Treatment Outcomes of Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Comparison of Radiosurgery and Endovascular Embolisation

Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery versus endovascular treatment for symptomatic cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula without ophthalmological emergency: a single-center 10-year experience

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is emerging as a treatment option for cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula (CS dAVF); it is less invasive and has a lower complication rate than conventional surgeries. However, little is known regarding the advantages and limitations of SRS compared to those of endovascular treatment (EVT). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between EVT and SRS for treatment of CS dAVF.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and April 2021, a total of 86 consecutive patients diagnosed with CS dAVF were treated with EVT or SRS. Among them, 8 patients with ophthalmological emergency and 8 without follow-up data at ≥ 12 months were excluded. During the same period, no neurological deficit due to intracranial hemorrhage or seizure was noted in any of the patients. Ultimately, 70 patients (EVT 33, SRS 37) were included in this study. Demographic characteristics, initial clinical presentations, clinical outcomes, and radiological findings were retrospectively reviewed and compared. Procedure-related complications were also assessed after the treatments.

RESULTS

The patients’ baseline characteristics (except conjunctival symptoms) and angiographic features of CS dAVF were not significantly different between the EVT and SRS groups. Conjunctival symptoms were more frequently noted in the EVT than in the SRS group (69.7% vs 40.5%, p = 0.015). After EVT, initial complete obliteration was achieved in 20 cases (60.6%). Complete obliteration was achieved at 6 months in 86.4% of cases with EVT and in 77.8% of those treated with SRS (p = 0.507), and at 12 months in 86.4% cases with EVT and in 94.4% of those treated with SRS (p = 0.357). Worsening of symptoms developed at 1 month in 24.2% of cases with EVT and in 5.4% of those treated with SRS (p = 0.038); at 6 months in 22.6% of cases with EVT and in 10.8% of those treated with SRS; and at 12 months in 30.0% of cases with EVT and in 13.5% of those treated with SRS (p = 0.099). The angioarchitecture of CS dAVF did not affect angiographic obliteration after SRS. Procedure-related morbidity and mortality occurred more frequently in the EVT than in the SRS group (27.3% vs 8.1%, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Both EVT and SRS were effective for the treatment of CS dAVF without ophthalmological emergency. However, procedure-related morbidity and mortality was less frequent in SRS than in EVT, and consequently SRS may be more advantageous in terms of safety.

Bilateral cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula with initial ocular symptom: A case report

RATIONALE

Cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula (CSDAVF) is a rare intracranial vascular malformation. Because of its complicated clinical manifestations, it is easy to miss or misdiagnose CSDAVF.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 42-year-old female had chief complaint that the right eyeball had conjunctival congestion for half a year. She was given levofloxacin eye drops to treat the right eye with anti-inflammatory treatment, but the symptoms did not improve. Cranial magnetic resonance and cerebrovascular imaging showed that the right lateral rectus muscle was slightly enlarged, the right eyeball was prominent, but there was no abnormality in the brain.

DIAGNOSES

Based on clinical and imaging examinations and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), she was diagnosed as low-flow CSDAVF.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient received interventional embolization with transvenous combined arterial approach using coils and Onyx liquid glue.

OUTCOMES

The patient's exophthalmos and congestion symptoms were improved.

CONCLUSION

DAS is the gold standard for the diagnose of CSDAVF. Intravascular embolization interventional therapy is an effective treatment for CSDAVF.

Magnetic resonance imaging as a single diagnostic tool for verifying radiosurgery outcomes of cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula

PURPOSE

MRI and MR angiography (MRA) are noninvasive methods for examining cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas (CSDAVFs) after radiosurgery. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of unenhanced MRI/3-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) MRA in evaluating CSDAVF obliteration as compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

METHODS

From 1995-2012, 48 cases of CSDAVFs received Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) and had undergone both unenhanced MRI/3D TOF MRA and DSA for posttreatment evaluation. Two blinded observers independently interpreted the results of MRI/MRA. The results of MRI/MRA were compared with those of DSA. The sensitivity (the probability of MRI/MRA showing obliteration when DSA showed complete obliteration), specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for CSDAVF obliteration were reported.

RESULTS

The median interval between the final MRI/MRA and the subsequent DSA was 2 months. Follow-up DSA revealed that 38 of 48 (79.2 %) CSDAVFs were completely obliterated. The results of interobserver agreement assessment showed almost perfect agreement between the 2 observers. For unenhanced MRI/3D TOF MRA, the observed sensitivity was 84.2 %, specificity was 100 %, positive predictive value was 100 %, and negative predictive value was 62.5 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Unenhanced MRI/3D TOF MRA alone may be adequate to document the complete obliteration of CSDAVFs after GKS. Time-resolved MRA or DSA can be reserved for a suspected residual CSDAVF after a sufficient latency period after GKS.

