Health and social services accessed by a cohort of Canadian illicit opioid users outside of treatment

'I'm on the coast and I'm on methadone': A qualitative study examining access to opioid agonist treatment in rural and coastal British Columbia

INTRODUCTION

Despite rural regions being disproportionately impacted by the toxic drug supply, little is known about the contextual factors influencing access to opioid agonist treatment (OAT) specific to rural residents. The present study examines these factors in a rural and coastal setting in British Columbia, Canada.

METHODS

The qualitative methods were used to examine the barriers and facilitators to OAT access. Between July and October 2021, semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who use drugs who reside in a rural and coastal community. Thematic analysis was used to identify emergent themes and subthemes. Results were corroborated by the research team and a local community advisory board.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (n = 27) participants described both limiting and facilitating factors that influenced OAT accessibility. Access was less challenging when participants' OAT dispensing pharmacy was in close proximity, had extended hours of operation, or when pharmacies provided delivery services. Barriers to OAT access identified by participants included the high cost of transportation, residing or working in remote communities and few local OAT prescribers. A variety of treatment motivations and goals that impacted OAT satisfaction are also highlighted.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patient satisfaction with OAT service access in a rural and coastal setting is multi-factorial and geographic proximity alone does not fully explain OAT accessibility issues in these settings. Accessibility to OAT may be improved through delivery services, expanded OAT prescribing authorisation beyond physician-only regulations, health authorities covering transportation costs and continual assurance that prescribing practices meet individuals' goals.

INTRODUCTION

Bien que les régions rurales soient touchées de manière disproportionnée par l'approvisionnement en drogues toxiques, on sait peu de choses sur les facteurs contextuels qui influencent l'accès au traitement par agoniste opioïde (TAO) spécifique aux résidents ruraux. La présente étude examine ces facteurs dans un contexte rural et côtier en Colombie-Britannique, au Canada.

MTHODES

Des méthodes qualitatives ont été utilisées pour examiner les obstacles et les facilitateurs de l'accès aux TAO. Entre juillet et octobre 2021, des entretiens semi-structurés ont été menés avec des personnes qui consomment des drogues résidant dans une communauté rurale et côtière. L'analyse thématique a été utilisée pour identifier les thèmes et sous-thèmes émergents. Les résultats ont été corroborés par l'équipe de recherche et un comité consultatif communautaire local.

RSULTATS

Vingt-sept (n = 27) participants ont décrit les facteurs limitants et facilitants qui ont influé sur l'accessibilité au TAO. L'accès était moins difficile lorsque la pharmacie du TAO des participants était proche, avait des heures d'ouverture prolongées ou lorsque les pharmacies offraient des services de livraison. Parmi les obstacles à l'accès au TAO mentionnés par les participants, il y avait le coût élevé du transport, le fait de résider ou de travailler dans des collectivités éloignées et la rareté des prescripteurs locaux du TAO. Les participants ont également fait état de divers objectifs et motivations liés au traitement qui ont eu une incidence sur la satisfaction à l'égard du TAO.

CONCLUSION

Cette étude démontre que la satisfaction des patients à l'égard de l'accès aux services du TAO en milieu rural et côtier est multifactorielle et que la proximité géographique n'explique pas à elle seule les problèmes d'accessibilité au TAO dans ces milieux. Cette accessibilité peut être améliorée par des services de livraison, l'élargissement de l'autorisation de prescrire un TAO au-delà des règlements réservés aux médecins, la prise en charge des coûts de transport par les autorités sanitaires et l'assurance continue que les pratiques de prescription répondent aux objectifs des individus.

Frequent emergency department presentations among people who inject drugs: A record linkage study

BACKGROUND

People who inject drugs (PWID) have been described as frequent users of health services such as emergency departments (EDs), however few studies have described demographic factors, patterns of substance use and previous health service use associated with frequent use of EDs in this population.

METHODS

Using a combination of self-reported data from a cohort of PWID and administrative ED data obtained through record linkage, we identified longitudinal factors associated with the use of ED services. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using negative binomial regression to identify exposures associated with both cumulative ED presentations, and logistic regression to identify exposures of frequent ED presentations (defined as three or more annual presentations).

