Rapid evolution of a young L1 (LINE-1) clade in recently speciated Rattus taxa

SCIFER: approach for analysis of LINE-1 mRNA expression in single cells at a single locus resolution

BACKGROUND

Endogenous expression of L1 mRNA is the first step in an L1-initiated mutagenesis event. However, the contribution of individual cell types to patterns of organ-specific L1 mRNA expression remains poorly understood, especially at single-locus resolution. We introduce a method to quantify expression of mobile elements at the single-locus resolution in scRNA-Seq datasets called Single Cell Implementation to Find Expressed Retrotransposons (SCIFER). SCIFER aligns scRNA-Seq reads uniquely to the genome and extracts alignments from single cells by cell-specific barcodes. In contrast to the alignment performed using default parameters, this alignment strategy increases accuracy of L1 locus identification by retaining only reads that are uniquely mapped to individual L1 loci. L1 loci expressed in single cells are unambiguously identified using a list of L1 loci manually validated to be expressed in bulk RNA-Seq datasets generated from the same cell line or organ.

RESULTS

Validation of SCIFER using MCF7 cells determined technical parameters needed for optimal detection of L1 expression in single cells. We show that unsupervised analysis of L1 expression in single cells exponentially inflates both the levels of L1 expression and the number of expressed L1 loci. Application of SCIFER to analysis of scRNA-Seq datasets generated from mouse and human testes identified that mouse Round Spermatids and human Spermatogonia, Spermatocytes, and Round Spermatids express the highest levels of L1 mRNA. Our analysis also determined that similar to mice, human testes from unrelated individuals share as much as 80% of expressed L1 loci. Additionally, SCIFER determined that individual mouse cells co-express different L1 sub-families and different families of transposable elements, experimentally validating their co-existence in the same cell.

CONCLUSIONS

SCIFER detects mRNA expression of individual L1 loci in single cells. It is compatible with scRNA-Seq datasets prepared using traditional sequencing methods. Validated using a human cancer cell line, SCIFER analysis of mouse and human testes identified key cell types supporting L1 expression in these species. This will further our understanding of differences and similarities in endogenous L1 mRNA expression patterns in mice and humans.

Subfamily-specific differential contribution of individual monomers and the tether sequence to mouse L1 promoter activity

BACKGROUND

The internal promoter in L1 5'UTR is critical for autonomous L1 transcription and initiating retrotransposition. Unlike the human genome, which features one contemporarily active subfamily, four subfamilies (A_I, Gf_I and Tf_I/II) have been amplifying in the mouse genome in the last one million years. Moreover, mouse L1 5'UTRs are organized into tandem repeats called monomers, which are separated from ORF1 by a tether domain. In this study, we aim to compare promoter activities across young mouse L1 subfamilies and investigate the contribution of individual monomers and the tether sequence.

RESULTS

We observed an inverse relationship between subfamily age and the average number of monomers among evolutionarily young mouse L1 subfamilies. The youngest subgroup (A_I and Tf_I/II) on average carry 3-4 monomers in the 5'UTR. Using a single-vector dual-luciferase reporter assay, we compared promoter activities across six L1 subfamilies (A_I/II, Gf_I and Tf_I/II/III) and established their antisense promoter activities in a mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line and a mouse embryonal carcinoma cell line. Using consensus promoter sequences for three subfamilies (A_I, Gf_I and Tf_I), we dissected the differential roles of individual monomers and the tether domain in L1 promoter activity. We validated that, across multiple subfamilies, the second monomer consistently enhances the overall promoter activity. For individual promoter components, monomer 2 is consistently more active than the corresponding monomer 1 and/or the tether for each subfamily. Importantly, we revealed intricate interactions between monomer 2, monomer 1 and tether domains in a subfamily-specific manner. Furthermore, using three-monomer 5'UTRs, we established a complex nonlinear relationship between the length of the outmost monomer and the overall promoter activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The laboratory mouse is an important mammalian model system for human diseases as well as L1 biology. Our study extends previous findings and represents an important step toward a better understanding of the molecular mechanism controlling mouse L1 transcription as well as L1's impact on development and disease.

