1
|
Gottschalk S, Kany S, König HH, Crijns HJGM, Vardas P, Camm AJ, Wegscheider K, Metzner A, Rillig A, Kirchhof P, Dams J. Cost-effectiveness of early rhythm control vs. usual care in atrial fibrillation care: an analysis based on data from the EAST-AFNET 4 trial. Europace 2023; 25:euad051. [PMID: 36966734 PMCID: PMC10227663 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The randomized, controlled EAST-AFNET 4 trial showed that early rhythm control (ERC) reduces the rate of a composite primary outcome (cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalization for worsening heart failure or acute coronary syndrome) by ∼20%. The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of ERC compared to usual care. METHODS AND RESULTS This within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis was based on data from the German subsample of the EAST-AFNET 4 trial (n = 1664/2789 patients). Over a 6-year time horizon and from a healthcare payer's perspective, ERC was compared to usual care regarding costs (hospitalization and medication) and effects (time to primary outcome; years survived). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were constructed to visualize uncertainty. Early rhythm control was associated with higher costs [+€1924, 95% CI (-€399, €4246)], resulting in ICERs of €10 638 per additional year without a primary outcome and €22 536 per life year gained. The probability of ERC being cost-effective compared to usual care was ≥95% or ≥80% at a willingness-to-pay value of ≥€55 000 per additional year without a primary outcome or life year gained, respectively. CONCLUSION From a German healthcare payer's perspective, health benefits of ERC may come at reasonable costs as indicated by the ICER point estimates. Taking statistical uncertainty into account, cost-effectiveness of ERC is highly probable at a willingness-to-pay value of ≥€55 000 per additional life year or year without a primary outcome. Future studies examining the cost-effectiveness of ERC in other countries, subgroups with higher benefit from rhythm control therapy, or cost-effectiveness of different modes of ERC are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Gottschalk
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Martinistraße 52 Building W37, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shinwan Kany
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Martinistraße 52 Building W37, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Harry JGM Crijns
- Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Universiteitssingel 50, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Panos Vardas
- European Society of Cardiology Health Policy Unit, European Heart Health Institute, European Heart Agency, 29 square de Meeus, B-1000 Brussels, BELGIUM
| | - A John Camm
- Molecular & Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Karl Wegscheider
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Christoph-Probst-Weg 1, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Metzner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Andreas Rillig
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Judith Dams
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Martinistraße 52 Building W37, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wahler S, Birkemeyer R, Alexopoulos D, Siudak Z, Müller A, von der Schulenburg JM. Cost-effectiveness of a photopethysmographic procedure for screening for atrial fibrillation in 6 European countries. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2022; 12:17. [PMID: 35218421 PMCID: PMC8882287 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-022-00362-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Strokes cause an estimated annual health care burden of 170 billion euros across Europe. Atrial fibrillation is one of the major risk factors for stroke and increases the individual risk 4.2-fold. But prevention with anticoagulants may reduce this risk by 70%. Screening methods are employed to detect previously undetected atrial fibrillation. Screening studies in various European countries show a high degree of undetected atrial fibrillation. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of systematic screening with a smartphone application, named Preventicus Heartbeats. It is a hands-on screening tool for use on smartphone to diagnose AF with high sensitivity and specificity. METHODS A previously published model for calculating screening cost-effectiveness was extended to 6 European countries covering a wide range in terms of treatment costs and epidemiologic parameters. RESULTS The use of screening lowers the cost per case in countries with comparatively high levels of health care costs (Switzerland: -€75; UK: -€7). Moderate higher costs per case were observed in 4 countries (Greece: €6; Netherlands: €15). Low levels of health care costs result in less or no potential for further cost reduction (Poland: €20; Serbia: €33). In all countries considered, the model showed an increase in effectiveness measures both in the number of strokes avoided and the quality adjusted life years. The number of strokes avoided per 1000 participants ranged from 2.52 (Switzerland) to 4.44 (Poland). Quality-adjusted life-years per case gained from screening ranged from 0.0105 (Switzerland) to 0.0187 (Poland). The screening procedure dominated in two countries (Switzerland, UK). For the remaining countries, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio ranged from €489/QALY (Greece) to €2548/QALY (Serbia). CONCLUSION The model results showed a strong dependence of the results on the country-specific costs for stroke treatment. The use of the investigated screening method is close to cost-neutral or cost-reducing in the Western European countries and Greece. In countries with low price levels, higher cost increases due to AF screening are to be expected. Lower costs of anticoagulation, which are expected due to the upcoming patent expiry of direct anticoagulants, have a positive effect on the cost result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Wahler