RESULTS

Among 612 PWID, over half (58%) presented to EDs at least once and over a third (36%) presented frequently between January 2008 and June 2013. Frequent and cumulative ED presentations were associated with reporting the main drug of choice as cannabis (AOR:1.42, 95%CI:1.07-1.89 and AIRR:2.96, 95%CI:1.44-6.07 respectively) or methamphetamine (AOR:1.62, 95%CI:1.17-2.2 and AIRR:2.42, 95%CI:1.08-5.46 respectively) compared to heroin, and past month use of mental health (AOR:1.42, 95%CI:1.08-1.85 and AIRR:3.32, 95%CI:1.69-6.53 respectively) and outpatient services (AOR:1.47, 95%CI: 1.00-2.16 and AIRR:0.95, 95%CI 1.52-10.28 respectively).

CONCLUSION

PWID who are frequent users of EDs are likely to have complex health and substance use-related needs. EDs should actively refer people who present with cannabis and methamphetamine dependence to harm reduction services. Harm reduction services should ensure people referred from EDs are screened for co-occurring mental health conditions and receive adequate support.

Exploring levers and barriers to accessing primary care for marginalised groups and identifying their priorities for primary care provision: a participatory learning and action research study

BACKGROUND

The involvement of patients and the public in healthcare has grown significantly in recent decades and is documented in health policy documents internationally. Many benefits of involving these groups in primary care planning have been reported. However, these benefits are rarely felt by those considered marginalised in society and they are often excluded from participating in the process of planning primary care. It has been recommended to employ suitable approaches, such as co-operative and participatory initiatives, to enable marginalised groups to highlight their priorities for care.

METHODS

This Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) research study involved 21 members of various marginalised groups who contributed their views about access to primary care. Using a series of PLA techniques for data generation and co-analysis, we explored barriers and facilitators to primary healthcare access from the perspective of migrants, Irish Travellers, homeless people, drug users, sex workers and people living in deprivation, and identified their priorities for action with regard to primary care provision.

RESULTS

Four overarching themes were identified: the home environment, the effects of the 'two-tier' healthcare system on engagement, healthcare encounters, and the complex health needs of many in those groups. The study demonstrates that there are many complicated personal and structural barriers to accessing primary healthcare for marginalised groups. There were shared and differential experiences across the groups. Participants also expressed shared priorities for action in the planning and running of primary care services.

CONCLUSIONS

Members of marginalised groups have shared priorities for action to improve their access to primary care. If steps are taken to address these, there is scope to impact on more than one marginalised group and to address the existing health inequities.

Using the evaluation process as a lever for improving health and healthcare accessibility: The case of HCV services organization in Quebec

BACKGROUND

The evaluation process can be a lever to improve pathways of access to healthcare. The objective of this article is to show how an evaluation strategy can both contribute to knowledge development and have direct impacts on health services provision. We use the case of hepatitis C (HCV) services organization to illustrate the use and the value of this evaluative approach.

METHOD

Inspired by empowerment evaluation, the transformative-participatory approach involved overlapping phases of knowledge development and discussion with stakeholders. We conducted several knowledge development activities to discern the needs of people with HCV, the resources available, and the facilitators and impediments along the care pathway, starting from prevention and screening, all the way through to treatment. Using an overlapping approach allowed us to regularly transfer acquired knowledge back to the participants in the study settings and also to gather their impressions, interpretations, and suggestions during periods of deliberation.

RESULTS

The knowledge development activities made it possible to document the needs, resources, and experiences of people affected by HCV. In the discussion sessions, viable solutions were identified to improve health and healthcare access for people with HCV and to prioritize certain actions. This project demonstrated that using the evaluation process can enable an instrumental, conceptual use of results and, in fact, can have a transformative impact on services organization.

Housing Status, Medical Care, and Health Outcomes Among People Living With HIV/AIDS: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence suggests responses to HIV that combine individual-level interventions with those that address structural or contextual factors that influence risks and health outcomes of infection. Housing is such a factor. Housing occupies a strategic position as an intermediate structural factor, linking "upstream" economic, social, and cultural determinants to the more immediate physical and social environments in which everyday life is lived. The importance of housing status for HIV prevention and care has been recognized, but much of this attention has focused on homeless individuals as a special risk group. Analyses have less often addressed community housing availability and conditions as factors influencing population health or unstable, inadequate, or unaffordable housing as a situation or temporary state. A focus on individual-level characteristics associated with literal homelessness glosses over social, economic, and policy drivers operating largely outside any specific individual's control that affect housing and residential environments and the health resources or risk exposures such contexts provide.

