Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease with a balloon-expandable paclitaxel eluting stent: procedural safety, efficacy and mid-term patency

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Drug Eluting Stents for Safety and Efficacy in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

BACKGROUND

Advancements in arterial stenting technology have challenged prior notions favoring medical management for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Where previous conclusions were drawn from bare metal stent (BMS) technology, recent studies suggest drug-eluting stents (DES) are favorable due to their anti-proliferative effect, which reduces vascular remodeling.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature prior to August 2023 reviewing all reports of ICAD treated with DES. Our target outcomes were incidence of any stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or death within 30 days (postprocedural complications), ischemic stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days (long-term complications), radiographically detected in-stent restenosis rate (ISR), and symptomatic ISR during follow-up. A subgroup analysis further stratified preprocedural mean stenosis above and below 70% into severe and moderate cohorts, respectively.

RESULTS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and EMBASE query identified 527 candidate articles, from which 14 studies met inclusion criteria for a total of 607 patients and 640 ICAD lesions. Incidence of postprocedural complications was 7.3% (95% CI 3.9-11.7%) with subgroup analysis demonstrating significantly higher incidence in the severely stenotic group [9.0% (95% CI 4.7-14.5%)] than the moderately stenotic group [3.0% (95% CI 0.7-6.8%)]. Long-term complications were 1.2% (95% CI 0.4-2.3%). Radiographic ISR was 3.5% (95% CI 1.4-6.3%) and symptomatic ISR was 0.3% (95% CI 0.0-1.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that DES can effectively reduce the risk of ISR and may be a viable treatment modality to reduce long-term complications in refractory ICAD patients.

Thirty-Day Outcomes of Resolute Onyx Stent for Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Comparison With Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD) is estimated to cause 10% of strokes annually in the United States. However, treatment remains a challenge with several different stenting options studied in the past with unfavorable results.

OBJECTIVE

To report the 30-day stroke and/or death rate associated with intracranial stent placement for sICAD using Resolute Onyx Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent (RO-ZES) and provide a comparison with the results of Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained databases across 8 stroke centers were used to identify adult patients treated with RO-ZES for sICAD between January 2019 and December 2021. Primary end point was composite of 30-day stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and/or death. Propensity score matching was performed using age, hypertension, lipid disorder, cigarette smoking, and symptomatic target vessel to create a matched group for comparison between RO-ZES and the SAMMPRIS medical management and treatment groups (SAMMPRIS percutaneous angioplasty and stenting [S-PTAS]).

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis (mean age: 64.2 years). Mean severity of stenosis was 81.4% (±11.4%). A total of 4 (3.03%) stroke and/or deaths were reported within 30 days of treatment in the RO-ZES group compared with 6.6% in the SAMMPRIS medical management group (OR [odds ratio] 2.26, 95% CI 0.7-9.56, P = .22) and 15.6% in the S-PTAS group (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.04-23.4, P < .001). Propensity score match analysis of 115 patients in each group demonstrated 30-day stroke and/or death rate of 2.6% in the RO-ZES group and 15.6% in the S-PTAS group (OR 6.88, 95% CI 1.92-37.54, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with RO-ZES had a relatively low 30-day stroke and/or death rate compared with the S-PTAS group. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RO-ZES for the treatment of sICAD.

The effectiveness of enterprise stent use on the treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis disease

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical outcome of Enterprise stent in patients with severe and symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Twenty-five patients who underwent Enterprise stenting between January 2012 and March 2019 were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were previous intracranial stenting and inadequate follow-up. Technical success rates of the procedures were recorded. Clinical outcome was evaluated with pre- and post-treatment modified Rankin Scale scores. The patients were monitored for 18 months clinically and for 14.3 months radiologically.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 15 males and 10 females was 61.6 ± 8.19. Of these 25 patients, 6 (24%) were in the anterior system and 19 (76%) were in posterior system. The mean degree of pre-treatment stenosis was 86.4% ± 7 with the mean lesion length of 12.5 ± 7.5 mm. The residual stenosis rate was 23.8% ± 8.81. Technical success rate was 100%. There were two major complications within the first 30 days (8%). Late major complications (after 30 days) occurred in one case (4%). Stent restenosis was detected in two patients (8%). No intracranial bleeding or mortality was observed.

