Burda MHF, van den Akker M, van der Horst F, Lemmens P, Knottnerus JA. Collecting and validating experiential expertise is doable but poses methodological challenges.
J Clin Epidemiol 2016;
72:10-5. [PMID:
26769258 DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.021]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2014] [Revised: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 10/26/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To give an overview of important methodological challenges in collecting, validating, and further processing experiential expertise and how to address these challenges.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING
Based on our own experiences in studying the concept, operationalization, and contents of experiential expertise, we have formulated methodological issues regarding the inventory and application of experiential expertise.
RESULTS
The methodological challenges can be categorized in six developmental research stages, comprising the conceptualization of experiential expertise, methods to harvest experiential expertise, the validation of experiential expertise, evaluation of the effectiveness, how to translate experiential expertise into acceptable guidelines, and how to implement these. The description of methodological challenges and ways to handle those are illustrated using diabetes mellitus as an example.
CONCLUSION
Experiential expertise can be defined and operationalized in terms of successful illness-related behaviors and translated into recommendations regarding life domains. Pathways have been identified to bridge the gaps between the world of patients' daily lives and the medical world.
Collapse