Organ-, sex- and age-dependent patterns of endogenous L1 mRNA expression at a single locus resolution

Expression of L1 mRNA, the first step in the L1 copy-and-paste amplification cycle, is a prerequisite for L1-associated genomic instability. We used a reported stringent bioinformatics method to parse L1 mRNA transcripts and measure the level of L1 mRNA expressed in mouse and rat organs at a locus-specific resolution. This analysis determined that mRNA expression of L1 loci in rodents exhibits striking organ specificity with less than 0.8% of loci shared between organs of the same organism. This organ specificity in L1 mRNA expression is preserved in male and female mice and across age groups. We discovered notable differences in L1 mRNA expression between sexes with only 5% of expressed L1 loci shared between male and female mice. Moreover, we report that the levels of total L1 mRNA expression and the number and spectrum of expressed L1 loci fluctuate with age as independent variables, demonstrating different patterns in different organs and sexes. Overall, our comparisons between organs and sexes and across ages ranging from 2 to 22 months establish previously unforeseen dynamic changes in L1 mRNA expression in vivo. These findings establish the beginning of an atlas of endogenous L1 mRNA expression across a broad range of biological variables that will guide future studies.

Cryptic genetic variation enhances primate L1 retrotransposon survival by enlarging the functional coiled coil sequence space of ORF1p

Accounting for continual evolution of deleterious L1 retrotransposon families, which can contain hundreds to thousands of members remains a major issue in mammalian biology. L1 activity generated upwards of 40% of some mammalian genomes, including humans where they remain active, causing genetic defects and rearrangements. L1 encodes a coiled coil-containing protein that is essential for retrotransposition, and the emergence of novel primate L1 families has been correlated with episodes of extensive amino acid substitutions in the coiled coil. These results were interpreted as an adaptive response to maintain L1 activity, however its mechanism remained unknown. Although an adventitious mutation can inactivate coiled coil function, its effect could be buffered by epistatic interactions within the coiled coil, made more likely if the family contains a diverse set of coiled coil sequences-collectively referred to as the coiled coil sequence space. Amino acid substitutions that do not affect coiled coil function (i.e., its phenotype) could be "hidden" from (not subject to) purifying selection. The accumulation of such substitutions, often referred to as cryptic genetic variation, has been documented in various proteins. Here we report that this phenomenon was in effect during the latest episode of primate coiled coil evolution, which occurred 30-10 MYA during the emergence of primate L1Pa7-L1Pa3 families. First, we experimentally demonstrated that while coiled coil function (measured by retrotransposition) can be eliminated by single epistatic mutations, it nonetheless can also withstand extensive amino acid substitutions. Second, principal component and cluster analysis showed that the coiled coil sequence space of each of the L1Pa7-3 families was notably increased by the presence of distinct, coexisting coiled coil sequences. Thus, sampling related networks of functional sequences rather than traversing discrete adaptive states characterized the persistence L1 activity during this evolutionary event.

Contrasted patterns of evolution of the LINE-1 retrotransposon in perissodactyls: the history of a LINE-1 extinction

Background

LINE-1 (L1) is the dominant autonomously replicating non-LTR retrotransposon in mammals. Although our knowledge of L1 evolution across the tree of life has considerably improved in recent years, what we know of L1 evolution in mammals is biased and comes mostly from studies in primates (mostly human) and rodents (mostly mouse). It is unclear if patterns of evolution that are shared between those two groups apply to other mammalian orders. Here we performed a detailed study on the evolution of L1 in perissodactyls by making use of the complete genome of the domestic horse and of the white rhinoceros. This mammalian order offers an excellent model to study the extinction of L1 since the rhinoceros is one of the few mammalian species to have lost active L1.