CONCLUSION

In this single-center study, we achieved high technical success and tolerable complication rates. Enterprise stent may be a good treatment alternative for severe intracranial stenosis especially in patients resistant to medical treatment when correct patient selection is made. However, further randomized controlled studies, including more cases should be carried out.

Drug-coated Balloons in the Neurovascular Setting: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of Current Use and Indications

Background

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are an established tool in the prevention and treatment of coronary and peripheral artery restenosis. The underlying effects of restenosis resemble those in the neurovascular field, yet data on the use of DCB in cervical and intracranial arteries is rare.

Methods

Medline, and international and major national guidelines and recommendations were systematically searched for data addressing the use of DCB in the neurovascular setting.

Results

Of the 1448 relevant records found in Medline, 166 publications were considered for this review.

Conclusions

Data on the use of DCB in the neurovascular setting show a possible benefit over preceding alternatives, such as self-expanding stents, and balloon-mounted or drug-eluting stents. Nonetheless, the role of DCB remains under-researched, and publications remain lacking.

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stent With Bare-Metal Stent in Patients With Symptomatic High-grade Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is the primary reason for stroke recurrence after intracranial stenting in patients who were treated with a standard bare-metal stent (BMS). Whether a drug-eluting stent (DES) could reduce the risk of ISR in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) remains unclear.

Objective

To investigate whether a DES can reduce the risk of ISR and stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic high-grade ICAS.

Design, Settings, and Participants

A prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment was conducted from April 27, 2015, to November 16, 2018, at 16 medical centers in China with a high volume of intracranial stenting. Patients with symptomatic high-grade ICAS were enrolled, randomized, and followed up for 1 year. Intention-to-treat data analysis was performed from April 1 to May 22, 2021.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to receive DES (NOVA intracranial sirolimus-eluting stent system) or BMS (Apollo intracranial stent system) treatment in a 1:1 ratio.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy end point was ISR within 1 year after the procedure, which was defined as stenosis that was greater than 50% of the luminal diameter within or immediately adjacent to (within 5 mm) the implanted stent. The primary safety end point was any stroke or death within 30 days after the procedure.

Results

A total of 263 participants (194 men [73.8%]; median [IQR] age, 58 [52-65] years) were included in the analysis, with 132 participants randomly assigned to the DES group and 131 to the BMS group. The 1-year ISR rate was lower in the DES group than in the BMS group (10 [9.5%] vs 32 [30.2%]; odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11-0.52; P < .001). The DES group also had a significantly lower ischemic stroke recurrence rate from day 31 to 1 year (1 [0.8%] vs 9 [6.9%]; hazard ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.80; P = .03). No significant difference in the rate of any stroke or death within 30 days was observed between the DES and BMS groups (10 [7.6%] vs 7 [5.3%]; odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.54-3.94; P = .46).

Conclusions and Relevance

This trial found that, compared with BMSs, DESs reduced the risks of ISR and ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic high-grade ICAS. Further investigation into the safety and efficacy of DESs is warranted.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02578069.

Carotid Artery Stenting Using Balloon-Expandable Coronary Stent: Intentional Use for Staged Angioplasty

Objective

We report carotid artery stenting (CAS) using balloon-expandable coronary (BECo) stent. The materials in this study consist of 15 cases of high-grade stenosis in internal carotid artery (ICA) in which self-expanding carotid (SECa) stent was not utilized. There were two groups why BECo stent was used instead of SECa stent: alternative group and intentional group. The alternative group was subdivided into two groups: access difficulty of guiding catheter and access difficulty of SECa stent.

Case Presentation

The alternative group included 11 cases (access difficulty of guiding catheter in 10 and access difficulty of SECa stent in 1), and the intentional group included 4 cases. There were four cases using transbrachial approach. All the intentional group cases were the first stage of staged angioplasty (SAP). The second stage of SAP was PTA in two and SECa stent over the BECo stent in two. There was no complication related to CAS.

Conclusion

CAS using BECo stent is one of the choices for the first stage of SAP, if stent placement instead of PTA is required at the first stage. It is also the useful alternative for the patient having difficulty of SECa stent.

Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with symptomatic extra- and intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses

Objective

Implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) for extra- and intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses is an emerging topic. It has the potential benefit of preventing recurrent stroke with a reduced rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Methods

Patients who underwent extra- or intracranial stenting using DES in a single institution were retrospectively reviewed with long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up data.

Results

Twenty-one patients, 9 (42.9%) with extracranial lesions and 12 (57.1%) with intracranial lesions, were included. The most common symptom was cerebral infarction (71.4%), followed by vertebrobasilar insufficiency (19.1%) and transient ischemic attack (9.5%). All patients achieved technical success, with the mean degree of stenosis of 85.9±6.3% before the procedure and 19.5±5.9% after the procedure. All patients showed clinical improvement and no symptomatic recurrence was reported during the mean clinical follow-up period of 45.5±8.9 months. The significant ISR was observed in one patient (4.8%) during the mean radiological follow-up period of 42.8±10.0 months.

Conclusions

Implantation of drug-eluting stents for symptomatic extra- and intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses is feasible and has the potential benefit of reducing the rate of ISR.

Leave Nothing Behind: Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease with Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty

PURPOSE

Intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) is an essential cause of stroke. The characteristics of effective treatment include low periprocedural risk and a sustained treatment effect. Angioplasty with a conventional balloon for ICAD is safe but has a dauntingly high restenosis rate. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty might reduce the risk of restenosis while maintaining the overall safety of the procedure.

METHODS

This study included symptomatic ICAD patients with more than 70% stenosis. Intermediate catheters were placed distally, and the lesions were predilated with a conventional balloon, followed by a DCB (SeQuent Please, B Braun, Melsungen, Germany). The primary endpoint was any stroke or death within 30 days or ipsilateral ischemic stroke thereafter. The secondary endpoint was arterial restenosis of more than 50% during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 39 sessions of DCB angioplasty were performed for 39 lesions in 35 patients between October 2015 and April 2018 in a single center. All of the DCBs could be navigated to the lesions. Major periprocedural complications were noted in two patients (5.7%, 2/35), and minor periprocedural complications were also noted in two patients (5.7%, 2/35). The average percentages of stenosis of the lesions were 76.6% ± 7% before treatment, 32.4% ± 11.2% after DCB angioplasty, and 25% ± 16% at follow-up. Stenosis over 50% was present in 3 lesions during the follow-up period (8.3%, 3/36).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the application of DCBs to treat ICAD patients was feasible and safe. A larger scale clinical trial is warranted to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Symptomatic Intracranial High Grade Stenosis : A Retrospective Study of 33 Patients

PURPOSE

Endovascular therapy (EVT) represents an alternative treatment modality for symptomatic intracranial high-grade atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS); however, periprocedural complication rates as well as midterm restenosis rates represent relevant limitations of EVT. Drug-coated balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (DCB-PTA) may overcome some of these shortcomings. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and safety as well as the stroke recurrence rate in 33 patients.

METHODS

A retrospective, monocentric cohort study of sICAS patients treated with DCB-PTA. Outcome measures were the periprocedural intracranial complication rate, the recurrent stroke rate and mortality during follow-up.

RESULTS

This cohort study included 33 patients with 35 sICAS treated with DCB-PTA. The median age was 72 years (interquartile range, IQR 66-77 years); median clinical and mean radiological follow-up time was 9 months (IQR 3-22 months). Median preprocedural degree of stenosis (WASID) was 80% (IQR 73-80%) and median postprocedural residual stenosis degree (WASID) was 50% (IQR 33-60%). Intracranial periprocedural complications occurred in 2 (6%) patients. The overall restenosis rate was 15% (n = 5). In four patients a symptomatic ischemic re-event occurred within 7 months after the initial treatment. None of the patients died.

CONCLUSION

This DCB-PTA cohort study showed a relatively low intracranial complication rate of 6% with a symptomatic recurrence rate of 12%. Larger trials are needed to validate these promising observations.

