1
|
Khan MMM, Munir MM, Khalil M, Tsilimigras DI, Woldesenbet S, Endo Y, Katayama E, Rashid Z, Cunningham L, Kaladay M, Pawlik TM. Association of county-level provider density and social vulnerability with colorectal cancer-related mortality. Surgery 2024; 176:44-50. [PMID: 38729889 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care providers play a crucial role in increasing overall awareness, screening, and treatment of cancer, leading to reduced cancer mortality. We sought to characterize the impact of provider density on colorectal cancer population-level mortality. METHODS County-level provider data, obtained from the Area Health Resource File between 2016 and 2018, were used to calculate provider density per county. These data were merged with county-level colorectal cancer mortality 2016-2020 data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multivariable regression was performed to define the association between provider density and colorectal cancer mortality. RESULTS Among 2,863 counties included in the analytic cohort, 1,132 (39.5%) and 1,731 (60.5%) counties were categorized as urban and rural, respectively. The colorectal cancer-related crude mortality rate was higher in counties with low provider density versus counties with moderate or high provider density (low = 22.9, moderate = 21.6, high = 19.3 per 100,000 individuals; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, the odds of colorectal cancer mortality were lower in counties with moderate and high provider density versus counties with low provider density (moderate odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99; high odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.86-0.91). High provider density remained associated with a lower likelihood of colorectal cancer mortality independent of social vulnerability index (low social vulnerability index and high provider density: odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.89; high social vulnerability index and high provider density: odds ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.98). CONCLUSION Regardless of social vulnerability index, high county-level provider density was associated with lower colorectal cancer-related mortality. Efforts to increase access to health care providers may improve health care equity, as well as long-term cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Mujtaba Khalil
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Selamawit Woldesenbet
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Erryk Katayama
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Zayed Rashid
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Lisa Cunningham
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Matthew Kaladay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pokharel R, Lin YS, McFerran E, O'Mahony JF. A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Europe: Have Studies Included Optimal Screening Intensities? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:701-717. [PMID: 37380865 PMCID: PMC10403417 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00819-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the range of strategies analysed in European cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with respect to the screening intervals, age ranges and test cut-offs used to define positivity, to examine how this might influence what strategies are found to be optimal, and compare them with the current screening policies with a focus on the screening interval. METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for peer-reviewed, model-based CEAs of CRC screening. We included studies on average-risk European populations using the guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or faecal immunochemical test (FIT). We adapted Drummond's ten-point checklist to appraise study quality. RESULTS We included 39 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Biennial screening was the most frequently used interval which was analysed in 37 studies. Annual screening was assessed in 13 studies, all of which found it optimally cost-effective. Despite this, 25 of 26 European stool-based programmes use biennial screening. Many CEAs did not vary the age range, but the 14 that did generally found broader ranges optimal. Only 11 studies considered alternative FIT cut-offs, 9 of which found lower cut-offs superior. Conflicts between current policy and CEA evidence are less clear regarding age ranges and cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS The existing CEA evidence indicates that the widely adopted biennial frequency of stool-based testing in Europe is suboptimal. It is likely that many more lives could be saved throughout Europe if programmes could be offered with more intensive annual screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajani Pokharel
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Yi-Shu Lin
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ethna McFerran
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lemmon E, Hanna CR, Hall P, Morris EJA. Health economic studies of colorectal cancer and the contribution of administrative data: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13477. [PMID: 34152043 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several forces are contributing to an increase in the number of people living with and surviving colorectal cancer (CRC). However, due to the lack of available data, little is known about the implications of these forces. In recent years, the use of administrative records to inform research has been increasing. The aim of this paper is to investigate the potential contribution that administrative data could have on the health economic research of CRC. METHODS To achieve this aim, we conducted a systematic review of the health economic CRC literature published in the United Kingdom and Europe within the last decade (2009-2019). RESULTS Thirty-seven relevant studies were identified and divided into economic evaluations, cost of illness studies and cost consequence analyses. CONCLUSIONS The use of administrative data, including cancer registry, screening and hospital records, within the health economic research of CRC is commonplace. However, we found that this data often come from regional databases, which reduces the generalisability of results. Further, administrative data appear less able to contribute towards understanding the wider and indirect costs associated with the disease. We explore several ways in which various sources of administrative data could enhance future research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Lemmon
- Edinburgh Health Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Catherine R Hanna
- CRUK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Peter Hall
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Eva J A Morris
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rebalka IA, Lindinger MI. In vitro Validation Assessment of a Fecal Occult Blood Protein Test for Horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2021; 104:103695. [PMID: 34416989 DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A commercially available equine fecal blood test (FBT) claims to be able to detect the presence of blood proteins (albumin and hemoglobin) in manure. The purpose of this study was to determine the FBT test sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), lower threshold of detection, time to obtain a visual positive result, effect of temperature and result stability in lab and field conditions. The FBT was assessed for its sensitivity and specificity for detecting pure albumin and hemoglobin at two temperatures over a range of concentrations. Time to result was measured for up to 60 minutes. PPV and NPV were assessed by measuring albumin and hemoglobin in manure from 13 pleasure horses over 25 days. Laboratory tests of hemoglobin alone, albumin alone, and hemoglobin and albumin combined were tested over a range of concentrations from 0.0125 ppm to 50 ppm. In the field study, fresh (within 30 minutes) manure was sampled and tested for proteins using the FBT. The FBT was both sensitive and specific to hemoglobin and albumin. The effect of cold temperature on time to a positive result at 15 minutes was not significant. Results were stable for up to 60 minutes. The field study showed evidence that the appearance of blood proteins in manure was intermittent, and that three tests on consecutive days provided a much better PPV and NPV. It is concluded that this FBT had high specificity, sensitivity, PPV, NPV, was equally functional at low and moderate temperatures, provided a rapid (within 15 minutes) and stable (for up to 60 minutes) reading. Its use in the field is simple and effective.
