/or window and level manipulation was used.

RESULTS

Viewing time was significantly longer for the non-EVP than the EVP cases. The difference occurred with all readers. Window and level manipulation was used on 35% of the EVP and 41% of the non-EVP images. Zoom was used on 64% of the EVP and 69% of the non-EVP images. Average time spent using zoom and window and level manipulation was significantly shorter with the EVP than with the non-EVP images.

CONCLUSION

EVP of chest images displayed on PACS monitors significantly improved workflow as measured by viewing time. EVP decreased use of window and level manipulation and zooming and the amount of time each one was used.

Impact of a diagnostic workstation on workflow in the emergency department at a level I trauma center

PURPOSE

When a computed tomography (CT) scan on a patient from the emergency department is completed at University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ)-University Hospital, a non-picture archiving and communication system (PACS) environment, formal diagnostic review cannot begin until the images are printed and transported to the on-call radiology resident. The time to reach a final diagnosis has been significantly reduced by the introduction of a single workstation in the on-call reading room.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five radiology residents were studied. Each read 10 CT studies on film and 10 on a workstation. After a training period to familiarize the residents with the workstation, measurements were taken of the time required to read the examination and the time required for printing and transporting or networking the images.

RESULTS

The average time required to transmit the images was reduced from approximately 40 minutes to 16 minutes. Interpretation times between the workstation and film were comparable.

CONCLUSION

The addition of a single workstation significantly reduces the time required to reach a final diagnosis by obviating the need to print and transport the images to the on-call radiology resident. Such time savings can have a significant impact on the care of trauma patients.