Results

We found that multiple L1 lineages, carrying different 5’UTRs, have been simultaneously active during the evolution of perissodactyls. We also found that L1 has continuously amplified and diversified in horse. In rhinoceros, L1 was very prolific early on. Two successful families were simultaneously active until ~20my ago but became extinct suddenly at exactly the same time.

Conclusions

The general pattern of L1 evolution in perissodactyls is very similar to what was previously described in mouse and human, suggesting some commonalities in the way mammalian genomes interact with L1. We confirmed the extinction of L1 in rhinoceros and we discuss several possible mechanisms.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13100-018-0117-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Revisiting the evolution of mouse LINE-1 in the genomic era

Background

LINE-1 (L1) is the dominant category of transposable elements in placental mammals. L1 has significantly affected the size and structure of all mammalian genomes and understanding the nature of the interactions between L1 and its mammalian host remains a question of crucial importance in comparative genomics. For this reason, much attention has been dedicated to the evolution of L1. Among the most studied elements is the mouse L1 which has been the subject of a number of studies in the 1980s and 1990s. These seminal studies, performed in the pre-genomic era when only a limited number of L1 sequences were available, have significantly improved our understanding of L1 evolution. Yet, no comprehensive study on the evolution of L1 in mouse has been performed since the completion of this genome sequence.

Results

Using the Genome Parsing Suite we performed the first evolutionary analysis of mouse L1 over the entire length of the element. This analysis indicates that the mouse L1 has recruited novel 5’UTR sequences more frequently than previously thought and that the simultaneous activity of non-homologous promoters seems to be one of the conditions for the co-existence of multiple L1 families or lineages. In addition the exchange of genetic information between L1 families is not limited to the 5’UTR as evidence of inter-family recombination was observed in ORF1, ORF2, and the 3’UTR. In contrast to the human L1, there was little evidence of rapid amino-acid replacement in the coiled-coil of ORF1, although this region is structurally unstable. We propose that the structural instability of the coiled-coil domain might be adaptive and that structural changes in this region are selectively equivalent to the rapid evolution at the amino-acid level reported in the human lineage.

Conclusions

The pattern of evolution of L1 in mouse shows some similarity with human suggesting that the nature of the interactions between L1 and its host might be similar in these two species. Yet, some notable differences, particularly in the evolution of ORF1, suggest that the molecular mechanisms involved in host-L1 interactions might be different in these two species.

Evolutionary conservation of the functional modularity of primate and murine LINE-1 elements

LINE-1 (L1) retroelements emerged in mammalian genomes over 80 million years ago with a few dominant subfamilies amplifying over discrete time periods that led to distinct human and mouse L1 lineages. We evaluated the functional conservation of L1 sequences by comparing retrotransposition rates of chimeric human-rodent L1 constructs to their parental L1 counterparts. Although amino acid conservation varies from ∼35% to 63% for the L1 ORF1p and ORF2p, most human and mouse L1 sequences can be functionally exchanged. Replacing either ORF1 or ORF2 to create chimeric human-mouse L1 elements did not adversely affect retrotransposition. The mouse ORF2p retains retrotransposition-competency to support both Alu and L1 mobilization when any of the domain sequences we evaluated were substituted with human counterparts. However, the substitution of portions of the mouse cys-domain into the human ORF2p reduces both L1 retrotransposition and Alu trans-mobilization by 200–1000 fold. The observed loss of ORF2p function is independent of the endonuclease or reverse transcriptase activities of ORF2p and RNA interaction required for reverse transcription. In addition, the loss of function is physically separate from the cysteine-rich motif sequence previously shown to be required for RNP formation. Our data suggest an additional role of the less characterized carboxy-terminus of the L1 ORF2 protein by demonstrating that this domain, in addition to mediating RNP interaction(s), provides an independent and required function for the retroelement amplification process. Our experiments show a functional modularity of most of the LINE sequences. However, divergent evolution of interactions within L1 has led to non-reciprocal incompatibilities between human and mouse ORF2 cys-domain sequences.