OBJECTIVES

We examined the available empirical evidence on the association between housing status (broadly defined), medical care, and health outcomes among people with HIV and analyzed results to inform future research, program development, and policy implementation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched 8 electronic health and social science databases from January 1, 1996, through March 31, 2014, using search terms related to housing, dwelling, and living arrangements and HIV and AIDS. We contacted experts for additional literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected articles if they were quantitative analyses published in English, French, or Spanish that included at least 1 measure of housing status as an independent variable and at least 1 health status, health care, treatment adherence, or risk behavior outcome among people with HIV in high-income countries. We defined housing status to include consideration of material or social dimensions of housing adequacy, stability, and security of tenure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality appraisal. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials and a modified version of the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Appraisal Tool for nonintervention studies. In our quality appraisal, we focused on issues of quality for observational studies: appropriate methods for determining exposure and measuring outcomes and methods to control confounding.

RESULTS

Searches yielded 5528 references from which we included 152 studies, representing 139,757 HIV-positive participants. Most studies were conducted in the United States and Canada. Studies examined access and utilization of HIV medical care, adherence to antiretroviral medications, HIV clinical outcomes, other health outcomes, emergency department and inpatient utilization, and sex and drug risk behaviors. With rare exceptions, across studies in all domains, worse housing status was independently associated with worse outcomes, controlling for a range of individual patient and care system characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of stable, secure, adequate housing is a significant barrier to consistent and appropriate HIV medical care, access and adherence to antiretroviral medications, sustained viral suppression, and risk of forward transmission. Studies that examined the history of homelessness or problematic housing years before outcome assessment were least likely to find negative outcomes, homelessness being a potentially modifiable contextual factor. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies indicate an independent effect of housing assistance on improved outcomes for formerly homeless or inadequately housed people with HIV. Housing challenges result from complex interactions between individual vulnerabilities and broader economic, political, and legal structural determinants of health. The broad structural processes sustaining social exclusion and inequality seem beyond the immediate reach of HIV interventions, but changing housing and residential environments is both possible and promising.

Patterns, determinants and barriers of health and social service utilization among young urban crack users in Brazil

Background

Crack use is prevalent across the Americas, and specifically among marginalized urban street drug users in Brazil. Crack users commonly feature multiple physical and mental health problems, while low rates of and distinct barriers to help service use have been observed in these populations. This study examined profiles and determinants of social and health service utilization, and unmet service needs, in a two-city sample of young (18–24 years), marginalized crack users in Brazil.

Methods

N = 160 study participants were recruited by community-based methods from impoverished neighborhoods in the cities of Rio de Janeiro (n = 81) and Salvador (n = 79). A mixed methods protocol was used. Participants’ drug use, health, and social and health service utilization characteristics were assessed by an anonymous interviewer-administered questionnaire completed in a community setting; descriptive statistics on variables of interest were computed. Service needs and barriers were further assessed by way of several focus groups with the study population; narrative data were qualitatively analyzed. The study protocol was approved by institutional ethics review boards; data were collected between November 2010 and June 2011.

Results

The majority of the sample was male, without stable housing, and used other drugs (e.g., alcohol, marijuana). About half the sample reported physical and mental health problems, yet most had not received medical attention for these problems. Only small minorities had utilized locally available social or health services; utilization appeared to be influenced by sex, race and housing characteristics in both sites. Participants cited limited service resources, lack of needs-specific professional skills, bureaucratic barriers and stigma as obstacles to better service access. However, most respondents stated strong interest and need for general social, health and treatment services designed for the study population, for which various key features were emphasized as important.

Conclusions

The study contributes substantive evidence to current discussions about the development and utilization of health and treatment interventions for crack use in Brazil. Based on our data, crack users’ social, service needs are largely unmet; these gaps appear to partly root in systemic barriers of access to existing services, while improved targeted service offers for the target population seem to be needed also.

Factors associated with involuntary admissions among patients with substance use disorders and comorbidity: a cross-sectional study

Background

To investigate factors associated with involuntary admissions to hospital pursuant to a social services act of patients with substance use disorder by comparing the socio-demographic characteristics, substance use, and psychiatric comorbidities with voluntarily admitted patients.

