Ability of hospitalized older adults to use their call bell: a pilot study in a tertiary care teaching hospital

Early diagnosis of sepsis using an E-health application for a clinical early warning system outside of the intensive care unit: a case report

Background

Elderly and frail patients who are unable to call for help in case of vital distress can develop complications during their hospitalization. As a supplement to clinical monitoring by the nursing staff, these patients can also be monitored in real time, with the Sensium E-health technology. An application notifies clinical staff of any change in their vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature) outside of normal ranges, suggestive of physiological decline. Nurses and physicians are notified of these abnormal changes by email and also via mobile application (iPhone or iPad), allowing early intervention to prevent further deterioration.

Case presentation

An 86-year-old Caucasian female, with chronic kidney disease, was hospitalized in our medical unit for pyelonephritis associated with a moderate deterioration of serum creatinine. Remote continuous monitoring allowed us to diagnose clinical deterioration early and adjust her treatment. The treatment improved her clinical condition and amended the secondary sepsis with circulation failure in 2 days.

Conclusions

The prognosis for patients with acute complicated pyelonephritis is much worse than for those with uncomplicated pyelonephritis. Remote continuous monitoring might be helpful to early diagnose urosepsis. This technology leads to improved prognosis of patients without initial vital distress, allowing early treatment and admission to intensive care unit.

A cry for help: time to re-think the patient call bell in an ageing population

Historically, the patient call bell has been the mechanism by which patients can alert a health-care worker to provide help. The authors were concerned that, in an increasingly comorbid population, this method of raising help was not fit for purpose. They therefore reviewed every level 3 bed space (n = 283) in a district general hospital over a 2-week period and assessed the usability of the call bell at each occupied bed. The call bells were on average 82 cm away from the bed. More worryingly, over one third (38.1%) of all inpatients were unable to understand independently the role of the call bell and how to use it. The authors conclude that, in times of immense inpatient bed pressures, it is critical that there are robust strategies to highlight the significant number of patients who cannot use the call bell and ensure they are given an appropriate ward location.

Prospective cohort study of adverse events in older people admitted to the acute general hospital: risk factors and the impact of dementia

BACKGROUND

Reported adverse events (RAEs) are relatively common in the acute hospital and are associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Dementia is increasing in hospital in-patients, however there have been few studies exploring risk factors for RAEs, in particular cognitive impairment and dementia. Our objective was to identify the prevalence of RAEs in older acute medical inpatients and associated demographic, clinical or cognitive risk factors.

METHOD

A longitudinal cohort study set on acute medical wards in a large general hospital. We recruited 710 people aged over 70 years undergoing emergency medical admission. Dementia was diagnosed using operationalised DSM-IV criteria. Patients were assessed using standardised tools including the Confusion Assessment Method, mini-mental state examination, the Functional Assessment Staging scale, the APACHE scale and Charlson co-morbidity index. Data on adverse events was supplied independently by the hospital clinical risk department.

RESULTS

8.6% (95% CI 6.4-10.6) of patients experienced an RAE; 5.9% (95% CI 4.2-7.6) were patient-related and 2.7% (95% CI 1.5-3.8) system-related (incidence rate for all RAEs was 2.1 (95% CI 1.7-2.8)) per person year of hospital admission. Median length of admission was 8 days (inter-quartile range 4-17 days). Patient-related RAEs were associated with male gender, delirium, mild/moderate cognitive impairment and a FAST score of 2-6. Overall, 11.1% died during the admission-this was not associated with experiencing an RAE. Staff comments on incident forms indicated an apparent lack of understanding of the impact of cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

RAEs were common and associated with risk factors identifiable at admission.

Perspectives of staff nurses of the reasons for and the nature of patient-initiated call lights: an exploratory survey study in four USA hospitals

BACKGROUND

Little research has been done on patient call light use and staff response time, which were found to be associated with inpatient falls and satisfaction. Nurses' perspectives may moderate or mediate the aforementioned relationships. This exploratory study intended to understand staff's perspectives about call lights, staff responsiveness, and the reasons for and the nature of call light use. It also explored differences among hospitals and identified significant predictors of the nature of call light use.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, multihospital survey study was conducted from September 2008 to January 2009 in four hospitals located in the Midwestern region of the United States. A brief survey was used. All 2309 licensed and unlicensed nursing staff members who provide direct patient care in 27 adult care units were invited to participate. A total of 808 completed surveys were retrieved for an overall response rate of 35%. The SPSS 16.0 Window version was used. Descriptive and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The primary reasons for patient-initiated calls were for toileting assistance, pain medication, and intravenous problems. Toileting assistance was the leading reason. Each staff responded to 6 to 7 calls per hour and a call was answered within 4 minutes (estimated). 49% of staff perceived that patient-initiated calls mattered to patient safety. 77% agreed that that these calls were meaningful. 52% thought that these calls required the attention of nursing staff. 53% thought that answering calls prevented them from doing the critical aspects of their role. Staff's perceptions about the nature of calls varied across hospitals. Junior staff tended to overlook the importance of answering calls. A nurse participant tended to perceive calls as more likely requiring nursing staff's attention than a nurse aide participant.

CONCLUSIONS

If answering calls was a high priority among nursing tasks, staff would perceive calls as being important, requiring nursing staff's attention, and being meaningful. Therefore, answering calls should not be perceived as preventing staff from doing the critical aspects of their role. Additional efforts are necessary to reach the ideal or even a reasonable level of patient safety-first practice in current hospital environments.