Radiobiological indices that consider volume: a review

Accrediting radiation technique in a multicentre trial of chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer

Before a multicentre trial of 3-D conformal radiotherapy to treat cancer of the pancreas, participating clinicians were asked to complete an accreditation exercise. This involved planning two test cases according to the study protocol, then returning hard copies of the plans and dosimetric data for review. Any radiation technique that achieved the specified constraints was allowed. Eighteen treatment plans were assessed. Seven plans were prescribed incorrect doses and two of the planning target volumes did not comply with protocol guidelines. All plans met predefined normal tissue dose constraints. The identified errors were attributable to unforeseen ambiguities in protocol documentation. They were addressed by feedback and corresponding amendments to protocol documentation. Summary radiobiological measures including total weighted normal tissue equivalent uniform dose varied significantly between centres. This accreditation exercise successfully identified significant potential sources of protocol violations, which were then easily corrected. We believe that this process should be applied to all clinical trials involving radiotherapy. Due to the limitations of data analysis with hard-copy information only, it is recommended that complete planning datasets from treatment-planning systems be collected through a digital submission process.

Thirty year celebration of journal publications on radiation oncology medical physics

The Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Journal (APESM) is an avenue for the profession to report scientific work in medicine; provide a facility for the publication of current work, new research and new techniques developed or reviewed; report on professional news from elsewhere and; publish the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) policies and protocols. The journal is a vital instrument within the ACPSEM organisation with a worldwide circulation. This review of APESM on medical physics in radiation oncology is meant to be a progress summary of work in that specialty. Even so, it has become a lengthy appraisal due to the many years involved. In considering publications related to medical physics in radiation oncology, this review has shown the progression of the College journal to an international journal. There is an increase in the number of papers contributed from Asia and other countries world wide for this discipline. Growth in the number of contributions should continue to rise. In order to provide some appreciation of where the present medical physics activity arose from, this article commences its discussion in 1959 and progresses towards the present, describing along the way, from radiation oncology papers published in APESM, the use of linear accelerators, brachytherapy, the medical physics workforce, the formation of the ACPSEM, and the more modern developments in radiotherapy such as 3-D treatment planning and IMRT.

Comparison of non-coplanar and coplanar irradiation techniques to treat cancer of the pancreas

We compared two different techniques of pancreatic irradiation using measures associated with normal tissue complications. Seven consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer were planned for both coplanar and non-coplanar (NCP) external beam radiation treatments, using the same defined anatomical volumes for each patient, in each case. Each pair of plans was then compared using a range of objective criteria. Individual normal tissues were assessed against traditional tolerance limits. Selected dose-points, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and equivalent uniform doses (EUD) were also compared, as were indices combining information from individual tissues - total NTCP and total weighted EUD. All individual normal tissues doses were within established tolerance limits. For NCP relative to coplanar planning, NTCP and EUD were lower for all individual tissues in four cases and one case, respectively, i.e. in most cases a benefit to one tissue was offset by detriment to others. Summary measures demonstrated overall benefits for NCP techniques, with the total NTCP in six patients, and with the total weighted EUD in all patients. NCP techniques show potentially useful benefits. We present a new objective measure, the total weighted EUD, which may be particularly useful comparing plans where there are multiple critical tissues.

EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties

The purpose of this work is to quantify the impact of dose uncertainty on radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation. Dose uncertainties are divided into two categories: physical and statistical. Physical dose uncertainty is associated with the systematic and/or random errors incurred during treatment planning and/or delivery. The dose uncertainty associated with Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions is deemed statistical and noted as artificial with respect to the actual delivered dose. We will refer to all dose uncertainties that arise from either calculation or delivery as stochastic. Both physical and statistical dose uncertainties are considered at the intra- and inter-voxel levels. To account for voxel dose uncertainty, we calculate the mean survival fraction (SF) for the random dose deposition. Mathematically, the expression for the mean survival fraction is identical to that used by Niemierko (1997 Med. Phys. 24 103-10) in defining equivalent uniform dose (EUD). To distinguish between spatial and probabilistic dose variations, we define equivalent stochastic dose (ESD) as a voxel dose that gives the mean expected survival fraction for the randomly deposited dose. For a probability density function f(D), that represents the probabilistic voxel dose, SF(ESD) can be calculated by convolving SF(D) with f(D). In the case where the probability density function follows a Gaussian distribution, an analytic expression is derived for SF(ESD). The derived expression is verified using the Monte Carlo method and ESD values calculated with varied radiosensitivities for cases of 60 and 70 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction. The analytic expression is also extended to account for a multi-voxel dose distribution that incorporates a spatial dose heterogeneity. The results show that survival fraction increases with an increased dose uncertainty. This reduction depends on radiobiological parameters attributed to tissue and tumour. For tissue, ESD drops to 55% of the mean physical dose when the dose has a 10% intra- and inter-voxel dose uncertainty and inhomogeneity.

Exploring the effect of marked normal structure volume on normal tissue complication probability

Radiation therapy dosimetry software now frequently incorporates biological predictions of the probability of normal tissue complications. This study investigates whether the length of normal structure outlined affects a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for that structure. It also researches the effect of any change in the dose parameter used to produce a 50% probability of a complication (the TD50) on the calculated NTCP, as this is related to the clinical observations. An NTCP was calculated for rectum and bladder on a sample of prostate cases receiving external beam radiation therapy. The length of the organs at risk was varied and the NTCP recalculated for each different length using the same treatment plan. Large variations of up to 80% in NTCP for different delineated lengths of organ for a given TD50 were observed. Changing the TD50 dose altered the calculated NTCP and the relative size of the variation in the values. This parameter will need further investigation; a standardized delineated length of 2 cm beyond the beam edge for normal structures is recommended. Interpatient and interinstitution plan comparison using dose volume histograms and/or normal tissue complication probabilities will be compromised until such standardization occurs.