An improved method of elimination of DNA from PCR reagents

Dual-priming oligonucleotide-based multiplex PCR using tissue samples from the rapid urease test kit for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in bleeding peptic ulcers

BACKGROUND

In patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB), diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection have low sensitivity. The aim of our study was to investigate the diagnostic yield of dual-priming oligonucleotide-based multiplex (DPO)-PCR using tissue samples from the rapid urease test (RUT, CLO(®)test) kit in patients with PUB.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with PUB. During second-look endoscopy, gastric biopsy specimens for histology and RUT were obtained from a total of 170 patients. DPO-PCR tests were performed on tissue samples obtained from the CLO(®)test kit. If testing for H. pylori was negative, endoscopy with re-biopsy was performed 8 weeks after the bleeding episode.

RESULTS

H. pylori-associated bleeding was confirmed in 64.1% (109/170) of the patients. At the bleeding episode, the diagnostic sensitivities of RUT, histology, and DPO-PCR test were 47.7% (52/109), 71.6% (78/109) and 97.2% (106/109), respectively (p<0.01). The specificity of the DPO-PCR test was 91.8% (56/61). The positive predictive value (PPV) of the DPO-PCR test was 95.5% (106/111), and its negative predictive value (NPV) was 94.9% (56/59).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PUB, the DPO-PCR test could be a useful diagnostic tool for H. pylori infection. Particularly given a negative RUT result, subsequent DPO-PCR testing of tissue samples from the CLO(®)test kit could be of considerable benefit.

Prospective comparison of eubacterial PCR and measurement of procalcitonin levels with blood culture for diagnosing septicemia in intensive care unit patients

Rapid identification of infection has a major impact on the clinical course, management, and outcome of critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We compared the results of PCR and procalcitonin with blood culture for ICU patients suspected of having septicemia. Ninety patients (60 patients meeting the criteria for sepsis and 30 patients not meeting the criteria for sepsis) were evaluated. Compared with blood culture as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for PCR were 100%, 43.33%, 46.87%, and 100%, respectively, and for procalcitonin were 100%, 61.66%, 56.6%, and 100%, respectively. The average times required to produce a final result were as follows: PCR, 10 h; blood culture, 33 h; procalcitonin, 45 min. Both PCR and procalcitonin may be useful as rapid tests for detecting septicemia but compared with blood cultures lacked specificity.

Prospective comparison of microbial culture and polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of corneal ulcer

PURPOSE

To compare polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to microbial culture for the detection and identification of bacterial and fungal pathogens in microbial keratitis.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 108 consecutive corneal ulcers were cultured and analyzed by PCR using pan-bacterial and pan-fungal primers. PCR products were cloned, sequenced, and compared to culture results using standard bioinformatics tools.

RESULTS

Of the 108 samples, 56 were culture-positive, 25 for bacteria and 31 for fungi; 52 were culture-negative. After eliminating false-positive PCR products, 94 of 108 were positive by PCR, 37 for bacteria and 57 for fungi. Nineteen of 25 bacterial culture-positive samples were positive by PCR, and 29 of 31 samples culture-positive for fungi were positive by PCR. The majority of sequenced PCR products matched the positive culture results. Of the 52 culture-negative samples, 46 (88%) yielded pathogen deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) PCR products, 18 bacterial and 28 fungal. These represented a variety of species, including at least three novel previously uncultured microbes.

CONCLUSIONS

PCR detects microbial DNA in the majority of bacterial and fungal corneal ulcers, and identifies potentially pathogenic organisms in a high proportion of culture-negative cases. Yield and concordance with culture are higher for fungal than bacterial ulcers. Practical use of the technique is limited by artefactual amplification of nonpathogenic organisms. PCR may be used as an adjunct to culture to identify potential pathogens in microbial keratitis.

Broad-range bacterial and fungal DNA amplification on vitreous humor from suspected endophthalmitis patients

BACKGROUND

Prompt and accurate diagnosis of infectious endophthalmitis is crucial for rapid and effective treatment. By identifying whether the causative pathogen is bacterial or fungal, a rational approach for the use of antibacterials or corticosteroids, respectively, can be followed.

AIM

To assess the clinical utility of broad-range bacterial and fungal DNA amplification in the detection of endophthalmitis (postoperative, posttraumatic, and endogenous).

METHODS

In a prospective study, vitreous humor samples from 70 patients with the clinical diagnosis of presumed endophthalmitis, and from 30 patients undergoing surgery for non-infectious causes, were subjected to routine microbiologic and molecular investigation. DNA extracted from a 50 microL sample was amplified by primers targeting the conserved 16S and 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences of bacteria and fungi, respectively. Reagents for bacterial DNA amplification were decontaminated of endogenous DNA using 8-methoxypsoralen and long wave UV treatment.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 35 specimens were positive for bacteria or fungi by culture. Of these, Gram-positive organisms were isolated in 19 specimens, Gram-negative organisms in 13 specimens and fungi in 3 specimens. Pseudomonas species, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus species were the main etiological agents isolated. Bacterial DNA amplification resulted in 49 positive specimens, compared with 32 positive specimens by culture; and fungal DNA amplification resulted in 11 positive specimens, compared with 3 positive specimens by culture. All control specimens were negative for both culture and DNA amplification.

CONCLUSION

DNA extracted using a single-extraction protocol from 50 microL of vitreous humor and amplified with broad-range bacterial and fungal primers will enable the rapid differentiation (within 14 hours) between bacterial and fungal endophthalmitis and allow tailoring of therapy to individual patients.