Collapse
|
5
|
Benamouzig R, Barré S, Saurin JC, Leleu H, Vimont A, Taleb S, De Bels F. Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies in high-risk individuals. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211002359. [PMID: 33953799 PMCID: PMC8042553 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211002359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Current guidelines recommend colonoscopy every 3-5 years for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening of individuals with a familial history of CRC. The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of screening alternatives in this population. METHODS Eight screening strategies were compared with no screening: fecal immunochemical test (FIT), Stool DNA and blood-based screening every 2 years, colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography, colon capsules, and sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, and colonoscopy at 45 years followed, if negative, by FIT every 2 years. Screening test and procedures performance were obtained from the literature. A microsimulation model reproducing the natural history of CRC was used to estimate the cost (€2018) and effectiveness [quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)] of each strategy. A lifetime horizon was used. Costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3.5% annually. RESULTS Compared with no screening, colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy at a 30% uptake were the most effective strategy (46.3 and 43.9 QALY/1000). FIT at a 30 µg/g threshold with 30% uptake was only half as effective (25.7 QALY). Colonoscopy was associated with a cost of €484,000 per 1000 individuals whereas sigmoidoscopy and FIT were associated with much lower costs (€123,610 and €66,860). Incremental cost-effectiveness rate for FIT and sigmoidoscopy were €2600/QALY (versus no screening) and €3100/QALY (versus FIT), respectively, whereas it was €150,000/QALY for colonoscopy (versus sigmoidoscopy). With a lower threshold (10 µg/g) and a higher uptake of 45%, FIT was more effective and less costly than colonoscopy at a 30% uptake and was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €4240/QALY versus no screening. CONCLUSION At 30% uptake, current screening is the most effective screening strategy for high-risk individuals but is associated with a high ICER. Sigmoidoscopy and FIT at lower thresholds (10 µg/g) and a higher uptake should be given consideration as cost-effective alternatives. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in high-risk individuals Fecal occult blood testing with an immunochemical test (FIT) is generally considered as the most cost-effective alternative in colorectal cancer screening programs for average risk individuals without family history.Current screening guidelines for high-risk individuals with familial history recommend colonoscopy every 3-5 years.Colonoscopy every 3-5 years for individuals with familial history is the most effective strategy but is associated with a high incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.Compared with colonoscopy, if screening based on FIT is associated with a higher participation rate, it can achieve a similar effectiveness at a lower cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Benamouzig
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Avicenne (AP-HP), Bobigny, France
| | | | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital (Hospices Civils de Lyon), Lyon, France
| | - Henri Leleu
- Public Health Expertise, 157 rue du faubourg saint-Antoine, Paris, 75011, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barré S, Leleu H, Benamouzig R, Saurin JC, Vimont A, Taleb S, De Bels F. Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative colon cancer screening strategies in the context of the French national screening program. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1756284820953364. [PMID: 33014138 PMCID: PMC7509710 DOI: 10.1177/1756284820953364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A nationwide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was set up in France from 2009 for average-risk, asymptomatic people aged 50-74 years based on an immunochemical fecal occult blood test [faecal immunochemical test (FIT)] every 2 years, followed by colonoscopy if positive. The European standard recommends a participation rate of 45% for the program to be cost-effective, yet the latest published rate in France was 34%. The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of screening alternatives taking real-world participation rates into account. METHODS Eight screening strategies were compared, based either on a screening test (Guaiac or FIT testing, blood-based, stool DNA, computed tomography colonography, colon capsules, and sigmoidoscopy) followed by full colonoscopy if positive or direct colonoscopy. A microsimulation model was used to estimate the cost effectiveness associated with each strategy. RESULTS Compared with no screening, FIT was associated with a 14.0 quality-adjusted life year (QALY) increase of €50,520 per 1000 individuals, giving an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3600/QALY. Only stool DNA and blood-based testing were associated with a QALY increase compared with FIT, with stool DNA weakly dominated by blood-based testing, and the latter associated with an ICER of €154,600/QALY compared with FIT. All other strategies were dominated by FIT. CONCLUSION FIT every 2 years appears to be the most cost-effective CRC screening strategy when taking into account a real-world participation rate of 34%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henri Leleu
- Public Health Expertise, 157 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, Paris, 75011, France
| | - R. Benamouzig
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Avicenne (AP-HP), Bobigny, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital (Hospices Civils de Lyon), Lyon, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ran T, Cheng CY, Misselwitz B, Brenner H, Ubels J, Schlander M. Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies-A Systematic Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1969-1981.e15. [PMID: 30659991 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Widespread screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has reduced its incidence and mortality. Previous studies investigated the economic effects of CRC screening. We performed a systematic review to provide up-to-date evidence of the cost effectiveness of CRC screening strategies by answering 3 research questions. METHODS We searched PubMed, National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Social Sciences Citation Index (via the Web of Science), EconLit (American Economic Association) and 3 supplemental databases for original articles published in English from January 2010 through December 2017. All monetary values were converted to US dollars (year 2016). For all research questions, we extracted, or calculated (if necessary), per-person costs and life years (LYs) and/or quality-adjusted LYs, as well as the incremental costs per LY gained or quality-adjusted LY gained compared with the baseline strategy. A cost-saving strategy was defined as one that was less costly and equally or more effective than the baseline