Transcranial duplex ultrasound monitoring of intracranial arterial stenosis treated with ELUTAX "3" drug-eluting balloon

We report the results of transcranial ultrasound monitoring in three patients with intracranial arterial stenosis of the middle cerebral artery treated with the only drug-eluting balloon certificated for intracranial use in highly symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis, ELUTAX "3" (AR Baltic Medical). We performed transcranial Doppler ultrasounds 24 h, 72 h, 10 days, 15 days and 30 days after the angioplasty, thereby measuring mean flow velocity (MFV) in the maximum stenosis area in patients with symptomatic steno-occlusive disease of the middle cerebral artery treated with ELUTAX "3". Two patients were treated during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) due to acute ischemic stroke and one patient was treated on elective basis due to symptomatic pre-occlusive stenosis, with recurrent transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) refractory to medical therapy. In Case 1, the first transcranial Doppler ultrasounds evidenced MFV of 348 cm/s, with progressive MFV reduction until 15 days post-treatment, with MFV of 177 cm/s. In Case 2, 24 h after angioplasty had an MFV of 258 cm/s, decreasing to 103 cm/s at 30 days. Case 3 had an MFV of 436 cm/s before angioplasty that immediately decreased after the procedure to 364 cm/s, with a final MFV of 260 cm/s at 30 days. We have recorded a progressive MFV reduction in intracranial arterial stenosis, with better outcomes in patients treated during MT. In our experience, the use of ELUTAX "3" for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis achieves a progressive improvement of stenosis, evident in the first weeks, to a higher extent in cases of occlusive thrombosis. More studies are needed to provide more information about this device.

Device profile of different paclitaxel-coated balloons: Neuro Elutax SV, Elutax '3' Neuro and SeQuent Please NEO for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial high-grade stenosis: overview of their feasibility and safety

Introduction: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is highly prevalent and probably the most common cause of stroke worldwide. Despite best medical treatment (BMT), the rate of recurrent stroke in symptomatic ICAD patients is elevated, especially in those with high-grade stenosis. Thus, alternative treatment options are needed. So far, endovascular ICAD treatment has been considered a second-line therapy. However, recent progress in the endovascular acute stroke treatment challenges this issue. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) - percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) represents a promising alternative to BMT alone.Areas covered: In this review, current clinical studies on paclitaxel-coated DCB-PTA in symptomatic high-grade ICAD patients will be presented and discussed. Furthermore, technical profile of the different paclitaxel-coated DCB, which has been used for intracranial use (Neuro Elutax SV, Elutax '3' Neuro, and SeQuent Please NEO) are being presented.Expert opinion: Despite limited data and its experimental (off-line) use, DCB-PTA has been demonstrated to be feasible and safe in selected ICAD patients with symptomatic high-grade stenosis. DCB-PTA offers several advantages compared to alternative endovascular therapy option as well as BMT alone. Consequently, DCP-PTA might be a promising candidate for the future armamentarium in ICAD treatment.

Prevention of neointimal hyperplasia induced by an endovascular stent via intravenous infusion of mesenchymal stem cells

OBJECTIVE

In-stent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) due to neointimal hyperplasia is a potential cause of clinical complications, including repeated revascularization and ischemic events. Neointimal hyperplasia induced by an inflammatory response to the stent strut may be a possible mechanism of in-stent restenosis. Intravenous infusion of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been reported to show therapeutic efficacy for cerebral stroke, presumably by an antiinflammatory effect. This study aimed to determine whether MSCs can reduce or prevent neointimal hyperplasia induced by an endovascular stent.

METHODS

In this study, two types of bare metal stents were deployed using a porcine (mini-pig) model. One stent was implanted in the common carotid artery (CCA), which is considered quite similar to the human CCA, and the other was inserted in the superficial cervical artery (SCA), which is similar in size to the human middle cerebral artery. Angiographic images, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging, and microscopic images were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Angiographic images and IVUS studies revealed that intravenous infusion of MSCs immediately after deployment of stents prevented in-stent stenosis of the CCA and SCA. Histological analysis also confirmed that inflammatory responses around the stent struts were reduced in both the stented CCA and SCA in the mini-pig.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous infusion of MSCs inhibited the inflammatory reaction to an implanted stent strut, and prevented progressive neointimal hyperplasia in the stented CCA and SCA in a porcine model. Thus, MSC treatment could attenuate the recurrence of cerebral ischemic events after stenting.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using the novel drug-coated balloon catheter SeQuent Please NEO for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial severe stenosis: feasibility and safety study

Objectives

Intracranial arteriosclerotic disease is a relevant cause of ischemic stroke worldwide with a high recurrence rate despite best medical treatment. Following the SAMMPRIS trial, endovascular treatment has remained a second-line therapy. Meanwhile, there has been significant advances in device technology. SeQuent Please NEO is a novel polymer-free, drug-coated (paclitaxel/iopromide) balloon (DCB) primarily designed for cardiology. Because of its high flexibility and pushability, it may also be suitable for intracranial use. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of SeQuent Please NEO DCB in symptomatic intracranial severe stenosis.

