Pain reduced by low-level laser therapy during use of orthodontic separators in early mixed dentition

The effect of physical interventions on pain control after orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pain is a frequent adverse reaction during orthodontic treatment, which can significantly reduce treatment compliance and compromise the expected treatment effect. Physical interventions have been used to alleviate pain after orthodontic treatment, but their effectiveness is controversial. This study used a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of various physical interventions typically used in managing pain after orthodontic treatment, with a view to provide evidence-based recommendations for representative interventions for orthodontic pain relief during peak pain intensity.

METHODS

A systematic search of six electronic databases, from their respective inception dates, was conducted to identify relevant literature on the efficacy of various typical physical interventions for managing pain after orthodontic treatment. Literature screening was performed according to the Cochrane System Evaluator's Manual. Stata 16.0 was used to assess heterogeneity, inconsistency, publication bias, and sensitivity to generate an evidence network diagram and conduct a network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 771 articles were reviewed to collect literature on interventions, including low-level laser therapy (LLLT), vibration, acupuncture, and chewing. Of these, 28 studies using a visual analog scale (VAS) as an outcome indicator were included. The results showed that LLLT, vibration, acupuncture, and chewing effectively relieved the pain symptoms in patients after orthodontic treatment. At 24 h post-treatment, LLLT (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 80.8) and vibration (SUCRA = 71.1) were the most effective interventions. After 48 h of treatment, acupuncture (SUCRA = 89.6) showed a definite advantage as the best intervention.

CONCLUSION

LLLT, vibration, acupuncture, and chewing can alleviate pain associated with orthodontic treatment. Among these interventions, acupuncture was found to be the most effective at 48 h after orthodontic treatment. In addition, acupuncture demonstrated long-lasting and stable pain-relieving effects. However, further studies are needed to determine the most suitable equipment-specific parameters for acupuncture in relieving pain associated with orthodontic treatment.

Auriculotherapy used to manage orthodontic pain: a randomized controlled pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Several methods are commonly used to decrease orthodontic pain, but versatile tools and standardized protocols are still lacking.

OBJECTIVE

In response to the need for alternatives to conventional analgesic methods, this study evaluates the analgesic effects of auriculotherapy (AT) during the first three months of fixed orthodontic treatment.

METHODS

A sample of 36 subjects was selected, with patients randomly allocated into two homogeneous groups, Study Group (SG) and Control Group (CG), depending on the application/non-application of AT. Patients rated their pain scores monthly from 0 to 10, on visual analogue scales (VAS) at the time of bonding (T0) and again at two appliance adjustments (T1 and T2). At each of these treatment phases, VAS was applied in six different time moments (TM): immediately before, immediately after, after 4 hours, after 8 hours, after 24 hours, and after 72h hours. Descriptive statistical analysis, a Student's t-test, and a Chi-square test were applied to the collected data (statistical significance for p< 0.05).

RESULTS

SG patients reported lower pain levels than CG patients, both at T0, T1 and T2. Moreover, average pain intensity values were lower in the SG for all TM analyzed, with the t-test significant (p< 0.05) for most TMs.

CONCLUSION

AT was effective in the pain treatment of patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Further studies are needed with a sham control group to confirm the validity of these results.

The Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Pain Induced by Orthodontic Separator Placement: A Systematic Review

Introduction: This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in orthodontic separator pain. Methods: This article was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Electronically and manually 3 databases, namely PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar, were searched by the keywords that were selected based on population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) on October 10, 2020. Studies were appraised by Cochrane version 5.2.0 with 7 domains and were checked by these inclusion criteria: 1. Randomized clinical trial (RCT) that examined the efficacy of LLLT in separator pain, 2. Split-mouth design, 3. LLLT application in the first hours after separator placement, 4. LLLT application to both sides of the teeth, 5. Patients receiving elastomeric separators between the premolars and molars, 6. Lasers with a wavelength of 800-899 nm, 7. Studies conducted from 2010 to 2020, and 8. Participants who went through orthodontic treatment without limitation in gender, age and social-economic status. Results: 299 studies were screened. 34 full-text papers were read by 2 authors independently. In the end, 4 articles met the inclusion criteria. All 4 articles showed LLLT has a significant impact on pain reduction. Conclusion: The exact protocol for laser therapy is still not clear. Therefore, more studies with a meticulously designed method are needed.