The ORF1 protein encoded by LINE-1: structure and function during L1 retrotransposition

LINE-1, or L1 is an autonomous non-LTR retrotransposon in mammals. Retrotransposition requires the function of the two, L1-encoded polypeptides, ORF1p and ORF2p. Early recognition of regions of homology between the predicted amino acid sequence of ORF2 and known endonuclease and reverse transcriptase enzymes led to testable hypotheses regarding the function of ORF2p in retrotransposition. As predicted, ORF2p has been demonstrated to have both endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities. In contrast, no homologs of known function have contributed to our understanding of the function of ORF1p during retrotransposition. Nevertheless, significant advances have been made such that we now know that ORF1p is a high affinity RNA binding protein that forms a ribonucleoprotein particle together with L1 RNA. Furthermore, ORF1p is a nucleic acid chaperone and this nucleic acid chaperone activity is required for L1 retrotransposition.

Functional endogenous LINE-1 retrotransposons are expressed and mobilized in rat chloroleukemia cells

LINE-1 (L1) is a highly successful autonomous non-LTR retrotransposon and a major force shaping mammalian genomes. Although there are about 600 000 L1 copies covering 23% of the rat genome, full-length rat L1s (L1Rn) with intact open reading frames (ORFs) representing functional master copies for retrotransposition have not been identified yet. In conjunction with studies to elucidate the role of L1 retrotransposons in tumorigenesis, we isolated and characterized 10 different cDNAs from transcribed full-length L1Rn elements in rat chloroleukemia (RCL) cells, each encoding intact ORF1 proteins (ORF1p). We identified the first functional L1Rn retrotransposon from this pool of cDNAs, determined its activity in HeLa cells and in the RCL cell line the cDNAs originated from and demonstrate that it is mobilized in the tumor cell line in which it is expressed. Furthermore, we generated monoclonal antibodies directed against L1Rn ORF1 and ORF2-encoded recombinant proteins, analyzed the expression of L1-encoded proteins and found ORF1p predominantly in the nucleus. Our results support the hypothesis that the reported explosive amplification of genomic L1Rn sequences after their transcriptional activation in RCL cells is based on L1 retrotransposition. Therefore, L1 activity might be one cause for genomic instability observed during the progression of leukemia.

Evolutionary history of LINE-1 in the major clades of placental mammals

BACKGROUND

LINE-1 constitutes an important component of mammalian genomes. It has a dynamic evolutionary history characterized by the rise, fall and replacement of subfamilies. Most data concerning LINE-1 biology and evolution are derived from the human and mouse genomes and are often assumed to hold for all placentals.

METHODOLOGY

To examine LINE-1 relationships, sequences from the 3' region of the reverse transcriptase from 21 species (representing 13 orders across Afrotheria, Xenarthra, Supraprimates and Laurasiatheria) were obtained from whole genome sequence assemblies, or by PCR with degenerate primers. These sequences were aligned and analysed.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Our analysis reflects accepted placental relationships suggesting mostly lineage-specific LINE-1 families. The data provide clear support for several clades including Glires, Supraprimates, Laurasiatheria, Boreoeutheria, Xenarthra and Afrotheria. Within the afrotherian LINE-1 (AfroLINE) clade, our tree supports Paenungulata, Afroinsectivora and Afroinsectiphillia. Xenarthran LINE-1 (XenaLINE) falls sister to AfroLINE, providing some support for the Atlantogenata (Xenarthra+Afrotheria) hypothesis.

SIGNIFICANCE

LINEs and SINEs make up approximately half of all placental genomes, so understanding their dynamics is an essential aspect of comparative genomics. Importantly, a tree of LINE-1 offers a different view of the root, as long edges (branches) such as that to marsupials are shortened and/or broken up. Additionally, a robust phylogeny of diverse LINE-1 is essential in testing that site-specific LINE-1 insertions, often regarded as homoplasy-free phylogenetic markers, are indeed unique and not convergent.