strategy. The net monetary benefit approach was used to answer research question 2. RESULTS Our review comprised 33 studies (17 from Europe, 11 from North America, 4 from Asia, and 1 from Australia). Annual and biennial guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests, annual and biennial fecal immunochemical tests, colonoscopy every 10 years, and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years were cost effective (even cost saving in most US models) compared to no screening. In addition, colonoscopy every 10 years was less costly and/or more effective than other common strategies in the United States. Newer strategies such as computed tomographic colonography, every 5 or 10 years, was cost effective compared with no screening. CONCLUSIONS In an updated review, we found that common CRC screening strategies and computed tomographic colonography continued to be cost effective compared to no screening. There were discrepancies among studies from different regions, which could be associated with the model types or model assumptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Ran
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Chih-Yuan Cheng
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Benjamin Misselwitz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jasper Ubels
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Caron M, Lamarre G, Grégoire P, Simonyan D, Laflamme N. The fecal immunochemical test (fit): Selected aspects regarding its effectiveness for colorectal cancer screening in Quebec City. Prev Med Rep 2018; 12:6-11. [PMID: 30116704 PMCID: PMC6082993 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Revised: 07/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS FIT's value has been ascertained across Canada and worldwide, but still needs to be assessed within the province of Quebec. There also remains a gap between formal indications for FIT, and its actual use in clinical practice. This research aims to evaluate some aspects of FIT's effectiveness in our setting, and its application by prescribers. METHODS We retrospectively identified and reviewed all the colonoscopies conducted for a positive FIT in 2014 at 2 hospitals located in Quebec City. RESULTS Five hundred and fifty-nine (559) colonoscopies were reviewed. We obtained PPVs of 6.8% and 46.9% for the detection of CRC and AA, respectively. The PPV for the detection of SCL was higher in men compared to women (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.11-2.20) and among justified FITs compared to unwarranted ones (OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.34-2.63). The PPV for CRC detection was 25.0% in the presence of unexplained iron deficiency anemia and 6.5% when anemia was absent (p = 0.0058). In 49.9% of cases, the prescription of a FIT was inappropriate. CONCLUSION The FIT holds a better PPV for detecting SCL among men and when it is indicated. Anemia is associated with a higher CRC detection rate. Half of the FITs were not initially indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mireille Caron
- Université Laval Faculty of Medicine, Room 4633, 1050, ave de la Médecine, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Gabriel Lamarre
- Université Laval Faculty of Medicine, Room 4633, 1050, ave de la Médecine, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Philippe Grégoire
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, 10, Rue de l'Espinay, Québec, QC G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - David Simonyan
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Center (CRCHUQ), Hôpital Saint-François-d'Assise, Room D1-719C, 10, rue de l'Espinay, Québec, QC G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - Nathalie Laflamme
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Center (CRCHUQ), Hôpital Saint-François-d'Assise, Room D1-719C, 10, rue de l'Espinay, Québec, QC G1L 3L5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith DH, O'Keeffe Rosetti M, Mosen DM, Rosales AG, Keast E, Perrin N, Feldstein AC, Levin TR, Liles EG. Balancing Adherence and Expense: The Cost-Effectiveness of Two-Sample vs One-Sample Fecal Immunochemical Test. Popul Health Manag 2018; 22:83-89. [PMID: 29927702 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2018.0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) causes more than 50,000 deaths each year in the United States but early detection through screening yields survival gains; those diagnosed with early stage disease have a 5-year survival greater than 90%, compared to 12% for those diagnosed with late stage disease. Using data from a large integrated health system, this study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), a common CRC screening tool. A probabilistic decision-analytic model was used to examine the costs and outcomes of positive test results from a 1-FIT regimen compared with a 2-FIT regimen. The authors compared 5 diagnostic cutoffs of hemoglobin concentration for each test (for a total of 10 screening options). The principal outcome from the analysis was the cost per additional advanced neoplasia (AN) detected. The authors also estimated the number of cancers detected and life-years gained from detecting AN. The following costs were included: program management of the screening program, patient identification, FIT kits and their processing, and diagnostic colonoscopy following a positive FIT. Per-person costs ranged from $33 (1-FIT at 150ng/ml) to $92 (2-FIT at 50ng/ml) across screening options. Depending on willingness to pay, the 1-FIT 50 ng/ml and the 2-FIT 50 ng/ml are the dominant strategies with cost-effectiveness of $11,198 and $28,389, respectively, for an additional AN detected. The estimates of cancers avoided per 1000 screens ranged from 1.46 to 4.86, depending on the strategy and the assumptions of AN to cancer progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Smith
- 1 Center for Health Research , Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - David M Mosen
- 1 Center for Health Research , Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - A Gabriela Rosales
- 1 Center for Health Research , Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Erin Keast
- 1 Center for Health Research , Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Nancy Perrin
- 1 Center for Health Research , Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Adrianne C Feldstein
- 1 Center for Health Research , Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.,2 Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest , Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Elizabeth G Liles