Methods

A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with symptomatic intracranial severe stenosis treated with SeQuent Please NEO DCB was performed at a tertiary stroke center.

Results

Ten patients (all men, median age 73 years (IQR 69–77)) were included. Median pre-treatment stenosis grade was 78% (IQR 75–80%) with four internal carotid artery, two mid-basilar artery, and four vertebral artery lesions. Median post-treatment stenosis grade was 50% (IQR 45–53%). Successful angioplasty was achieved in all cases without technical failure. There were no cases of peri-procedural reocclusion and no deaths at median follow-up of 3 months (IQR 2–3).

Conclusion

In this pilot study, SeQuent Please NEO DCB was feasible and safe in the treatment of symptomatic intracranial severe stenosis. It might represent a promising alternative to medical treatment in selected cases.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent for the intracranial atherosclerotic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Drug-eluting stent (DES) is a potential endovascular treatment for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD). However, evidence regarding the treatment of ICAD with DES is lacking. We systematically searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane database (before 2017-12-21) for literature reporting the application of DES in the treatment of sICAD. The main outcomes were as follows: the incidence of any stroke or death within 30 days (perioperative complications), ischemic stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days (long-term complications), in-stent restenosis rate (ISR) and symptomatic ISR during follow-up. Those studies with mean stenosis rate greater than 70% and less than 70% were defined as severe and moderate stenosis group, respectively. The random effect model was used to pool the data. Of 518 articles, 13 studies were eligible and included in our analysis (N = 336 patients with 364 lesions). After the implantation of DES, perioperative complications (mortality = 0) occurred in 6.0% (95%CI 2.0%-11.9%), long-term complications occurred in 2.2% (95%CI 0.7%-4.5%), ISR rate was 4.1% (95%CI 1.6%-7.7%) and the symptomatic ISR rate was only 0.5% (95%CI 0-2.2%). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that the perioperative complication rate in severe stenosis group [10.6% (95%CI 6.5%-15.7%)] was significantly (p < 0.01) higher than that in moderate stenosis group [1.0% (95%CI 0.3%-3.5%)]. In summary, endovascular DES implantation is a relatively safe and effective method compared with stents or medical management group in SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials. However, a higher preoperative stenosis rate may imply a higher risk of perioperative complications. Further studies are needed.

Weighing in on the Off-Label Use: Initial Experience of Neuroform EZ Stenting for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis in 45 Patients

Background: The role of stenting for intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) has been increasingly debated due to negative results of randomized trials. Thus, exploration of more appropriate devices may hopefully shed light on the endovascular approach, especially for patients with recalcitrant ICAS related to a high risk of stroke. We sought to present and analyze the data of Neuroform EZ stenting for medically refractory ICAS in a single-center series.

Materials and methods: Between November 2016 and January 2018, 45 consecutive patients treated with the Neuroform EZ stent were included in our retrospective study. Outcomes evaluation included successful procedure rate, vascular event within 30 days and recurrent stenosis for at least 6 months after the procedure.

Results: The technical success rate was 100% for all 46 stenotic lesions. Mean pre-stent stenosis was 86.5 ± 8.7%, improving to 23.7 ± 18.1% after stenting. Combined procedure related vascular event rate was 2.2% (n = 1) within 30 days after the procedure. No in-stent restenosis was observed during an average follow-up period of 7.3 months.

Conclusion: The Neuroform EZ stent system could serve as an off-label but promising optional device for ICAS stenting in a carefully selected subgroup of patients. Further longer-term clinical follow-up is mandatory to validate our initial results.

