Use of a laser fluorescence device for the in vitro activity assessment of incipient caries lesions

Agreement of Bioluminescence Measurements and Visual Assessment in Monitoring Occlusal Surfaces of Permanent Teeth

Background: Caries lesion activity is typically assessed by visual–tactile criteria. Regular monitoring is required to detect the transition of lesions and to ensure that the initial assessment was valid. This clinical study aimed to evaluate the agreement of bioluminescence measurements (Calcivis imaging system, Cis) with visual examination to assess caries lesion activity and to monitor occlusal surfaces. Methods: The occlusal surfaces of ninety-one permanent posterior teeth were assessed for the presence or absence of active caries lesions with ICCMS criteria and Cis measurements at three visit times: baseline (t1) and six months (t2) and 12 months (t3) after baseline. Results: At the baseline visit, 70% of the included occlusal sites were assessed visually as active lesions (ICCMS codes 1 and 2). At t3, 64.8% of the sites showed signs of an active lesion. The percentage agreements between the visual and Cis methods were 87.8% (t1), 89.9% (t2) and 88.6% (t3). The corresponding κ-values were 0.71 (95% CI 0.52;0.87), 0.75 (95% CI 0.59;0.89) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.61;0.90), respectively. No significant difference between the visual and bioluminescence systems was found at any visit (p > 0.05). The results based on cluster randomization (generalized estimation equations) showed no significant differences between the visual and Cis findings for all visits (p = 0.108, Wald Χ² with 1 df = 2.587). Conclusion: The bioluminescence system demonstrated substantial agreement for the activity assessment of occlusal lesions compared to the findings obtained by visual assessment over twelve months.

In vivo validation of Diagnodent and Vista proof devices vs ICDAS clinical criteria on incipient carious lesions in adults

AIM

This study aimed to validate the in vivo performance of Diagnodent and Vista proof devices with ICDAS clinical criteria on incipient carious lesions in adults.

METHODS

A total of 44 adult patients with 230 incipient occlusal caries took part in the present study. These patients were assessed for caries with ICDAS clinical criteria, and then they were examined with Diagnodent pen™ (DP) and Vista proof™ (VP) fluorescence devices. Sensitivity, specificity accuracy, and ICC agreement between devices with ICDAS criteria, which served as a gold standard, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Regarding the caries diagnostic devices, sensitivity and specificity found 0,61 and 0,51 for DP, and 0,64 and 0,54 for VP, respectively. The different detection methods showed no differences in diagnostic capacity (Az values) each other, and ICC values with ICDAS criteria were calculated low.

CONCLUSIONS

DP and VP do not contribute to incipient occlusal carious lesions' better detective ability compared with visual ICDAS clinical criteria. The DP and VP devices presented no differences in diagnostic ability and measured lesion depth concerning the visual examination.