Elektrische Isolation des linken Vorhofohrs

Bilateral left lateral ridge ablation increases the long-term success of patients ablated for atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Studies reported that the PVI single procedure was able to achieve durable sinus rhythm without the need of antiarrhythmic drugs in 60-80% of patients with PAF. In this study, we report data regarding bilateral left lateral ridge ablation for PAF.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of 120 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 10 years; 62% male) referred to our center to perform PVI. In 60 patients we performed PVI (group 1) and in 60 patients performed PVI and bilateral left lateral ridge ablation (group 2). All patients performed a clinical follow-up after 24 months from the ablation procedure.

RESULTS

PVI was achieved in all patients. The mean radiofrequency time to perform ablation on the left atrial appendage ostium was 216 ± 49 s. In all patients of group 2 we obtained disappearance of local electrograms and the loss of local capture during pacing on posterior wall of left atrial appendage ridge. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding mean contact force during ablation (14 ± 4 vs. 15 ± 4 g; groups 1 and 2, respectively, P = 0.34). At 24-month follow-up, single procedure success rate was significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1 (88 vs. 74%, respectively; P = 0.03). No significant procedural complications were documented.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral left lateral ridge ablation is a safe technique able to improve the success rate of PVI in patients with PAF.

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion

BACKGROUND

Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D TEE) enables better visualization of the left atrial appendage (LAA) and may be superior to real-time two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT2D TEE) for LAA occlusion (LAAO). The aim of this study was to assess inter- and intra-observer variability of RT2D TEE and RT3D TEE measurements of LAA, and to assess the accordance of RT2D TEE and RT3D TEE with appropriate occluder selection.

METHODS

Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 40 patients during LAAO. RT2D TEE and RT3D TEE measurements of the ostium and landing zone were performed independently by two echocardiographers. The appropriate choice of occluder was confirmed with fluoroscopic criteria. After the procedures, RT2D TEE and RT3D TEE evaluation were repeated separately by the same echocardiographers.

RESULTS

The mean ostium diameters by RT2D TEE obtained by the two observers were 23.6 ± 4.2 vs. 24.8 ± 5.2 (p = 0.04), and the mean landing zone diameters were 17.7 ± 4.4 vs. 19.4 ± 3.9 (p < 0.01). In the case of RT3D TEE, the ostium diameters were 29.6 ± 5.3 vs. 29.4 ± 6.4 (p = not significant [NS]) and the landing zone diameters were 21.4 ± 3.8 vs. 21.6 ± 3.9 (p = NS). Intra-observer differences were absent in the case of RT3D TEE. The comparison of RT2D TEE vs. RT3D TEE analyses performed by the same echocardiographer revealed significant differences in the ostium and landing zone measurements (both p < 0.01). Agreement between the suggested device size was better for RT3D TEE (weighted kappa was 0.62 vs. 0.28, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained with RT3D TEE showed significantly larger dimensions of the ostium and the landing zone. RT3D TEE showed lesser inter- and intra-observer variability and better agreement with the implanted device.