Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations

The impact of X-ray scatter correction software on abdomen radiography in terms of image quality and radiation dose

INTRODUCTION

The conventional anti-scatter grid is widely used in X-ray radiography to reduce scattered X-rays, but it increases patient dose. Scatter-correction software offers a dose-reducing alternative by correcting for scattered X-rays without a physical grid. Grids and software correction are necessary to reduce scatter radiation and improve image quality especially for the large body parts. The scatter correction can be beneficial in situations where the use of grid is challenging. The implementation of grids and advanced software correction techniques is imperative to ensure that radiographic images maintain high levels of clarity, contrast, and resolution, and ultimately facilitating more accurate diagnoses. This study compares image quality and radiation dose for abdomen exams using scatter correction software and physical grids.

METHODS

An anthropomorphic phantom (abdomen) underwent imaging with varying fat and lean tissue layers and body mass index (BMI) configurations. Imaging parameters included 70 kVp tube voltage, 110 cm SID, and Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) both lateral and central chambers. AP abdomen X-ray projections were acquired with and without an anti-scatter grid, and scatter correction software was applied. Image quality was assessed using contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) metrics. The tube current mAs was considered an exposure factor that affected radiation dose and was used to compare the VG software and physical grid. Radiation dose was measured using Dose Area Products (DAP). The effective dose was estimated using Monte Carlo simulation-PCXMC software. Paired t-tests were used to investigate the image quality difference between the Gridless and VG software, Gridless and PG, and VG software and PG approaches. For the DAP and effective dose, paired t-test was used to investigate the difference between VG software and PG.

RESULTS

Images acquired with a grid had the highest mean CNR (71.3 ± 32) compared to Gridless (50 ± 33.8) and scatter correction software (59.3 ± 37.9). The mean SNR of the grid images was (82.7.3 ± 38.9), which is 18% higher than the scatter correction software images (70.4 ± 36.7) and 29% higher than in the Gridless images (62.9.3 ± 34). The mean DAP value was reduced by 81% when the scatter correction software was used compared to the grid (mean: 65.4 μGy.m2 and 338.2 μGy.m2, respectively) with a significant difference (p = 0.001). Scatter correction software resulted in a lower effective dose compared to physical grid use, (mean difference± SD = -0.3 ± 0.18 mSv) with a significant difference (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Scatter correction software reduced the radiation dose required but images employing a grid yielded higher CNR and SNR. However, the radiation dose reduction might affect the image quality to a level that impacts the diagnostic information available. Thus, further research needs to be conducted to optimise the use of the scatter correction software.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Objectively, X-ray scatter correction software might be promising in conditions where a grid cannot be applied.

Radiation dose reduction and image quality evaluation for lateral lumbar spine projection

Purpose

Optimization studies in digital radiology help to reduce the radiological risk to patients and maximize the benefits associated with their clinical purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the optimization of lateral lumbar spine projection via a combination of exposure parameters adjustments and additional filtration using a sectional anthropomorphic phantom.

Materials and methods

We evaluated the effects of peak voltage, tube loading, and low-cost filters made of copper, titanium, brass, and nickel on both the perceived and physical quality of 125 radiographs obtained in a computer radiography system. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) with their Figure of Merit (FOM), based on the entrance surface air kerma with backscatter (ESAK), was used to assess physical image quality.

Results

The standard image had a perceived image quality, SNR, FOMSNR, CNR, FOMCNR and ESAK of 3.4, 22.3, 386.4, 23.6, 433.7 and 1.28 mGy, respectively. Copper (90.3% purity) and titanium (95.0% purity) filters reduced ESAK by an average of 60% without compromising diagnostic quality, while brass and nickel filters increased dose under the conditions of the study.

Conclusions

Our findings show that optimizing lumbar spine projection can reduce radiation dose without compromising image quality. Low-cost copper and titanium filters can be valuable in resource-limited settings. Further research can explore additional strategies for radiological optimization.

How does a non-optimal tube potential influence radiation dose to the patient in lumbar spine radiography?

INTRODUCTION

When comparing the radiation dose to the patient, the lumbar spine has one of the highest dose values in general radiography, therefore the procedure needs to be optimised. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a non-optimal tube potential (66 kV) during anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spine radiography on the radiation dose received by the patient compared with the radiation dose when an optimal tube potential (79 kV) is used, in accordance with European guidelines.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 100 patients referred for lumbar radiography in two different diagnostic departments. Half of the patients were admitted to a department which used optimal tube potential and the other half to the department which used non-optimal tube potential for AP lumbar spine radiography protocols. The height and weight of the patients were collected to calculate the body mass index (BMI) of the patients. The image field size and dose area product (DAP) values were collected after each imaging session. The effective dose and selected organ dose were calculated using the PCXMC 2.0 program.

