Pavlovian Extinction of the Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Nicotine and Ethanol in Rats Varies as a Function of Context

Ethanol→Nicotine & Nicotine→Ethanol drug-sequence discriminations: Conditional stimulus control with two interoceptive drug elements in rats

Self-administration of ethanol (E) and nicotine (N) occurs frequently in tandem orders (i.e., N→E vs. E→N) and thereby produces differing interoceptive profiles of subjective effects in humans. If the interoceptive stimulus characteristics of N→E differ from E→N, it is possible that such differences contribute to their co-dependence. The rationale for the present investigation was to determine whether ethanol, when preceded or followed by nicotine, produces different discriminative stimulus effects in rats. In two experiments, using a one-manipulandum operant drug discrimination procedure, rats were trained to discriminate temporal sequential administrations of ethanol (1.0 g/kg) that was followed or preceded by nicotine (0.3 mg/kg). Sessions alternated between food-reinforcement sessions on a variable interval 30-sec schedule (i.e., SD) and non-reinforcement sessions (i.e., SΔ). In Experiment 1, administrations of ethanol were followed or preceded by a 10-min interval of nicotine. Training sessions took place 10 min following the second drug injection. Four groups of rats were trained to discriminate only one sequence from sequential administrations of saline, and each drug sequence was counterbalanced across groups for their roles as SD or SΔ. There was robust stimulus control. N→E and E→N functioned equally well as SD or SΔ. Experiment 2 used two groups of rats. For one group, the E→N sequence functioned as the SD and the N→E sequence functioned as the SΔ. The drug sequences were counterbalanced for the other group. Brief non-reinforcement tests revealed significantly greater responding during the SD sequence compared to the SΔ sequence for both groups. These results suggest that different drug sequences of ethanol followed or preceded by nicotine established reliable discriminative stimulus control over operant responding, potentially because of characteristic differences in the overlapping pharmacokinetic profiles of the NE compound. The results are discussed in terms of: 1) conditional stimulus control among two interoceptive drug states; and 2) the clinical modulation of human alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking.

Can the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine function concurrently as modulatory opponents in operant and pavlovian occasion setting paradigms in rats?

Nicotine promotes interoceptive changes in the nervous system. Such interoceptive stimuli play important roles in modulating addictive behavior. Operant and Pavlovian stimulus control modulate responsiveness to environmental stimuli related to drug-seeking and self-administration. Nicotine functions as a discriminative stimulus in modulating operant behavior as well as Pavlovian feature stimuli in modulating the conditional responding (CR) to exteroceptive CS→US contingencies. Elucidation of the interaction of these interoceptive stimulus control functions is vital for a comprehensive understanding of nicotine use/abuse, which might lead to better behavioral treatment strategies. This experiment evaluated the interaction among Pavlovian feature positive (FP) and feature negative (FN) effects of nicotine on concurrently occurring operant S^D and S^Δ effects. Sixteen rats were trained in a Pavlovian and operant bidirectional contingency paradigm, using nicotine (0.3 mg/kg) and non-drug (saline) states as interoceptive cues for operant discriminative stimulus conditions (S^D and S^Δ) as well as Pavlovian FP and FN for a light-CS, either leading to a shared food pellet outcome or non-outcome. Nicotine and saline sessions were intermixed. For one group of rats (n = 8), nicotine served as an S^D for lever pressing (variable interval 60 s) and simultaneously functioned as an FN for CS-light→noUS relation on the same sessions. On intermixed sessions, saline served as the S^Δ for lever pressing (non-reinforced) and FP, during which the 8-sec light preceded delivery of the food pellet (variable time ITI = 60 s). For the other group (n = 8) nicotine served as the S^Δ (lever pressing non-reinforced) and FP for the CS, with saline serving in the reverse roles. Consecutive brief non-reinforcement tests revealed that: A) rates of lever pressing were significantly greater in S^D than S^Δ with nicotine and saline suggesting strong operant discriminative stimulus control; B) FP responding to the light CS with nicotine and saline was evident; and C) FN suppression of the CR with nicotine was not evident but weak under saline. These data suggest that nicotine can function as an interoceptive context that hierarchically can enter into concurrently opposing modulatory relations in Pavlovian and operant drug discrimination procedures.

The discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine & ethanol with two distinct olfactory contexts in male and female rats

Odor cues and interoceptive cues can combine in promoting drug seeking behavior. Drug discrimination methodology was combined with odor-context conditioning in 8 male and 8 female rats. One drug (nicotine or EtOH) plus odorant (peppermint or anise) compound functioned as setting the occasion for sessions of food-reinforced nose poke responses (i.e., the S^D) that were maintained on a variable interval 30 s schedule (VI-30), whereas the opposite drug (EtOH or nicotine) plus odorant (anise or peppermint) compound predicted intermixed sessions of non-reinforcement of nose poking (i.e., the S^Δ). During brief non-reinforcement tests conducted with each condition there was significantly greater responding under the S^D drug plus odor compound compared to the S^Δ drug plus odor compound. Discriminative control was evident and there was a sex by stimulus role interaction with greater S^Δ responding in females. The odor contexts and drug contexts alone also sustained strong stimulus control but to a lesser extent compared to the full drug-odor compounds. These data suggest configural learning among drug and odor cues.

Configurations of the interoceptive discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol and nicotine with two different exteroceptive contexts in rats: Extinction & recovery

Interoceptive states interact with exteroceptive contexts in modulating operant behavior, which is maintained by its consequences. Evaluating discriminative stimulus control by overlapping interoceptive and exteroceptive configurations (gestalts) and the contribution of each modality may be clinically important for understanding aspects of relapsing behavior (e.g., drug abuse). With rats, the current investigation used a completely counterbalanced one-manipulandum operant drug discrimination procedure that established discriminative stimulus control between nicotine (0.3mg/kg) in one exteroceptive context and EtOH (1.0g/kg) in a differing exteroceptive context. One combined interoceptive-exteroceptive condition occasioned sessions of food reinforcement (S(D)) and the other counterbalanced condition occasioned sessions of non-reinforcement (S(Δ)). Each stimulus modality contributed to discriminative control, but to lesser extents than the combined intero-exteroceptive compound configurations (Experiments 1 & 2). In Experiment 1, responding was extinguished in the interoceptive stimulus conditions alone in a neutral exteroceptive context, but then renewed by reconfiguring the drugs with the exteroceptive contexts, and reversed in the opposing exteroceptive contexts. In Experiment 2, responding was extinguished in the interoceptive and exteroceptive contexts separately. Reconfiguration of the full intero-exteroceptive compound configurations did not promote recovery. These results suggest that interoceptive and exteroceptive discriminative control can be methodologically configured in modulating operant behavior during acquisition, extinction, and recovery of behavior; however, configuring interoceptive and exteroceptive discriminative stimuli do not appear to function as unique cues that differ from each stimulus modality alone. Clinical implications are discussed.

Acquisition, extinction, recovery, and reversal of different response sequences under conditional control by nicotine in rats

Complex voluntary behaviors occur in sequence. Eight rats were trained in an operant procedure that used nicotine and non-drug (saline) states as interoceptive cues that signaled which of two behavioral sequences led to food reward. The distal and proximal responses in the chain were always maintained on variable interval 30-sec and fixed ratio-1 schedules, respectively, and rate differences between the responses were used as the dependent variable. Extinction and reversal training was conducted. Distal response rates were significantly greater than proximal response rates during training, testing, extinction, and reversal learning. These data suggest that (a) nicotine can establish interoceptive control over different response sequences, and (b) extinction of one response sequence may be state-dependent. The clinical relevance of extinction of complex behavioral repertoires such as drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior that are evoked by specific interoceptive cues is addressed in regard to drug abuse treatment and relapse.