Complication rate, cure rate, and long-term outcomes of microsurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: a multicenter series and systematic review

Although microsurgery is an established treatment modality for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF), data regarding the perioperative complication rate, cure rate, and long-term outcomes remain scarce. The aims of this study were to describe our original experience with microsurgery, including the surgical complications and pitfalls, and conduct a systematic review of the relevant literature. A multicenter cohort of patients with dAVF treated by microsurgery was retrospectively assessed. In addition, the PubMed database was searched for published studies involving microsurgery for dAVF, and the complication rate, cure rate, and long-term outcomes were estimated. The total number of patients in our multicenter series and published articles was 553 (593 surgeries). The overall rates of transient complications, permanent complications, death, and incomplete treatment were 11.4, 4.0, 1.2, and 6.5%, respectively. A favorable outcome was achieved for 90.1% patients, even though almost half of the patients presented with intracranial hemorrhage. Of note, the incidence of recurrence was only one per 8241 patient-months of postoperative follow-up. Surgeries for anterior cranial fossa dAVF were associated with a lower complication rate, whereas those for tentorial dAVF were associated with higher complication and incomplete treatment rates. The complication and incomplete treatment rates were lower with simple disconnection of cortical venous drainage than with radical occlusion/resection of dural shunts. Our findings suggest that the cure rate, complication rates, and outcomes of microsurgery for dAVF are acceptable; thus, it could be a feasible second-line treatment option for dAVF. However, surgeons should be aware of the specific adverse events of microsurgery.

Endovascular treatment of the cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula: current status and considerations

A cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula (CS-DAVF) is an abnormal arteriovenous communication involving the dura mater within or near the CS wall. The dural arteries from the internal carotid artery and external carotid artery supply the CS-DAVF, and the superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) and inferior petrous sinus (IPS) are frequent venous drainers. In CS-DAVF cases, high-risk lesions require treatment. Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been the first-line option for CS-DAVFs. To our knowledge, a review of the EVT of CS-DAVFs is lacking. Therefore, in this paper, we review the available literature on this issue. In addition, some illustrative cases are also provided to more concisely expound the EVT of CS-DAVFs. According to the recent literature, transvenous embolization via the IPS is considered the most effective method for EVT of CS-DAVFs. In addition, the transorbital approach is another reasonable choice. Other venous approaches can also be tried. Because of the low cure rate, transarterial embolization for CS-DAVFs is limited to only highly selected patients. In the EVT of CS-DAVFs, various agents have been used, including coil, Onyx, and n-butyl cyanoacrylate, with coil being the preferred one. In addition, when EVT cannot obliterate the CS-DAVF, stereotactic radiotherapy may be considered. In general, despite various complications, EVT is a feasible and effective method to manage CS-DAVFs by way of various access routes and can yield a good prognosis.

Sphenoid dural arteriovenous fistulas

Sphenoid wing dural AVFs represent a rare clinical entity. These lesions may be asymptomatic or present with focal neurologic deficits, intracranial venous hypertension, or intracranial hemorrhage. Diagnosis is based on clinical findings and diagnostic imaging. They are alternatively classified as lesions of either the greater or lesser wings of the sphenoid bone. We performed a search of the PubMed database of studies evaluating the clinical behavior and surgical and endovascular therapies of these lesions. Dural AVFs draining into the superficial middle cerebral vein and/or laterocavernous sinus, or rather, lesions of the greater wing of the sphenoid, exhibit a greater likelihood of developing an aggressive clinical course, with higher probability of cortical venous reflux and consequent intracranial venous hypertension, intracranial hemorrhage, and symptomatic presentation. Dural AVFs of the sphenoparietal sinus, that is, lesions of the lesser wing of the sphenoid, typically exhibit a more benign clinical course, as there is a prominent epidural venous drainage into the cavernous sinus, reducing the risk of cortical venous reflux, and consequently, the probability of intracranial venous hypertension, hemorrhage, and floridly symptomatic presentation. These lesions may be treated via surgical clipping of the fistulous point, transarterial or transvenous embolization, and/or stereotactic radiosurgery. Though surgical intervention was the principal therapy due to facility of craniotomy access to the fistulous point, embolization has become standard of care permitted by innovation in endovascular technology. The natural history, clinical presentation, angioarchitecture, diagnosis, and management of these lesions are reviewed and discussed.