RESULTS

The results showed that a non-optimal tube potential resulted in a significant increase in the DAP value by 360% (p < 0.001) and a significant increase in the effective dose by 160% (p < 0.001). Dose to selected organs due to non-optimal tube potential increased from 107% (breasts) up to 631% (prostate) (p < 0.001). The images were not assessed using visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis, but the radiologists evaluated all the images appropriate for diagnostic reading.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study's stated results, we can conclude that optimal tube potential use is essential to achieve the ALARA principle.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The study shows the effect of a non-optimal tube potential on the radiation dose received by the patient during radiography of the lumbar spine. This could influence possible diagnostic departments to consider protocol optimisation due to the high radiation dose received by the patient.

LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHY: LOWER ORGAN DOSE WITH THE USE OF PA PROJECTION

The purpose of the research was to determine the effect of the posteroanterior (PA) patient position in lumbar spine imaging on effective dose and the absorbed organ dose. The study was performed on 100 patients that were referred to the lumbar spine radiography that were divided into two equal groups of 50. Body Mass Index, Dose Area Product (DAP), exposure index (EXI), tube time-current (mAs), image field size and the source-patient distance were acquired for each patient. The entrance surface dose (ESD), the effective dose and the absorbed organ doses were calculated. There was no statistically significant difference in the BMI and EXI between the AP and PA projection. The results showed a significant reduction of ESD by 33% and the effective dose by 53% when the PA projection was used. Furthermore, there was a 64% average reduction of the absorbed organ doses to the selected organs.

Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study

PURPOSE

Exposure creep is the gradual increase in x-ray exposures over time that results in increased radiation dose to the patient. It has been theorized as being a phenomenon that results from the wide-exposure latitude of computed radiography (CR) and direct/indirect digital radiography (DR). This project evaluates radiographic exposures over 43 months to determine if exposure creep exists and if measures can be applied to halt or reverse exposure creep trends.

METHODS

Exposure indices were initially recorded over 29 months between August 2007 and December 2009 from the intensive and critical care unit (ICCU) and the emergency department (ED) departments where manual CR exposures were used. The data from this period were then assessed and the exposure indexes (EI) values from the radiographic images were compared to the radiology department criteria of EI values between 1400 to 1800 as being in the optimal exposure range. EI values below this were considered underexposed and over this as overexposed. An intervention was required to be used in ICCU and implemented in January 2010 to halt a noted trend of overexposure. The EI value for each chest x-ray (CXR) was recorded in the patients' ICCU records and was to be used by radiologic technologists/radiographers in determine exposure factors in subsequent CXR. After the intervention, EI values were recorded and evaluated for an additional 15 months between February 2010 and March 2011.

RESULTS

Between August 2007 and December 2009, 17,678 ICCU CXR images and 69,327 ED x-ray examinations were evaluated for over- and underexposure. A trend was noted in ICCU that showed a significant increase (P = .023) in EI values from the beginning to the end of the evaluation. No such trend was seen in the ED EI values (P = .120). After the intervention in ICCU, the overexposure trend was halted.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure creep has been show to exist. It is surmised that this occurs where judgment to determine the correct radiographic exposure factors is needed when taking into account a large range of patient sizes. It has also been shown that providing radiologic technologists/radiographers with previous EI values for the same x-ray examination can halt a trend of exposure creep.

Correlation of image quality with exposure index and processing protocol in a computed radiography system

The correlation of image quality with the exposure index (EI) and the processing protocol was investigated in a Kodak computed radiography (CR) system using clinical radiographs and a water phantom containing an aluminium and a copper step-wedge. The phantom was exposed to different dose levels and the acquired images were processed using four clinical protocols. The quality of these images was evaluated in terms of image brightness, contrast and noise. In clinical radiographs, there was no straightforward correlation of image quality with EI. In phantom images, higher EI values improved contrast and reduced noise but after a point this improvement does not justify the implied increase in patient dose. Image brightness, contrast and noise were also strongly dependent on the processing protocol. To obtain the images of satisfactory quality with the Kodak CR system, a dose slightly higher than those used in 400 relative speed screen-film systems and a processing protocol designated for the specific radiographic examination are required.