Intra- and interindividual variabilities in the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal soluble film in healthy subjects: a cross-study analysis

A dose titration study of fentanyl buccal soluble film for breakthrough cancer pain in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Fentanyl buccal soluble film (FBSF), a new formulation of fentanyl, is developed for the treatment of breakthrough pain (BTP) in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer.

AIMS

This study aimed to assess the feasible dose range of FBSF required for Taiwanese population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was an open-label, multicenter, noncomparative study. Cancer patients who were aged 20 years or older and had a stable regimen equivalent to 60 to 1000 mg/day of oral morphine, 20 to 120 mg/day of intravenous morphine, or 25 to 300 μg/h of transdermal fentanyl for at least 1 week were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the feasible dose range of FBSF. Secondary endpoints included difference in pain intensity at 30 minutes (PID30), percentage of episodes requiring rescue medication, and overall satisfaction. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded for safety measurements. The final effective dose in the per-protocol (PP) population (n = 30) ranged from 200 to 800 μg, of which 26 subjects (86.7%) achieved an effective dose range of 200 to 400 μg. Among the 283 BTP episodes recorded in the maintenance period, the mean PID30 was 4.0, and only 13 events (4.6%) required rescue medication. For 63.6% of the BTP episodes, patients rated their satisfaction as good to excellent. Only 5% of AEs were considered drug-related.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized dose titration is recommended for BTP management for patients' benefit. Overall, FBSF was effective and well tolerated and was positively correlated with patients' background opioid dose for persistent pain management.

Proportional dose of rapid-onset opioid in breakthrough cancer pain management: An open-label, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The management of breakthrough pain (BTP) in cancer patients is a challenge. It is clinically useful to evaluate the effectiveness of rapid-onset opioid at a starting dose in proportional to the background opioid regimen. This open-label, multicenter, noncomparative study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of proportional doses of fentanyl buccal soluble film (FBSF) in patients with breakthrough cancer pain.

METHODS

Thirty patients aged 20 to 70, experiencing 1 to 3 BTP per day, receiving regimens equivalent to 60 to 360 mg/day of oral morphine or 25 to 150 μg/h of transdermal fentanyl ≥1 week, were prospectively recruited. FBSF was administered proportionally based on their current opioid regimen for baseline pain. The percentage of patients requiring dose titration was evaluated. For each BTP episode, changes in pain intensity at 30 minutes (PID30) after dosing, patient's satisfaction, the percentage of episodes requiring rescue medication, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients who required dose titration was 21.4% (6/28) and 12.0% (3/25) in the full analysis set and per-protocol populations, respectively. The average PID30 was 3.9, and a pain score ≤3 was achieved in 95.1% of the events. Eight out of 367 (2.2%) BTP episodes needed rescue medication. The majority of subjects (75.8%) rated their experience of pain management as good to excellent. A total of 6 drug-related AEs were reported by 3 (10.7%) patients in the safety population.

CONCLUSIONS

FBSF dose in proportional to the regimen of opioid for baseline pain management is efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of cancer patients with BTP.

Rapid acting fentanyl formulations in breakthrough pain in cancer. Drug selection by means of the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis

Drug selection of rapid acting fentanyl formulations in the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer is performed by the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis method. All seven available formulations were included in the analysis. The following selection criteria were used: number of available strengths, variability in the rate of absorption, interactions, clinical efficacy, side effects, ease of administration and documentation. No direct double-blind comparative studies between two or more formulations were identified and the clinical documentation of all formulations is limited. The most distinguishing criterion was ease of use. This led to slightly higher scores for Abstral, Instanyl and PecFent than for the other formulations. The pros and cons of each formulation should be discussed with the patient, and the most suitable formulation selected for each individual patient.

Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl for Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Opportunities and Challenges for Use in Palliative Care

Opioids are used to treat breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP) and can be classified by relative duration and onset of action. Regulatory approvals of numerous transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl (TIRF) formulations provide alternative options to palliative care-trained providers in the management of BTCP. TIRFs have been formulated as a sublingual tablet, sublingual spray, intranasal spray, pectin-based nasal spray, buccal tablet, and buccal soluble film. Differences exist between TIRFs regarding formulation design and dosing to treat BTCP. Opportunities for use include palliation of BTCP in head and neck cancer and/or radiation-induced mucositis. The purpose of this review is to discuss TIRF formulation and dosing, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, patient acceptability, and safety/tolerability. In addition, barriers to TIRF utilization will be discussed.

Considerations in selecting rapid-onset opioids for the management of breakthrough pain

Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transitory pain that occurs despite the use of long-term, around-the-clock analgesia. It is highly prevalent in certain populations and places a significant burden on patients, their families, caregivers, and health-care systems. Despite its prevalence and impact, BTP is sometimes unrecognized and often undertreated. Various formulations of fentanyl – a rapid-onset opioid with short duration of action – are available for the management of BTP. The efficacy of formulations using transmucosal, transbuccal, sublingual, and intranasal administration routes has been demonstrated for BTP treatment in clinical trials. However, a lack of head-to-head trials evaluating their relative efficacy makes it challenging for physicians to reach informed decisions on the most efficacious intervention for individual patients. In the absence of clear data on the relative efficacy of fentanyl formulations, prescribing decisions need to be based on physician understanding and experience and product cost and availability, taking into account the individual patient’s needs, the ability of the patient or caregivers to administer medication, and the patient’s wishes. This review evaluates current pharmacologic methods of alleviating BTP and discusses factors that should be considered when selecting the most appropriate formulation for individual patients. With the range of fentanyl formulations available, it is now possible to successfully address BTP in the majority of patients.

A review of the pharmacokinetic profile of transmucosal fentanyl formulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transitory flare of moderate-to-severe pain that occurs in patients with stable, controlled persistent pain. Management of BTP episodes is difficult because frequency, time-to-peak intensity, and duration of episodes vary both within and between individuals. Formulations of fentanyl that use a buccal, sublingual, or nasal transmucosal route of administration have been developed for the treatment of BTP in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer. These formulations allow rapid passage into the bloodstream and avoid first-pass metabolism and, therefore, are more likely to match the time-course of BTP episodes than are oral formulations. The purposes of this analysis were to identify and review published data describing the pharmacokinetic properties of rapid-onset fentanyl formulations and to evaluate these properties in view of the temporal dynamic characteristics of BTP in order to help guide medical practice.

METHODS

Relevant publications were searched in the PubMed database from 1998. The plasma drug concentration-time profile of each formulation obtained from the identified studies was adjusted to a consistent scale for comparison.

RESULTS

The data revealed that the various transmucosal formulations resulted in three typical plasma fentanyl concentration profiles: (1) type 1: a very rapid rise and short duration; (2) type 2: a rapid increase and sustained intensity; and (3) type 3: a slower onset and longer duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the substantial variability of BTP episodes experienced by patients, these pharmacokinetic differences may provide useful information for a physician who is selecting a rapid-onset opioid medication for a patient.

A comprehensive review of rapid-onset opioids for breakthrough pain

Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transitory pain (reaching maximum severity in ~15 minutes and lasting ~60 minutes in patients with cancer) that occurs despite the management of chronic pain with long-term around-the-clock analgesia. BTP occurs in 33-65% of patients with chronic cancer pain and in ~70% of patients with chronic noncancer pain. BTP has historically been managed with short-acting opioids; however, these medications have a pharmacokinetic profile that does not correlate with the sudden onset and short time to maximum severity of BTP. Interest in rapid-onset opioids to relieve BTP has therefore been growing. This comprehensive review aims to summarize the currently available clinical data for the approved rapid-onset opioids, which comprise different formulations of fentanyl, a μ-opioid receptor agonist with anaesthetic and analgesic properties. Administration routes for fentanyl in the management of BTP currently include the transmucosal and intranasal routes; an intrapulmonary formulation is also in development. The findings of this review suggest that the efficacy and safety of the approved rapid-onset opioids are comparable.