Viability of Photobiomodulaton Therapy in Decreasing Orthodontic-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To assess the viability of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in decreasing orthodontic-related pain after different orthodontic procedures. Methods: A computerized literature search was conducted within the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and CBM databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which used PBMT to relieve pain during orthodontic treatment. Particular inclusion and exclusion criteria were connected to recognize relevant articles. The information was extricated autonomously by two reviewers, and a quality assessment was carried out by utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration "risk of bias" tool. Meta-analysis was conducted with fixed- or random-effects models as suitable. Statistical heterogeneity was also examined. The RevMan 5.4 software was utilized for data analysis. Results: Of 1024 recognized articles, 25 RCT were at long last included. Within the risk-of-bias assessments, 1 study displayed a high risk, 22 an unclear risk, and 2 a low risk. The meta-analysis appeared that in patients treated with photobiomodulation (PBM) versus control there was a distinction in support of PBMT in placement of elastomeric separators, canine retraction, and archwire placement during 1 week. Conclusions: PBMT demonstrated to be effective in advancing a reduction pain after elastomeric separators placement, canine retraction, and archwire placement within 1 week. In the future, more high-quality research with consistency in research design is needed for further evaluation.

A systematic review of the effective laser wavelength range in delivering photobiomodulation for pain relief in active orthodontic treatment

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to establish an effective wavelength range for PhotoBioModulation (PBM) to relieve pain in orthodontic treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The electronic literature search was carried out in the following databases: PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane. In the initial search, 255 papers were obtained. Deleting duplicates in the search left 180 items. One manually searched study was included for a total of 181 studies. According to PRISMA guidelines and a thorough analysis of their methodology, the final sample was composed of 13 RCTs. The final statistical analysis was performed in 11 studies. The statistical analysis sought to strengthen the collected data, determining the correlation coefficient (r) for the same time interval (24h) using a scale equivalent to the standard value (0-10cm). Aiming to reduce the effect of heterogeneity, the difference in cm between control group (GC) and experimental group (EG) averages was considered the outcome. This difference was correlated with the wavelength in nm, calculating the Pearson linear correlation coefficient, and calculating a logarithmic correlation.

RESULTS

The dispersion of the data obtained in the experimental groups at each given wavelength showed that the most significant number of studies were in the ranges of 780-830nm. The correlation between the wavelength and the difference between the control and experimental group averages, either linear (R2=0.0564, r=0.237) or logarithmic (R2=0.0688, r=0.262) was not significant (P>0.90). Therefore, pain reduction after 24h is not significantly dependent of wavelength.

CONCLUSION

The majority of RCTs related to pain relief in orthodontic treatment showed 780-830nm as the most effective photobiomodulation wavelength range for orthodontic pain relief. However, pain reduction after 24h is not significantly dependent of wavelength. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019119799).

Effects of 445-nm Diode Laser-Assisted Debonding of Metallic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength and Enamel Surface Morphology

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a 445-nm diode laser on the shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic brackets before debonding. Background: Due to the new blue laser technology, very few studies are available in this context. Methods: Seventy metallic brackets (Discovery; Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) were bonded to the frontal enamel surfaces of 70 caries-free bovine incisors in a standardized way. Each sample was randomly assigned to the control or laser group, with 35 samples per group. The brackets in the laser group were irradiated with the diode laser (SIROLaser Blue^®; Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) on three sides of the bracket bases for 5 s each (lateral-coronal-lateral, a total of 15 s) immediately before debonding. SBS values were evaluated for the control group and laser group. Micrographs of the enamel surface were taken with 10 × magnification to assess the adhesive remnant index (ARI) and the degree of enamel fractures after debonding. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in SBS in the laser group in comparison with the control group (p > 0.05). The distribution of ARI scores was also not statistically significantly different in the laser group in comparison with the control group (p > 0.05). Three enamel fractures occurred in the control group and one in the laser group after debonding. Conclusions: Irradiation of metallic brackets with the 445-nm diode laser before debonding does not significantly reduce the SBS values and does not influence the remaining amount of adhesive on the enamel surface. The risk of enamel fractures during debonding is therefore not clinically affected.

Effectiveness of different psychological interventions in reducing fixed orthodontic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/Objective

Pain induced by tooth movement is a common experience for orthodontic patients. The effectiveness of psychological intervention, as a new approach to control pain, has not been fully explored. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis is intended to evaluate the analgesic effect of psychological intervention within the week after fixed orthodontic initial arch wire placement.

Methods

A computerised literature search was conducted in the Medline (1966-2019), Embase (1984-2019), Cochrane Library (Issue 1 of 2019), CBMdisk (1978-2019) and CNKI (1994-2019) databases to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs), which used psychological interventions to relieve pain during fixed orthodontic treatment. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to identify relevant articles. The data were extracted independently by two reviewers and a quality assessment was carried out by using the Cochrane Collaboration ‘risk of bias’ tool. Meta-analyses were conducted with fixed or random effects models as appropriate. Statistical heterogeneity was also examined. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis.