- 1 Center for Health Research , Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.,2 Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest , Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lairson DR, Kim J, Byrd T, Salaiz R, Shokar NK. Cost-Effectiveness of Community Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Low-Income Hispanic Population. Health Promot Pract 2017; 19:863-872. [PMID: 29290126 DOI: 10.1177/1524839917750815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among low-income uninsured Hispanics in El Paso, Texas. METHOD Participants 50 to 75 years old who were due for screening, were uninsured, and had a Texas address were randomized to promotora, video, or promotora and video interventions. High-risk participants were offered colonoscopy, while others were offered fecal immunochemical testing. A nonintervention comparison group was recruited from a similar Texas U.S.-Mexico border county. Screening was determined at 6 months postintervention. Resources were tracked prospectively to determine cost. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were assessed with "intention to treat" methods. Uncertainty in the estimates was analyzed with sensitivity analysis and nonparametric bootstrap methods. RESULTS The interventions achieved screening rates of between 75% and 87% compared to 10% in the comparison group. The cost per participant ranged from $72 for group sessions to $93 for individual video sessions with video and promotora. The group video sessions cost $104 per additional person screened. CONCLUSION The CRC screening interventions were effective for increasing CRC screening. Compared to the experience in the control county, the group-based video-only intervention was the most cost-effective CRC screening promotion intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Lairson
- 1 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Junghyun Kim
- 1 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Theresa Byrd
- 2 Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | - Rebekah Salaiz
- 3 Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim M, Kim HJ, Lee IK, Oh ST, Han K. Fecal occult blood test/fecal carcinoembriogenic antigen dual rapid test as a useful tool for colorectal cancer screening. Eur Surg 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-017-0464-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
12
|
Kapidzic A, van Roon AHC, van Leerdam ME, van Vuuren AJ, van Ballegooijen M, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Spijker W, Izelaar K, Hol L, Kuipers EJ. Attendance and diagnostic yield of repeated two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer. Gut 2017; 66:118-123. [PMID: 26370109 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Revised: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited data exist on attendance and additional yield of 2-sample faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) screening during multiple rounds. We therefore conducted a population-based colorectal cancer screening trial comparing attendance and yield of repeated 1-sample and 2-sample FIT screenings. DESIGN Two randomly selected groups of average-risk subjects aged 50-74 years were invited for two rounds of either 1-sample (n=5007) or 2-sample (n=3197) FIT (OC-sensor Micro) screening. The test was considered positive if at least one sample was positive (cut-off 50 ng/mL; 10 µg haemoglobin/g). RESULTS The cumulative attendance rate was similar for repeated 1-sample and 2-sample FIT screenings (1-sample FIT: 68.1%; 2-sample FIT: 67.1%, p=0.368). The positivity rate in the second round was lower for 1-sample FIT (6.2%, 95% CI 5.4% to 7.2%) than for 2-sample FIT (8.4%, 95% CI 7.1% to 9.8%, p=0.007), whereas the detection rate of advanced neoplasia (AN, 1-sample FIT: 1.9%, 95% CI 1.2% to 2.2%; 2-sample FIT: 1.7%, 95% CI 1.2% to 2.5%, p=0.861) and the positive predictive value (1-sample FIT: 32%, 95% CI 24% to 40%; 2-sample FIT: 21%, 95% CI 15% to 29%, p=0.075) did not differ. After two rounds of screening, the cumulative diagnostic yield of AN for 1-sample FIT was 29.3 per 1000 invitees, compared with 34.0 for 2-sample FIT (p=0.241). CONCLUSIONS Using 2-sample FIT instead of 1-sample FIT does not result in a higher detection rate of AN in the second round of repeated FIT screening. Furthermore, both strategies lead to a similar yield of AN over two rounds. These findings imply that 1-sample FIT screening is preferred over 2-sample FIT screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atija Kapidzic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aafke H C van Roon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfert Spijker
- Regional Organization for Population Screening South-West Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Izelaar
- Regional Organization for Population Screening South-West Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cai SR, Zhu HH, Huang YQ, Li QL, Ma XY, Zhang SZ, Zheng S. Cost-Effectiveness between Double and Single Fecal Immunochemical Test(s) in a Mass Colorectal Cancer Screening. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:6830713. [PMID: 27144171 PMCID: PMC4838800 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6830713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2015] [Revised: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated the cost-effectiveness between double and single Fecal Immunochemical Test(s) (FIT) in a mass CRC screening. A two-stage sequential screening was conducted. FIT was used as a primary screening test and recommended twice by an interval of one week at the first screening stage. We defined the first-time FIT as FIT1 and the second-time FIT as FIT2. If either FIT1 or FIT2 was positive (+), then a colonoscopy was recommended at the second stage. Costs were recorded and analyzed. A total of 24,419 participants completed either FIT1 or FIT2. The detection rate of advanced neoplasm was 19.2% among both FIT1+ and FIT2+, especially high among men with age ≥55 (27.4%). About 15.4% CRC, 18.9% advanced neoplasm, and 29.9% adenoma missed by FIT1 were detected by FIT2 alone. Average cost was $2,935 for double FITs and $2,121 for FIT1 to detect each CRC and $901 for double FITs and $680 for FIT1 to detect each advanced neoplasm. Double FITs are overall more cost-effective, having significantly higher positive and detection rates with an acceptable higher cost, than single FIT. Double FITs should be encouraged for the first screening in a mass CRC screening, especially in economically and medically underserved populations/areas/countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan-Rong Cai
- Cancer Institute, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Science, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
| | - Hong-Hong Zhu
- Preventive Medicine Institute, Louisiana, MO 63353, USA
| | - Yan-Qin Huang
- Cancer Institute, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Science, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
| | - Qi-Long Li
- Institute of Oncology Prevention and Treatment, Jiashan, Zhejiang 314100, China
| | - Xin-Yuan Ma
- Institute of Oncology Prevention and Treatment, Jiashan, Zhejiang 314100, China
| | - Su-Zhan Zhang
- Cancer Institute, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Science, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
| | - Shu Zheng