Neuro Elutax SV drug-eluting balloon versus Wingspan stent system in symptomatic intracranial high-grade stenosis: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease is a well-known cause of ischemic stroke. Following the SAMMPRIS trial, medical treatment is favored over stenting. Drug-eluting balloons (DEB) are widely used in coronary angioplasty, showing better results than bare-surface balloons. There is little evidence of DEB employment in intracranial stenosis, especially of paclitaxel-eluted balloons (pDEB). The Neuro Elutax SV (Aachen Resonance) is the first CE certificated pDEB for intracranial use.

OBJECTIVE

To compare pDEB Neuro Elutax SV (ElutaxDEB) with the Wingspan/Gateway stent system (WingspanStent).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center, open-label, retrospective cohort study of 19 patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial high-grade stenosis treated with either ElutaxDEB or WingspanStent from a tertiary stroke center in Switzerland.

RESULTS

Eight patients (42%) received ElutaxDEB. Median clinical follow-up was 10 months for the WingspanStent and 9.5 months for ElutaxDEB (P=0.36). No differences were found in the clinical baseline characteristics, with a median stenosis grade of 80% for the WingspanStent and 81% for the ElutaxDEB (P=0.87). The compound endpoint 'ischemic re-event and/or restenosis' was significantly lower for ElutaxDEB (13% vs 64%; P=0.03, OR 0.08 (95% CI 0.007 to 0.93; P=0.043) than for the WingspanStent.

CONCLUSIONS

The ElutaxDEB may be a promising alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic high-grade intracranial stenosis showing a significantly lower rate of ischemic re-events or restenosis in comparison with the WingspanStent-treated patients with a similar safety profile. Further studies will be needed to definitively elucidate the role of pDEB in the management of symptomatic intracranial high-grade stenosis.

Emergent revascularization of acute tandem vertebrobasilar occlusions: Endovascular approaches and technical considerations-Confirming the role of vertebral artery ostium stenosis as a cause of vertebrobasilar stroke

Patients suffering from acute atherothrombotic occlusion of the proximal vertebral artery (VA) and concomitant basilar artery (BA) occlusion present a grim prognosis. We describe our experience in the endovascular recanalization of tandem vertebrobasilar occlusions using endovascular techniques. The BA was accessed through the normal VA (clean-road) or the occluded, thrombotic VA (dirty-road), and stentriever-based thrombectomy was performed using antegrade or reverse revascularization variants. Seven patients underwent successful stentriever-assisted mechanical thrombectomy of the BA and five sustained concomitant VA revascularization. Stroke onset to endovascular intervention initiation (time-to-treatment) ranged from 4.5-13hours (mean 8.6). In two of seven patients, the BA occlusion was approached with a 'clean-road' approach via the contralateral VA; in five of seven patients, a 'dirty-road' approach via the occluded VA was used. Mean time-to-recanalization was 66minutes (range 55-82). There were no perforations, iatrogenic vessel dissections, or other technical complications. Four patients presented mild-to-moderate disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3) at 3months, one remained with moderate-to-severe disability (mRS 4), and two patients died on days 9 and 23 after their strokes. Follow-up ranged from 6-45months (mean 24months). In selected patients with acute VA-BA occlusion, stentriever-based thrombectomy performed through either the patent or the occluded VA, may be feasible, effective, and safe. Clinical outcomes in these patients seem to equipoise the neurological outcome of patients with successful revascularization for isolated BA occlusion. This unique pair of occlusions confirms the role of VA ostium stenosis as a cause of vertebrobasilar stroke.

Safety and Efficacy Analyses of Angioplasty and Stenting for Severe Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in China

Background

The value of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) in the context of aggressive medical treatment for severe intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) is under debate. This study compared the effects of PTAS and aggressive medical treatment in patients with severe ICAS and transient ischemic attack or stroke.

Material/Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with severe ICAS were assigned to a PTAS group or aggressive medical treatment group, according to the angiographic features of the stenotic lesions. The primary outcome was defined as stroke or death within 30 days or cerebral ischemia occurring ipsilaterally to the qualifying artery beyond 30 days.

Results

We included 220 patients: 48 in the PTAS group and 172 in the medical group. The median follow-up was 32 months. PTAS was not associated with an increased incidence of the primary outcomes (10/42 vs. 39/172, p=0.96) or increased risks of the secondary outcomes of stroke, cardiovascular events, major bleeding, or mortality. The results of log-rank tests did not support a significant difference in event-free survival as a primary outcome between the 2 groups (chi-square=0.07, p=0.79). Moreover, although not significantly greater, the mean survival of patients in the PTAS group appeared to be better than that among patients in the medical group, as indicated by the curve for cumulative survival.

