Combination of Inhaled Corticosteroids and β2-Agonists in Asthma: Clinical and Economic Implications

Patient preferences for managing asthma: results from a discrete choice experiment

Effective control of asthma requires regular preventive medication. Poor medication adherence suggests that patient preferences for medications may differ from the concerns of the prescribing clinicians. This study investigated patient preferences for preventive medications across symptom control, daily activities, medication side-effects, convenience and costs, using a discrete choice experiment embedded in a randomized clinical trial involving patients with mild-moderate persistent asthma. The present data were collected after patients had received 6 weeks' treatment with one of two drugs. Three choice options were presented, to continue with the current drug, to change to an alternative, hypothetical drug, or to take no preventive medication. Analysis used random parameter multinomial logit. Most respondents chose to continue with their current drug in most choice situations but this tendency differed depending on which medication they had been allocated. Respondents valued their ability to participate in usual daily activities and sport, preferred minimal symptoms, and were less likely to choose drugs with side-effects. Cost was also significant, but other convenience attributes were not. Demographic characteristics did not improve the model fit. This study illustrates how discrete choice experiments may be embedded in a clinical trial to provide insights into patient preferences.

The cost utility of bupropion in smoking cessation health programs: simulation model results for Sweden

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To calculate incremental cost-utility ratios (cost per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained) for bupropion (Zyban; GlaxoSmithKline; Gothenburg, Sweden), as compared to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in smoking cessation programs for a follow-up period of 20 years.

DESIGN

The Global Health Outcomes simulation model was used for a male cohort and for a female cohort as a point of departure but was further extended in order to include the following: (1) the indirect effects of smoking cessation on production and consumption in the economy, and (2) morbidity-specific QALYs gained.

SETTING

Sweden in 2001.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Model cohort consisting of 612,851 male and 780,970 female smokers, distributed by age, > or = 35 years old, as in the Swedish population of 2001.

INTERVENTIONS

Bupropion, as compared to NRT (nicotine patches and nicotine gums), in smoking cessation programs for a follow-up period of 20 years.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

When the indirect effects on production and consumption were taken into account, bupropion was cost saving in comparison to both NRTs. When only the direct costs were included, bupropion was still cost saving in comparison to nicotine gum. The incremental costs per QALY gained were relatively low for bupropion in comparison to nicotine patches, 6,600 Swedish kronas (SEK) (approximately 725 euro) per QALY gained for men and 4,900 SEK (approximately 535 euro) for women, all calculations in 2001 Swedish prices. The comprehensive sensitivity analysis showed robust results; results were, however, more sensitive to quit rates and intervention costs than to other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Bupropion is a cost-effective therapy in smoking cessation programs. Furthermore, recent studies report even higher effectiveness in terms of quit rates than was assumed here, indicating that our estimated cost-utility ratio should be even more favorable to bupropion.

An international observational prospective study to determine the cost of asthma exacerbations (COAX)

Asthma is a common chronic condition that places substantial burden on patients and healthcare services. Despite the standards of asthma control that international guidelines recommend should be achieved, many patients continue to suffer sub-optimal control of symptoms and experience exacerbations (acute asthma attacks). In addition to being associated with reduced quality of life, asthma exacerbations are a key cost driver in asthma management. Routine clinical practice for the management of asthma exacerbations varies in different healthcare systems, so healthcare providers require local costs to be able to assess the value of therapies that reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations. This prospective study, conducted in a total of 15 countries, assessed the local cost of asthma exacerbations managed in either primary or secondary care. Healthcare resources used were costed using actual values appropriate to each country in local currency and in Euros. Results are presented for exacerbations managed in primary care in Brazil, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Ukraine, and in secondary care in Croatia, Denmark, Ireland, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain. Multiple regression analysis of the 2052 exacerbations included in the economic analysis showed that the cost of exacerbations was significantly affected by country (P<0.0001). Mean costs were significantly higher in secondary care (euro 1349) than primary care (euro 445, P=0.0003). Age was a significant variable (P=0.0002), though the effect showed an interaction with care type (P<0.0001). As severity of exacerbation increased, so did secondary care costs, though primary care costs remained essentially constant. In conclusion, the study showed that asthma exacerbations are costly to manage, suggesting that therapies able to increase asthma control and reduce the frequency or severity of exacerbations may bring economic benefits, as well as improved quality of life.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: a review of the analytical standards

PURPOSE

To determine whether published cost-effectiveness studies on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma adhered to basic analytical standards as defined in health economic textbooks and in guidelines assessing and comparing efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Original cost-effectiveness studies published between 1990 and 2000 in general medical or economic journals were reviewed to assess the adherence to five fundamental methodological principles: (1) design of the study, (2) choice of perspective and corresponding costs, (3) choice of outcome measure, (4) marginal cost analysis, and (5) sensitivity analysis and discussion about external validity. For each principle, the studies were ranked as high, medium or low quality.

RESULTS

Most of the 18 studies included were ranked medium on the first two principles. The studies adhered to a higher degree to the remaining three principles. Only three studies were high ranked in all five principles. The number of principles fulfilled increased over time. Studies comparing pharmaceutical products from competing companies were typically short-term studies, designed for other purposes than health economic analyses, and, in general, did not use therapeutically equivalent dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Attention should be drawn to the study design, the weak correspondence between perspective and costs, and especially to the impact of bias in health economic results when comparing different doses of ICSs.