- St. Bernward GmbH, Friedrich-Kirsten-Straße 40, D-22391, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | - Dimitrios Alexopoulos
- Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Tetrapoleos 18, GR-115 27, Athens, Greece
| | - Zbigniew Siudak
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Jan Kochanowski University, Stefana Żeromskiego 5, PL-25-369, Kielce, Poland
| | - Alfred Müller
- Analytic Services GmbH, Jahnstr. 34c, D-80469, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Birkemeyer R, Müller A, Wahler S, von der Schulenburg JM. A cost-effectiveness analysis model of Preventicus atrial fibrillation screening from the point of view of statutory health insurance in Germany. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2020; 10:16. [PMID: 32519034 PMCID: PMC7282133 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-020-00274-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With atrial fibrillation (AF) the risk of stroke is 4.2-fold increased to a comparable population without AF. This risk decreases by up to 70% if AF is detected early enough and effective stroke preventive measures are taken as recommended by international guidelines. Long-term studies found large number of subjects with undiagnosed AF. Preventicus Heartbeats" is a hands-on screening tool for use on smartphone to diagnose AF with high sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study is to research the cost-effectiveness of systematic screening for AF with this smartphone application. METHOD Employing a Markov model we analysed the cost-effectiveness of the "Preventicus Heartbeats" screening for Germany, i.e. from the perspective of German statutory sick funds. RESULTS For a cohort of 10,000 insured 75-year-old the use of the diagnostic app could avoid 60 strokes in the remaining lifetime thereof 32 strokes in the next four years. Former models have applied similar cohorts. The same cohort showed an increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) in the remaining lifetime of 165 QALYs in the scenario with screening versus. without screening and a decrease in discounted lifetime costs (including risk compensation effects) of €129 per participant (€148 for male, €114 for female participants). CONCLUSIONS The modelling demonstrates the health benefits and economic effects of an implementation of a systematic screening on AF with "Preventicus Heartbeats", given the perspective of the German payer, the statutory health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alfred Müller
- Analytic Services GmbH, Jahnstr. 34c, 80469, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Wahler
- St. Bernward GmbH, Friedrich-Kirsten-Straße 40, 22391, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ibáñez L, Sabaté M, Vidal X, Ballarin E, Rottenkolber M, Schmiedl S, Heeke A, Huerta C, Martin Merino E, Montero D, Leon-Muñoz LM, Gasse C, Moore N, Droz C, Lassalle R, Aakjaer M, Andersen M, De Bruin ML, Groenwold R, van den Ham HA, Souverein P, Klungel O, Gardarsdottir H. Incidence of direct oral anticoagulant use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and characteristics of users in 6 European countries (2008-2015): A cross-national drug utilization study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 85:2524-2539. [PMID: 31318059 PMCID: PMC6848911 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To estimate the incidence of direct oral anticoagulant drug (DOAC) use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and to describe user and treatment characteristics in 8 European healthcare databases representing 6 European countries. Methods Longitudinal drug utilization study from January 2008 to December 2015. A common protocol approach was applied. Annual period incidences and direct standardisation by age and sex were performed. Dose adjustment related to change in age and by renal function as well as concomitant use of potentially interacting drugs were assessed. Results A total of 186 405 new DOAC users (age ≥18 years) were identified. Standardized incidences varied from 1.93–2.60 and 0.11–8.71 users/10 000 (2011–2015) for dabigatran and rivaroxaban, respectively, and from 0.01–8.12 users/10 000 (2012–2015) for apixaban. In 2015, the DOAC incidence ranged from 9 to 28/10 000 inhabitants in SIDIAP (Spain) and DNR (Denmark) respectively. There were differences in population coverage among the databases. Only 1 database includes the total reference population (DNR) while others are considered a population representative sample (CPRD, BIFAP, SIDIAP, EGB, Mondriaan). They also varied in the type of drug data source (administrative, clinical). Dose adjustment ranged from 4.6% in BIFAP (Spain) to 15.6% in EGB (France). Concomitant use of interacting drugs varied between 16.4% (SIDIAP) and 70.5% (EGB). Cardiovascular comorbidities ranged from 25.4% in Mondriaan (The Netherlands) to 82.9% in AOK Nordwest (Germany). Conclusion Overall, apixaban and rivaroxaban increased its use during the study period while dabigatran decreased. There was variability in patient characteristics such as comorbidities, potentially interacting drugs and dose adjustment. (EMA/2015/27/PH).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Ibáñez
- Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia (FICF), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mònica Sabaté
- Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia (FICF), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Vidal
- Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia (FICF), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Ballarin
- Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia (FICF), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marietta Rottenkolber
- Diabetes Research Group, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Schmiedl
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.,Philipp Klee-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | - Consuelo Huerta
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisa Martin Merino
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Dolores Montero
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Luz María Leon-Muñoz
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Nicholas Moore
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cécile Droz
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Régis Lassalle
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mia Aakjaer
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Andersen
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie Louise De Bruin
- Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science (CORS), Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rolf Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrika A van den Ham
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiteit Utrecht, David de Wiedgebouw, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Souverein
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiteit Utrecht, David de Wiedgebouw, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf Klungel
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiteit Utrecht, David de Wiedgebouw, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helga Gardarsdottir
- Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ulrich LR, Petersen JJ, Mergenthal K, Berghold A, Pregartner G, Holle R, Siebenhofer A. Cost-effectiveness analysis of case management for optimized antithrombotic treatment in German general practices compared to usual care - results from the PICANT trial. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2019; 9:4. [PMID: 30729350 PMCID: PMC6734317 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-019-0221-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/27/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND By performing case management, general practitioners and health care assistants can provide additional benefits to their chronically ill patients. However, the economic effects of such case management interventions often remain unclear although how to manage the burden of chronic disease is a key question for policy-makers. This analysis aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of 24 months of primary care case management for patients with a long-term indication for oral anticoagulation therapy with usual care. METHODS This analysis is part of the cluster-randomized controlled Primary Care Management for Optimized Antithrombotic Treatment (PICANT) trial. A sample of 680 patients with German statutory health insurance was initially considered for the cost analysis (92% of all participants at baseline). Costs included all disease-related direct health care costs from the payer's perspective (German statutory health insurers) plus case management costs for the intervention group. A-Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) measurement (EQ-5D-3 L instrument) was used to evaluate utility, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to assess cost-effectiveness. Mean differences were calculated and displayed with 95%-confidence intervals (CI) from non-parametric bootstrapping (1000 replicates). RESULTS N = 505 patients (505/680, 74%) were included in the cost analysis (complete case analysis with a follow-up after 12 and 24 months as well as information on cost and QALY). After two years, the mean difference of direct health care costs per patient (€115, 95% CI [- 201; 406]) and QALYs (0.03, 95% CI [- 0.04; 0.11]) in the two groups was small and not significant. The costs of case management in the intervention group caused mean total costs per patient in this group to rise significantly (mean difference €503, 95% CI [188; 794]). The ICER was €16,767 per QALY. Regardless of the willingness of insurers to pay per QALY, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective never rose above 70%. CONCLUSIONS A primary care case management for patients with a long-term indication for oral anticoagulation therapy improved QALYs compared to usual care, but was more costly. However, the results may help professionals and policy-makers allocate scarce health care resources in such a way that the overall quality of care is improved at moderate costs, particularly for chronically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41847489 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa R. Ulrich
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Juliana J. Petersen
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Karola Mergenthal
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andrea Berghold
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gudrun Pregartner
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Rolf Holle
- Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Neuherberg, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Siebenhofer
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|