Animal Pharmacology of Nebivolol

A Single-Center, Open-Label, 3-Way Crossover Trial to Determine the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Nebivolol and Valsartan in Healthy Volunteers at Steady State

Combining different classes of antihypertensives is more effective for reducing blood pressure (BP) than increasing the dose of monotherapies. The aims of this phase I study were to investigate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between nebivolol, a vasodilatory β1-selective blocker, and valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, and to assess safety and tolerability of the combination. This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 3-way crossover trial in 30 healthy adults aged 18-45 years. Participants were randomized into 1 of 6 treatment sequences (1:1:1:1:1:1) consisting of three 7-day treatment periods followed by a 7-day washout. Once-daily oral treatments comprised nebivolol (20 mg), valsartan (320 mg), and nebivolol-valsartan combination (20/320 mg). Outcomes included AUC0-τ,ss, Cmax,ss, Tmax,ss, changes in BP, pulse rate, plasma angiotensin II, plasma renin activity, 24-hour urinary aldosterone, and adverse events. Steady-state pharmacokinetic interactions were observed but deemed not clinically significant. Systolic and diastolic BP reduction was significantly greater with nebivolol-valsartan combination than with either monotherapy. The mean pulse rate associated with nebivolol and nebivolol-valsartan treatments was consistently lower than that associated with valsartan monotherapy. A sharp increase in mean day 7 plasma renin activity and plasma angiotensin II that occurred in valsartan-treated participants was significantly attenuated with concomitant nebivolol administration. Mean 24-hour urine aldosterone at day 7 was substantially decreased after combined treatment, as compared with either monotherapy. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, nebivolol and valsartan coadministration led to greater reductions in BP compared with either monotherapy; nebivolol and valsartan lower BP through complementary mechanisms.

Nebivolol: pharmacologic profile of an ultraselective, vasodilatory beta1-blocker

Beta-blockers are well-established therapeutic agents in the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. However, these agents are highly heterogeneous. Beta-blockers differ in their ancillary pharmacologic properties, which are clinically important. Nebivolol is a highly selective beta(1)-adrenergic receptor blocker that induces vasodilation through stimulation of the endothelial nitric oxide/L-arginine pathway. As a racemic mixture of d- and l-enantiomers, nebivolol is highly lipophilic and rapidly absorbed. Nebivolol undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism through the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) system. As a result of genetic polymorphisms, CYP2D6 has variable activity, manifested by extensive and poor metabolizers of nebivolol. Time to maximum concentration is 0.5 to 2 hours, and half-life is 11 hours in extensive metabolizers; these values are about 3 times longer in poor metabolizers. Urinary and fecal excretion of unchanged nebivolol is less than 0.5% of the dose. Nebivolol has a unique hemodynamic profile of reduced systemic vascular resistance and increased left ventricular function. These properties are attributed to its vasodilating action and contrast with the hemodynamic effects of conventional beta-blockers. Nebivolol is thus a novel beta-blocker with several important pharmacologic properties that distinguish it from traditional beta-blockers. These unique properties may confer clinical benefits beyond simple blood pressure lowering.

Comparison of effects on systolic and diastolic left ventricular function of nebivolol versus atenolol in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension

This was a double-blind, randomized, prospective study comparing the effects of nebivolol and atenolol on systolic diastolic left ventricular function in patients with essential hypertension. A significant difference was seen in stroke volume between these 2 drugs. The blood pressure lowering effect of atenolol was strongly related to cardiac output and heart rate reduction. The blood pressure lowering effect of nebivolol was related to a reduction in peripheral resistance and an increase in stroke volume with preservation of cardiac output. This preservation of cardiac output, together with a reduced peripheral resistance, may be potentially important in treating heart failure.

Nebivolol induces NO-mediated relaxations of rat small mesenteric but not of large elastic arteries

Nebivolol is a newer beta1-selective adrenergic receptor antagonist, which unlike classic beta-blockers, lowers systemic vascular resistance by direct vasodilator effects possibly involving NO. This study was designed to determine the effects of nebivolol on small arteries, which contribute to the most part of systemic vascular resistance. Mesenteric arteries, isolated from 9-week-old Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats, were studied under perfused and pressurized conditions using a video dimension analyzer. Aortic rings from the same animals were suspended in organ chambers, and isometric tension was measured. Experiments were performed during contraction to prostaglandin F2alpha. In small arteries, nebivolol (10(-9) to 3 x 10(-5) M) induced concentration-dependent relaxations (maximum, 55 +/- 8%). The relaxations were less pronounced as compared with those to acetylcholine (maximum, 99 +/- 2%; p < 0.05), but were significantly greater than those to atenolol (maximum, 2 +/- 0%; p < 0.05). Nebivolol-induced responses were markedly reduced by the NO-synthase inhibitor N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME; 10(-4) M; maximum, 11 +/- 2%; p < 0.05). This inhibition could be entirely reversed by pretreatment with L-arginine (10(-3) M; maximum, 46 +/- 7%), a precursor of NO. In contrast to mesenteric arteries, nebivolol did not affect vascular tension of precontracted aortas. These findings indicate that nebivolol induces NO-mediated relaxations in small arteries but not large elastic vessels and therefore, independent of its antihypertensive action, might be effective in protecting the microcirculation in various cardiovascular disease states.

Nebivolol: a third-generation beta-blocker that augments vascular nitric oxide release: endothelial beta(2)-adrenergic receptor-mediated nitric oxide production

BACKGROUND

Nebivolol is a beta(1)-selective adrenergic receptor antagonist with proposed nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vasodilating properties in humans. In this study, we explored whether nebivolol indeed induces NO production and, if so, by what mechanism. We hypothesized that not nebivolol itself but rather its metabolites augment NO production.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Mouse thoracic aorta segments were bathed in an organ chamber. Administration of nebivolol did not affect NO production. When nebivolol was allowed to metabolize in vivo in mice, addition of plasma of these mice caused a sustained 2-fold increase in NO release. Interestingly, coadministration of a selective beta(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist (butoxamine) prevented the response. Immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis demonstrated the presence of beta(2)- but not beta(1)-adrenergic receptors on endothelial cells. In the absence of calcium, metabolized nebivolol failed to increase NO production, suggesting a role for calcium-dependent NO synthase. With digital fluorescence imaging, a rapid and sustained rise in endothelial cytosolic free Ca(2+) concentration was observed after administration of metabolized nebivolol, which also was abrogated by butoxamine pretreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo metabolized nebivolol increases vascular NO production. This phenomenon involves endothelial beta(2)-adrenergic receptor ligation, with a subsequent rise in endothelial free [Ca(2+)](i) and endothelial NO synthase-dependent NO production. This may be an important mechanism underlying the nebivolol-induced, NO-mediated arterial dilation in humans.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in phase I/phase II of drug development

Early investigation of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in Phase I/II may facilitate the further clinical development of a new drug. Although some pharmacology assessments in Phase I are often only surrogates for the therapeutic effect, PK-PD modelling of those effects provides in general crucial information on the drug's potency in vivo. A mathematical PK-PD expression allows explorative simulations on the rate of onset of drug action, on the intensity and duration of the effects for doses in future clinical trials, or in situations of altered drug kinetics. Furthermore, understanding of the PK-PD relationship early on in drug development may anticipate unnecessary exposure of human subjects to inappropriate drug doses or trials.