Methods

This cross-sectional study compared two groups admitted to combined substance use disorder and psychiatry wards. Sixty-five patients were involuntarily admitted pursuant to the Social Services Act and 137 were voluntarily admitted. The International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems was used for diagnostic purposes regarding substance use disorders, type and severity of psychiatric problems, and level of functioning. Socio-demographic variables were measured using the European Addiction Severity Index, and the Symptom Checklist-90-R instruments were used to evaluate the range of psychological problems and psychopathological symptoms. Logistic regression was performed to investigate the relationship between involuntary admissions and patients characteristics.

Results

Patients who had been involuntarily admitted were more likely to be females, had utilized public welfare services more often, presented more severe substance use patterns, and had a history of more frequent visits to physicians for somatic complaints in the last 6 months, they also had fewer comorbid mental disorders. Still, considerable burdens of comorbid substance use disorders and mental disorders were observed both among involuntary and voluntary admitted patients.

Conclusions

More attention is required for involuntarily admitted patients in order to meet the needs associated with complex and mixed disorders. In addition, treatment centers should offer diagnostic options and therapy regarding substance use, psychiatric and somatic disorders.

Differences in drug consumption, comorbidity and health service use of opioid addicts across six European urban regions (TREAT-project)

OBJECTIVES

This comparative study investigated consumption patterns, comorbidity and treatment utilization of opioid addicts in six European cities (Athens, Essen, London, Padua, Stockholm, Zurich).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Data were collected by structured face-to-face interviews. The representative sample comprises 599 addicts (100 patients per centre, 99 in London) at the start of a treatment episode.

RESULTS

Patients were dependent on opioids for about 10 years. Regional differences were significant regarding the patients' drug consumption pattern and their method of heroin administration (up to a fourth of the patients in Essen, London and Zurich usually smoke heroin). Concomitant use of benzodiazepines, cannabis and alcohol was common in all regions with the German and English samples showing the highest level of polydrug use. The prevalence of major depression was high in all regions (50%). Stockholm and London patients worry most about their physical health. Differences in the amount of needle sharing and especially in the use of public health service were prominent between the sites. Opioid addiction was a long-term disorder associated with a high burden of comorbidity and social problems in all cities.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study show significant interregional differences of opioid addicts which might require different treatment strategies in European countries to handle the problem.

Accessing care for injection-related infections through a medically supervised injecting facility: a qualitative study

Injection drug users (IDU) experience complex barriers to accessing primary medical care which may result in over reliance on emergency health services. Supervised injecting facilities (SIF) aim to address HIV and overdose risks, as well as improve access to primary medical care among IDU. This study sought to investigate IDU perspectives regarding the impact of SIF on access to care and treatment of injection-related infections. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 50 individuals recruited from a cohort of SIF users known as the Scientific Evaluation of Supervised Injecting (SEOSI). Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and a thematic analysis was conducted. IDU narratives indicate the availability of on-site nursing attention at the SIF facilitated uptake of health services. IDU reported that the facility provided assessment and care of injection-related infections, as well as enhanced access to off-site medical services. The presence of professional nursing personnel within a sanctioned drug consumption setting serves to address social and structural barriers that often impede IDU access to health care. This study emphasizes that the facility enables contact with the healthcare system and thereby helps to facilitate the management of injection-related infections.

When the dragon's awake: a needs assessment of people injecting drugs in a small urban centre

BACKGROUND

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador is one of the smallest Canadian provincial capitals. Like other Canadian coastal communities, St. John's has been affected by dramatic economic and institutional restructuring that negatively impacted community health. Marginalized populations including people who inject drugs are more negatively affected by the gap between health needs and available services.

METHODS

A mixed methods needs assessment began with a survey and key informant and focus group interviews to determine attitudes, knowledge, and practices of people with current or previous experience injecting drugs. An environmental scan of programmes and services was conducted followed by a community consultation with key stakeholders, community agencies, study participants, the media, and members of the public to share and validate findings, solicit feedback, and gather data about future knowledge transfer activities.

RESULTS

This paper examines two of the five barriers to health and health services for people injecting drugs: First, there was a discrepancy amongst people injecting drugs between awareness and use of safer practices, and second, there was a limited formalized network of health and social programmes and services.

CONCLUSION

Accurate and timely information about safer practices, whilst an essential component of a harm reduction approach, is insufficient to reduce the risk of negative health outcomes for people injecting drugs. Funding new programmes and services, although desirable, is not always feasible in small urban centres with limited human and material resources. Recommendations for promoting health, reducing harm, and building local capacity must consider these limitations. Registered nurses are well positioned to provide leadership through collaborative community-based research, education and advocacy.