- Cancer Institute, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Science, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lyons BL, Korsten MA, Spungen AM, Radulovic M, Rosman AS, Hunt K, Galea MD, Kornfeld SD, Yen C, Bauman WA. Comparison between pulsed irrigation enhanced evacuation and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for bowel preparation prior to elective colonoscopy in veterans with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2015; 38:805-11. [PMID: 25096918 PMCID: PMC4725814 DOI: 10.1179/2045772314y.0000000256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor preparation for elective colonoscopy is common in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). This unsatisfactory outcome is likely due to long-standing difficulty with evacuation and decreased colonic motility. Our objective was to determine the most effective preparation for elective colonoscopy applying a novel and traditional approach to bowel cleansing. METHODS Twenty-four subjects with SCI were consented and scheduled to receive one of the two possible arms: pulsed irrigation enhanced evacuation (PIEE) or polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution (PEG; CoLyte(®)). The quality of the preparation was scored during the colonoscopy by applying the Ottawa scoring system. RESULTS Patients with SCI who received PIEE tended to have lower Ottawa scores and a higher percentage of acceptable preparations than did those who received PEG; however, the results were not statistically different. CONCLUSION In this preliminary study in subjects with SCI, neither PIEE nor PEG produced acceptable bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy. Future studies should confirm our findings and consider studying alternative, more efficacious approaches to bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopic procedures in patients with SCI, which should provide better outcomes. Registration number for clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00745095.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian L. Lyons
- National Center of Excellence for the Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Correspondence to: Brian Lyons, National Center of Excellence for the Medical Consequences of SCI, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Rm 7A-13, 130 West Kingsbridge Road, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Christina Yen
- National Center of Excellence for the Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roperch JP, Benzekri K, Mansour H, Incitti R. Improved amplification efficiency on stool samples by addition of spermidine and its use for non-invasive detection of colorectal cancer. BMC Biotechnol 2015; 15:41. [PMID: 26022272 PMCID: PMC4446959 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-015-0148-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2014] [Accepted: 04/22/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Using quantitative methylation-specific PCR (QM-MSP) is a promising method for colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis from stool samples. Difficulty in eliminating PCR inhibitors of this body fluid has been extensively reported. Here, spermidine is presented as PCR facilitator for the detection of stool DNA methylation biomarkers using QM-MSP. We examined its effectiveness with NPY, PENK and WIF1, three biomarkers which we have previously shown to be of relevance to CRC. Results We determined an optimal window for the amplification of the albumin (Alb) gene (100 ng of bisulfite-treated stool DNA added of 1 mM spermidine) at which we report that spermidine acts as a PCR facilitator (AE = 1680%) for SG RT-PCR. We show that the amplification of methylated PENK, NPY and WIF1 is considerably facilitated by QM-MSP as measured by an increase of CMI (Cumulative Methylation Index, i.e. the sum of the three methylation values) by a factor of 1.5 to 23 fold in individual samples, and of 10 fold in a pool of five samples. Conclusions We contend that spermidine greatly reduces the problems of PCR inhibition in stool samples. This observed feature, after validation on a larger sampling, could be used in the development of stool-based CRC diagnosis tests. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12896-015-0148-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pierre Roperch
- Profilome, Paris Biotech 24 rue du Faubourg St Jacques, Paris, 75014, France. .,OncoDiag, Agoranov 96 Bis, Boulevard Raspail, Paris, 75006, France.
| | - Karim Benzekri
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC), Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.
| | - Hicham Mansour
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Bioscience Core Laboratory Research Department, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Roberto Incitti
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Computational Biology Research Center, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Amiot A, Mansour H, Baumgaertner I, Delchier JC, Tournigand C, Furet JP, Carrau JP, Canoui-Poitrine F, Sobhani I. The detection of the methylated Wif-1 gene is more accurate than a fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening. PLoS One 2014; 9:e99233. [PMID: 25025467 PMCID: PMC4099003 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2014] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical benefit of guaiac fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) is now well established for colorectal cancer screening. Growing evidence has demonstrated that epigenetic modifications and fecal microbiota changes, also known as dysbiosis, are associated with CRC pathogenesis and might be used as surrogate markers of CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study that included all consecutive subjects that were referred (from 2003 to 2007) for screening colonoscopies. Prior to colonoscopy, effluents (fresh stools, sera-S and urine-U) were harvested and FOBTs performed. Methylation levels were measured in stools, S and U for 3 genes (Wif1, ALX-4, and Vimentin) selected from a panel of 63 genes; Kras mutations and seven dominant and subdominant bacterial populations in stools were quantified. Calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square, and discrimination was determined by calculating the C-statistic (Area Under Curve) and Net Reclassification Improvement index. RESULTS There were 247 individuals (mean age 60.8±12.4 years, 52% of males) in the study group, and 90 (36%) of these individuals were patients with advanced polyps or invasive adenocarcinomas. A multivariate model adjusted for age and FOBT led to a C-statistic of 0.83 [0.77-0.88]. After supplementary sequential (one-by-one) adjustment, Wif-1 methylation (S or U) and fecal microbiota dysbiosis led to increases of the C-statistic to 0.90 [0.84-0.94] (p = 0.02) and 0.81 [0.74-0.86] (p = 0.49), respectively. When adjusted jointly for FOBT and Wif-1 methylation or fecal microbiota dysbiosis, the increase of the C-statistic was even more significant (0.91 and 0.85, p<0.001 and p = 0.10, respectively). CONCLUSION The detection of methylated Wif-1 in either S or U has a higher performance accuracy compared to guaiac FOBT for advanced colorectal neoplasia screening. Conversely, fecal microbiota dysbiosis detection was not more accurate. Blood and urine testing could be used in those individuals reluctant to undergo stool testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelien Amiot
- Department of Gastroenterology, APHP, Henri-Mondor hospital, Créteil, France
- University of Paris Est Creteil, Créteil, France
- Laboratoire d'Investigation Clinique EA 4393 EC2M3, Créteil, France
| | - Hicham Mansour
- Laboratoire d'Investigation Clinique EA 4393 EC2M3, Créteil, France
- Bioscience Core Laboratories, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Jean-Charles Delchier
- Department of Gastroenterology, APHP, Henri-Mondor hospital, Créteil, France
