Assessment of vascular dysfunction after transradial coronary angiography

The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of access to the femoral artery for the purposes of coronary angiography through the measurement of femoral artery distensibility and elasticity on the accessed and non-accessed sides.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included patients who underwent femoral angiography at least 1 year previously. Those whose femoral artery was accessed once formed Group 1 (n = 59), those who were accessed twice formed Group 2 (n = 57), those accessed 3 times formed Group 3 (n = 55), and those with more than 3 accesses, Group 4 (n = 60). The groups were compared in respect of femoral artery elasticity and distensibility in the accessed and non-accessed sides.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was determined in respect of femoral distensibility and elasticity in Group 1 (9.40 ± 0.84 vs 9.48 ± 0.75, p = 0.107 and 0.23 ± 0.03 vs 0.23 ± 0.03, p = 0.433, respectively). However, a significant difference was observed between the two sides in terms of distensibility and elasticity in Group 2 (9.02 ± 0.81 vs 9.23 ± 0.75, and 0.21 ± 0.02 vs 0.22 ± 0.02), in Group 3 (8.49 ± 0.77 vs 9.18 ± 0.9 and 0.19 ± 0.02 vs 0.21 ± 0.02), and in Group 4 (8.14 ± 0.74 vs 9.03 ± 0.81 and 0.16 ± 0.01 vs 0.2 ± 0.02, p <0.001, for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

While a single access in the femoral artery for coronary angiography does not affect femoral artery elasticity and distensibility, multiple accesses may have adverse effects.

Evaluation of endothelial dysfunction with flow-mediated dilatation after transradial coronary angiography

Objective Transradial coronary angiography (TRCA) may lead to endothelial dysfunction. Therefore, this study investigated the TRCA-related endothelial dysfunction and its relation to operator experience, the number of punctures and procedure duration. Methods and results A total of 57 patients (42 males and 17 females) who underwent TRCA were included in this single-centre study. Nine months after the procedure, all patients underwent radial artery B-mode ultrasound imaging, and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and nitroglycerin-mediated dilatation (NMD) techniques were employed. The non-intervened right radial artery was accepted as control. The percentage change in diameter after FMD was significantly greater in the right radial artery compared to the left radial artery (right 13.6% vs left 10.1%, P = 0.041). The percentage change in diameter after NMD was similar in both right and left radial arteries (right 23.8% vs left 23.4%, P = 0.932). According to the puncture numbers, the percentage change was significantly lower in the intervened artery among patients with more than one puncture (13.3% vs 7.8%, P = 0.005). According to the operator experience, the percentage change in the intervened artery was significantly higher in patients in whom the procedure was performed by experienced operators (13.7% vs 7.6%, P = 0.002). The procedure duration also showed a negative correlation with the percentage change in the intervened artery (r = -0.349, P = 0.008). Conclusions TRCA may lead to endothelial dysfunction represented by FMD. Moreover, higher puncture numbers for sheath insertion, longer procedure durations and less experience in radial interventions may have adverse effects on the endothelial function.

Does Previous Transradial Catheterization Preclude Use of the Radial Artery as a Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?

The radial artery (RA) is a commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, and recent studies have demonstrated that it provides superior long-term patency rates to the saphenous vein in most situations. In addition, the RA is also being used with increasing frequency as the access point for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. However, there has been concern for many years that these transradial procedures may have a detrimental impact on the function of RA grafts used in coronary artery bypass grafting, and there is now comprehensive evidence that such interventions cause morphologic and functional damage to the artery in situ. Despite this, there remain remarkably few studies investigating the use of previously cannulated RAs as grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery, and there are no clear guidelines on the use of the RA in coronary artery bypass grafting after its catheterization. This article will review concisely the evidence that transradial procedures cause damage to the RA, and discuss the impact this could have on previously cannulated RAs used as coronary artery bypass grafting conduits. On the basis of the evidence assessed, we make a number of recommendations to both surgeons and cardiologists regarding use of the RA in cardiovascular procedures.