Conclusions

A suitable PTAS procedure is safe for patients with severe ICAS, and no significant differences in incidence of recurrent stroke or death were found between PTAS and aggressive medication treatment.

Solving the Issue of Restenosis After Stenting of Intracranial Stenoses: Experience with Two Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents (DES)-Taxus Element™ and Resolute Integrity™

PURPOSE

Thin-strut, flexible DES are suitable for intracranial stenting and may improve long-term vessel patency. The purpose of this study was to report our experience with two new-generation DES for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with Taxus Element™ or Resolute Integrity™ stent for an intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis between March 2011 and August 2013. Technical success was defined as the ability to deploy the device at the desired location and reduce the degree of stenosis below 50 %. All procedure-related strokes were recorded. Control angiography was scheduled after 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. A luminal narrowing ≥50 % was regarded as a restenosis. Stroke recurrence in the territory of the treated artery was reported.

RESULTS

In the defined period we treated 101 patients harboring 117 intracranial stenoses. The procedure was successful in 100 (85.5 %) lesions. Procedure-related strokes occurred in 10 (9.9 %) patients with a permanent morbidity in 3 (3.0 %). Follow-up angiography was available for 83 of 100 (83.0 %) successfully treated lesions with an average of 355 days (IQR 153-482 days). Three (3.6 %) asymptomatic restenoses were detected. All occurred after treatment with Resolute Integrity™, none after Taxus Element™ (p = 0.059). New strokes in the territory of the treated artery were encountered in 2 (2.6 %) occasions.

CONCLUSION

Thin-strut DES improve long-term patency and reduce the risk of subsequent stroke. Differences between devices may exist. Feasibility is comparable to bare-metal balloon-mounted stents and procedure-related strokes occurred within the expected range.

Endovascular Advances for Intracranial Occlusive Disease

Stroke is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease accounts for 8%-10% of ischemic stroke in the United States. So far, surgical bypass has not proved to be superior to medical therapy. As both medical and endovascular therapies for intracranial atherosclerosis evolve, so too do the guidelines for treatment. Initial reports on the results of stent placement for symptomatic high-grade intracranial atherosclerotic disease were encouraging; however, recent trials suggest that initial medical management may be preferable. Currently, intracranial angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis is now more controversial. Further trials are necessary to help determine which patients are ideal for endovascular therapies.

Role of stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis in the post-SAMMPRIS era

Introduction. The initial promise of endovascular stenting for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) has been tempered by the results of the SAMMPRIS trial which demonstrated better outcomes with medical management compared to stenting for symptomatic ICAD. We review post-SAMMPRIS ICAD stenting outcomes. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed to identify all ICAD stenting series published after the SAMMPRIS in September 2011. The type and design of the stent, number of patients and lesions, inclusion criteria, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were noted. Results. From October 2011 to August 2013, 19 ICAD stenting series were identified describing the interventional outcomes for 2,196 patients with 2,314 lesions. Of the 38 different stents used, 87% were balloon-expandable stents (BESs) and 13% were self-expanding stents. The median minimum stenosis was 50%. The median rates of technical success rate, postprocedural ischemic events, and symptomatic in-stent restenosis (ISR) were 98% (range 87–100%), 9.4% (range 0–25%), and 2.7% (range 0–11.1%), respectively. The median follow-up durations were one to 67 months. Conclusions. The management of severe ICAD remains controversial. Future trials are needed to define the optimal patient, lesion, and stent characteristics which will portend the best outcomes with intervention.

Comparison of Drug-eluting Coronary Stents, Bare Coronary Stents and Self-expanding Stents in Angioplasty of Middle Cerebral Artery Stenoses

Objective

The purpose of this study is to investigate the results of treatment using stent-angioplasty for symptomatic middle cerebral arterial (MCA) stenosis and comparison of in-stent restenosis between drug-eluting stents (DES), bare metal coronary stents (BMS) and self-expanding stents (SES).