- University of Paris Est Creteil, Créteil, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- University of Paris Est Creteil, Créteil, France
- Department of Oncology, APHP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Furet
- Commensals and Probiotics-Host Interactions Laboratory, INRA, MICALIS Institute, Jouy en Josas, France
| | | | - Florence Canoui-Poitrine
- University of Paris Est Creteil, Créteil, France
- Laboratoire d'Investigation Clinique EA 4393 EC2M3, Créteil, France
- Department of Public Health, APHP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Iradj Sobhani
- Department of Gastroenterology, APHP, Henri-Mondor hospital, Créteil, France
- University of Paris Est Creteil, Créteil, France
- Laboratoire d'Investigation Clinique EA 4393 EC2M3, Créteil, France
- * E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lejeune C, Le Gleut K, Cottet V, Galimard C, Durand G, Dancourt V, Faivre J. The cost-effectiveness of immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening. Dig Liver Dis 2014; 46:76-81. [PMID: 24012177 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2013] [Revised: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 07/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal immunochemical test to use for generalised mass screening is still under debate in France. AIM To compare the cost and effectiveness in biennial screening for colorectal cancer of fifteen strategies consisting of the three-stool sample un-rehydrated guaiac faecal occult blood test and three immunochemical tests: Magstream, FOB-Gold and OC-Sensor, at different positivity cut-off levels and stool-sample collection. METHODS A Markov model was used to compare these strategies in a general population of 100,000 individuals aged 50-74 over a 20-year period. RESULTS Immunochemical tests were efficient strategies compared with guaiac faecal occult blood test. When all 15 strategies were compared with each other, only five of them remained efficient: the one- and two-stool sample Magstream, the one- and two-stool sample FOB-Gold with the 176 ng/mL cut-off, and the two-stool sample OC-Sensor with the 150 ng/mL cut-off. Sensitivity analyses showed that, at an identical price, the one-stool sample OC-Sensor was the most efficient strategy, and outperformed FOB-Gold. CONCLUSION One-stool immunochemical testing can be considered a promising alternative to the guaiac faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer mass screening in the general population. Competition between manufacturers should now be introduced to reduce purchase price differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vanessa Cottet
- INSERM U 866, Burgundy University, Dijon Cedex, France; Burgundy Registry of Digestive Cancer, INSERM U 866, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Vincent Dancourt
- INSERM U 866, Burgundy University, Dijon Cedex, France; Burgundy Registry of Digestive Cancer, INSERM U 866, Dijon, France
| | - Jean Faivre
- INSERM U 866, Burgundy University, Dijon Cedex, France; Burgundy Registry of Digestive Cancer, INSERM U 866, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Aberrant methylation of NPY, PENK, and WIF1 as a promising marker for blood-based diagnosis of colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:566. [PMID: 24289328 PMCID: PMC4219483 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2013] [Accepted: 11/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background DNA methylation is a well-known epigenetic mechanism involved in epigenetic gene regulation. Several genes were reported hypermethylated in CRC, althought no gene marker was proven to be individually of sufficient sensitivity or specificity in routine clinical practice. Here, we identified novel epigenetic markers and assessed their combined use for diagnostic accuracy. Methods We used methylation arrays on samples from several effluents to characterize methylation profiles in CRC samples and controls, as established by colonoscopy and pathology findings, and selected two differentially methylated candidate epigenetic genes (NPY, PENK). To this gene panel we added WIF, on the basis of being reported in literature as silenced by promoter hypermethylation in several cancers, including CRC. We measured their methylation degrees by quantitative multiplex-methylation specific PCR (QM-MSP) on 15 paired carcinomas and adjacent non-cancerous colorectal tissues and we subsequently performed a clinical validation on two different series of 266 serums, subdivided in 32 CRC, 26 polyps, 47 other cancers and 161 with normal colonoscopy. We assessed the results by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), using cumulative methylation index (CMI) as variable threshold. Results We obtained CRC detection on tissues with both sensitivity and specificity of 100%. On serum CRC samples, we obtained sensitivity/specificity values of, e.g., 87%/80%, 78%/90% and 59%/95%, and negative predictive value/positive predictive value figures of 97%/47%, 95%/61% and 92%/70%. On serum samples from other cancers we obtained sensitivity/specificity of, e.g, 89%/25%, 43%/80% and 28%/91%. Conclusions We showed the potential of NPY, PENK, and WIF1 as combined epigenetic markers for CRC diagnosis, both in tissue and serum and tested their use as serum biomarkers in other cancers. We optimized a QM-MSP for simultaneously quantifying their methylation levels. Our assay can be an effective blood test for patients where CRC risk is present but difficult to assess (e.g. mild symptoms with no CRC family history) and who would therefore not necessarily choose to go for further examination. This panel of markers, if validated, can also be a cost effective screening tool for the detection of asymptomatic cancer patients for colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
19
|
Cruzado J, Sánchez FI, Abellán JM, Pérez-Riquelme F, Carballo F. Economic evaluation of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 27:867-80. [PMID: 24182607 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2013] [Revised: 09/15/2013] [Accepted: 09/17/2013] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Because of its incidence and mortality colorectal cancer represents a serious public health issue in industrial countries. In order to reduce its social impact a number of screening strategies have been implemented, which allow an early diagnosis and treatment. These basically include faecal tests and studies that directly explore the colon and rectum. No strategy, whether alone or combined, has proven definitively more effective than the rest, but any such strategy is better than no screening at all. Selecting the most efficient strategy for inclusion in a population-wide program is an uncertain choice. Here we review the evidence available on the various economic evaluations, and conclude that no single method has been clearly identified as most cost-effective; further research in this setting is needed once common economic evaluation standards are established in order to alleviate the methodological heterogeneity prevailing in study results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Cruzado