X accumulation of LINE-1 retrotransposons in Tokudaia osimensis, a spiny rat with the karyotype XO

The observation that LINE-1 transposable elements are enriched on the X in comparison to the autosomes led to the hypothesis that LINE-1s play a role in X chromosome inactivation. If this hypothesis is correct, loss of LINE-1 activity would be expected to result in species extinction or in an alternate pathway of dosage compensation. One such alternative pathway would be to evolve a karyotype that does not require dosage compensation between the sexes. Two of the three extant species of the Ryukyu spiny rat Tokudaia have such a karyotype; both males and females are XO. We asked whether this karyotype arose due to loss of LINE-1 activity and thus the loss of a putative component in the X inactivation pathway. Although XO Tokudaia has no need for dosage compensation, LINE-1s have been recently active in Tokudaia osimensis and show higher density on the lone X than on the autosomes.

Identification of the proteins specifically binding to the rat LINE1 promoter

The initial step of LINE1 retrotransposons dissemination requires transcription from species-specific promoter located within 5'-untranslated region of LINE1. Although the 5'-untranslated region of the rat LINE1 element shows promoter activity, no promoter-binding proteins have been discovered so far. Using an EMSA and Southwestern blotting methods, we identified Sp1 and Sp3 proteins, which specifically bind to the rat LINE1 promoter in vitro. The Sp1/Sp3-binding motif within rat LINE1 promoter is located downstream of the major predicted transcription initiation site.

Molecular evolution and tempo of amplification of human LINE-1 retrotransposons since the origin of primates

We investigated the evolution of the families of LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons that have amplified in the human lineage since the origin of primates. We identified two phases in the evolution of L1. From approximately 70 million years ago (Mya) until approximately 40 Mya, three distinct L1 lineages were simultaneously active in the genome of ancestral primates. In contrast, during the last 40 million years (Myr), i.e., during the evolution of anthropoid primates, a single lineage of families has evolved and amplified. We found that novel (i.e., unrelated) regulatory regions (5'UTR) have been frequently recruited during the evolution of L1, whereas the two open-reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2) have remained relatively conserved. We found that L1 families coexisted and formed independently evolving L1 lineages only when they had different 5'UTRs. We propose that L1 families with different 5'UTR can coexist because they don't rely on the same host-encoded factors for their transcription and therefore do not compete with each other. The most prolific L1 families (families L1PA8 to L1PA3) amplified between 40 and 12 Mya. This period of high activity corresponds to an episode of adaptive evolution in a segment of ORF1. The correlation between the high activity of L1 families and adaptive evolution could result from the coevolution of L1 and a host-encoded repressor of L1 activity.

SINE extinction preceded LINE extinction in sigmodontine rodents: implications for retrotranspositional dynamics and mechanisms

Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements, or SINEs, retrotranspose despite lacking protein-coding capability. It has been proposed that SINEs utilize enzymes produced in trans by Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements, or LINEs. Strong support for this hypothesis is found in LINE and SINE pairs that share sequence homology; however, LINEs and SINEs in primates and rodents are only linked by an insertion site motif. We have now profiled L1 LINE and B1 SINE activity in 24 rodent species including candidate taxa for the first documented L1 extinction. As expected, there was no evidence for recent activity of B1s in species that also lack L1 activity. However, B1 silencing appears to have preceded L1 extinction, since B1 activity is also lacking in the genus most closely related to those lacking active L1s despite the presence of active L1s in this genus. A second genus with active L1s but inactive B1s was also identified.

