Immunohistochemical detection of glycoprotein hormone alpha subunit in somatoprolactinic and pure somatotroph adenomas

Pathologic Characteristics of Somatotroph Pituitary Tumors-An Observational Single-Center Study

The pathologic evaluation of a tumor tissue is an essential part of an acromegaly patient's assessment. This study aimed to analyze the pathologic characteristics of pituitary tumors in patients with acromegaly. The demographic data, in addition to the hormonal, imaging, and pathologic results of 120 patients with acromegaly after pituitary surgery, were extracted from the Polish Acromegaly Registry. We compared sparsely and densely granulated tumors, GH(+), mixed GH(+)/PRL(+) and plurihormonal tumors, α-subunit-positive and α-subunit-negative tumors, and tumors of various Ki-67 indices in terms of the abovementioned features. Sparsely granulated tumors were more frequent in women than in men (p = 0.001) and in younger patients (p = 0.011), and they were larger (p < 0.001) compared to densely granulated tumors. Tumors with positive α-subunit were smaller (p = 0.013), showed extrasellar extension less often (p = 0.039), and were more often densely granulated (p < 0.001) compared to α-subunit-negative tumors. Patients with a higher Ki-67 index were younger (p < 0.001) and more often diagnosed with genetic syndromes (p = 0.02); they had higher GH concentrations (p = 0.007), larger tumors (p = 0.006), and cavernous sinus invasions more frequently (p = 0.022). Conclusions: The pathologic characteristics of somatotroph pituitary tumors are associated with patient's age, sex, hormonal results, tumor size, and the degree of extrasellar expansion.

Clinical, hormonal and pathomorphological markers of somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumors predicting the treatment outcome in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSS) of somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) is the first-line treatment of acromegaly. Pharmacological treatment is recommended if surgery is contraindicated or did not lead to disease remission. The choice of treatment best fitting each patient should be based on thorough investigation of patients' characteristics. The current analysis attempts to create a tool for personalized treatment planning.

AIM

This study aimed to assess whether clinical, biochemical, imaging and pathological characteristics can predict surgical remission and response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) and pasireotide-LAR in acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 153 acromegaly patients, treated in the Department of Endocrinology in Bielanski Hospital in Warsaw, Poland was performed. Data on demographics, hormonal and imaging results, pathological evaluation, and treatment outcome was extracted from the Polish Acromegaly Registry collecting information from 11 endocrinology centers in Poland and analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with surgical remission had lower GH and IGF-1 concentrations at diagnosis (median GH 5.5 µg/L [IQR: 3.1-16.0] vs. 19.9 µg/L [IQR: 9.8-42.4], p=<0.001 and mean IGF-1 3.1xULN ± SD=1.2 vs. 3.7xULN ± SD=1.2, p=0.007, respectively) and smaller tumors (median 12.5mm [IQR: 9-19] vs. 23mm [IQR: 18-30], p<0.001). These tumors were more often densely granulated (DG) (73.2% vs. 40.0%, p=0.001) with positive staining for alpha-subunit (α-SU) (58.3% vs. 35.5%, p=0.021) and lower Ki-67 index (p=0.002). Patients responding well to SRLs were more often male (55.6% vs 44.4%, p=0.026), presented lower GH concentration (median GH 17.2 µg/L [IQR: 6.2-29.0] vs. 23.8 µg/L [IQR: 11.2-49.5], p=0.048) and had more often DG tumors (63.0% vs. 14.3%, p<0.001). No significant differences between good and poor-response to pasireotide-LAR groups were found. In multivariate logistic regression analysis fasting GH concentration <8.63 µg/L, maximal tumor diameter <15.5mm, normoprolactinemia and DG tumor turned out to be independent predictors of surgical remission (OR=0.92, p=0.026; OR=0.87, p=0.069, OR=3.86, p=0.096 and OR=3.05, p=0.181, respectively). Fasting GH concentration <36.6 µg/L and DG tumor turned out to be independent predictors of good response to first-generation SRLs (OR=0.96, p=0.06 and OR=10.68, p=0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Younger age at diagnosis, male sex, lower GH, IGF-1 and PRL concentrations, smaller tumor size at diagnosis as well as positive α-SU staining, lower Ki-67 index and DG tumors predicted better treatment outcome in acromegaly patients.

Serum alpha-subunit levels in patients with pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

We investigated preoperative and postoperative serum alpha-subunit levels and the alpha-subunit response to TRH in patients with various types of pituitary tumour and correlated the data with histological findings in order to clarify the significance of alpha-subunit measurement in pituitary adenomas.

PATIENTS

We examined 59 patients with pituitary tumours (22 with GH cell adenomas, 30 with clinically nonfunctioning adenomas and seven with other tumours) treated at Toranomon Hospital between 1996 and 1998.

RESULTS

The basal alpha-subunit level was supranormal in six out of 22 (27%) patients with a GH cell adenoma and in nine out of 30 (30%) patients with a nonfunctioning adenoma. A paradoxical alpha-subunit response to TRH was found in seven out of 22 (32%) patients with a GH cell adenoma. These seven patients also showed a paradoxical GH response to TRH administration. In addition, paradoxical response to TRH was found in eight out of 30 (27%) patients with a clinically nonfunctioning adenoma. In contrast, patients with other types of pituitary tumour showed neither a supranormal alpha-subunit level nor a paradoxical response to TRH. The supranormal alpha-subunit level and the abnormal response to TRH were normalized in both GH cell adenoma and nonfunctioning adenoma patients after successful surgery. Immunohistochemical studies showed alpha-subunit positive cells in 51% of GH cell adenomas or nonfunctioning adenomas and there was a good concordance with the serum alpha-subunit levels in both GH cell adenoma and nonfunctioning adenoma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that supranormal serum alpha-subunit levels are mainly due to hypersecretion by the tumour itself, while the paradoxical alpha-subunit response to TRH is an associated phenomenon in patients with a GH cell adenoma or nonfunctioning adenoma. The alpha-subunit level and the response to TRH may be useful indicators for assessing the operative outcome, especially in nonfunctioning adenoma patients who have no other definite endocrine markers.