- Colorectal Cancer Prevention Program for Región de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cha JM, Lee JI, Joo KR, Shin HP, Jeun JW, Lim JU. Use of a low cut-off value for the fecal immunochemical test enables better detection of proximal neoplasia. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58:3256-62. [PMID: 23912251 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2819-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2013] [Accepted: 07/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advantage of the quantitative fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is the flexibility to set the positivity threshold. However, the diagnostic success of the FIT has not been compared for standard and low cut-off thresholds. AIMS The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic success of FIT for standard and low cut-off thresholds. METHODS In 2009 and 2010 a standard cut-off threshold (20 μg Hb/g feces) was used as positivity criterion for the FIT; in 2012 a low cut-off (10 μg Hb/g feces) was used. Diagnostic success was compared between the two groups. RESULTS Of the total of 14,289 participants, 195 (1.4 %) had positive FIT results. Positivity of the FIT was significantly higher in the low cut-off group than in the standard cut-off group (1.8 vs. 1.0 %, p = 0.000). Although detection of advanced neoplasia lesions was comparable, proximal neoplasia was more frequently detected in the low cut-off group (33.3 vs. 20.9 %, p = 0.016). With the low cut-off threshold, 39 (0.7 %) participants were also classified as having positive results, and 18 (46.2 %) of these had colorectal neoplasias. The number of positive results from the FIT was increased by 54.9 %, and detection of advanced neoplasia was increased by 60 % with the low cut-off threshold compared with the standard cut-off. CONCLUSIONS A low cut-off threshold for the FIT resulted in better detection of proximal neoplasia in population-based screening. These results indicate the cut-off threshold for positive FIT should be properly chosen and adjusted in colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Myung Cha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, 149 Sangil-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-727, South Korea,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hogan NM, Joyce MR, Kerin MJ. miRNAs as colorectal cancer biomarkers: current progress and future challenges. COLORECTAL CANCER 2013. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.13.46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY Colorectal cancer is a common pathology, accounting for approximately 8% of cancer deaths. The induction of a metastatic cascade heralds a potentially devastating end point with limited curative therapeutic options and early detection is, therefore, crucial. Novel diagnostic and predictive biomarkers are urgently required as current candidates lack sensitivity and specificity, particularly in the context of early disease. miRNAs are a group of short noncoding RNAs which regulate gene expression at a post-transcriptional level and have recently been shown to hold promise as fecal, circulating or tissue biomarkers. This review explores current progress and future challenges in this rapidly expanding field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh M Hogan
- Department of Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland
| | - Myles R Joyce
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland
| | - Michael J Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jeong KE, Cairns JA. Review of economic evidence in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2013; 3:20. [PMID: 24229442 PMCID: PMC3847082 DOI: 10.1186/2191-1991-3-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2013] [Accepted: 08/23/2013] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
This paper aims to systematically review the cost-effectiveness evidence, and to provide a critical appraisal of the methods used in the model-based economic evaluation of CRC screening and subsequent surveillance. A search strategy was developed to capture relevant evidence published 1999-November 2012. Databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, National Health Service Economic Evaluation (NHS EED), EconLit, and HTA. Full economic evaluations that considered costs and health outcomes of relevant intervention were included. Sixty-eight studies which used either cohort simulation or individual-level simulation were included. Follow-up strategies were mostly embedded in the screening model. Approximately 195 comparisons were made across different modalities; however, strategies modelled were often simplified due to insufficient evidence and comparators chosen insufficiently reflected current practice/recommendations. Studies used up-to-date evidence on the diagnostic test performance combined with outdated information on CRC treatments. Quality of life relating to follow-up surveillance is rare. Quality of life relating to CRC disease states was largely taken from a single study. Some studies omitted to say how identified adenomas or CRC were managed. Besides deterministic sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was undertaken in some studies, but the distributions used for PSA were rarely reported or justified. The cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies among people with confirmed adenomas are warranted in aiding evidence-informed decision making in response to the rapidly evolving technologies and rising expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim E Jeong
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom
| | - John A Cairns
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sobhani I, Amiot A, Le Baleur Y, Levy M, Auriault ML, Van Nhieu JT, Delchier JC. Microbial dysbiosis and colon carcinogenesis: could colon cancer be considered a bacteria-related disease? Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2013. [PMID: 23634186 DOI: 10.1177/1756283x1247367410.1177_1756283x12473674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is posing an increasingly important burden on the health care system, with western countries seeing a growing incidence of the disease. Except for germline DNA mutations which have been attributed to less than 5% of patients, little is known about the main causes of CRC. However, environment factors such as food, lifestyle and medication are now suspected to have a major influence on inducing cancers. Today, exhaustive quantitative and qualitative evaluation of all environmental factors is not possible. Various environment-induced diseases have been characterized based on colon microflora, also called microbiota, analyses. Growing data have shown specific changes in microflora (i.e. dysbiosis) in the stools of patients with colon cancer or those adherent to the colonic mucosa. Thus, it appears that microbiota may be considered a platform offering host and environment interactions for studying CRCs. The hypothesis that colon cancer might be a bacteria-related disease is suggested and perspectives are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iradj Sobhani