Extinction of LINE-1 activity coincident with a major mammalian radiation in rodents

LINE-1 transposable elements (L1s) are ubiquitous in mammals and are thought to have remained active since before the mammalian radiation. Only one L1 extinction event, in South American rodents in the genus Oryzomys, has been convincingly demonstrated. Here we examine the phylogenetic limits and evolutionary tempo of that extinction event by characterizing L1s in related rodents. Fourteen genera from five tribes within the Sigmodontinae subfamily were examined. Only the Sigmodontini, the most basal tribe in this group, demonstrate recent L1 activity. The Oryzomyini, Akodontini, Phyllotini, and Thomasomyini contain only L1s that appear to have inserted long ago; their L1s lack open reading frames, have mutations at conserved amino acid residues, and show numerous private mutations. They also lack restriction site-defined L1 subfamilies specific to any species, genus or tribe examined, and fail to form monophyletic species, genus or tribal L1 clusters. We determine here that this L1 extinction event occurred roughly 8.8 million years ago, near the divergence of Sigmodon from the remaining Sigmodontinae species. These species appear to be ideal model organisms for studying the impact of L1 inactivity on mammalian genomes.

Teleost fish genomes contain a diverse array of L1 retrotransposon lineages that exhibit a low copy number and high rate of turnover

Retrotransposable elements exhibit a wide range of variation in population dynamics, abundance, and lineage diversity among host genomes across taxa. This range of diversity is illustrated by a single well-defined constituent monophyletic clade of L1 non-LTR retrotransposons that is shared between mammalian and teleost fish genomes. Despite the clear phylogenetic relationships that exist between mammalian and teleost L1 sequences, these elements exhibit markedly different dynamics within their respective taxa. While mammalian genomes typically contain a single, abundant lineage of L1 elements that traces millions of years of evolution, the zebraflsh genome was recently shown to exhibit a high diversity of ancient lineages coexisting at a very low copy number and apparently exhibiting a high rate of turnover. In the present study, a combination of degenerate PCR, lineage-specific PCR, and genomic Southern blot analysis is utilized to demonstrate high L1 lineage diversity, low copy number, and a high proportion of polymorphic inserts in the genomes of the killifish species, Fundulus heteroclitus. Additional species surveyed by degenerate PCR include Cyprinodon variegatus, Rivulus marmoratus, and Menidia beryllina. These results further support the generality of the differences that exist in host-element dynamics between teleost fish and mammalian genomes with regard to L1 retrotransposons.

Different rates of LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon amplification and evolution in New World monkeys

LINE-1 (L1) elements constitute the major family of retrotransposons in mammalian genomes. Here we report the first investigation of L1 evolution in New World monkeys (NWM). Two regions of the second open-reading frame were analyzed by two methods in three NWM species, the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus), the tamarin (Saguinus oedipus), and the spider monkey (Ateles paniscus). Since these three species diverged, L1 has amplified in the Saimiri and Saguinus lineages but L1 activity seems to have been strongly reduced in the Ateles lineage. In addition, the active L1 lineage has evolved rapidly in Saimiri and Saguinus, generating species-specific subfamilies. In contrast, we found no evidence for a species-specific subfamily in Ateles, a result consistent with the low L1 activity in this species for the last approximately 25 My.

Adaptive evolution in LINE-1 retrotransposons

We traced the sequence evolution of the active lineage of LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons over the last approximately 25 Myr of human evolution. Five major families (L1PA5, L1PA4, L1PA3B, L1PA2, and L1PA1) of elements have succeeded each other as a single lineage. We found that part of the first open-reading frame (ORFI) had a higher rate of nonsynonymous (amino acid replacement) substitution than synonymous substitution during the evolution of the ancestral L1PA5 through the L1PA3B families. This segment encodes the coiled coil region of the protein-protein interaction domain of the ORFI protein (ORFIp). Statistical analysis of these changes indicates that positive selection had been acting on this region. In contrast, the coiled coil segment hardly changed during the evolution of the L1PA3B to the present L1PA1 family. Therefore, selective pressure on the coiled coil segment has changed over time. We suggest that the fast rate of amino acid replacement in the coiled coil segment reflects the adaptation of L1 either to a changing genomic environment or to host repression factors. In contrast, the second open-reading frame and the nucleic acid-binding domain of the first open-reading frame are extremely well conserved, attesting to the strong purifying selection acting on these regions.