Results

A total of 472 articles were identified, from which nine RCTs were finally included. A meta-analysis revealed that after initial arch wire placement, cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and music therapy could significantly reduce pain within three days compared with a control group. In addition, there were no differences in pain reduction between CBT and music therapy within one week. Furthermore, a structured phone and text follow-up could significantly reduce and control pain and had the same effectiveness in pain reduction.

Conclusions

In the short term after initial arch wire placement, all psychological interventions could significantly reduce the intensity of pain without adverse effects. In the current study, there was no significant difference in pain relief between the different psychological interventions. In the future, more high-quality research with consistency in research design is needed for further evaluation.

Influence of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Gingivitis Induced by Multi-Bracket Appliances: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this split-mouth trial was to investigate the influence of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on adjuvant treatment of gingivitis induced by multi-bracket appliances, after bracket debonding and professional tooth cleaning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients (mean age 16.15 years; standard deviation ±2.12 years) who had completed active orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances in an orthodontic clinic were included on a randomized basis. At time point T0, after bracket debonding and professional tooth cleaning, the papilla bleeding index (PBI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed in the upper jaw by the blinded investigator (M.S.), who was not aware at any time of which quadrant received PBMT. The study was based on a patient-blinded split-mouth design. In each patient, PBMT was administered by a practitioner (S.S.) in one upper quadrant (wavelength: 660 nm; Power: 100 mW; Power density: 100 mW/cm²; Energy density per application point = 2 J/cm²; Energy per application point = 2 J; Total dose = 52 J/cm²; Total energy = 52 J; Irradiation time: 26 × 20 sec), while the other upper quadrant received a simulated laser application with the laser system turned off. Randomized equal allocation of the sides was accomplished. The second PBI and BOP assessment followed 4-6 days after laser irradiation (T1) by M.S.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were observed between the sides with regard to PBI and BOP values at T0 (p > 0.05). The PBI and BOP values decreased significantly between T0 and T1 on both sides (p < 0.05). At T1, the PBI and BOP values were significantly lower in the laser side in comparison with the control side (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these results and study parameters, adjuvant PBMT is able to accelerate the healing process in patients with gingivitis induced by multi-bracket appliances.

445-nm diode laser-assisted debonding of self-ligating ceramic brackets

Objectives:

This study determined the influence of irradiation on aesthetic ceramic brackets with a novel 445-nm diode laser prior to debonding on the bracket failure mode.

Materials and methods:

Thirty ceramic brackets (In-Ovation® C, GAC) were standard-bonded to the oral and buccal planed and polished enamel surfaces of 15 caries-free human 3

Results:

In the laser group, the ARI-score was statistically significantly reduced (p<0.05) at 10-fold and 20-fold magnifications compared to the conventional group, while enamel fractures were not found at any magnification in either group at T1. Enamel fractures and grinding marks were increasingly found in the conventional group by SEM at T2.

Conclusion:

Irradiation with the novel diode laser prior to debonding of ceramic brackets significantly changes bonding failure in terms of less remaining adhesive. This is of clinical importance as the risk of enamel fractures and chair time can be reduced.

Current advances in orthodontic pain

Orthodontic pain is an inflammatory pain that is initiated by orthodontic force-induced vascular occlusion followed by a cascade of inflammatory responses, including vascular changes, the recruitment of inflammatory and immune cells, and the release of neurogenic and pro-inflammatory mediators. Ultimately, endogenous analgesic mechanisms check the inflammatory response and the sensation of pain subsides. The orthodontic pain signal, once received by periodontal sensory endings, reaches the sensory cortex for pain perception through three-order neurons: the trigeminal neuron at the trigeminal ganglia, the trigeminal nucleus caudalis at the medulla oblongata and the ventroposterior nucleus at the thalamus. Many brain areas participate in the emotion, cognition and memory of orthodontic pain, including the insular cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, locus coeruleus and hypothalamus. A built-in analgesic neural pathway—periaqueductal grey and dorsal raphe—has an important role in alleviating orthodontic pain. Currently, several treatment modalities have been applied for the relief of orthodontic pain, including pharmacological, mechanical and behavioural approaches and low-level laser therapy. The effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain relief has been validated, but its effects on tooth movement are controversial. However, more studies are needed to verify the effectiveness of other modalities. Furthermore, gene therapy is a novel, viable and promising modality for alleviating orthodontic pain in the future.