- APHP-UPEC Paris12, 51 Av Mal deLattre de Tassigny, Créteil 94010, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sobhani I, Amiot A, Le Baleur Y, Levy M, Auriault ML, Van Nhieu JT, Delchier JC. Microbial dysbiosis and colon carcinogenesis: could colon cancer be considered a bacteria-related disease? Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2013; 6:215-29. [PMID: 23634186 PMCID: PMC3625019 DOI: 10.1177/1756283x12473674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is posing an increasingly important burden on the health care system, with western countries seeing a growing incidence of the disease. Except for germline DNA mutations which have been attributed to less than 5% of patients, little is known about the main causes of CRC. However, environment factors such as food, lifestyle and medication are now suspected to have a major influence on inducing cancers. Today, exhaustive quantitative and qualitative evaluation of all environmental factors is not possible. Various environment-induced diseases have been characterized based on colon microflora, also called microbiota, analyses. Growing data have shown specific changes in microflora (i.e. dysbiosis) in the stools of patients with colon cancer or those adherent to the colonic mucosa. Thus, it appears that microbiota may be considered a platform offering host and environment interactions for studying CRCs. The hypothesis that colon cancer might be a bacteria-related disease is suggested and perspectives are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iradj Sobhani
- APHP-UPEC Paris12, 51 Av Mal deLattre de Tassigny, Créteil 94010, France
| | - Aurelien Amiot
- Gastroenterology Unit, Albert Chenevier-Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, UPEC, Université Paris 12, Paris, France
| | - Yann Le Baleur
- Gastroenterology Unit, Albert Chenevier-Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, UPEC, Université Paris 12, Paris, France
| | - Michael Levy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Albert Chenevier-Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, UPEC, Université Paris 12, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Luce Auriault
- Department of Pathology, Albert Chenevier-Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, UPEC, Université Paris 12, Paris, France
| | - Jeanne Tran Van Nhieu
- Department of Pathology, Albert Chenevier-Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, UPEC, Université Paris 12, Paris, France
| | - Jean Charles Delchier
- Gastroenterology Unit, Albert Chenevier-Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, UPEC, Université Paris 12, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mosli MH, Al-Ahwal MS. Colorectal cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: need for screening. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 13:3809-13. [PMID: 23098475 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.8.3809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health problem in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Our aim was to characterize the epidemiology of CRC in the Saudi population. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective analysis of all cases of CRC recorded in the Saudi Cancer Registry (SCR) between January 2001 and December 2006 amongst Saudi citizens in KSA. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were retrieved from the database of the SCR. Descriptive statistics was performed using SPSS. RESULTS A total of 4,201 cases of CRC were registered in the SCR. The incidence of CRC increased between 2001 and 2006. The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis was 58 years; most patients were above 45 years of age (n=3322; 79.1%). At the time of diagnosis, 977 patients (23.0%) presented with localized disease and 1,018 (24.0%) had distant metastasis. The most frequent pathological variant was adenocarcinoma (73%), with grade 2 (moderately differentiated) being the most common grade among all variants (61%). For all cancer grades, the frequency of CRC was significantly higher among patients >45 years (P=0.004), who presented with more advanced disease (stages III and IV) (P=0.012). Based on logistic regression, age >45 years was associated with advanced regional presentation (P=0.001). Tumor grade was associated with advanced regional presentation and metastasis. CONCLUSION There was an increase in the incidence of CRC between 2001 and 2006. The age at the time of diagnosis was low when compared with reports from developed countries. A nationwide approach is needed to encourage and illustrate the importance of screening programs.
Collapse
|
26
|
Gonzalez-Tallon AI, Vasquez-Guerrero J, Garcia-Mayor MA. Colonic Metastases From Lung Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Gastroenterology Res 2013; 6:29-33. [PMID: 27785223 PMCID: PMC5051117 DOI: 10.4021/gr518e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer death in the world. Although about 50% of lung cancers have distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, gastrointestinal metastasis has rarely been described. The most common metastatic site is the small bowel, whereas, colonic metastases are very rare. This report presents a clinical case of a 68-year-old male with a previous diagnosis of non-microcytic lung carcinoma (T4, N2, M1), stage IV, who presented rectorrhagia at the emergency. Colonoscopy showed many ulcerated tumors along the colon and histology proved that these lesions were metastases of primitive lung carcinoma. Gut metastasis from the lung is uncommon but we have to be aware of it in patients who present gastrointestinal symptoms.
Collapse
|
27
|
Faivre J, Dancourt V, Lejeune C. Screening for colorectal cancer with immunochemical faecal occult blood tests. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44:967-73. [PMID: 22898146 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2012] [Accepted: 07/05/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Population-based studies have shown that guaiac faecal occult blood testing followed by colonoscopy in case of positivity can reduce colorectal cancer mortality. However these tests have been criticised for their fairly low sensitivity. For this reason attention has been given to alternative tests. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence for screening for colorectal cancer using qualitative immunochemical faecal occult blood tests. For the complete range of tested cut-off values, immunochemical faecal occult blood tests lead to higher diagnostic yield, improved sensitivity and greater participation. The optimal number of samples and the optimal cut-off value has to suit local resources and the acceptability of missed cancers. All economic evaluations, despite some differences between studies, add further arguments to support the opinion that the immunochemical faecal occult blood test is currently the most cost-effective screening test for average-risk populations. These economic evaluations provide strong arguments in favour of the 1-sample strategy. With decreasing the cut-off value similar performances can be achieved with one-compared to two day sampling. Too few data are currently available to accurately compare existing qualitative tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Faivre
- Burgundy Digestive Cancer Registry, INSERM U866, University of Burgundy, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon Cedex, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
New Era for Stool Screening Tests: Fecal Immunochemical Tests, DNA, and Beyond. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-011-0111-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|