Selection against deleterious LINE-1-containing loci in the human lineage

We compared sex chromosomal and autosomal regions of similar GC contents and found that the human Y chromosome contains nine times as many full-length (FL) ancestral LINE-1 (L1) elements per megabase as do autosomes and that the X chromosome contains three times as many. In addition, both sex chromosomes contain a ca. twofold excess of elements that are >500 bp but not long enough to be capable of autonomous replication. In contrast, the autosomes are not deficient in short (<500 bp) L1 elements or SINE elements relative to the sex chromosomes. Since neither the Y nor the X chromosome, when present in males, can be cleared of deleterious genetic loci by recombination, we conclude that most FL L1s were deleterious and thus subject to purifying selection. Comparison between nonrecombining and recombining regions of autosome 21 supported this conclusion. We were able to identify a subset of loci in the human DNA database that once contained active L1 elements, and we found by using the polymerase chain reaction that 72% of them no longer contain L1 elements in a representative of each of eight different ethnic groups. Genetic damage produced by both L1 retrotransposition and ectopic (nonallelic) recombination between L1 elements could provide the basis for their negative selection.

Distribution of the bilbo non-LTR retrotransposon in Drosophilidae and its evolution in the Drosophila obscura species group

The bilbo element is a non-LTR retrotransposon isolated from Drosophila subobscura. We conducted a distribution survey by Southern blot for 52 species of the family Drosophilidae, mainly from the obscura and melanogaster groups. Most of the analyzed species bear sequences homologous to bilbo from D. subobscura. In the obscura group, species from the same species subgroup also share similar Southern blot patterns. To investigate the phylogenetic relationship among these elements, we analyzed eight copies of a short sequence of the element from several species of the obscura group. The obtained phylogram agrees with the phylogeny of the species, which suggests vertical transmission of the element.

L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon evolution and amplification in recent human history

L1 (LINE-1) elements constitute a large family of mammalian retrotransposons that have been replicating and evolving in mammals for more than 100 Myr and now compose 20% or more of the DNA of some mammals. Here, we investigated the evolutionary dynamics of the active human Ta L1 family and found that it arose approximately 4 MYA and subsequently differentiated into two major subfamilies, Ta-0 and Ta-1, each of which contain additional subsets. Ta-1, which has not heretofore been described, is younger than Ta-0 and now accounts for at least 50% of the Ta family. Although Ta-0 contains some active elements, the Ta-1 subfamily has replaced it as the replicatively dominant subfamily in humans; 69% of the loci that contain Ta-1 inserts are polymorphic for the presence or absence of the insert in human populations, as compared with 29% of the loci that contain Ta-0 inserts. This value is 90% for loci that contain Ta-1d inserts, which are the youngest subset of Ta-1 and now account for about two thirds of the Ta-1 subfamily. The successive emergence and amplification of distinct Ta L1 subfamilies shows that L1 evolution has been as active in recent human history as it has been found to be for rodent L1 families. In addition, Ta-1 elements have been accumulating in humans at about the same rate per generation as recently evolved active rodent L1 subfamilies.

The biological properties and evolutionary dynamics of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons

Mammalian LINE-1 (L1) elements belong to the superfamily of autonomously replicating retrotransposable elements that lack the long terminal repeated (LTR) sequences typical of retroviruses and retroviral-like retrotransposons. The non-LTR superfamily is very ancient and L1-like elements are ubiquitous in nature, having been found in plants, fungi, invertebrates, and various vertebrate classes from fish to mammals. L1 elements have been replicating and evolving in mammals for at least the past 100 million years and now constitute 20% or more of some mammalian genomes. Therefore, L1 elements presumably have had a profound, perhaps defining, effect on the evolution, structure, and function of mammalian genomes. L1 elements contain regulatory signals and encode two proteins: one is an RNA-binding protein and the second one presumably functions as an integrase-replicase, because it has both endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities. This work reviews the structure and biological properties of L1 elements, including their regulation, replication, evolution, and interaction with their mammalian hosts. Although each of these processes is incompletely understood, what is known indicates that they represent challenging and fascinating biological phenomena, the resolution of which will be essential for fully understanding the biology of mammals.