Materials and Methods

From Jan. 2007 to June. 2012, 34 patients (mean age ± standard deviation: 62.9 ± 13.6 years) with MCA stenosis were treated. Inclusion criteria were acute infarction or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and angiographically proven symptom related severe stenosis. Stents used for treatment were DES (n = 8), BMS (n = 13) and SES (n = 13). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission was 2.5 ± 3.1 and mean stenosis rate was 79.0 ± 8.2%. Assessment of clinical and angiographic results was performed retrospectively.

Results

Among 34 patients, periprocedural complications occurred in four cases (11.8%), however, only two cases (6.0%) were symptomatic. All patients were followed clinically (mean follow-up period; 40.7 ± 17.7 months) and 31 were followed angiographically (91.2%. 13.4 ± 8.5 months). There was no occurrence of repeat stroke in all patients; however, mild TIAs related to restenosis occurred in three of 34 patients (8.8%). The mean NIHSS after stent-angioplasty was 1.7 ± 2.9 and 0.8 ± 1.1 at discharge. The modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge was 0.5 ± 0.9 and 0.3 ± 0.8 at the last clinical follow-up. In-stent restenosis over 50% occurred in five of 31 angiographically followed cases (16.1%), however, all of these events occurred only in patients who were treated with BMS or SES. Restenosis rate was 0.0% in the DES group and 20.8% in the other group (p = 0.562); it did not differ between BMS and SES (2/11 18.2%, 3/13 23.1%, p = 1.000).

Conclusion

Stent-angioplasty appears to be effective for symptomatic MCA stenosis. As for restenosis, in our study, DES was presumed to be more effective than BMS and SES; meanwhile, the results did not differ between the BMS and SES groups.

Prevention and treatment of neurovascular in-stent stenoses: review of the concepts

Advances in medical devices technology now allow the endovascular treatment of stenotic lesions of the intracranial arteries with the help of the implantation of microstents. The technical development in stent, catheter and guidewire technology now allows the application of these devices in the intracranial arteries, where access issues due to difficult anatomy and length of the access pathway pose far more hurdles to accurately, efficiently and safely navigate these devices as compared with the treatment of lesions of the peripheral arteries or the coronary system. Although the efficacy and safety of these procedures show a continuous improvement with decreased periprocedural complication rates, the development of a significant intraluminal stenotic lesion as a result of neointimal hyperplasia induced within the implants remains a serious delayed complication. In this review, the authors give an overview of the factors affecting the development of neointimal hyperplasia and review the currently available possibilities of the prevention as well as the treatment of the already existing intraimplant stenotic lesions.

Prevention of intracranial in-stent restenoses: predilatation with a drug eluting balloon, followed by the deployment of a self-expanding stent

Purpose

Stenting in intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is increasingly debated, due to issues of procedural safety, technical efficacy, and in-stent recurrent stenoses (ISR). In the present study, feasibility, safety, and efficacy of angioplasty using a drug-eluting balloon (DEB) followed by the implantation of a self-expanding stent (Enterprise) were evaluated for the treatment of ICAD lesions.

Methods

Fifty-two patients (median age: 71 years; range: 54–86 years; male/female ratio 37:15) underwent stenting of high-grade ICAD lesions between February 2010 and November 2011 in a single center. Angioplasty using a paclitaxel coated SeQuent Please (B. Braun, Germany) or DIOR (Eurocor, Germany) coronary PTCA balloon, followed by the implantation of a self-expanding stent (Enterprise, Codman, USA) was performed in 54 lesions. Angiographic and clinical follow-up was performed at 6 and 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Technical success rate, periprocedural complications, occurrence of recurrent ischemic symptoms, and the development of an ISR were analyzed.

Results

Angioplasty using a DEB followed by stent implantation was successfully performed in 44 (81 %) cases. DEB insertion failed in 19 % of the cases and angioplasty was finally performed using a conventional PTCA balloon. The combined procedure related permanent neurologic morbidity and mortality rate (stroke, ICH, and subarachnoid hemorrhage) at 30 days and beyond was 5 %. Angiographic and clinical follow-up were obtained in 33 (61 %) lesions in 32 patients. Recurrent stenosis was seen in one (3 %) lesion.

Conclusion

Angioplasty and stenting using a DEB is safe and yields encouragingly low ISR rates. Further technical developments to improve lesion accessibility are, nevertheless, mandatory.