The end of the LINE?: lack of recent L1 activity in a group of South American rodents

L1s (LINE-1: Long Interspersed Nuclear Element 1) are present in all mammals examined to date. They occur in both placental mammals and marsupials and thus are thought to have been present in the genome prior to the mammalian radiation. This unusual conservation of a transposable element family for over 100 million years has led to speculation that these elements provide an advantage to the genomes they inhabit. We have recently identified a group of South American rodents, including rice rats (Oryzomys), in which L1s appear to be quiescent or extinct. Several observations support this conclusion. First, genomic Southern blot analysis fails to reveal genus-specific bands in Oryzomys. Second, we were unable to find recently inserted elements. Procedures to enrich for young elements did not yield any with an intact open reading frame for reverse transcriptase; all elements isolated had numerous insertions, deletions, and stop codons. Phylogenetic analysis failed to yield species-specific clusters among the L1 elements isolated, and all Oryzomys sequences had numerous private mutations. Finally, in situ hybridization of L1 to Oryzomys chromosomes failed to reveal the characteristic L1 distribution in Oryzomys with either a homologous or heterologous probe. Thus, Oryzomys is a viable candidate for L1 extinction from a mammalian host.

Molecular evolution of two lineages of L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposons in the california mouse, Peromyscus californicus

The large number of L1 [long interspersed elements (LINE)-1] sequences found in the genome is due to the insertion of copies of the retrotransposon over evolutionary time. The majority of copies appear to be replicates of a few active, or "master" templates. A continual replacement of master templates over time gives rise to lineages distinguishable by their own unique set of shared-sequence variants. A previous analysis of L1 sequences in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus and P. leucopus, revealed two active L1 lineages, marked by different rates of evolution, whose most recent common ancestor predates the expansion of the Peromyscus species. Here we exploit lineage-specific, shared-sequence variants to reveal a paucity of Lineage 2 sequences in at least one species, P. californicus. The dearth of Lineage 2 copies in P. californicus suggests that Lineage 2 may have been unproductive until after the most recent common ancestor of P. californicus and P. maniculatus. We also show that Lineage 1 appears to have a higher rate of evolution in P. maniculatus relative to either P. californicus or P. leucopus. As a phylogenetic tool, L1 lineage-specific variants support a close affinity between P. californicus and P. eremicus relative to the other species examined.

Recombination between subtypes creates a mosaic lineage of LINE-1 that is expressed and actively retrotransposing in the mouse genome

LINE-1, or L1, elements are retrotransposons that have amplified to high-copy number during the evolution of mammals. L1 appears to amplify in waves, spawning large numbers of progeny such that elements with distinct sequence features dominate the dispersal process in a given window of time. This process generates discrete subfamilies of L1 within mammalian genomes, with the oldest being remnants, or fossils, of earlier waves of amplification. In mice, at least three distinct subfamilies of L1 were distinguished by their unique 5' ends, A, F and V. These subfamilies amplified at distinct times in the evolution of mice, with A being the youngest and V the oldest; both V and F subfamilies were believed extinct. Recent data established that a variant of the F family, TF, is actively retrotransposing. We demonstrate here that members of the TF subfamily are abundantly expressed in mouse cells and encode the major protein constituent of L1 ribonucleoprotein particles. Although members of the TF subfamily are not as numerous in the genomes of laboratory mice as are members of the older A and F subfamilies, they appear to have been activated some time ago during mouse evolution, in the common ancestor of Mus spretus and Mus domesticus. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrates that this modern, active form of TF-type L1 has a composite evolutionary history, showing evidence of multiple recombinations between distinct L1 variants, including members of the A and F subfamilies.